causal argument - David Kelsey`s Philosophy Home Page

advertisement

Critical Thinking

Lecture 12

Causal Arguments

By David Kelsey

Causal Arguments

Causal claim: states or suggests the presence of causation.

– Examples:

• A causal argument has as its conclusion a causal claim.

A cause is an event, person, place or thing X without which some other event, person, place or thing Y, X’s effect, would not occur, exist, etc.

– A cause necessitates its effect such that without the cause, the effect would not occur.

– Causes can’t just be correlations though.

• Causal powers

Post Hoc Fallacy

Post Hoc Fallacy : When one thinks that just because X is followed by Y this must mean that X causes Y.

– Post Hoc is short for Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc which translates:

The mistake is Thinking Correlation entails causation :

– Accidental correlation : this is a mistake because X could play no role in Y’s coming to be.

• X could merely be accidentally correlated with the occurrence of Y.

• 3 pennies example :

• Other possibilities besides X causing Y or X and Y being accidentally correlated:

Hypotheses

Hypothesis : a supposition offered as a starting point for further investigation.

– When hypothesizing you are conjecturing, I.e. making a guess about some way the world is.

How do we test a hypothesis?

– Look for counterexamples to it.

• What is a Counterexample?

• A counterexample to: Vitamin C cures colds

Relevant difference reasoning

• Relevant difference reasoning :

– If some effect, Y, occurs in one situation & Y doesn’t occur in other situations similar

– we can try to find something that is different about this situation, I.e. X.

– We then suspect this difference X is the cause of Y.

– To find X, simply look for the differences between this situation and those situations that are similar but in which Y doesn’t occur.

• Use relevant difference reasoning when:

Which difference is relevant?

• Question: how do you know which is the relevant difference?

Engine overheating :

Examples of

Relevant difference reasoning

• Examples of relevant difference reasoning:

Headaches :

Post Office :

Common Thread Reasoning

• When do we use this kind of reasoning?

• Look for a common thread : some event, person, place or thing that is common to all the occurrences of the effect.

• Mosquito example :

Common mistakes in informal causal reasoning

• 1.) We can overlook alternative common threads or differences :

– If one difference or thread seems particularly relevant, don’t overlook others as you may miss the real cause in doing so.

– Example:

• 2.) We can focus on irrelevant differences or common threads :

– To know that a difference or thread is relevant you must have some knowledge of the situation, its causes and its effects.

3 more mistakes

3.) We can overlook the possibility that causation is the reverse of what has been asserted :

– Climbing a rope:

4.) We can overlook the possibility that the asserted cause and effect are both the effects of some third underlying cause :

– The leaves turning yellow:

• 5.) We can fail to consider the possibility of coincidence :

– The cancer example:

Doubtful causal claims

1. Appeal to Anecdotal evidence : watch out for a causal claim when the evidence is one or two cases only.

– Smoking doesn’t cause cancer:

• To show smoking doesn’t cause cancer we need to show that even if everyone smoked, the cancer rate would not increase. Can you do this with 1 piece of evidence though?

2. Circularity

: The cause cannot merely restate the effect for if so we haven’t learned anything new.

– Insomnia example:

• 3. Excessive Vagueness : if a causal claim is too vague we won’t know exactly how it is to be tested.

– Bad Karma example:

Doubtful causal claims #2

4. Nontestability

: we can’t have a causal claim for which testing is isn’t possible.

– Aids example:

• 5. Unnecessary assumptions : why needn’t make any unnecessary assumptions in asserting a causal claim?

– Déjà vu example:

• 6. Conflict with well-established theory : as a general rule, we don’t really want our causal claims to conflict with our theories.

– We can have theoretical advances, but…

– Height example:

Causal Explanations vs.

Arguments

A causal explanation is an explanation of the cause of something.

Explanations vs. Arguments : while causal explanations can look superficially like arguments, explanations assert cause and effect while arguments try to prove that something is the case .

Explaining causes : When we try to justify or defend or excuse something we or someone else did, we sometimes explain its causes.

– Bread example:

But not every attempt to explain behavior is an attempt to excuse it: One might be simply trying to offer an explanation without any sympathy at all for the actions being explained.

– Nazi Germany example:

Download