Interactive Whiteboards for Teacher Training Tuyet Hayes The University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa tuyhayes@hawaii.edu How familiar are you with interactive whiteboards? A. B. C. D. I don’t know what it is. I have only heard of it. I have attended a training or lesson that used one. I have delivered a training or lesson that used one. Interactive Whiteboards IWB are a “conglomeration of all previous educational technologies” (Hall & Higgins, 2005) QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. Introduction Within the next five years, one in every five classrooms worldwide will have an IWB (EFY News Network, 2009) Introduction Within the next five years, one in every five classrooms worldwide will have an IWB (EFY News Network, 2009) IWB market for education/training will total $880 million in 2009, and $2 billion by 2014 (Wainhouse Research, 2010) Introduction Within the next five years, one in every five classrooms worldwide will have an IWB (EFY News Network, 2009) IWB market for education/training will total $880 million in 2009, and $2 billion by 2014 (Wainhouse Research, 2010) Personal motivations Research Question What is the impact of integrated IWB use on participant engagement, learning, and interaction? Intervention Who: QuickT i me™ and a decom pressor are needed to see this picture. 13 lower school (K-5) faculty and staff Quic kTime™ a nd a d eco mp res so r ar e n eed ed to see thi s p ictu re. Intervention Who: What: QuickT i me™ and a decom pressor are needed to see this picture. 13 lower school (K-5) faculty and staff VoiceThread training using IWB Quic kTime™ a nd a d eco mp res so r ar e n eed ed to see thi s p ictu re. Intervention Who: 13 lower school (K-5) faculty and staff What: VoiceThread training using IWB When: Feb 12 - teacher work day QuickT i me™ and a decom pressor are needed to see this picture. Quic kTime™ a nd a d eco mp res so r ar e n eed ed to see thi s p ictu re. Intervention Who: 13 lower school (K-5) faculty and staff What: VoiceThread training using IWB When: Feb 12 - teacher work day Where: St. Andrew’s Priory School QuickT i me™ and a decom pressor are needed to see this picture. Quic kTime™ a nd a d eco mp res so r ar e n eed ed to see thi s p ictu re. Intervention Who: 13 lower school (K-5) faculty and staff What: VoiceThread training using IWB When: Feb 12 - teacher work day Where: St. Andrew’s Priory School Why: Resources and access QuickT i me™ and a decom pressor are needed to see this picture. Quic kTime™ a nd a d eco mp res so r ar e n eed ed to see thi s p ictu re. Instructional Strategies Modeling/Guided Practice QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. Instructional Strategies Opportunities for interaction QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. Data collection: Online surveys QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. Data collection: Learner response system QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. Qui ckT ime™ and a dec ompress or are needed to s ee this pic ture. Results: Engagement QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. Results: Engagement Motivating factors included: “Cool” interactive pen – “HUGE mousepad” – Polling feature – Ease of switching between applications – Surprise that peers were focused Results: Interaction QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. Results: Interaction Responses focused primarily on learner response system “Huge hit” with students – Anonymity – “Game-like” atmosphere – Instant feedback – Results: Interaction Responses focused primarily on learner response system – – – – “Huge hit” with students Anonymity “Game-like” atmosphere Instant feedback Also mentioned – – Ability to write on the board Trainer’s ability to troubleshoot Results: Learning QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. Results: Learning Average Pre-test score: 11% Average Posttest score: 88% Results: Learning Average Pre-test score: 11% Average Posttest score: 88% Features that supported learning: Large display matched their screens – Teacher at board (easier to see/hear/interact) – Tools: Pen, annotation ability, LRS – Results: Usefulness QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. Results: Usefulness Teachers were inspired by “how simple and engaging the whiteboard really is.” Results: Usefulness Teachers were inspired by “how simple and engaging the whiteboard really is.” Key points Large display – Instant feedback – Student interaction – Results: Usefulness Teachers were inspired by “how simple and engaging the whiteboard really is.” Key points Large display – Instant feedback – Student interaction – 84% rated 4 or 5 (on 1-5 scale) Results: Usefulness Teachers were inspired by “how simple and engaging the whiteboard really is.” Key points Large display – Instant feedback – Student interaction – 84% rated 4 or 5 (on 1-5 scale) 84% indicated they would use it at least weekly Results: Usefulness Teachers were inspired by “how simple and engaging the whiteboard really is.” Key points Large display – Instant feedback – Student interaction – 84% rated 4 or 5 (on 1-5 scale) 84% indicated they would use it at least weekly 46% anticipated daily use Discussion Small sample Discussion Small sample Pre and post survey alignment Discussion Small sample Pre and post survey alignment Research study topic confusion Discussion Small sample Pre and post survey alignment Research study topic confusion Barriers remain – – – Insufficient training Lack of time to develop materials Other technologies Conclusion IWB can be effective for teacher training Engagement – Interaction – Learning – Conclusion IWB can be effective for teacher training Engagement – Interaction – Learning – Secondary benefits Increase teacher comfort with IWB – Model effective instructional strategies using IWB – Quote of the Day “I’m not afraid to use it now. There are a whole host of possibilities running through my head.” – Participant Acknowledgements Dr. Grace Lin Leslie Arakaki ETEC Faculty at UH Manoa Peers in ETEC program Family Any Questions? QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. tuyhayes@hawaii.edu