Safety Performance Indicators

advertisement
12
4.50
4.00
Number of Incursions
10
3.50
8
3.00
2.50
6
2.00
4
1.50
1.00
2
0.50
0
0.00
2001
Daniel Bircher
Safety Officer
Zürich-Flughafen l
Incursion Rate per 100'000 Movements
Safety Performance Indicators and Safety Targets
2002
2003
Inc/Y
2004
Rate ZRH
2005
2006
Rate ECAC
©
Unique (Flughafen Zürich AG)
ICAO Requirements (Doc 9774)
Particulars of the safety management
system …, the essential features
being:
a) …
b) …
c) SMS strategy and planning, such
as setting safety performance
targets, allocating priorities for
implementing safety initiatives and
providing a framework for controlling the risks to as low a level as
is reasonably practicable …
d)…
2 l
l ACI OSSC Amsterdam, 11.-13.9.2007
©
Unique (Flughafen Zürich AG)
Why measuring Safety Performance?
•
•
•
•
•
•
observe performance of operations
identify and analyse undesirable trends in service
establish basis to define safety targets
define effective means to achieve an acceptable level of safety
initiated corrective actions in an efficient and effective way
Compare safety perfomance with identified hazards
And…
Managers / decision makers like to manage using indicators
3 l
l ACI OSSC Amsterdam, 11.-13.9.2007
©
Unique (Flughafen Zürich AG)
Requirements and Challenges
Requirements 
• Easy to measure
• Company or departementspecific
• Lagging and leading
• Credible and accepted by staff
• causally related to accident and
incident frequency and severity.
• include system failures as well
as human error.
• include the whole spectrum of
airside operations
4 l
l ACI OSSC Amsterdam, 11.-13.9.2007
To be avoided 
• Inconsistent definitions
• Focus only on very few
indicators
• only reactive, lagging indicators
(e.g. accidents, accident rates)
• complex and impracticable
• Based on incomplete or false
data
• Benchmarking may result in a
distorted picture (different
reporting thresholds)
©
Unique (Flughafen Zürich AG)
12
4.50
4.00
Number of Incursions
10
3.50
8
3.00
2.50
6
2.00
4
1.50
1.00
2
0.50
0
0.00
2001
2002
2003
Inc/Y
5 l
l ACI OSSC Amsterdam, 11.-13.9.2007
Incursion Rate per 100'000 Movements
Zurich Airport Approach
2004
Rate ZRH
2005
2006
Rate ECAC
©
Unique (Flughafen Zürich AG)
Safety Performance Indicators Zürich (Draft, Aug 07)
RWY Incursion
Near miss on apron
Fuel spillages
Wake turbulence
Aircraf t Accidents MTOM > 5,7t
Incide nts
Aircraft accide nts and
othe r accide nts
DG incident
Aircraf t Accidents MTOM < 5,7t
Aircraf t Accidents with helicopters
Bird strikes
Accidents with v ehicles, equipment
Injuries to personnel / PAX
Flight OPS
Ground OPS
Safe ty e nhance m e nt
inform ations
Safety Performance
Indicators
07.09.2007 - v22
Infras tructure
Saf ety Audit Findings
Qualif ication / training def iciencies
Tickets due to ov erspeed
Failure of mov ement guidance sy stem
Othe r indicators
Failure of electrical sy stem
Worn Signs and Markings
RWY /TWY surf ace condition
Go-around
RWY Crossings
6 l
l ACI OSSC Amsterdam, 11.-13.9.2007
©
Unique (Flughafen Zürich AG)
Sample indicator sheet
Description of indicator
Definition of indicator
including denominators
Past safety performance
(if available)
Safety target for defined
period (e.g. 2010)
7 l
l ACI OSSC Amsterdam, 11.-13.9.2007
©
Unique (Flughafen Zürich AG)
Next Step: Industry Benchmark
• Sharing experience with safety perfomance indicators and safety targets within
the ACI community
• Unique (Zurich Airport Ltd.) would like to send you a short questionnaire
•
•
•
•
Your experience/views on this subject
Comments on the proposed airport safety performance indicators
Ideas comments regarding safety targets
Any other comment
• WEB-Based questionnaire (need to perform login)
• Feedback of findings will be presented at the next ACI OSSC meeting or as
required
8 l
l ACI OSSC Amsterdam, 11.-13.9.2007
©
Unique (Flughafen Zürich AG)
Thank you
9 l
l ACI OSSC Amsterdam, 11.-13.9.2007
©
Unique (Flughafen Zürich AG)
Download