Near v. Minnesota 1931 The Case of the Miscreant Purveyor Of Scandal What’s at Stake Prior Restraint Freedom of Speech Prevention or censorship of materials from reaching publication. 1st Amendment Due Process 14th Amendment People Involved: Howard Guilford – Publisher of the Saturday Press. Jay Near – Reporter. Floyd B. Olson – Hennepin County Attorney – later the Governor of Minnesota. Sequence of Events 1925 – Minnesota Public Nuisance Law enacted. Judges can cease publications before publication deemed: 1927 – The Saturday Press hits the stands. Scandalous Defamatory Malicious Story says city is run by Jewish gangsters in cooperation with the police chief and mayor. June 1, 1931, Near v. Minnesota decided. Arguments State of Minnesota: Contended no injunction was issued against the paper prior to publication. Near’s Attorneys: Argued no state can deny freedom of the press by using prior restraint. Said the state injunction against future issues was prior restraint. Case Outcome Court Opinion 5-4 decision. Justices focused on 14th Amendment. The Nuisance Law was a suppression not just of defamatory material, but of future publication, a violation of due process and freedom of speech. Barred Speech Speech that can be suppressed: Obscenity Publication of critical war information. Publication inciting public violence and government overthrow. Publications invading private rights. Links Near V. Minnesota case syllabus and opinions. Near v. Minnesota recent citations. Supreme Court case resource site. Supreme Court site. 14th Amendment Text.