CLLD 2014-2020
Anna Parizán
Rural Development Desk Officer
Ministry of Rural Development
28. May 2014.
Planning of the Rural Development
Programme
2012.
2013.
2014.
Monitoring of the New Hungary Rural Development Programme (2007-2013)
Development of organizational structure
Ex-ante Evaluation
SWOT Analysis
Strategic Environmental Assessment
SWOT
analysis,
assessment
VP 1.0
Development
of goals and
directions
VP 2.0
Development of
priorities
VP 3.0
VP 4.0
Formulation of
the indicative
content of the
measures
Measures
Monitoring and
evaluation plan
2
EAFRD allocation for the programming
period 2014-2020
Billion €
2007-2013
2014-2020
Change
Change (%)
EU total budget
994
960
-34
97
CAP budget
421
373
-48
89
Direct Payments
319
278
-41
87
Rural Development
98
85
-13
87
CAP budget in Hungary
10,4
12,3
1,9
118
Hungarian CAP budget in the EU (%)
2,36
3,19
0,83
135
Direct Payments in Hungary
6,6
8,8
2,3
135
Rural Development budget in Hungary
3,9
3,5
-0,4
89
EAFRD co-financing rates
Hungary gives the maximum contribution (No national top-up):
• Less developed regions (6 regions out of 7): 85%
• Developed regions (Central Hungary): 53%
• „Green" measures (all locations): 75%
• Knowledge transfer; Producer groups; cooperation; LEADER:
Developed regions: 80%
Less developed regions: 90%
• Financial instruments; I pillar amounts transferred: 100%
4
CLLD 2014-2020
Demarcation of rural areas
Principles:
• The demarcation is the same for the whole Priority 6 and CLLD/Leader;
• There is no radical change regarding the demarcation of 2007-2013;
• As result of the demarcation a settlement list will be delivered which will be part of the
calls.
• We consider it important to provide opportunities for the urban-rural cooperation.
The demarcation of 2014-2020 is based on the programming period 2007-2013.
The definition of rural areas (2014-2020):
• Settlements with less than 10.000 (3007 settlements with 3,97 million inhabitants,
75 775 km2)
• Population density with less than 120 inhabitants/km2 (another 35 settlements with
591 410 million inhabitants, 7007 km2)
• Settlements which would be excluded based on these criteria, but the inhabitants of
its periphery is more than 2% (only with the periphery)
.
5
LAGs 2007-2013
- 96 LAGs
- The whole rural area of Hungary was covered by LAGs
6
LAGs 2014-2020
• After a long process the final decision on CLLD is: MONOFUND + calls from
other founds for LAGs. Those measures won’t be indicated in the LDSs.
• Pilot programme: ERDF/ESF – CLLD in cities
• The process of the reorganization and preliminary recognition of the future
LAG territories almost finished.
• The whole eligible country should be covered (110 LAGs) – but smaller
budget
2007-2013: more than 480 million EUR from Axis III through LAGs
272 million EUR on LEADER
Total amount: 752 million EUR
2014-2020: CLLD public expenditure in rural areas: 170 million EUR
• Population covered by LAG – 4.5 million inhabitants
7
Standardisation of LAGs
Training
Since there is an uncertainty in the system (the Government didn’t set up yet,
there is no MA for 2014-2020, etc.) difficult to plan the trainings.
Without any certain framework we plan:
•
•
•
•
On-going trainings;
Online e-learning system (set up until 31th of May);
Translation of the CLLD Guide to Hungarian;
Providing templates for LDS.
8
Training - Thematic modules I.
Title of the module
1.
2.
EU, CAP, LEADER approach
How to develop and implement a strategy?
3.
Community based planning
4.
5.
Local economy development
Community building and social development
6.
7.
8.
Environment
Sustainability and global issues
Cooperation and networking
9
Training - Thematic modules II.
The structure (minimum content) of a module:
• clarifying the definitions (e.g. LDS, innovation, beneficiary, etc.),
• theoretical background,
• practical and good practice examples,
• workshop.
The training organization has to provide the following tools per modules:
• thematic education plan,
• ppt presentation or other format,
• 20-50 pages "textbook" per modules,
• list of recommended professional literature.
The participation is obligatory for the potential LAG managers and optional for
the other stakeholders dealing with LEADER. As closure an examination will be
organized.
10
„Bridge the gap”
On-going implementation of the following measures:
LEADER – Implementation of the LDS 3rd call
LEADER – Transnational cooperation
LEADER – Inter-territorial cooperation
Axis III. – Development of tourism activities
Additional duties:
•
•
•
•
Territorial reorganization (already done)
Training
Preparation of the LDS
Evaluation of the period 2007-2013
11
Thank you for your kind attention!
Anna Parizán
Ministry of Rural Development
Department of Rural Development
Rural Development Unit
1055 Budapest, Kossuth tér 11.
e-mail: anna.parizan@vm.gov.hu
12