Informatica Productivity Pack Save Time and Money while Increasing the Quality of Your PowerCenter Deployment Louis Hausle 1 Are these issues you have run into? • Best Practices Violations even though you have them documented! • Abuse and misuse of SQL overrides, log verbosity or commit/cache/dtm buffer size? • Zombie Workflows? 2 Where is Time Spent in a PowerCenter Environment? (source Informatica World 2012 Poll) • Development accounts for less than 50% of time Code Review and Best Practices Enforcement 10% Monitoring of P0werCenter 21% Data Validation and Testing 29% Development 38% • More Time and Money Spent on Testing and Monitoring • You can shrink the TCO of PowerCenter by automated Testing and Monitoring 3 What Exactly is the Productivity Pack? ( it is a Sales Bundle of Three Products) DEV TEST PROD PowerCenter Productivity Pack Proactive Proactive Data Monitoring for Monitoring for Validation PowerCenter PowerCenter Option - Governance - Operations 4 Agenda • Development – Proactive Monitoring for PowerCenter – Governance • Testing – The Informatica Data Validation Option – DVO • Production – Proactive Monitoring for PowerCenter - Operations 5 Every PowerCenter Customer Has Best Practices, Nearly Every One Struggles to Enforce Them! 6 Challenges in Data Integration & Governance • Best Practice Enforcement • Most companies have no way to enforce best practices • Production Impact • Unchecked Development Practices and Choices can lead to Fatal Mistakes in Production • Measure and Quantify Development Work • How can you track many developers in different locations? 7 1. Enforcement of Best Practices Customer Challenges • How do you monitor many developers in many locations, all the time? • How do make your Best Practices Actionable and enforceable as they happen? Mappings are created and saved without comments Next Developer has no idea of what logic is doing Time is wasted and Mistakes can be made 8 2. Production Impact of Development Options Customer Challenges • There are hundreds of development flags and options on Mappings, Workflows, Sessions and Transformations • Customers can have dozens, hundreds and thousands of Workflows A developer uses the ‘truncate target table’ option for testing in development He forgets to change the flag, and the workflow is migrated into production Data is lost, and recovery steps can take time and introduce new data problems 9 Agenda • Development – Proactive Monitoring for PowerCenter – Governance • Testing – The Informatica Data Validation Option – DVO • Production – Proactive Monitoring for PowerCenter - Operations 11 The Data Validation and Testing Dilemma Informatica has over 4,000 PowerCenter Customers who believe using a metadata driven, graphical tool to move data is better than writing SQL and hand coding. 15 years later, 99% of those 4,000 Customers still use SQL and Excel to test the data they have moved in data integration products. There has to be a better way… 12 Current Approach: Like a Photo Hunt 13 Data Validation Simple Illustration Source A Sales Orders Sales Amount 30 $150,000 Source B Sales Orders Sales Amount 23 $150,000 Target (DW or Operational System Data Integration Or Movement Sales Orders Sales Amount 52 $290,000 DVO - tells you 1 Order and $10,000 is Missing In a few clicks it does set, aggregation and value tests. 14 DVO: Test Creation Leverage your PowerCenter Metadata! GUI with Pre-Built Test Operators with NO SQL 15 DVO: Test Results Summary of Test Results 16 Agenda • Development – Proactive Monitoring for PowerCenter – Governance • Testing – The Informatica Data Validation Option – DVO • Production – Proactive Monitoring for PowerCenter - Operations 17 Informatica built these solutions to address three common customer concerns… 1. Customers asked for a “Complete, PowerCenter Centric” Monitoring Solution 2. Customers want to become “Proactive” in seeing issues before they turn into problems. Send email alerts instead of logging in to a monitor. 3. Scalable way to identify anomalies such as Workflows running longer/shorter than normal or returning more/less rows than normal. 18 What is Proactive PowerCenter Monitoring? Prebuilt Rules to Monitor Informatica PowerCenter Delivers Alerts to people, dashboards and systems Complete Operational and Best Practices Extensible – build unlimited number of new rules 19 Solution Overview Operational Monitoring Monitoring via Proactive PowerCenter Continuous Correlation (Sample Rules) SQL Sources to Expose Repository Features and Allow Easy Rule and Report Building Environmental Monitoring Custom: Environmental (CPU, Memory..) DB (SQL) Runtime Statistics JMSvia Web Receiver Web Services Services Hub Ping PowerCenter Services • • Operational Design Time 1 Workflow/session was successful but zero (0) records loaded 2 Rejected Records in Session 3 Disproportionate elapsed time between Workflow and Session 4 Session/Workflow Failures 5 Correlate session changes to workflow failures SLA Violations: Workflow/Folder/Repository Level Significant increase in Workflow/Session Elapsed Times 6 7 Notification Framework for Alerts Prebuilt EMAIL Responses Prebuilt Dashboard Alerts Alert Enrichment PowerCenter Workflow Response to Execute Commands Web Services and more… Significant decrease in applied row counts 8 DBs, 9 Workflows missing schedules Alert Editing, Creation and Management 10 Too many concurrent workflows 11 Automatic Restart of Zombie Workflows 12 Ping Domain/Integration Service/Repository Service • • • Start/Stop Workflows Create Help Desk Ticket Update Control Tables 20 Proactive Monitoring for PowerCenter Illustration of Components that are Monitored PowerCenter 1. The PowerCenter Domain, Integration Services and Repository Services are Monitored Database Domain Repository Service 3. The PowerCenter Server OS is Monitored for Memory and CPU Usage Administrator Integration Service Server Application Server 2. The PowerCenter Repository Database is Monitored for Up/Down and Tablespace Usage 4. Running Workflows and Sessions are Monitored 5. Over 500 Attributes can be used in rules 21 DEMONSTRATION of PROACTIVE MONITORING FOR GOVERNANCE • Check for Commit size violations • Check On Rollback Transactions on Errors • Naming Conventions and Check for Comments 22