

This video is the fifth in a series of five videos created to support
the understanding of SLOs. The Teacher Expectations/Elective
Rating video addresses Section 5 of the SLO template and will
outline the following…
• Establishing Levels of Projected Teacher Performance
• Factors to Consider/Helpful Hints
• Determining the Elective Rating
The documents that support this video are located on the WPAIUCC
SLO Moodle (http://bit.ly/slopa)
2
3
• The SLO Process allows for a great deal of flexibility and control.
• The four Teacher Expectation levels are established by educators
prior to the evaluation period.
• Each performance level is populated with a percentage ranging
from 0% to 100% distributed among all four levels.
• The principal and teacher need to have a conversation about
how the ranges were established.
4
• How do you define proficiency?
• Are you satisfied with the % of students meeting proficiency?
• What data and decisions did you consider in determining your
levels of scores?
• Regardless, it is a local decision!
Helpful Hints:
• Use historical data, if available, in determining the
percentage ranges.
• Start with the range for the Proficient level.
5
• This element is not completed until after performance data is
collected, reviewed and evaluated against each indicator, and in
the aggregate, against 5a criteria.
• The evaluator then uses the summary of the actual performance
data and the percentages specified in 5a to determine the
teacher’s resulting performance level.
• 5b Notes/Explanation Element provides an opportunity for
teachers to offer information.
6
1. Teacher Expectations
5a. Level
Failing
Needs
0% to 59% of
Improvement
students will meet 60% to 79% of
the PI targets.
students will meet
the PI targets.
Proficient
80% to 89% of
students will meet
the PI targets.
Distinguished
90% to 100% of
students will meet
the PI targets.
Individual Performance Indicators: How well did the students do?:
• SLO is based on 100 students in each indicator.
Indicators
PI #1
Jumping
PI #2
Hopping
PI #3
Sprinting
Number of Students who Meet Expectations (i.e., meet the
Performance Indicator in 3a)
75
80
85
Total Number of Students Assessed
100
100
100
•
•
•
Indicator #1: 75 of your 100 students met the expectation
Indicator #2: 80 of your 100 students met the expectation
Indicator #3: 85 of your 100 students met the expectation
75+80+85=240 students met the expectations
240 divided by 300 (total
number of students) = .80
or 80%
80%
PROFICIENT
7
1. Teacher Expectations
5a. Level
Failing
Needs
0% to 70% of
Improvement
students will meet 71% to 79% of
the PI targets.
students will meet
the PI targets.
Proficient
80% to 91% of
students will meet
the PI targets.
Distinguished
92% to 100% of
students will meet
the PI targets.
Individual Performance Indicators: How well did the students do?:
• SLO is based on 20 students in each indicator.
Indicators
PI #1 : 80%/+ on “5th
Grade Common Social
Studies Assessment 3rd Quarter”
PI #2:
3/+ on “Social
Studies Research
Project Rubric”
PI #3: 80%/+ on “Final
Exam” Post-test or at
least 30% growth from
Pre- to Post-test
Number of Students who Meet
Expectations (i.e., meet the
Performance Indicator in 3a)
15
18
18
Total Number of Students Assessed
20
20
20
•
•
•
Indicator #1: 15 of your 20 students met the expectation
Indicator #2: 18 of your 20 students met the expectation
Indicator #3: 18 of your 20 students met the expectation
15 + 18 + 18 = 51 students met the
expectations
51 divided by 60 (total number of
students) = .85 or 85%
85%
PROFICIENT
8
If you need more information regarding SLOs, please contact your
IU representative listed below.
IU 1:
IU 3:
IU 4:
IU 5:
IU 7:
IU 27:
IU 28:
JoBeth McKee
Paul Cindric
Cathleen Cubelic, Anthony Conti
Kirk Shimshock, Linda Lorei, and Jim Gallagher
Natalie Smith
Lori Ceremuga, Marsha Hughes and Cristine Wagner-Deitch
Lynne Snyder
9