SVMI Leading the Way for CCSS - Silicon Valley Mathematics Initiative

advertisement

SVMI

Leading the Way for CCSS

September 7 th , 2011

Hayward School District

Assessment for Learning

In the Era of the

Common Core

Standards

David Foster

Silicon Valley Mathematics Initiative www.svmimac.org

45* States, DC, and US Virgin Islands Islands

*Washington and Idaho have adopted the CCSS conditionally/provisionally

** Minnesota has adopted the CCSS in ELA only

3

Race to the Top Assessment Program

In September 2010, the U.S. Department of Education awarded $350 million of Race to the Top Funds as grants to the two consortia:

• Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC)

• Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and

Careers (PARCC)

Task: To design and develop common K-12

Mathematics and English language assessment systems aligned to common, college-and careerreadiness standards.

SMARTER Balanced Assessment

Consortium

• Alabama

• *California

• *Connecticut

• *Idaho

• *Kansas

• *Maine

• *Missouri

• *Nevada

• North Carolina

• Ohio

• *Oregon

• South Carolina

• *Utah

• *Washington

• *Wisconsin

• Wyoming

• Colorado

• Delaware

• *Hawaii

• Iowa

• Kentucky

• *Michigan

• *Montana

• *New Hampshire

• North Dakota

• Pennsylvania

• South Dakota

• *Vermont

• *West Virginia

* Governing States

Caveats

• These assessment consortia are state-led initiatives with many players

Many decisions have not been made yet

-Some decisions are in flux

• The federal role is to provide support to the states for the development of innovative assessments

• There will be new assessments in 2014-15

-How innovative will the new assessments be?

Intention of SBAC Design

To strategically “balance” summative, interim, and formative assessment through an integrated system of standards, curriculum, assessment, instruction, and teacher development, while providing accurate year-to year indicators of students’ progress toward college and career readiness.

Center for K-12 Assessment and Performance Management at ETS

Current vs. CCSS

Current STAR Assessments Proposed CCSS Assessments

• Grades 2-11, writing at 4 and 7 th

Taken around 85% of the instructional days

Only multiple choice accountability system th

Only paper & pencil option

• Part of the state and federal

• Grades 3-8 and 11, Grades 9 and 10 available for states that choose to use them

• Delivered via computer (Paper and pencil option available for 3 years) and are computer adaptive

• Taken during the final 12 weeks of school

• Performance tasks and comprehensive end-of -year computer adaptive assessment which will some selected response items

• Accountability system has not been established yet

Proposed Elements to the Common

Assessment

• Online testing

• College and career-readiness assessment aimed at 11 th grade

• Rapid reporting system to inform instruction

• Teachers involved in developing and scoring tests

• Item types

– Short constructed response

– Extended constructed response

– Technology enhanced

– Performance tasks

– Selected response

Proposed Assessment System

Components

• Summative assessment (computer adaptive)

-supports accountability and measures growth

• Interim assessment (computer adaptive)

-Optional comprehensive and content cluster assessment

-Learning progressions

-Available for administration throughout the year

• Formative process and tools

-Optional resources for improving instructional learning

-Assessment literacy

The System

(Possible Scenario)

• 2011

Proposed Timeline

Development of formative tools, processes, and practices underway; Specifications for summative and interim assessments developed

• 2012 Summative and interim item development completed ; Interim item pool become available for use

• 2013 Field testing of items for adaptive summative assessment completed

• 2014

Preliminary achievement standards proposed and other policy definitions adopted

• 2015 Operational summative assessment administered; Final achievement standards verified and adopted

Center for K-12 Assessment & Performance Management at ETS

Types of Tasks in Mathematics

Novice

– short items focused on skills and routines

Apprentice

– medium performance tasks with scaffolding

Expert

– long tasks with high cognitive load and/or complexity.

SBAC’s Specifications for Math

• Written by Hugh Burkhardt and Alan

Shoenfeld as commissioned by Linda Darling

Hammond for SBAC.

• 60% of the SBAC will be assessed using performance assessment and scored using an analytic point scoring rubric (fashion after

MARS rubrics)

• 40% will be machined scored.

Exemplars in

Appendix

Silicon Valley Mathematics Initiative

53 Members School Districts and Charter School Networks

Antioch Unified

Aspire Charter Schools

Atlanta PS

Bayshore

Belmont

Berryessa

Bolinas - Lagunitas

Brisbane

Cambrian

Cristo Rey School Network

Cupertino

Discovery Charter School

East Side UHSD

Emery

Franklin - McKinley

Hamilton County, Tn

Hayward

Jefferson

Las Lomitas

Los Altos

Los Gatos

Menlo Park

Moreland

Morgan Hill Charter School

Mountain

Mt Pleasant

National Council of La Raza

New York City

Oakland Military Institute

Oakland Unified

Pacifica

Pajaro Valley

Palo Alto

Pittsburgh USD

Portola Valley

Ravenswood

Salinas City Schools

San Carlos

San Carlos Charter School

San Francisco USD (Mission Dist)

San Ramon Valley

Santa Clara

Santa Cruz City

Saratoga

Scotts Valley

SCCOE County Court Schools

SMCOE County Court Schools

South Cook Service District

South San Francisco

Walnut Creek

Supporting Teaching and Learning of Mathematics Since 1996

• September 27 or 29

• October 18 or 20

• November 15 or 17

• December 6 or 8

• January 24 or 26

Locations: Tilden Center, Oakland (Tuesdays),

Moreland DO (Tuesday), Nesbit School Thursday,

Pajaro Valley DO (Thursday)

Principal As Instructional Leader

• Patrick Callahan – Assistant Director of the

California Math Project

• TBA

Dates:

• Wednesday November 30

• Thursday February 2

General MAC Meetings

• MAC Final Report and Tools for Teachers

(October 5th at Santa Clara DRC)

• Distribute MAC 2012 Tests and Test Guidelines

(February 8 at Santa Clara DRC)

• MAC 2012 Preliminary Results, ISR

(May 16 at Fremont DO)

Other SVMI Events

• Lesson Study Project

• Math Network Meetings

• MAC Assessments – First Grade

• CCSS Transition Units

• Shell Centre Formative Assessment Lessons

• Number Talk Resources

• Problems of the Month

CCSS aligned Unit Outline

Welcome to the Inside Mathematics Website

Welcome to Inside Mathematics, a professional resource for educators passionate about improving students' mathematics learning and performance.

This site features classroom examples of innovative teaching methods and insights into student learning, tools for mathematics instruction that teachers can use immediately, and video tours of the ideas and materials on the site.

Several allied initiatives dedicated to improving math teaching have contributed to this resource.

http://www.insidemathematics.org

Field Testing of MAC Tasks

Field Test in the Next Grade Level

• 4 th Grade (Entire Test)

• 5 th Grade (Entire Test)

• 6 th Grade (Entire Test)

• 7 th Grade (one task)

• 8 th Grade (two tasks)

• Course 1 (one task)

Download