CTE Accountability and Planning
Perkins Planning Meeting
March 2013
MSDE/DCCR
Accountability Team
Pat Mikos, Program Manager
George Comegys, CTE Specialist
Matt Koerner, CTE Specialist
Mike Beck, CTE Specialist
This Session:
CTE Accountability 101
•
Measures and Requirements
What’s in the CTE PQI?
• Review of the Reports
• Perkins Plan Development
What’s Next?
•
Complete 2013 Collection/Reporting
Review of 2013-2014
CTE Data Collection and Reporting
CTE Programs
(CIP & course codes)
Update List A
Sept. 30th
Enrollment Files
April 30th
Enrollment
(with Concentrators)
End of Year Status
(grad, dropout, tech ach)
Outcome Files
Aug. 15th
MDCTEDATA.ORG
Perkins IV: Secondary Indicators
1.
Academic Attainment:
Reading/LA and Math
2.
Technical Skill Attainment
3.
Secondary School Completion
4.
Student Graduation Rate
5.
Secondary Placement
6.
Non-Traditional Participation &
Completion
Perkins IV: Postsecondary Indicators
1.
Technical Skill Attainment
2.
Credential, Certificate, or
Diploma
3.
Student Retention or Transfer
4.
Student Placement
5.
Non-Traditional Participation &
Completion
CTE Concentrator:
A postsecondary/adult student who
completes at least 12 academic or
CTE credits within a single
program area sequence that is
comprised of 12 or more academic
and technical credits and
terminates in the award of an
industry-recognized credential, a
certificate, or a degree
This Session:
What’s in the PQI?
• Review of the Reports
CTE Data Analysis
• Program Quality Index (PQI)
• Programs by cluster – enrollment, Perkins outcomes
• Local Perkins Accountability Report (LPAR)
• Shows three year trend for each measure
• Negotiated Targets and the 90% rule
• Data Summary Sheets
• Cluster Information – enrollment and graduates
• Program Performance – highest & lowest performing
2012 PQI Data Sheet
Perkins Accountability Targets
• State Performance Levels are established by OVAE
targets and previous performance
• Local Performance Levels adjusted to baseline
performance based on relative performance (quartile) for
each measure
• Improvement plans will be required if any of the
performance measures are not met (90%)
• 2012: If 90% of target is not met for 3 consecutive years,
in the same measure, subsequent action is taken. (2008 was
the transition year and is not included in timelines for improvement)
Setting and Negotiating Local Targets
3P1
3P1
Retention
2013 Growth
or Transfer
Target
Howard CC
2.49
3.08
Cecil CC
5.96
7.40
13.81
17.14
Harford CC
Rate of Growth is
1.5 x 16% = 24%
Allegany CC
16.40
19.03
Montgomery College
17.62
20.45
College of Southern MD
19.12
22.19
Chesapeake College
21.42
24.86
Rate of Growth is 16%
Frederick CC
25.06
29.08
Prince George's CC
28.84
33.47
Baltimore City CC
36.97
42.91
Hagerstown Jr.
37.95
44.04
Garrett CC
39.31
42.46
Anne Arundel CC
42.27
45.66
CCBC
50.03
54.05
Wor-Wic CC
54.71
59.10
2012 State
2013 Target
30.16
*35.00 % Growth
Rate of Growth is
0.5 x 16% = 8%
2013
0.1605
Rate of Growth is set by
the State Target, set by
OVAE
Negotiation of Local Targets
LOCAL PERKINS ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT (LPAR)
SUMMARY REPORT 2007 - 2009
SECONDARY RECIPIENTS
Sub
Indicator
1S1
Academic
Attainment
Measurement
Definition
2007
2008
Performance Performance
Percentage Percentage
Numerator:
# of CTE Concentrators
meeting standards on
HSA English II
2009
Data
2009
Performance
Percentage
2009
Local
Target
2010
Local
Target
81.60
68.57
83.64
337
57.14
62.34
413
Target is met – Yeh!
Denominator:
# of CTE Concentrators
1S2
Academic
Attainment
Numerator:
# of CTE Concentrators
meeting standards on
HSA Algebra
Any reason 2012 would not be
met?
383
69.32
77.95
92.74
81.85
93.90
• TSA – expanding testing areas…
413
Denominator:
# of CTE Concentrators
2S1
Technical
Skill
Attainment
Numerator:
# of CTE Concentrators who
met industry standards
• Eliminating / Adding programs
199
N/A
85.58
62.38
88.79
76.66
319
Denominator:
# of CTE Concentrators who
took an assessment aligned
to CTE and industry standards
March  May 2012 review of information, negotiation of targets…
Signature line with submission of Perkins Plan _________________
2011 Target not met – give
explanation
• new assessment process
• data collection limitation
• other…
Data Summary Charts/Graphs
Distribution by Cluster - within LEA
CTE Program Performance
1S1,1S2, 2S1, 4S1
English HSA - Highest and Lowest Performing Programs,
------ Co. 2012
100.00
100.00
80.00
66.70
60.00
40.00
27.27
20.00
29.41
14.29
0.00
NAF Academy of
Finance
County Avg. All CTE
Building Property
Maintenance
Construction Trades, Construction Trades,
Masonry Option
Electrical Option
CTE data collection/reporting challenges
– HSA Pass Rates:
• Target program areas with high number of students completing “Bridge Projects”
– TSA Collection:
• Increasing support for testing centers
• Working with SIS to include indicators for Taking / Passing
– CTE Completer Status:
• Scheduling and guidance to support completion
• Working with SIS to include CTE Program Completion with USM
– Non-Traditional Program Areas:
• Scheduling and guidance to support enrollment and completion
4%
What’s Next?
 Review the 2013-14
Specifications Manual for
CTE Data Collection:
• Files may be submitted as “flat file” or Excel
• Race/Ethnicity – new federal guidelines
• Record Layout – full last name and first name
Due Dates
• April 30, 2013 – SY 2011-12 secondary enrollment due
• June 15, 2013 – CTE Concentrator File Posted
• August 15, 2013 – CTE Outcome File Due
• September 30, 2013 – List A Verification (for 2013-14)
• October 30, 2013 – Postsecondary Fall Enrollment