Shifting the Paradigm Providing Academic Language through Complex Texts to ELLs October 17, 2012 Who are Boston’s English Language Learners? 46% of BPS students speak a language other than English as their first language BPS students’ families are from over 100 countries BPS students speak over 80 different first languages 40% of BPS students are either currently learning English or mastered academic English while attending BPS schools Data as of April 17, 2012 from MyBPS > ELD Level tabs & May 24, 2012 “AllBPSwithTests.xls” file generated by BPS OIIT 2 What is the distribution of ELLs - by language? Language # % Spanish* 9,777 57% Haitian* 1,636 10% Cape Verdean* Vietnamese* 1,259 965 7% 6% 2% 1% 1% 9% 2% 5% Spanish 57% Haitian Cape Verdean Chinese Vietnamese 6% Chinese* 948 5% Somali 316 2% Portuguese 305 2% Arabic 187 1% French 182 1% Arabic Other 1550 9% Other Total 17,125 100% Data as of April 17, 2012 from MyBPS > ELD Level tabs 7% 10% Portuguese Somali French 3 Commissioned research on BPS ELL's test results yields similar findings The Mauricio Gaston Institute for Latino Community Development and Public Policy (2011) found that: “the command of English required to pass standardized tests designed for English proficient students, such as the MCAS, far exceeds the levels of English proficiency represented by MEPA Levels 1–3, and to some extent 4. BPS SY 2009 Elementary School (grades 3-5) Findings English Proficiency Level MCAS ELA Pass Rate (NI+P+A) MEPA Level 1 0.0% MEPA Level 2 15.6% MEPA Level 3 31.2% MEPA Level 4 74.8% MEPA Level 5 95.3% English Proficient 84.0% 4 Critical Changes Across the District: Adapting to Common Core and WIDA Shifting paradigms: where we were Mostly vocabulary and grammar The Common Core for English Language Learners: Challenges and Opportunities ell.stanford.edu 6 Shifting Paradigms: where we need to be Discourse Text (complex text) Explanation Argumentation Purpose Typical structure of text Sentence structures Vocabulary practices Adapted from: “The Common Core for English Language Learners: Challenges and Opportunities” Webinar, presented by Kenji Hakuta, Understanding Language, Stanford University Language Arts 7 2012-13 Office of English Language Learners Departmental Goal: • Provide access to Common Core for all students regardless of program placement • The Standards set requirements not only for English language arts (ELA) but also for literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Common Core State Standards …the Standards also lay out a vision of what it means to be a literate person in the twenty-first century. Indeed, the skills and understandings students are expected to demonstrate have wide applicability outside the classroom or workplace. Students who meet the Standards: •readily undertake the close, attentive reading that is at the heart of understanding and enjoying complex works of literature. •habitually perform the critical reading necessary to pick carefully through the staggering amount of information available today in print and digitally. •actively seek the wide, deep, and thoughtful engagement with high-quality literary and informational texts that builds knowledge, enlarges experience, and broadens worldviews. •reflexively demonstrate the cogent reasoning and use of evidence that is essential to both private deliberation and responsible citizenship in a democratic republic. WIDA CAN-DO DESCRIPTORS Grouping Flexibility in Boston Elementary Classrooms ELD 1-3 Secondary Classrooms ELD 1-2 &3 ELD 4-5 ELD 4-5 Hybrid ELLs 1-3 and non-ELLs Hybrid ELLs 1-3 and non-ELLs Reconceptualizing the Role of Central Office • Reconceptualize the role of OELL as a key contributor to the discussion on instruction with the capacity to improve Language Proficiency outcomes for ELLs in ELD 1-3 and Language Proficiency and MCAS outcomes for ELLs in ELD 4-5. • Moving beyond Compliance to Instruction (DOJ/OCR) CURRICULUM MAPPING: CONNECTING WIDA/CCSS THROUGH COMPLEX TEXT Unit 2: Staying Alive Common Core Standards: RL.2.1: Ask!and answer such questions as who, what, where, when, why, and how to demonstrate understanding of key details. WEEK 1. Anchor Selection: Twilight Hunt, Reach SE pp. 74–89 W.2.3: Write narratives in which they recount a well-elaborated event or short sequence of events, include details to describe actions, thoughts, and feelings, use temporal words to signal event order, and provide a sense of closure. WEEK 3. Alternate Selection: National Geographic Leveled Readers: Flash, Firefly, Flash!; Sea Horses; Puffer Fish; Mud, Mud, Mud; A Hole Is a Great Home SL.2.4: Tell a story or recount an experience with appropriate facts and relevant, descriptive details, speaking audibly in coherent sentences. L.2.4: Determine or clarify the meaning of unknown and multiplemeaning words and phrases based on grade 2 reading and content, choosing flexibly from an array of strategies. WEEK 2. Alternate Selection: Living Lights, Reach SE pp. 106–119 WEEK 4. Alternate Selection: National Geographic Education Online Video: Meerkat Survival Tactics Throughout this unit: Reading Foundations: Blends with s; Final Consonant Blends; Multisyllabic Words; Digraphs ch, tch; Plural Endings –s, -es What does it take to survive? ! WEEK 1: Twilight Hunt Accessing the Anchor Selection Correlating Standards: Common Core Standard RL.2.10: By the end of the year, read and comprehend literature, including stories and poetry, in the grades 2-3 complexity band proficiently, with scaffolding as needed at the high end of the range. Level 1: Entering Introduce the Big Question. Read Anchor Selection aloud and point to its illustrations. Have students track the story and follow along as it is being read aloud. See: R T76–77 See: RfR T74 Level 3: Developing Level 2: Emerging Level 4: Expanding Level 5: Bridging Introduce the Big Question. Read Anchor Selection aloud via choral reading. Introduce the Big Question. Have students read Anchor Selection aloud in groups. Introduce the Big Question. Have students read Anchor Selection aloud in pairs. Ask students inferential questions about the Anchor Selection. Ask students to make predictions after paging through the Anchor Selection illustrations. Display and invite students to sing along with “Where Can My Butterfly Be?” song. Discuss Science Vocabulary. Display “Where Can My Butterfly Be?” song. Ask students to connect song back to Anchor Selection. See: R T78–79, T80–81 See: RfR T74, T76–77 See: R T78–79, T82–83 See: RfR T78-79 See: R T68, T69 See: RfR T68, T69 See: R T68, T69, T75 See: RfR T68, T69 Introduce the Big Question. Read Anchor Selection aloud and have students whisperread. Reading Correlating Standards: Common Core Standard RL.2.1: Ask and answer such questions as who, what, where, when, why, and how to demonstrate understanding of key details. WIDA Standard 4: English language learners communicate information, ideas and concepts necessary for academic success in the content area of Science. Level 1: Entering Have students identify the Anchor Selection creatures. Have students repeat each creature name and point to it. Ask how the illustrations connect to the Big Question. See: R T74, T78–79 See: RfR T74 Level 3: Developing Level 2: Emerging Review the Big Question with vocabulary choral response “Yes or No” Game. Ask students to search and point to an illustration that represents a Key Word. See: R T74, T74b, T91b See: RfR T74, T88e Have student pairs ask and answer questions using Key Words. Ask students to make connections between the Big Question and Key Words. Encourage multisyllabic word usage in students’ connections. See: R T74b See: RfR T74 ! Level 4: Expanding Level 5: Bridging Have student pairs review Key Words. Ask pairs to express ideas about the Big Question using multisyllabic words. Review the Big Question. Have students identify the context clues for the Key Word adaptation and use as review. Have pairs identify a Key Word and make a 4-Corner Poster. Have students do Power Writing for Key Word adaptation. Discuss as a class. See: R T74b See: RfR T74 See: R T74b See: RfR T74 WHY COMPLEX TEXT? • Project Name: Re-visioning Instruction for ELLs : The “Ls” ELLs Need: Language, Literacy and Learning • Project Purpose: The purpose of this project is to provide professional development for teachers, administrators, coaches and district leaders on how to re-vision ESL curriculum by building academic language through complex texts and tasks, which is one of the major shifts in instruction due to the changes in the Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks (Common Core State Standards). Project Overview The use of this integrated approach using complex texts and tasks will be piloted at the Hennigan and McKay Schools in 3rd grade and in SIFE classes and at a secondary level site later this fall. In addition, support staff called capacity builders will also learn this approach to 1) support teachers at the Hennigan and other sites while implementing this approach; and 2) be able to teach and support other teachers as this pilot expands. Complex Text Implementation Role of Teachers: Teachers will learn about how to work with complex text- from choosing text to deconstructing text and incorporating academic language to curriculum mapping. Focus will be placed on thematic units aligned to the CCSS and scaffolds to support the teaching of the complex texts and tasks embedded in ever challenging units of study. Capacity Builders: (Content Directors and Coaches) Support staff will learn about how to work with complex text AND how to work with teachers who are learning how to use this approach. Understanding of the major shifts needed to align ESL curriculum to the CCSS and to increase the rigor so that ELLs can achieve and meet the high stakes assessments. Focus will be on the infrastructural, instructional and professional learning moves needed to support this approach/shift. Boston’s Summer ESL Institute • ESL Institute- Teacher/Principals: (With Lily Wong Fillmore*) • First session where capacity builders explored how thinking differently about curriculum for ELLs and instruction create newer ways of working with ELLs in terms of instruction, infrastructure and professional learning. (August 2012) Training for Central Office Staff • Understanding of why and how complex text is important especially in light of the new demands of the Common Core State Standards • Participants also were presented with an overview of how complex text can be used in the classroom. (April 11, 2012) Teachers and Capacity Builders • • Hennigan 3rd Grade Teachers First session where teachers were introduced to complex text: What is it? Why is it important? How can it be incorporated into lesson (May 2012) • Capacity Builders and Central Office Staff (Content Directors and Coaches) These participants must commit to being trained for all modules. • Modules 1-3: First session where capacity builders explored how thinking differently about curriculum for ELLs and instruction to create newer ways of working with ELLs in terms of instruction, infrastructure and professional learning. (May 2012) • Boston Complex Text Sequence • • • • • • • • Module 5: Scaffolding Complex Texts: Deconstructing/Reconstructing/Mapping Meaning of complex sentences Module 6: Scaffolding Complex Texts: Demystifying Figurative Language and Understanding Language Functions across Content Areas Module 7: Developing Text Dependent Questions: Scaffolds for a Robust and Academic Talk around Texts Module 8: Developing an Integrated Lesson with a Focus on Learning, Language and Literacy Class walk-through and “correction”: Capacity Builders: See how implementation is going and observe how Maryann “corrects” and supports teachers during the implementation process. Module 9: Explicit Moves that Matter in Academic Writing: Writing to Convey Information and Convince Module 10: The Reading and Writing Connection: Developing Rigorous Tasks in Writing/ Performance Tasks as Assessment of Learning Module 11: Curriculum Mapping: Nesting Academic Language inside Compelling and Complex Units of Study Internal Capacity Builders • Elementary Site(Hennigan) • Secondary site to be chosen • Staff from other schools trained at these satellite sites • Principal/teacher teams trained by Boston OELL to sustain and practice key concepts • Teams represent Gen. Ed./SPED as well Shifting Paradigms Today, in higher education generally, you can choose to view this era as one of threatening change and unsettling volatility, or you can see it as a moment charged with the most exciting possibilities presented to educators in our lifetimes, with the possibility of better understanding how we learn, and of sharing the transformative power of education far beyond the bounds of any campus. Susan Hockfield MIT President, May 2, 2012 23