Integrating Concepts in Biology an interdisciplinary approach to introductory biology by Christopher J. Paradise, Laurie J. Heyer and A. Malcolm Campbell What’s wrong with biology education now? Vocabulary is emphasized Experimental approaches are minimized Math is absent Memorization is rewarded Critical thinking is discouraged Information is irrelevant to students Can we cram in more content and honestly meet the needs of our students? Artificial divide within biology Small Biology Big Biology To fix biology education: Reduce the volume of information Eliminate artificial “small” vs. “big” bio divide Facilitate construction of knowledge – teach the way people learn Use math to illuminate biology Analyze real experimental data Reward thinking and creativity Discuss ethical, legal, social implications We started with what the experts recommended… Integrating Math and Biology “Concepts, examples, and techniques from mathematics… should be included in biology courses …” Undergraduate Biology Education Ability to 1. apply process of science 2. use quantitative reasoning 3. use modeling/ simulation 4. tap into ID nature of science 5. communicate/collaborate 6. understand relationship between science & society Five Big Ideas of Biology Information Homeostasis Evolution Biology Emergent Properties Cells Five Levels of Organization Molecular Cellular Organismal Population Ecological System A New Biology Majors Textbook Integrated Concepts in Biology (Wiley) Unique Pedagogy http://mywiley.info/campbell Information Ecological System Homeostasis Evolution Biology Ecological System Ecological System Emergent Properties Cells Ecological System Ecological System Content is Question-Driven Ch. 5: Information in Ecological Systems Ethical, Legal and Social Implications Are religion and evolution compatible? Should we alter the timing of death? Are humans still evolving? Is pollution a tragedy of the commons? What are the issues with using animals in research? Should the US have a public health strategy to deal with the obesity epidemic? Effect of predation on tadpole communities southern toad leopard frog spring peeper Figure 5.25 Effect of predation on tadpole communities Figure 5.25 Salamander predators Fish predators What is the biodiversity of tadpole community in each treatment? Which predators affected diversity the most? Salamander predators Figure 5.25 Effect of predation on tadpole communities Fish predators Salamander predators Fish predators Bio-Math Exploration 5.3: How do you measure biodiversity? • Objective: Quantify biodiversity • Required Skills: proportions, basic arithmetic • The Shannon diversity index is based on the number and abundance of each species. • In a system with many equally common species, an individual has equal probability of encountering an individual of any species. • There is a great diversity of information because of the variety of possible encounters. Bio-Math Exploration Integrating Questions 1. Calculate the Shannon biodiversity index for the three communities with fish predators. Use the proportions in Figure 5.25a, and confirm that your results match the values in Figure 5.25b. What is the biodiversity of tadpole community in each treatment? Which predators affected diversity the most? Salamander predators Figure 5.25 Effect of predation on tadpole communities Fish predators Salamander predators Fish predators BME 5.3: Computing the Shannon diversity index for Figure 5.26a, no predators To compute the Shannon diversity index, find the relative proportion of each species. No Predator Southern toad Leopard frog Spring peeper Shannon biodiversity index LN Proportion * Proportion (proportion) LN(proportion 0.575 -0.5534 -0.3182 0.4 -0.9163 -0.3665 0.025 -3.6889 -0.0922 0.7769 BME 5.3: Computing the Shannon diversity index for Figure 5.26a, no predators The second step is to find the natural logarithm of each of these proportions No Predator Southern toad Leopard frog Spring peeper Shannon biodiversity index LN Proportion * Proportion (proportion) LN(proportion 0.575 -0.5534 -0.3182 0.4 -0.9163 -0.3665 0.025 -3.6889 -0.0922 0.7769 BME 5.3: Computing the Shannon diversity index for Figure 5.26a, no predators No Predator Southern toad Leopard frog Spring peeper Shannon biodiversity index LN Proportion * Proportion (proportion) LN(proportion 0.575 -0.5534 -0.3182 0.4 -0.9163 -0.3665 0.025 -3.6889 -0.0922 Next, multiply each proportion by its natural log, such as 0.575 * -0.5534. 0.7769 BME 5.3: Computing the Shannon diversity index for Figure 5.26a, no predators No Predator Southern toad Leopard frog Spring peeper Shannon biodiversity index LN Proportion * Proportion (proportion) LN(proportion 0.575 -0.5534 -0.3182 0.4 -0.9163 -0.3665 0.025 -3.6889 -0.0922 0.7769 Finally, add these three products and negate the answer. ELSI Box 5.1: Do we have an obligation to preserve biodiversity? Each species is unique The rate of species loss today Prevention of extinction is subject of debate ELSI Integrating Questions Summarize arguments for and against preservation of biodiversity. Which argument is most compelling to you, and why? Fall 2010 Assessment of ICB and ID Approach to Introductory Biology Students enrolled in three sections of BIO 111. One section (n = 32) used ICB, while two additional sections (n = 64) used a traditional textbook. Content: 4 questions each in 4 tests April 2011, students asked 4 questions again Data analysis skills: 4 skills surveys Perceptions: students’ perceptions of their own skills and the field of biology Did students learn less content? 80 Percentt Correct (+/- SEM) 70 Tradit… ICB 60 50 40 p = 0.74 p = 0.06 30 20 63% response rate (Tradit.) 83% response rate (ICB) 10 0 Fall (16 questions) Spring (4 questions) Can students analyze data better? Did students realize their gains? Did students realize their gains? Student Opinions “The data-driven approach is brilliant. It alleviates the issues that I’ve always had of asking, ‘How do we know that? What’s the supporting data?’ ” anonymous student course evaluation, Dec. 2010 “… my class pushed me to understand biological concepts and processes rather than memorizing lists which led to a more enriching learning experience.” anonymous student course evaluation, Dec. 2010 “The method of learning, placing emphasis on the interpretation of data, has helped me not only in this class, but also in others.” anonymous student course evaluation, Dec. 2010 National recognition of need to change AP Biology is changing to match our design To summarize We have designed a new ID text for intro bio (Integrating Concepts in Biology) We use a 5 x 5 matrix, question-driven content, published data, mathematical applications, and ELSIs Volume of facts for memorization is reduced The divide between “small” vs. “big” bio is eliminated Students actively construct their own knowledge & build on what they’ve already learned Not overwhelmed with huge numbers of facts New information presented in context of interesting question Acknowledgements Faculty: Pat Sellers, Mark Barsoum, Dave Wessner, and Jennifer Round Students of AMC’s, DW’s, and JR’s Fall 2010 BIO 111 classes