June 28, 2011
1
Assumptions:
Statewide issues & solutions (no pilots)
Administrative Collaboration (Courts/Agency)
Voluntary process (no Supreme Court “directives” – just “gentle pressure applied relentlessly”)
Focus on strengths & solutions
Relationships, relationships, relationships
2
Pennsylvania’s CIP structure:
Local Children’s Roundtables
Leadership Roundtables
State Roundtable: Workgroup Structure
3
Pennsylvania Children’s Roundtable Structure
•
State Supreme Court Justice
•Secretary of Public Welfare
•Deputy Secretary of OCYF
•Pennsylvania Legislators
•American Bar Association
•American Humane Association
•Pennsylvania Bar Association
•Pennsylvania County Commissioners
Meets Annualy
•Office of Children and Families in the Court
•Leadership Roundtable Co-Chairs
•Directors of Human Services
•Guardians ad Litem
• Solicitors
•Child Advocates
•Special Invited Guests
LR 1
Meets Semi-annually
Lead Dependency Judge and Children &Youth Administrator (co-chairs) advance to the State
Roundtable and act as representatives for each LR (additional representation for some LRs).
8 Leadership Roundtables (LR) comprised of like size counties grouped together
LR 2 LR 3 LR 4
LR 5 LR 6
LR 7
Lead Dependency Judge & Children &Youth Administrator plus one additional designated stakeholder from the Local Children’s
Roundtable advance to a Leadership Roundtable
• County Commissioners
• Hearing Masters
• Solicitors
• Guardians ad Litem
• Parent Attorneys
• Youth & Families
• County Child Welfare Staff
• Juvenile Probation Staff
Local Children’s Roundtable
Meets regularly as determined by lead dependency judge and child welfare administrator
LR 8
• Law Enforcement
• Medical Professionals
• County Agencies
• School Districts
• Other Community Stakeholders
• Other Service Providers
• Office of Children & Families in the Courts Program Analyst
Honorable Max Baer, Supreme Court Justice 2004
Supreme Court assumes oversight of CIP 2006
OCFC created July 2006
Inaugural meeting of State Roundtable June 2007
CPCMS Outcome tracking data system roll-out 2008
Permanency Practice Initiative (Phase One) begins March 2009
Family Group Decision Making
Family Finding
Family Development Credentialing
Mission & Guiding Principles for Pennsylvania’s Dependency System created
May 2009
Father Engagement selected as State Roundtable Priority May 2009
Dependency Bench Book created 2010
PPI Phase Two begins August 2010
PPI Phase Three begins February 2011
6
http://www.ocfcpacourts.us/about-ocfc/guiding-principles
http://www.ocfcpacourts.us/judges-and-legal-professionals/benchbook
Building the Foundation for Father Engagement
• State Roundtable presentation May 2009
– Karen Jenkins, AHA & Mimi Laver, ABA
• Father Engagement Workgroup established 2009
• “Bringing Back the Dads” – distributed at 1 st Children’s
• First Report to State Roundtable & York County Panel
• Father Engagement Keynote at 2 nd Children’s
Distributed Green Book
- Father Engagement Plenary Session:
Ron Clark, NFI & Jessica Kendall, ABA
- County Planning document
• Second Report to State Roundtable May 2011
10
http://www.ocfcp
acourts.us/assets/ files/page-
329/file-547.jpg
Bringing Back the Dads: Engaging Non-Resident Fathers in the
Child Welfare System
Advocating for Nonresident Fathers in
Child Welfare Court Cases (Green Book)
National Expert Presenters
ABA Center on Children and the Law
National Quality Improvement Center
Policy Roundtable – Washington DC
Best Practice Conference – Washington DC
12
QIC Policy
Roundtable
February 8, 2011
Washington DC
Honorable Kim Berkely Clark, Committee Co-chair
Honorable Maria Musti Cook, Committee Co-chair
Ann Marie Cucinotta, Berks Hearing Master
Barbara Ash, Philadelphia HS Legal Dept.
Bill Phifer, Allegheny CYS
CarrieAnn Frolio, York CYS
Honorable George Hartwick, III, Dauphin Commissioner
Dan Worley, York Parent Advocate
Gene Detter, CWTP
Karen Jenkins, American Humane Association
Lisa Chambers, Allegheny CYS
Tonya Burgess, CWTP Parent Ambassador
Tina Zanis, Provider
Steve Suknaic, Dauphin JPO
Honorable Flora Barth Wolf, Philadelphia
• Researched state and national best practices (2008-2010 QIC)
• Conducted Pennsylvania survey of courts and child welfare professionals (2009)
• Conducted focus group of non-resident fathers (2009)
• Created Key Areas for Fathers in Child Welfare (2009)
• Created protocols for agency, attorneys, & court (2010)
• Created Father Brochure (2011)
• Creating regional training (2011)
15
http://www.ocfcpacourts.us/about-ocfc/father-involvement
To What End: Change Perceptions,
Change Behavior, Change Outcomes
Develop Protocol for:
Establishing Paternity
Locating Fathers
Engaging Fathers:
Case planning
Services
Court
Supporting Culture Change
Agency (Father-friendly checklist)
Court
Community/Services
Developing Education – judges, attorneys, child welfare, cross-system
17
To What End: Change
Perceptions, Change Behavior,
Change Outcomes
Incorporated as overarching theme in
Judicial Bench Book
Incorporating Father Engagement in all Workgroup discussions & planning: Legal Representation, Visitation, Bench Book
Collecting data to conduct evaluation of efforts & impact (CPCMS
Module & focus groups)
Included in Pennsylvania’s Performance Improvement Plan (PIP)
18
19
We must recognize and acknowledge the value of fathers in the lives of their children
Leadership from the top is needed to accomplish this but change at all levels needs to occur
20
21
Developing a plan for the dissemination of the father’s brochure
Developing Fatherhood component for all judicial, legal and child welfare education sessions
Developing father support groups in counties
22
• Send request to Juvenile Court Procedural
Rules Committee – revised CPCMS order forms to:
– include a checkbox that would require the court to find that paternity has been established and how paternity was established
– collect data to measure outcomes with respect to father engagement
23
Child Welfare Agency
Parent Attorney
Court http://www.ocfcpacourts.us/aboutocfc/father-involvement
24
Pennsylvania’s Father Engagement Work
25