Data Overview
ITEC 7305
Fickett ES
2012-2014 CRCT
3rd Grade Mathematics
Submitted by Ruben Barkley
Purpose of Presentation
The purpose of this data overview is to provide a
concise summary of the student achievement
results for 3rd grade students, over a 3 year period,
in the content area of mathematics at Fickett
Elementary School (FES). As part of this data
overview, I will closely examine the 2012-2013
CRCT mathematics scores of the 3rd grade students
and I will highlight strengths, as well as
weaknesses, and emphasize one or two key areas
in which academic improvement is needed most.
In addition, I will use pie charts, bar charts and
line graphs to visually display the data trends.
rd
3
District
Grade
Proficiency Over Time
90%
84%
80%
70%
71%
68%
65%
85%
85%
79%
75%
78%
74%
66%
69%
63%
60%
Reading
50%
ELA
40%
Math
30%
20%
10%
0%
2012
2013
2014
District 3rd Grade Proficiency
Over Time (Details)
District Percent Proficient Over 3 Years
2012
2013
Reading
84%
85%
85%
ELA
84%
79%
78%
Math
68%
66%
69%
Science
65%
66%
63%
Social Studies
71%
75%
74%
Percentages reflect those students
performing at or above proficiency
(2014 reflects preliminary data)
2014
2011-2012
rd
3
Number Tested
Grade
School Year
Subject
Does Not Meet
Meets
Exceeds
2011-12
English Language Arts
98
17%
53%
30%
Mathematics
97
36%
38%
26%
Reading
98
12%
57%
31%
Science
100
35%
38%
27%
Social Studies
100
21%
45%
34%
2012-2013
rd
3
Number Tested
Grade
School Year
Subject
Does Not Meet
Meets
Exceeds
2012-13
English Language Arts
87
33%
47%
20%
Mathematics
86
42%
37%
21%
Reading
87
17%
54%
29%
Science
89
38%
44%
18%
Social Studies
89
28%
49%
22%
rd
3
2013-2014
Grade
3RD GRADE - CRCT 2014
Level 1
Level 2 & 3
39%
46%
64%
67%
81%
61%
54%
36%
33%
19%
READING
ELA
MATH
SCIENCE
S.STUDIES
3rd Grade
Reading
Preiminary Data
ELA
Math
Science
S.Studies
Level 1
19
33
61
54
36
Level 2 & 3
81
67
39
46
64
2011-12 ( 3rd Grade Gender Comparison)
Males
Females
2011-2012 Gender Comparison
(Details)
School Year
Gender
Subject
2011-12
Female
English Language Arts
49
20%
53%
27%
Mathematics
48
42%
35%
23%
Reading
49
12%
59%
29%
Science
51
43%
37%
20%
Social Studies
51
27%
47%
25%
English Language Arts
49
14%
53%
33%
Mathematics
49
31%
41%
29%
Reading
49
12%
55%
33%
Science
49
27%
39%
35%
Social Studies
49
14%
43%
43%
English Language Arts
46
17%
61%
22%
Mathematics
45
33%
42%
24%
Reading
46
9%
54%
37%
Science
46
24%
57%
20%
Social Studies
46
22%
50%
28%
English Language Arts
41
51%
32%
17%
Mathematics
41
51%
32%
17%
Reading
41
27%
54%
20%
Science
43
53%
30%
16%
Social Studies
43
35%
49%
16%
Male
2012-13
Female
Male
Number Tested
Does Not Meet
Meets
Exceeds
2012-2013 (Gender
Comparison)
Male
Female
2012-2013 Gender
Comparison (Details)
School Year
Gender
Subject
2011-12
Female
English Language Arts
49
20%
53%
27%
Mathematics
48
42%
35%
23%
Reading
49
12%
59%
29%
Science
51
43%
37%
20%
Social Studies
51
27%
47%
25%
English Language Arts
49
14%
53%
33%
Mathematics
49
31%
41%
29%
Reading
49
12%
55%
33%
Science
49
27%
39%
35%
Social Studies
49
14%
43%
43%
English Language Arts
46
17%
61%
22%
Mathematics
45
33%
42%
24%
Reading
46
9%
54%
37%
Science
46
24%
57%
20%
Social Studies
46
22%
50%
28%
English Language Arts
41
51%
32%
17%
Mathematics
41
51%
32%
17%
Reading
41
27%
54%
20%
Science
43
53%
30%
16%
Social Studies
43
35%
49%
16%
Male
2012-13
Female
Male
Number Tested
Does Not Meet
Meets
Exceeds
2011-2012 (3rd Grade Economic Status Comparison)
Economically
Disadvantaged
Non-Economically
Disadvantaged
2012-2013 (3rd Grade Economic Status Comparison)
Economically
Disadvantaged
Non-Economically
Disadvantaged
2011-2012 (Economic Status Comparison)
Details
School Year
Economic Status
Subject
2011-12
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Arts
78
17%
56%
27%
Mathematics
78
37%
40%
23%
Reading
78
13%
55%
32%
Science
80
36%
40%
24%
Social Studies
80
23%
44%
34%
English Language Arts
20
20%
40%
40%
Mathematics
19
32%
32%
37%
Reading
20
10%
65%
25%
Science
20
30%
30%
40%
Social Studies
20
15%
50%
35%
English Language Arts
76
36%
49%
16%
Mathematics
75
45%
36%
19%
Reading
76
20%
57%
24%
Science
78
40%
42%
18%
Social Studies
78
29%
51%
19%
English Language Arts
11
18%
36%
45%
Mathematics
11
18%
45%
36%
Reading
11
36%
64%
Science
11
27%
55%
18%
Social Studies
11
18%
36%
45%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2012-13
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Number Tested
Does Not Meet
Meets
Exceeds
2012-2013 Fickett 3rd Grade Domain Data (Teacher
Comparison)
51%
63%
51%
Algebra
69%
84%
64%
58%
66%
64%
63%
Geometry
Teacher 6
79%
Teacher 5
72%
Teacher 4
43%
Teacher 3
64%
Teacher 2
49%
Measurement and Data Analysis
68%
Teacher 1
73%
61%
41%
63%
37%
Numbers and Operation
61%
73%
70%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
2012-2013 Percentage of 3rd Grade Students At/Above
Proficiency in Mathematics
65%
59%
Numbers & Operations
Measurement and Data Anaylsis
Geometry
Algebra
60%
67%
Total Number of students
tested: 86 (45 Females, 41
Males)
Summary
• On the 2012-2013 CRCT, the 3rd Grade students at Fickett ES
performed the weakest in the Numbers & Operations domain on the
mathematics portion of the assessment.
• The inconsistency of the percentage of students at or above
proficiency on the 2012-2013 CRCT, as displayed in the Domain Data
comparison of teachers, suggests that there is a lack of shared and
collaborative planning among the 3rd Grade teachers.
• In comparing the 3rd Grade students at or above proficiency in
mathematics based on gender, the females out-performed the males
by 17% (Females = 66% at/above proficiency, Males = 49% at/above
proficiency) on the 2012-2013 CRCT.