SURF Cloudstrategy TF-MSP MALTA - 27 NOVEMBER 2014 Walter van Dijk Version: 0.1 27 November 2014 This tale started in 2011 Lots of momentum after study trip Group of university board members visited: • University of California, Berkeley • University of Washington • Google • IBM • Microsoft Position Paper Cloud: Cloud First strategy: “Cloud not question if, but how and when” “Let’s act together” “SURF, please take the lead” “Sense of urgency, act now!” http://www.surf.nl/cloud/ A lot has happened since… Vendor management team cloud services 250+ service providers connected to SURFconext Network opened up for cloud service providers: NetherLight Template Sourcing Strategy Project ‘Orchestrating the Cloud: i-Strategy’ Set of legal terms, drafted in close collaboration with experts from the sector Joint architecture guidelines: HORA Special Interest Group Cloud Adoption One-stop shop for cloud services: cloud.surfspot.nl The Gartner hypecycle: position of cloud? Plateau of productivity on the horizon However… The uptake of public cloud services by IT-management lags behind expectations Privacy and information security are serious concerns in our constituency Various customer segments have recently indicated that they want SURF to develop community cloud services in order to have a real choice Cloud ambition SURF In 2018 the SURF-constituency contracts a substantial part of its required cloudservices from SURF Underlying principles Cloudstrategy SURF We make a difference by putting the needs of higher education first SURF offers the full cloud spectrum: “users are choosers” SURF is a trusted partner Development of services jointly with early adopters: co-creation Available services offered to all SURF institutions via ‘one stop shop’ SURF takes care: contractterms, vendormanagement, support etc The SURF Cloud Approach Phase-1: 1. Institutions initiate an “Early Adopters Group” for a new cloudservice 1. Requirements are defined jointly by EAG & SURF 2. Delivery models are explored 3. Choice of deliverymodel is made Phase-2: 5. Depending on the type of deliverymodel commitment will be confirmed 6. Start acquisition (‘buy’) or joint service development (‘make’) Phase-3: 7. Service available for all connected institutions SURF Cloud Continuum: freedom to choose Guidance required on functionality Alignment with SURF core competencies “make” Impact on primary processes HighEd Alignment with SURF core competencies “buy” Keep financial benefits within the sector No guidance possible on functionality Distance to primary processes HighEd Economies of scale translate into better terms & conditions Community Cloud (‘make’) Connect Public Cloud (‘buy’) Examples SURF cloud delivery models Public Cloud Community Cloud Mix & Match SaaS MS Exchange SURFdrive/ownCloud PaaS MS Azure SURF PaaS IaaS HigherEd IaaS SURF IaaS Datacenters HigherEd datacenters SURF datacenters Peerings/NetherLight SURF-netwerk SURF-netwerk Underlying principles in every delivery model: Contract based on “insourcing to” SURF Compliant with legal framework HigherEd ’ Offered to all member institutions Authentication via SURFconext Criteria delivery models: institution influence on functionality cooperation/sharing confidentiality Public cloud Mix & match Data classification lower Community Cloud HORA Data classification higher Legal terms cloudservices HigherEd B2C B2B2C B2B cost / value Lower Higher Criteria delivery models Alignment with core competencies SURF Potential to scale up towards other higher education and research institutes Differentiating factors in comparison with public cloud functionality Potential for innovation: integration with other SURF services Legitimacy: no market disruptions Financial investments versus customer commitment Availability of essential personnel resources Ambitions SURF subsidiaries SURFsara: develops community cloud services based on in-depth knowledge of high performance cloud computing and data management. SURFnet: connects all cloud services to the SURF infrastructures and safeguards that all services comply fully with requirements in the areas of security and privacy. SURFmarket: takes care of efficient and legitimate acquisition of public cloud services as well as of community cloud components. The complete portfolio is available via a one-stop-shop. MAKE CONNECT BUY SURF Cloud Governance Decision making in three phases: Phase-1: collecting requirements and assessment service models Phase-2: joint procurement or service development Phase-3: service provisioning Cooperation with “Early Adaptors Groups” is project based: joint steering group Decision making on SURF portfolio by SURF management team Decision making based on business models, including: Weighting of relevant criteria Business-case Risk analysis Tariff proposal After ultimately 4 years a decision is made about continuation of the service under the same or under another service model Current status (november 2014) Universities: Joint development of personal storage service: SURFdrive New initiative on cooperation on webservices/webhosting Other sectors: Six universities of applied science have requested to start a project on IaaS services Four academic medical centers have requested to start a project on MS Exchange services Eight academic medical centers have indicated that they want to explore cooperation with SURF on a joint community cloud (IaaS, Sharepoint, IdM, Exchange etc) And finally SURFnet… remains committed to European cloud collaboration within GN3+ and GN4 actively shares experience with ownCloud / SURFdrive with other NREN’s is involved in NREN initiated arrangements with (cloud) vendors in the area of joint procurement is very keen on collaboration with NREN’s ! THANK YOU