Right to Public Services -PPT

advertisement
Transparency, Accountability &
Timeliness in Right to Public
Services
An Overview of 5
States
-Tina Mathur
February 2012
Why Service Guarantees - Broad
• Changes in Political Thought & Agenda –
What [also] gets Votes
▫ Good Governance
▫ Development – Provision of Basic Essential
Services
▫ Open, Transparent Government
▫ Anti-corruption Measures
▫ Acceptance by State of Civil Society
movements for rights
Why Service Guarantees- Specific
• Failure of Citizen Charters
• Precedence of Rights-based Laws : RTI,
MNREGS, RTE
• Increasing Bad Publicity on Grievances
related to poor Public Service Delivery
• Top-down Push for systems that holds frontline service providers accountable
• Simultaneously empowering citizens
RTPS Acts: Highlights
• Transparency
• Accountability
• Timeliness
RTPS Acts: Highlights
• Transparency- making public service
delivery processes & procedures open
and visible
• Transparency – Information to citizens
on:
▫ Reasons [in writing] why an application
is rejected or a service delayed or
denied
▫ Status of Applications
RTPS Acts: Highlights
• Accountability - by identifying the
responsible authorities within the system
• Accountability - Penalizing wilful nonperformance
• Accountability - Put Citizen First:
mechanism for redress of grievance;
compensation
RTPS Acts: Highlights
• Timeliness - Imposes a legally
enforceable timeframe for service
delivery
• Timeliness: Imposes legally enforceable
timeframe for addressing grievances
through the mechanisms of Appeals and
Reviews
Comparative Overview
• Sample: 5 States
• Methodology
▫ Review of Documents
▫ Limited field visits
▫ A Quick Review of Major
Elements
Comparative Overview
• Madhya Pradesh- PIONEER- first to pass and
implement Act
• Bihar- RTPS NO. 1 on its ‘SUSHASAN’ Good
Governance Agenda
• Rajasthan- maximum number of services
guaranteed
• Delhi- An entirely different approach – e-SLA
• Uttar Pradesh- quick to follow MP, but least
number of services under Act
Key Highlights
TRANSPARENCY -Public Awareness
• Awareness drives through
▫ Special Gram Sabhas in MP;
▫ TV, Radio, Print media in Bihar,
▫ Nukkad Nataks, Village Pracharaks, Schools in
Rajasthan
• Notice Boards in all States
• Clear instructions for citizens on application
process and services coming under RTPS
• Bihar BRTPS Rules (sec.18) and Rajasthan
Rules (20) specifically mention
Dissemination and Training
Transparency
• Online application tracking and monitoring systems
in MP, Bihar, Delhi, UP; final stages of software
readiness in Rajasthan
• Jigyasa and Samadhan helpline in Bihar for queries
related to RTPS
• e-SLA monitoring and tracking system in Delhi
[compensatory cost for delay is calculated through eSLA software]
• SMS based reminder system in MP for officials
regarding pending services; application status
through SMS in Bihar
Accountability – Fixing Responsibility
• Designated Authorities/Competent Officer,
Appellate Authorities, Reviewing Authority
identified in all 5 States
• Penalties have been notified in case of failure to
comply by time stipulations; compensation fixed
in MP, UP, Rajasthan and Delhi
• Delhi - Incentives for Good Performance- upto
5000 rupees for no default in 1 year; disciplinary
action for 25 defaults in a year
Accountability – Monitoring
Performance
• Monitoring and tracking at the level of applications –
▫ Offices to maintain Register of applications accepted or
rejected AND services delivered, delayed or denied
▫ Software-driven such as Adhikar, e-District and e-SLA
• Monitoring also done through
▫ nodal officials,
▫ inspections,
▫ monthly meetings at which disposal, pendency of
applications & appeals is done
▫ Video conferences
Timeliness – Regular Systems
• In all five states, Notified Services have to unambiguously
state the TIME LIMIT within which services will be
delivered
• In all states [except Uttar Pradesh] acknowledgement slips
show the Date on or before which the service would be
delivered
• Delhi : an automatically generated Time Limit through the
e-SLA system; Bihar: through Adhikar
• Single window systems in Revenue Department – all 5
States
• MP and Rajasthan - in addition - 1-day Governance
Timeliness – Some Field Observations
• Most services – reported to have been delivered before
time: especially, mutation, caste/income/residence
certificates
• MP, Bihar, UP, Rajasthan and Delhi have used IT for
process efficiency.
▫ Online application system introduced in MP, Bihar, Delhi &
Rajasthan
▫ In Rajasthan for certain services (caste, domicile and birth)
certificates issued online with digital signature
• In MP and UP: where connectivity or capacity a problem,
applications accepted, verified on paper and entries made
into computer later to save time
Timeliness- Issues
• Too much time has been stipulated for
services in the RTPS Acts
▫ Citizens: Earlier the process was faster.
▫ Governments: A safety mechanism since
penalties are involved; does provide
flexibility to set better standards locally
• Delays: Very few appeals so far- MP,
Bihar and Rajasthan have reported a few
Overarching Challenges
• Overall implementation mechanisms robust
▫
▫
▫
▫
rules framed
process simplification on-going
citizen awareness campaigns on-going
capacity building on-going
• Shortages of Staff in Front-line Institutions: seems to be
nearly universal
▫ In urban: due to high demand for services
▫ In rural – vacancies not filled for years
▫ Staffing situation needs re-assessment
• Shortage of funds has been reported: extra costs
incurred for computer stationery; electricity supply, etc.
Overarching Challenges
• Service Delivery staff need further capacity building
▫ Mindset change
• Infrastructure: Frontline institutions require more
space and better working conditions
• Service guarantee to reach the illiterate, people
living in remote areas: How to enable?
• Important that citizens understand what is
guaranteed: NOT acceptance of Application alone!
▫ in some cases even where citizens were not eligible,
perception was that the service was still guaranteed
Overarching Challenges
• A competitive spirit amongst states for
increasing number of services under RTPS Acts
▫ Good when notification of more services is wellthought out
▫ Danger in playing number games
Overall Picture So Far
• States-led: Ownership Very High
• State Specific Strategies the Norm
▫ Notified Services – local demand-pull; supply-push
▫ Multi-modal Delivery: Paper and Electronic
▫ Choice: Punishment or Mutual Understanding
[Delhi-developing culture for timely service
delivery; encouraging departments to join E-SLA]
▫ Modes of Monitoring
▫ Procedures for Appeals/Complaints
• Self-generated Competitive Spirit amongst states
Overall Picture So Far
• An enabling law for citizens rights that has
received largely positive feedback from all,
including government staff
• Pressure of service delivery on the
designated officials as more people applying
for services after learning about the
guarantee
• Change in citizen perceptions: no longer
need the services of middlemen or bribe to
get services
Thank You
Download
Related flashcards

Political science

34 cards

Liberalism

24 cards

Democratic socialism

40 cards

Liberal parties

74 cards

Create Flashcards