Server Side Caching vs Other Alternatives

advertisement
Virtunet Systems Elevator Pitch
What We Do
– Server Side Performance Tier for Existing SAN
– Software Only
How Our Customers Benefit
– Increases Application Performance
– Increases number of VMs per Host
– Pushes out SAN upgrades
Status of Company
– 3 year old
VirtuCache
• Accelerate Storage Performance from ANY SAN based
Storage Appliance by Caching frequently used data to inhost SSD.
• 10 Minute Install
• Kernel Only Software
–No Dependency on Guest VMs
–Low latency
–Easy to Manage
• No Downtime
VirtuCache - Features
● Accelerates Reads + Writes
● Clusters SSDs across Hosts
● Mirrors Writes across Hosts
● Supports VMware Advanced Features –
DRS, Linked Clones, Snapshots, HA
3
Us vs. SAN and Appliance Upgrade
SAN and Storage Appliance Upgrade
Virtunet
Higher Latency
Lower Latency
• SSDs behind Controller and Network
• SSD closer to CPU
• Only 2 Controllers (CPUs) involved in
Caching
• Each VMware Host CPU involved in Caching
Throw Away Older SAN and Storage
Appliance
Keep Existing SAN and Storage Appliance
H/W Vendor Lock-In – SSDs bought from
Storage Vendor
No Vendor Lock-In – SSDs bought Retail
Needs Downtime
No Reboot Even.
Expensive
Affordable
• Storage Vendor SSDs cost $20-40/GB
• Same SSD costs $1-3/GB retail.
• HBA and SAN Switch Upgrade Reqd
• Reduce Network Burden. No SAN Upgrade
• Storage Appliance Needs Replacing
• Cost of Entry = Lic Fees + SSD for One Host
Comparison Versus Nimble and Pure Storage
(Assuming 5 Hosts Sharing One Storage Appliance)
Parameter
Hybrid Arrays
(Nimble)
All Flash Array
(Pure)
Virtunet
Nimble Cx4,
36TB Raw, 1.6
TB SSD
FA-405, 4 TB Raw
SSD
5 Hosts, 1 TB Enterprise
SATA SSD in each Host
Cost
$ 75K
125K
$ 25 K for License for 5 hosts
+ $ 5 K for 5 x 1 TB SSD
Total IOPS
50K
100K
250 K
$/IOPS
$ 1.5/IOPS
$ 1.25/IOPS
12 cents /IOPS
Cost of Entry
$ 75K
$ 125K
$ 6 K for One Host (inc.SSD)
TB of SSD
Provided
1.6 TB
4 TB
5 TB
Cost of Additional
SSD
$15-30/GB
$ 30/GB
$ 1 /GB (retail price on
amazon)
Summary 1 : Separation of Capacity
and Performance
● Capacity
●Best Done with Centralized Storage
● Performance
●Best Done Closest to the CPU
6
Summary 2 : Cheap and Lower
Latency than Alternative
● In-server SSD is cheaper than Storage
Appliance side SSD.
●Deployment of SSD inside the Server is
architecturally superior than in the Storage
Appliance since its closer to the CPU.
Download