Glides (/w/, /j/) & Liquids (/l/, /r/) Associated with 1. high degree of vocal tract constriction 2. articulatory transition Degree of Constriction • Greater than vowels – Poral slightly greater than Patmos • Less than fricatives Transition rate • faster than the diphthongs • slower than the stops • lasts ~ 75-250 msec – Poral for glides/liquids < Poral for fricatives • Constriction lasts ~ 100 msec • Constriction results in a loss in energy – weaker formants Stephen M. Tasko /w/ 3000 Freq (Hz) • Place: labial • Acoustics – /u/-like formant frequencies – Constriction formant values – F1 ~ 330 Hz – F2 ~ 730 Hz – weak F3 (~ 2300 Hz) F3 2000 F2 1000 F1 V Stephen M. Tasko w V • Place: palatal • Acoustics – /i/-like formant frequencies – F1 ~ 300 Hz – F2 ~ 2200 Hz – F3 ~ 3000 Hz Freq (Hz) /j/ 3000 F3 2000 F2 F1 1000 V j Stephen M. Tasko V /j/ V j Stephen M. Tasko V Liquids (/l/, /r/) • lateral /l/ • Rhotic /r/ • Pickett (1999) considers these consonants glides as well Stephen M. Tasko /r/ • Place: palatal • Articulatory phonetics – Variable tongue positions – “bunched” – “retroflexed” Allophonic Variations Some suggest – “dark” (CV) –very low F3 – “light” (VC) –F3 not as low • Acoustics – Hallmark of /r/ is a low F3 – F1 ~ 350 Hz – F2 ~ 1050 Hz – F3 ~ 1550 Hz – Vowels have F3 above 2200 Hz – Vowels around /r/ are colored or • F3 values lower than usual Stephen M. Tasko /r/ Freq (Hz) 3000 F3 2000 F2 1000 F1 V r V Stephen M. Tasko Role of F3 transition in /w/ vs. /r/ perception Stephen M. Tasko /r/ “coloring” of vowels // // Stephen M. Tasko Articulatory Variability and /r/ Stephen M. Tasko Point parameterized representation Bunched Stephen M. Tasko Point parameterized representation Retroflexed Stephen M. Tasko Between-speaker variation “row” “row” JW39 tp004 Very common Stephen M. Tasko JW45 tp004 Within-speaker variation: different context “row” “dorm” JW37 tp009 Common Stephen M. Tasko JW37 tp099 Within-speaker variation: same context “right” “right” JW37 tp009 Not common, but possible! Stephen M. Tasko JW37 tp099 • N=53 normal speakers • Not just two different configurations, but a whole family of possible configuration From Westbury et al. (1998) Stephen M. Tasko How can these vastly different tongue configurations lead to similar acoustic/perceptual consequences? Stephen M. Tasko Stephen M. Tasko Summary • There is a wide distribution of articulatory configurations for /r/ • Different articulatory configurations of /r/ are indistinguishable acoustically and perceptually – Different tongue configurations can produce equivalent area functions – Some parts of the area function are more critical than others for determining key acoustic/perceptual effects Stephen M. Tasko Clinical Digression • Clinically, /r/ is a difficult sound for children to learn. • Is there anything from our discussion that might suggest why this might be the case? Stephen M. Tasko /l/ • Place: alveolar • Articulatory phonetics: • Acoustics – tongue tip contacts alveolar ridge, splitting the vocal tract – Introduces antiformants – – – – F1 ~ 360 Hz F2 ~ 1300 Hz F3 ~ 2700 Hz F2 is variable and affected by vowel environment – Transition often looks more abrupt than other sounds discussed – Allophonic variations • Light /l/: – CV environment • Dark /l/: – VC environment Stephen M. Tasko /l/ Freq (Hz) 3000 F3 2000 F2 1000 F1 V l Stephen M. Tasko V /l/ V l V Stephen M. Tasko