The Sudden Evolution of Language? -- Pillar #6 Brian MacWhinney Psychology Carnegie Mellon 1 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney The Seven Pillars of UG 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Grammar Gene Speech is Special Language Organ and Modularity Critical Periods Poverty of the Stimulus Sudden Evolution of Language Recursion - LND 2 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Data Sources 1. Direct Evidence • • • • • Genetics Fossils, reconstructions, comparative physiology Settlement patterns, habitat range Tools, artifacts, art Climactic changes - glaciation, eruptions 2. Indirect Evidence Human ontogeny, language acquisition Neurology Linguistics -- function, gesture, phonology, recursion Evolutionary Psychology All of the above across other primates and other species 3 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Core Issues • Saltation vs. Coevolution • Developing an account that is consistent with the observed data • Recent focus by Hauser, Chomsky, Fitch on recursion as the core of language • Can we use this account to predict new findings and results in: Comparative behavior Comparative neurology Fossils, tools, settlement, genetics Evolutionary Neural Networks Evolutionary Psychology 4 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Lessons from Child Language Language learning involves linking a series of abilities Audition Segmentation Imitation Articulation, Timing Attention Lexicon Combination Recursion …. 5 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Lessons from Functional PsychoLinguistics • Language is grounded on cognition in Direct perception Space/Time/Aspect deixis Causal Roles Social Roles • Each level is organized by perspective • Incremental processing starts from embodied core -- McNeill • Compilation relies on item-based patterns and recursion 6 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Lessons from Evolutionary Theory • Adaptations must lead to individual reproductive advantage • Group advantages are secondary • Advantages can be linked to disadvantages (sickle cell, autism) • Populations are dynamic • Changes are gradual and emergent - but this is still debated 7 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Skill Network • Each attainment builds on previous ones. • Each relies on abilities that are found in a more limited form in our primate cousins. • Each ability can in turn be decomposed into subcomponents. • Given this, simple saltation is impossible. • However, some key changes could foster productive co-evolution of the network. • What forces could support continued progress? 8 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Continued Support • The shift to bipedalism continued across three million years. • The role of the freed hands changed over time, but was a continuing drive. • Social forces exerted continual pressure. • Social forces combined with the role of the hands. 9 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney A Grounded Social Climber • As a bipedal, man is like the kangaroo. • Unlike the kangaroo, hominids were climbers who used their hands. • The hands were then used to control tools, but … • Forced into face to face contact, the hands could also contribute to social interaction. 10 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Proto-Mimesis • Bipedalism opens up face-to-face contact • The hands operate in the contact area • This produces proto-mimesis (Zlatev) with pointing and teaching • Vocalization locks in attention 11 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Partial Differences • Some ape lexical learning, but incomplete • Some ape planning abilities (Goodall straws), but incomplete • Some ape intersubjectivity, but incomplete • Some ape pointing, but incomplete 12 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Sharper Changes • • • • Cortical control of vocalization Duality of patterning - Recursion? Brain expansion Physical changes Articulation - teeth, mouth Phonation - vocal cords, bent vocal tract Thumb Posture, parturition, neotony 13 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Problems with Saltationism • Only deals with the last 100,000 years, not the last 6 million years • Ignores 300% increase in brain size • Ignores many morphological changes • Ignores homo erectus expansion. • Fails to deal with gesture • Fails to deal with skill network • Etc… 14 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Five Periods • • • • • Bipedalism 7-4 MYA Social Cohesion 4-2 MYA Mimesis 2-.2 MYA Phonology 300,000 - 50,000 Creativity 50,000 - now 15 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Cognitive Attainments • Bipedalism Basic imagery, tool use, spatial recursion • Social Cohesion Cortical control of vocal-auditory channel • Mimesis Gestural item-based pattern, prosody • Phonology Phonemic system, phonological loop • Creativity Item-based, perspective 16 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney 1. Bipedalism • Coppens East Side Story 10-7 MYA • Jungle -> savannah (lakes?) Handedness and affordances for arboreal Deixis for terrestrial • Tool use and locomotion (primary) • Communication (secondary) • Groups needed for protection against predators 17 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Neuronal Support • Parietal reorganization at 4MYA- Holloway Body image projection Navigation and deixis Spatial images support recursion Facial recognition (supramarginal) • Tools, navigation, social cohesion 18 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney 2. Social Cohesion • Expansion at 4MYA, contraction at 3.5MYA • Habilis/ergaster vs. australopithecus • Competition was won by the most cohesive and planful groups Good social partners Sexual arms race Dominance vs. external aggression Role of dialect marking Dunbar, Power, Worden social accounts 19 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Cortical Control of Vocalization • Primate system links Arousal (amygdala, brainstem) Motivation (basal ganglion) Memory (limbic, hippocampus) • The primate external striatum was absorbed by the neocortex, giving cortical control • Control is now from the supplementary motor and anterior cingulate 20 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney 3. Mimesis • Parallel evolution The gestural channel contained the content The vocal channel contained the social glue • Disorganized nature of mimetic processes • Inefficient gestalt encoding • Mechanisms: Imitation Pointing Joint attention (Intersubjectivity) Perspective-taking 21 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Monkey See, Monkey Do • Whiten 2003 Patteson 1978 22 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Early Gestalts • Mimetic patterns do not separate verbs and nouns • Me-hand-grab-axe-up-swing-down-cutchips-sound • This can be imitated as a Gestalt, but Gestalt storage is expensive • I chop wood. 23 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Satisfied Preconditions • • • • Hands were free Hands were controlled by complex plans Spatial maps had evolved for self and group The visual system could generate and store images • Visual images encoded hierarchically and open to recursion • Vocalization and eye-gaze controlled attention in face-to-face interaction 24 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Neuronal Support • Tripling in brain size (some allometric) • Earlier growth was in specific areas Parietal Cortical control of vocal channel • New pressures Need for full simulation of the body for mimesis Storage of mimetic sequences Processing of mimetic operators Teaching of mimetic sequences by mothers Perspective-switching 25 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney How successful? • • • • • Expansion to all of Eurasia At the expense of other hominids Big, unorganized brain No vocal systematization Climate changes of the Pleistocene led to new pressures 26 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney 4. Phonology • Phonological patterning MacNeilage and vocal gesture Gupta and MacWhinney and the phonological loop • Making efficient use of lexical storage • Capitalizes on evolution in TOM and perspective 27 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Vocal Adaptations • • • • Lower larynx and hence larger (and distinct) pharynx Longer local cords (at least in adult males) Aerodynamical streamlined conus elasticus (underside of vocal cords Expanded neuronal control of intercostals at 300,000 These adaptations produce loud, efficient, and low-pitched vocalizations (but not necessarily speech itself). 28 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Facial Musculature 29 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Ears, Teeth 30 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Vocal Cords 31 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Source-Filter Theory 32 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Bent Vocal Tract 33 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Possible Vowels 34 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon 35 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Neuronal Support • Broca’s for lip-smacking becomes Broca’s for CV syllabic framework • Phonological loop involving superior temporal stores lexical items • Lexical items have access to all of the brain, but not dynamically 36 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Reuse of earlier mechanisms • Phonological store allows vocal rehearsal • Hippocampus stores the episodic basis of lexical meanings • DLPFC stores plans for tools use and mimesis • Integrated frontal function constructs group relations: kinship, reciprocals, hierarchy 37 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney 5. Phoenix • Narrowing of evolutionary window at 70,000 • Computed through females, but males must be similar • Perhaps due to Toba Batak, perhaps to a pandemic • Survivors were an interesting subset of the earlier population • Phoenix from the Ashes 38 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Creativity Explosion • • • • • Artifacts at 50,000 - carved bone, amulets Cave paintings at 30,000 Burial at 30,000 Opposition to Neanderthal Mithen theory of demodularization 39 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney 40 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Suspects • Perspective • Recursion • Priesthood 41 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Perspective Hypothesis unified embodied image language as a functional neural circuit perspective direct experience perspective space/time deixis perspective perspective plans social 42 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Evolution and Perspective • The five periods do not match the four cognitive levels • But each level was constructed as a part of this process • Each was progressively refined over time • The phonetic revolution underlies the grammar, but the grammar maps to cognition, not phonology 43 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney But… • • • • • TOM is developed in chimps Perspective was important during mimesis Imitation was present Imagery was present Mirror neurons are in monkeys 44 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Recursion • Next talk: What Chomsky means by recursion reduces to item-based patterns • Item-based patterns require Items Slots Features Clustering 45 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Patterns from Combinations • cookie = “would you please open the cupboard door and bring me down a cookie” • • • • want ##### cookie want # cookie want cookie Nim Chimpsky, Washoe, Sara, Lana 46 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Item-based Patterns • my + X Position Meaning relation Possible fillers My little dolly • Where + X Where the wheel goes? Where goes the wheel? 47 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Sockets are action-based --- breaks Throw__ __give__ __ __kick __ __ running 48 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Feature-based patterns • • • • big + X, nice + X …. Adj + X Adj + N But what about? Actor + Action Subject + Verb Topic + Comment 49 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Patterns to Creativity • Item-based patterns provided full recursion • Recursion linked dynamically to perspectival systems • Articulate language users became priests • Priests constructed the afterworld and myth 50 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Syntax and Perspective • • • • Tim saw the Grand Canyon flying to New York. Jessie stole a picture of *her/herself. Jessie stole me a picture of her/*herself. The adults in the picture are facing away from us, with the children hidden behind them. • Did the bicyclist appear to fall? • Tim couldn’t find Mary’s beloved cat. 51 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Social Perspectives I claim that reason is a self-developing capacity. Kant disagrees with me on this point. He says it’s innate, but I answer that that’s begging the question, to which he counters, in Critique of Pure Reason, that only innate ideas have power. But I say to that, what about neuronal group selection? And he gives no answer. 52 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney Conclusions • Language evolution was gradual, relying on coevolution of language, thought and gesture. • We can distinguish five major periods. • Recursion was important in recent changes, but relied on earlier spatial patterns • Most recent changes involves coordination of recursion and lexicon with perspective 53 Collaborative Commentary - MacWhinney