The Physics of Processing Time • The Science and the Art Introductions We will be discussing a model All models depend on other applicable base knowledge We will touch on other base skills in order to make sure we are all on the same page First, what is processing time The time your brain must devote to the “process of interpretation” Processing Time…NOT Lag Time I am VERY picky about this point! YES… I know Dennis Cokely says “Lag Time.” Why? Lag, as a Verb Fail to maintain a desired pace or to keep up; fall or stay behind: After five minutes of hard running, some of them began to lag. Move or develop slowly, as toward a goal or objective, or in relation to an associated factor (often fol. by behind): to lag behind in production. Delay or fail in reaching full development: The factory lags regularly in making its quota. Hang back; linger; delay: The old friends lagged because they wanted to talk some more. Decrease, wane, or flag gradually, as in intensity: Interest lagged as the meeting went on. Lag as a Noun Lagging or falling behind; retardation. A person who lags behind, is the last to arrive, etc. An interval or lapse of time: There was a developmental lag in the diffusion of ideas. Processing as a Verb To put through the steps of a prescribed procedure: processing newly arrived immigrants; process an order. To prepare, treat, or convert by subjecting to a special process: process ore to obtain minerals. Process as a Noun A series of actions, changes, or functions bringing about a result: the process of digestion; the process of obtaining a driver's license. A series of operations performed in the making or treatment of a product: a manufacturing process; leather dyed during the tanning process. Progress; passage: the process of time; events now in process. Which term more accurately describes the target action? • I don’t care if you don’t agree! It’s my presentation! Models What is a Model of Interpreting? Why is it important to study them? Looking What into the “Black Box” do they tell us? Gish Cokely Colonomos Cokely Colonamos What a model can and cannot do. Learning a new model will not instantly impact your skills Learning a new model will impact you training. Models give a visual representation of an abstract concept No Model for Processing time At least not that I know of… Have you ever seen one? What can a Processing Time Model show us? Physics We must pause and take a deep breath I am not a physicist I don’t even play one on t.v. All of the physics in this presentation is more “physish” than “physics” It is here to make a point. The Point We perceive time as an “enemy” We feel it crushing us We feel it controlling us We don’t know how to exert our will over time • We don’t know what to do with the time we have. • • • • Processing Time Vs. Actual Time In order to understand the model I propose for Processing Time, we must first look at how physicist describe actual time. SCIENCE Have you ever looked back in time? Have you ever looked in a mirror? Have you ever looked at the stars? Space is Relative to the Observer Space The tennis ball The tennis ball on the train Time is Relative to the Observer • Einstein’s Theory of Relativity Future Light Cone Present Past Light Cone Based on a model from the book “A Brief History of Time: Big Bang to Black Holes” Future Light Cone Event enters the future Light Cone… The Sun Goes Out! Present Past Light Cone • The question now is… HOW DO WE ENVISION THE TIME BETWEEN THE EVENTS? Light Waves “Time” can be thought of as the interval from crest to crest Time and Speed are not the same thing A Change in Frequency Does Not Change the Speed… Only the Look! An observer from another position would see it as a unified event happening in a set order … a shifting “present” Future Light Cone Present Event enters the future Light Cone… The Sun Goes Out! The observer on earth sees the event as the present only when the light arrives . Past Light Cone Time is Relative To the position of the observer To the distance from the target event If you could travel away from the event at the speed of light you could, in theory stop time because the light would never reach you. In theory you can control “time” by understanding the relative relationships So What! • What does any of this have to do with interpreting? See Time Differently • See time as a part of the process • Not a detriment to the process • See time The Change Over Time Formula C/T=Pt Change over time=processing time units Accept the position of the interpreter as the “Present” The Contextual Stream looks into the future, the contextual possibilities become broader the further you look into the future Future context stream Interpreter Past text/context stream A Word on the Concept of Contextual Cone This includes all observable information and background knowledge. It is the interpreters“known universe” Anything that happens outside the known universe should not impact the interpretation. But, it does… Textual Event Anything happening outside the contextual cone cannot directly impact the interpretation (Your shopping, laundry, schoolwork, etc…) When a Textual Event enters the contextual cone the interpreter must prepare to deal with it in “the present” Future context stream Textual event enters the future context stream Interpreter Past text/context stream The Change Over Time Formula The textual event enters the context cone at a point in the future relative to the position of the interpreter. The Interpreter must deal with such “future events” As the event nears the “present” the contextual possibilities narrow. For the observer the “present” occurs when the information is relayed by the interpreter When the interpreter actually relays the information…the information entered the cone in the past. Text Flow Discourse, Transition or Prosity Marker Change/Time Events Crest to Crest Carol Patrie’s books give a good theoretical basis for understanding the some of the “Changes” Temporal Relationships Spatial Relationships Logical Relationships These are just three examples of many… A Change in Frequency Does Not Change the Speed… Only the Look! Speed of Information versus Speed of Signs Just because someone moves their hands fast Just because someone strings words together fast does not mean the communication is fast Understanding the context is the first step. Understanding the relationships is the second In other words… People talk how they talk Speaking fast does not mean that the “speed” of the information is necessarily also fast. Signing fast refers to the motion of the hands… but not the speed of the information. Lets see it in action! • http://youtu.be/c_piKF7XH18 Lets see it in action! • http://www.ted.com/talks/dan_b arasch_a_park_underneath_th e_hustle_and_bustle_of_new_ york_city Lets see it in action! • http://www.ted.com/talks/ma c_barnett_why_a_good_boo k_is_a_secret_door For more discussion • Dale H Boam Esq. CI, Utah Master • dboam@comcast.net • 801-815-2547 v/text