2014-04-08-02TCB Meeting Presentation NIST

advertisement

Telecom MRAs: What is New?

TCB Council Meeting

April 8, 2014

Presented by Ramona Saar

MRA Program Office – NIST – Dept. of Commerce

Outline of Topics

New EMC Directive

Key Dates

Changes

Role of Accreditation

Next Steps for NIST

MRA Program Office Activities

What is Available for US CABS?

News - Israel

News - Vietnam

Next Meetings

New EMC Directive

EMC Directive (Directive 2014/30/EU) was published in the

Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU) on

March 29, 2014.

Rationale for Revisions

Across various industry sectors…“Experience…has shown”:

…non-compliant product on market, mistrust of CE mark

…competitive disadvantages to those following the rules

...varying enforcement practices

Differing practices in the designation of CABs by national authorities

Problems with the quality of certain notified bodies

In 2008 - New Legislative Framework (NLF)

 NLF Regulation on accreditation and market surveillance

NLF Decision establishing common framework for marketing of products

Process to align various Directives was initiated

Important Dates

Entry into Force Date for new EMC Directive (2014/30/EU):

 April 20, 2014 (Art. 46)

Member State Transposition Date:

 by April 19, 2016 (Art.44)

“Old” EMC Directive (2004/108/EC) Repeal Date:

 April 20, 2016 (Art. 45)

Products placed on the EU market on or after April 20, 2016 must comply with the new Directive. (Art. 43)

U.S. NBs must be re-notified to the new Directive before this date.

 Timing and process for re-notification not yet determined

Additional Guidance To Be Made Available

New 2014 Blue Guide on Implementation of EU Product Rules has just been published.

Guidance from EUANB (Group of Notified Bodies Under the EMC

Directive

-

May 20, 2014 Meeting – Amsterdam

Guide for the EMC Directive to be revised

Commission to provide U.S. with details on implementation of the

Directive under the MRA

Key Sections on NBs

Chapter 4: Notification of Conformity Assessment Bodies

 Notifying Authorities (Art. 21)

Requirements Relating to Notifying Authorities (Art. 22)

Information Obligations on Notifying Authorities (Art. 23)

Requirements Related to Notified Bodies (Art. 24)

Application for Notification (Art. 27)

Notification Procedures (Art. 28)

Identification numbers and Lists of Notified Bodies (Art. 29)

Challenge of the Competence of Notified Bodies (Art. 31)

Operational Obligations of Notified Bodies (Art. 32)

Information Obligations on Notified Bodies (Art. 34)

Coordination of Notified Bodies (Art. 36)

Annex III: Module B: EU-Type Examination Certificate

Notifying Authority

One in each Member State and in MRA Countries

Responsible for setting up and carrying out the necessary procedures for

Assessment of CABS

Notification of CABS

These two functions can be carried out by an accreditation body

Monitoring of NBs

Restrict/Suspend/Withdraw Notification (Art. 30)

NIST serves as the Notifying Authority to the Commission for the U.S.

Notifying Authority - Qualifications

Must:

Not have any conflict of interest with CABS

Be objective, impartial, and safeguard confidentiality

Ensure that a decision on notification of a CAB is taken by persons different than those carrying out the assessment.

Have a sufficient number of competent personnel to properly perform tasks.

Provide Commission with procedures for assessment and notification of CABs and monitoring of NBs. The Commission will make this information public.

EU-Type Examination Certificate (Annex III) &

Supporting Evaluation Report

Replaces NB Statement of Opinion

Module B: NB must determine if product design complies with relevant legislative requirements.

Certificate: Manufacturer name, address, conclusions, essential requirements covered, validity conditions, data for type identification, any other relevant information

- made available to Commission, Member States and other

NBs upon request

Supported by: NB evaluation report that indicates what activities were done to examine manufacturer’s technical documentation to assess the adequacy of the technical design with relevant essential requirements.

- made available to Commission and Member States upon request

Information Obligations from Manufacturer

Manufacturer must select a single NB (supported by a written declaration in application process to NB)

Manufacturer must notify the NB of modifications that affect the conformity of the apparatus with essential requirements or validity conditions for the Certificate

- A new Certificate may be required

Information Obligations to Manufacturer

NB must monitor “state of the art” and notify manufacturer if any changes impact compliance of apparatus with applicable Directive requirements

What is “state of the art”?

(27) Harmonized standards reflect the generally acknowledged state of the art as regards electromagnetic compatibility in the Union

Information Obligations to NIST (Art. 34)

NB shall inform NIST (Notifying Authority) of

Refusals, restrictions, suspension, withdrawals of EU-Type

Examination Certificates

Any requests received from Market Surveillance Authorities

CAB activities performed as NB (upon request)

Information Obligations to Other NBs

(Art. 34)

NB shall inform other NBs of

Relevant information on issues relating to negative and (on request) positive conformity assessment results.

(Annex III # 8)

NB shall inform other NBs

“…concerning…certificates and/or additions to which it has refused, withdrawn, suspended or otherwise restricted.”

Coordination of NBs:

Requirements Relating to NBs (Art. 24)

# 11 - Added:

The NB must participate in (or be informed about)

Relevant standardization activities

Activities of the NB coordination group*

Must apply administrative decisions and documents produced by the group.

* EUANB for EMC Directive

Changing Role of Accreditation in the

Notification Process

Accreditation “As Preferred Route”

 Text in new EMC Directive

“…Since accreditation is an essential means of verifying competence of CABs, it should also be used for the purposes of notifications.”

 New Blue Guide on the Implementation of EU Product Rules

“accreditation…favored instrument for evaluating competence and integrity of the bodies to be notified” (page 70).

 European Cooperation for Accreditation (EA) http://www.europeanaccreditation.org/role

“The process of achieving notification has changed such that accreditation is now the preferred route by which a conformity assessment body demonstrates its competence to become a Notified

Body.”

Accreditation for NB functions

(Art. 27 – 2) “Application for notification shall be accompanied by…….accreditation certificate, where one exists, issued by a national accreditation body attesting that the CAB fulfils the requirements of

Article 24.” (Requirements for Notified Bodies.)

 Note that for the accreditation to be accepted, the NB functions would need to be included under the Scope of Accreditation .

 Until now, this has not been the case for US NBs.

 Accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025 has been a prerequisite only to demonstrate to NIST knowledge of harmonized standards.

 All other requirements for NB functions have been evaluated directly by NIST, not the ABs.

When NB is Not Accredited for NB functions

Must Release Evidence of Competency Evaluation to Commission and

Others

(Art. 28 4) “Where a notification is not based on an accreditation certificate…the notifying authority shall provide….documentary evidence which attests to the CAB’s competence and arrangements for monitoring…”

See Blue Guide, 5.3.2.4 for guidance on the evaluation procedure to be followed in accreditation is not used as basis for notification:

When NB Not Accredited for NB functions

The NB Will Face a Longer Commission Decision Process

 Timing of Decision on NB status (Art. 28 – 5)

2 weeks with accreditation certificate

2 months without accreditation certificate (for NB functions) and release of all NB documents to demonstrate compliance with NB requirements as noted on previous slide.

Accreditation of NBs in the EU

Competent/National Authority in each Member State may elect to have NB assessment/accreditation role for their AB.

NB functions are not an exact fit with current accreditation standards such as

ISO/IEC 17025 and/or ISO/IEC Guide 65 (ISO/IEC 17065).

European Co-Operation for Accreditation

– EA has published

EA-2/17: EA Guidance on the Horizontal Requirements for the

Accreditation of CABS for Notification Purposes .

Connects key NB requirements with key clauses of several accreditation standards such as EN 45011 (G65), EN ISO/IEC 17025…..

Example of EU AB reference document: UKAS

P16: Accreditation for the purposes of appointment as approved and notified bodies

EMC Directive – Notified Bodies (NBs)

EU lists 178 NBs for the EMC Directive (2004/108/EC)

22 of these NBs are in the U.S.

All 22 are ISO/IEC 17025 accredited – but NB functions not covered.

14 of 22 are also ISO/IEC Guide 65 accredited – NB functions not covered.

Blue Guide (p. 120, 3.2)

For Module B, ISO/IEC 17025 “not appropriate”

ISO/IEC 17020 and ISO/IEC 17065 “can be considered”

Conclusions

Changes to EMC Directive are significant for NBs and NIST.

Formal ISO/IEC 17065 accreditation for NB functions is now preferred (for Module B).

Alternative NIST led NB evaluation/assessment program is not seen as a good option if private sector accreditation bodies can meet the necessary requirements to conduct this conformity assessment activity.

Next Steps for NIST

Attend EUANB Meeting and confirm transition process and timing with

Commission

Obtain stakeholder input for (and keep stakeholders informed of) development of NB Notification scheme requirements

Publish NB Notification scheme requirements and conduct workshops/training as needed

Process re-designation applications for notification from qualified CABs that meet NB requirements.

Formally withdraw all NB notifications to the old Directive on April 19 th (or

20 th ) 2016.

Follow applicable steps for the RED Directive.

Part II: MRA Program Office Activities

What is available?

Lab recognition is available for 8 economies for specific standards/regulations:

Australia, Canada, Chinese Taipei, Hong Kong, Korea,

Singapore, and Vietnam

Israel

Certification Body (CB) recognition is available for 4 economies for specific standards/regulations:

 Canada, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Japan

Notified Body (NB) status is available for the EU for the EMC

Directive and the R&TTE Directive

TCB designation to the FCC is available through NIST. Formal recognition is issued by the FCC

Current Activities

The NIST MRA Program includes 83 CABS in 112 locations holding 381 separate formal MRA Partner recognitions for specific standards/regulations.

MRA signed but not implemented yet with one economies:

Mexico

The U.S. Government is engaged in dialogue for new agreements with two economies:

Korea (CB recognition) and Malaysia (lab recognition)

Israel – Now Available

Signed October 15, 2012

 Test lab recognition – Phase I

NIST Criteria Document published February 7, 2014.

NIST is accepting applications for designation as of March 31, 2014.

No CABs designated yet.

Link to MRA text: http://www.ustr.gov/sites/default/files/US-

Israel%20MRA%20Text.pdf

Vietnam - Update

Vietnam/MIC Annex I Update

 Release of updates to Annex I for Vietnam/MIC on February 7,

2014 and March 14, 2014.

here .

New Vietnam/MIC Designation Requirement – Template/Sample Test

Report

For CABs newly seeking designation: requirement is now effective. See the Required Documents (Item 7) and the

Vietnam Specific Requirements page.

For CABs already recognized by MIC: NIST will be contacting each recognized CAB directly with a request for a template/sample test report. CABs will be given at least 30 days to send NIST the template/sample.

Next MRA-Related Meetings

APEC TEL Working Group & MRA Task Force

Yangzhou, China

April 21-26, 2014

RTTE CA & EUANB Meetings

Amsterdam, The Netherlands

May 19-20, 2014

-

NIST MRA Program Office

Information - Website

NIST MRA Team:

Staff: Gerry Baker, Nathalie Rioux, Ramona Saar

Contractors: Joe Dhillon, Dan Hoolihan

Questions about MRAs

Please send your request to mra@nist.gov

Direct Contact Information

Ramona J. Saar

NIST, Program Manager ramona.saar@nist.gov

Thank you.

Download