IMPROVING MCH THROUGH QI: POST-PARTUM CONTRACEPTION PLANS Lori Cannon, RN Red Cliff Community Health Center Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa RED CLIFF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER Full service clinic for 1,200 Tribal members and residents of surrounding counties Baminiijaanisag – “support with having a child” Prenatal Care Coordination – from conception through two years post- partum INTERVALS BETWEEN PREGNANCIES Amount of time after giving birth until next pregnancy Percent of Women >17 months 52.6% Within 17 months 26.3% Within 11 months 15.8% Within 6 months 10.5% AIM STATEMENT By July 31, 2013, 30% of women served through the Red Cliff Community Health Center’s PNCC program will have a plan for post-partum contraception in place with their provider prior to the birth of their child. Nutrition/food safety Exercise/mobility PLAN DO CHEC K ACT Post-partum contraception Signs of pre-term labor Doulas Labor & delivery Breastfeeding Bottle feeding Post-partum moods/depression Car seats/infant safety Swaddling/safe sleep 1.What do you know about different birth control methods? -pill -patch -Mirena/IUD -Implanon/Nexplanon -NuvaRing -Diaphragm -Depo 2.Where do you get most of your information on birth control/family planning? 3.What factors affect your decision-making about having children? 4.What would be helpful to you in terms of making decisions about family planning? PLAN DO CHEC K ACT Client A: 15 year old 30th week School visits Client B: 20 year old 17th week Home visits PLAN DO CHEC K ACT • Clients A and B • Contraceptive Technology Conference • Conclusion: clients don’t know what they don’t know PLAN DO CHEC K ACT • Updated and enhanced information • New technology • Risks • Multi-media • Hands-on • Video CONTRACEPTIVES Copper IUD (Paragard) Hormonal IUD (Mirena) Implant (Nexplanon/Implanon) Depo Provera Oral contraceptives (combined and progestin-only) Patch (Ortho-Evra) Ring (NuvaRing) Diaphragm Condoms PLAN DO CHEC K ACT • Client A • Client B • Client C AIM STATEMENT By July 31, 2013, 30% of women served through the Red Cliff Community Health Center’s PNCC program will have a plan for post-partum contraception in place with their provider prior to the birth of their child. Meeker-McLeod-Sibley CHS Quality Improvement Project Increasing WIC fruit and vegetable voucher redemption Background Meeker-McLeod-Sibley was formed in 1980 and is governed by a community health board through a joint powers agreement. Staff work in teams across the three counties according to assigned program areas and have identified team leaders. WIC program is a consolidated program across the three counties. Background Meeker-McLeod-Sibley Community Health Services (MMS CHS) has a total population of 75,177 MMS CHS is categorized as a rural farming community with industrial businesses. Largest city within 3 counties is Hutchinson with a population of 14,093 Average Hispanic rate for three counties is 5.1% Average number of monthly WIC participants is 1,900 for all three counties Background Identification of the Problem Staff were finding unused, outdated fruits and vegetable (f/v) vouchers in WIC folders State report showed MMS had an average of 75.94% of fully redeemed f/v vouchers PLAN AIM STATEMENT By July 31st, 2013, the MMS CHS WIC QI team will increase redemption of fruit and vegetable voucher dollars from 76% to 85%. Getting Started PLAN Collection of Data Focus Groups Root Cause Analysis Potential Solutions PLAN PLAN Focus Groups WIC staff WIC participants Local vendors PLAN Root Cause Analysis 5 Why’s Fishbone Diagram PLAN Identify Potential Solutions 5 How’s Prioritization of interventions by voting Discussion with QI coach to prioritize and chose best potential solutions DO Test the Theory Taste Testing May Kickoff Every month in each county Training Collaboration with state and local WIC agencies DO STUDY Assess Results Will compare baseline data with future report to determine if interventions worked. Comments from the Field Taste Testing Comments from WIC participants ACT Adopt, Adapt, or Abandon based on the results Lessons Learned • Start with a simple concrete project and apply a simple tool to get the hang of it and to get staff buy in. Then proceed forward with a larger project. • Don’t jump to solutions • Get buy in from staff • People realizing they were doing QI all along, but now have a name for it • Gather enough data • Plan for adequate time for testing interventions in the PDSA cycle • Realize the importance of root cause analysis • Crucial to have leadership support • Have staff on the same page Next Steps Will continue with testing interventions in PDSA cycle Next Steps Continue to create a Quality Improvement Culture Next Steps “Excellent firms don’t believe in excellence- only in constant improvement and constant change.” Tom Peters Contact Information Allie Freidrichs allie@mmspublichealth.org 507-766-3531 Jessica Remington Jessica.remington@co.mcleod.mn.us 320-864-3185 Dual Enrollment of Pregnant Women into WIC and Public Insurance Programs Mary A. Prignano RN, MS DuPage County Health Department Wheaton, Illinois Dual Enrollment Initiation of this QI Project Pregnant women are seen as priority populations for the WIC Supplemental Nutrition Program. Dual Enrollment Initiation of QI Project Pregnant women were attending the walk-in hours for benefitting, where they could have their applications completed for public insurance, termed Medically Presumed Eligible (MPE). Dual Enrollment Initiation of the Project The Benefitting (MPE) services and the WIC services were in two different departments of the Health Department When pregnant women completed MPE first, they needed to return for WIC. Dual Enrollment By Appointment 1. WIC Certification and 2. MPE Application As Walk-In 1. MPE Application only 2. WIC Appointment if requested Second trip required Delay in entry to services Dual Enrollment Initial data collection demonstrated that some clients: Received MPE without WIC. Had delay in WIC enrollment Had a greater chance of refusal. Dual Enrollment AIM STATEMENT By July 31, 2013, the DuPage County Health Department will implement a benefitting process that results in a 10% increase in the number of pregnant women who are dually enrolled in MPE/ Medicaid public insurance program and the WIC Nutrition Program. QI Project Team WIC Service Area WIC Program Coordinator WIC Case Manager WIC Site Supervisor Quality Improvement Coordinator Client Benefits Area Customer Service Supervisor Client Benefitting Specialist Supervisor Office Supervisor Client Benefit Specialist QI Project Data MPE application data entered into spreadsheet. To inform the QI team of: progress toward dual enrollment locations and # of enrollments QI Project Data MPE Applications for Addison Location No WIC- Not in WIC at the time of the MPE Application Total/ All Centers Addison December'12 January'13 February'13 No WIC Total Applications % No WIC No WIC Total Applications % No WIC No WIC Total Applications % No WIC 19 35 54% 44% 37 55 67% 100 239 42% 14 19 74% 67 153 32 115 28% Benefitting Process for Pregnant Women without WIC Appointment Front Desk Second Appointment Check-in for CBS with appointment or walk-in Proof Pregnancy Needed? Check-in for CBS yes Client Benefit Specialist no yes MPE and Kidcare Application completed If no appt., make WIC appointment? yes Pregnancy Testing Completed If no appt., make WIC appointment? yes Case Manager Follow-Up of MPE applications without WIC appointment If no appt., make WIC appointment? Refused/ No response Case Manager Follow-Up WIC Clinic no QI Project Data Sources Client Benefit Specialist Interviews Structured interviews were conducted with the Client Benefits Specialists (CBS) All 5 health department office locations. Completed by the QI Coordinator Client Benefit Specialist Interviews 1. Do prenatal clients have tendency to walk-in or to schedule a CBS appointment? 2. Why do some clients decline to make WIC appointment? 3. Is pregnancy testing available/offered onsite before or after MPE visit? 4. If client is leaving CBS visit to go make appointment, where are they instructed to go? 5. Why do you think it is important for these clients to access WIC services? Fishbone Diagram Casefinding Staff WIC Staff Pregnancy testing Redundant Processes Communication with CBS Aware of Walk-in CBS Hours Clients Prepared with documents Desire to receive both services Knowledge about WIC Clients difficult to reach once left office Turnover/ Training Sufficient Time Return to clinic is an issue Transportation Problems Total Cost to Agency Aware of differences in eligibility Additional total time spent in enrolling WIC Scheduling not available Walk-in versus Scheduled appt. Previous service received Turnover/ training Communication with WIC staff Availability of Pregnancy testing Administration CBS Staff Clients Pregnant Client does not enroll in both MPE& WIC Fishbone Diagram Identified: WIC Staff CBS Staff Pregnancy Testing Knowledge of MPE Communication with CBS Pregnancy Testing Knowledge of WIC Program Communication with WIC MPE/ WIC QI Project Review of Factors in Process Change Changeable? Strategies? Priority? Selection for Pilot MPE/ WIC QI Pilot Who: Client Benefitting Specialists and WIC staff Where: Addison office When: May, 2013 What: Use of instant messaging Engage “Warm Handoff” Complete WIC enrollment or scheduling Process for WIC Enrollments for Pregnant Women (May, 2013) NPHC Clinic Assistant CBS Walkin Phase CBS Walkin: MPE and All Kids Applications Proof of Pregnancy Yes/ No? Pregnancy test presented NO Pregnancy test presented to CBS Return to CBS for MPE Are they currently receiving WIC Services? NO Does the client have WIC proofs needed? No proofs Receiving WIC Services: no action required Provide direction to client re: proofs needed Offer WIC appointment Return to WIC Clinic At later time WIC Clinic Proofs available Pregnancy test Completed Offer WIC appointment No Does client wish to stay for WIC Clinic? Yes WIC Certification MPE/ WIC QI Pilot Process Changes: WIC staff relocated next to CBS Instant Messaging Clients escorted to WIC area Clients seen regardless of residency MPE/ WIC QI Pilot Client Changes: Do clients have their documents for enrollment? Do they wish to stay for WIC? Pilot Results Addison Pilot ran for 4 weeks. Two pregnant clients were seen each week 7 of the 8 clients agreed to completion of the WIC assessments (87.5%)- 1 refusal 3 of the 7 clients received their food instruments that same day (43%) 4 of the 7 clients returned to complete their pickup as scheduled (57%) Pilot Results Instant Messaging- Staff needed to be introduced to each other by the supervisory staff, including correct spelling of their names. Warm “hand off”- Clients expressed appreciation for walking them over to the next station of the interview Pilot Results Engage the QI Team in deciding next steps: Pilot expansion from MPE walk-in to appointment? Pilot expansion to infants and children? Pilot expansion to other office locations? Challenges and Opportunities Opportunity of pregnancy testing Communication challenge: in person, email, instant messaging Engaging client feedback Computer limitations