Sensing Meets Mobile Social Networks: The Design, Implementation and Evaluation of the CenceMe Application Emiliano Miluzzo†, Nicholas D. Lane†, Kristóf Fodor†, Ronald Peterson†, Hong Lu†, Mirco Musolesi†, Shane B. Eisenman§, Xiao Zheng†, Andrew T. Campbell† †Computer Science, Dartmouth College §Electrical Engineering, Columbia University Slides from http://nslab.ee.ntu.edu.tw/NetworkSeminar/slides/cenceme.ppt Outline • • • • • • • Introduction of CenceMe Design Consideration CenceMe Implementation CenceMe Classifier System Performance User Study Conclusion Motivation • Text messaging: “Where are you?” “What are you doing?” • Sensors in mobile phone: GPS, accelerometers, microphone, camera … etc • Data collection through sensors Introduction of CenceMe • People-centric sensing application • Implementation on Nokia N95; Symbian/JME VM platform • Share user presence information (Facebook) Contributions • • • • Design, implementation and evaluation Lightweight classifier Trade-off: time fidelity v.s. latency Complete User study Mobile Phone Limitations • • • • OS Limitations API and Operational Limitations Security Limitations Energy Management Limitations CenceMe Architecture Architecture Design Issues • Split-Level Classification (primitives, facts) – Customized tag – Resiliency – Minimize bandwidth usage/energy – Privacy/data integrity • Power Aware Duty-Cycle CenceMe Implementation Operations (Phone): • Sensing • Classification to produce primitives • Presentation of people's presence on the phone • Upload of primitives to backend servers Classifications (Backend Server): • Classifying the nature of the sound collected from the microphone • Classifying the accelerometer data to determine activity (sitting, standing, walking, running) • Scanned Bluetooth/MAC addresses in range • GPS readings • Random photos Phone Software ClickStatus Backend Software Phone classifiers (1/2) • Audio – Feature extraction – Classification Human voice Environment noise Mean Standard Deviation Phone classifiers (2/2) Sitting • Activity Standing Walking Running Time Backend Classifier • Conversation • Social context – Neighborhood conditions – Social status • Mobility mode detector (vehicle or not) • Location (to description/icon) • “Am I Hot” – Nerdy, party animal, cultured, healthy, greeny System Performance • Classifier accuracy • Impact of mobile phone placement on body – 8 users – Annotations as ground truth for comparison with classifier outputs • Environmental conditions • Sensing duty cycles General Results Phone Placement on Body • Pocket, lanyard, clipped to belt • Insignificant impact conversation vs. Non-conversation Environmental Impacts • Independent of activity classification • More important: transition between locations Duty Cycle • Problem detecting short term event • Experiment: 8 people. Reprogram different duty cycles Power Benchmarks • Measuring battery voltage, current, temperature • Battery lifetime: 6.22+/- 0.59 hours Memory and CPU Benchmarks User Study • Survey user experience • Feedback: – – – – – Positive from all users Willing to share detail status and presence information on Facebook Privacy not an issue (??) Stimulate curiosity among users Self-learning on activity patterns and social status User Study • • • • A new way to connect people What is the potential CenceMe demographic? Learn about yourself and your friends My friends always with me Conclusion • A complete design, implementation and evaluation • First application to retrieve and publish sensing presence • A complete user study and feedback for future improvement