PROPOSED SOLUTIONS The proposed solutions are organised into three strategic pillars: (A) Public Transport Enhancement; (B) Demand Management; and (C) Infrastructure Upgrade. Each solution is classified by implementation timeframe (short-, medium-, or long-term), estimated cost category, and primary responsible agency. Pillar A: Public Transport Enhancement Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Corridor – Thika Road Line One of the public transport improvement strategy is to have a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system along the Thika Road corridor. BRT is a high-quality, high-capacity bus-based transit system that delivers metro-like performance. The proposed Thika Road BRT would extend from the Globe Roundabout CBD terminus to the Thika Town terminus, a distance of approximately 42 kilometres. The key design features of the proposed BRT system include: • Dedicated bus lane in each direction, created by converting one existing express inner lane per direction. • Off-board fare collection at closed, level-access stations to eliminate dwell time losses. • Real-time Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) system enabling reliable schedule adherence and passenger information. • High-frequency operations: minimum 3-minute headways during peak hours, 6–10 minutes during off-peak. • Adequate Fleet Size for peak-hour operations. • Integration with feeder bus services, NMT infrastructure, and park-and-ride facilities. • Level boarding platform design for accessibility compliance. International experience from comparable BRT systems—such as Johannesburg’s Rea Vaya, Dar es Salaam’s DART, and Lagos BRT-Lite—indicates that BRT can achieve a modal shift of approximately 15–30% from private cars within 3–5 years of operation, while delivering peakhour passenger throughput in the range of 4,000–8,000 passengers per hour per direction (pphpd). Park and Ride Facilities Park-and-ride (P&R) facilities are strategically located car parks situated at or near major public transport nodes, enabling motorists originating from peri-urban catchments to drive to the facility, park securely, and continue their journey by public transport into the congested urban areas. This strategy intercepts vehicle trips before they enter the congested section of the corridor, reducing both vehicle volumes and the associated externalities. Three park-and-ride facilities are proposed along the Thika Road corridor: • Ruiru P&R Hub (Northern terminus): To be designed as a multi-storey facility adjacent to the Ruiru Interchange, with integrated BRT and matatu interchange. Land availability is favourable given the proximity to the Eastern Bypass junction. • Roysambu P&R Hub (Mid-corridor): To be designed as a multi-storey facility integrated with the proposed Roysambu BRT station. Potential to expand to a multi-storey structure in the next phase. • Garden City P&R Hub: to begin as a surface car park but later on to be upgraded to multistorey facility. It would be integrated with the Garden City BRT station. Pricing strategy for P&R facilities should be set significantly below CBD parking rates to create a clear financial incentive for modal shift. Monthly and annual season ticket products should be offered to drive regular use. Public Service Vehicle Fleet Modernisation and Incentives Most of the matatus and buses serving the Thika Road corridor are ageing, poorly maintained, and provide an unattractive level of service that discourages potential users from shifting away from private car use. A targeted incentive programme for Public Service Vehicle (PSV) operators is proposed to accelerate fleet renewal and improve service quality: Low-interest green vehicle financing facility: Establish a co-funded financing mechanism (by government and development finance institutions) to support operators in acquiring electric or hybrid buses as replacements for ageing minibuses. Competitive route-based franchising for PSV Saccos: Award operating rights for the Thika Road corridor through a competitive tendering process. Tender criteria should include service quality standards such as vehicle age limits, GPS tracking, electronic ticketing, staff uniform requirements, and adherence to schedules. Only compliant operators would be permitted to operate on the corridor following franchise awards. Operational incentives for compliant operators: Provide a full waiver of annual inspection fees and reduced third-party insurance levies for Saccos that meet and maintain the required standards. Schedule Planning and High-Quality Transit Services Beyond physical infrastructure, the quality of the travel experience is a key factor influencing how people choose to move. A comprehensive service improvement programme is proposed: Real-time passenger information: Provide accurate arrival and departure information through digital displays at BRT stations and major matatu termini, integrated with mobile applications. Integrated fare system: Introduce a unified electronic payment system across BRT, matatus, and park-and-ride facilities to enable seamless travel using a single payment method. Staggered working hours: Pilot flexible working schedules in partnership with major corridor employers (such as universities, hospitals, Kenya Power and Lighting Company, Kenya Electricity Generating Company, and Safari Park Hotel) to spread peak travel demand. Premium express bus service: Introduce high-quality commuter buses targeting private car users, offering guaranteed seating, Wi-Fi, air conditioning, and reliable travel times as a competitive alternative to driving. Pillar B: Demand Management Congestion Charging Scheme Congestion charging is an effective way to manage traffic demand by ensuring that road users pay the true cost of their trips, including the delays they cause to others. By pricing road access during peak periods, congestion charging simultaneously raises revenue which can fund public transport improvements, reduces demand, and allocates scarce road space to those who value it most. A cordon-based congestion charging scheme is proposed for the Nairobi Inner Cordon. This would apply to vehicles entering the Central Zone during peak hours (07:00–09:00 and 17:00–19:30). Key design features: Pricing: Charge per inbound trip for passenger cars, to be set based on transport demand modelling. Technology: Free-flow electronic charging using Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR), similar to systems in Stockholm, Singapore, and London. Exemptions: Emergency vehicles, motorcycles, and high-occupancy vehicles (3+ passengers). Discounts: 50% reduced charge for certified low-emission vehicles (hybrid/electric). Revenue use: All net revenues to be ring-fenced for public transport improvements, including BRT operations, fleet renewal, and non-motorised transport (NMT) infrastructure. International experience provides strong evidence of the effectiveness of congestion charging. In Stockholm, the congestion tax reduced car trips across the cordon by approximately 20–25% within the first year, with sustained reductions of around 15–20% over the following decade (Swedish Transport Agency. The Stockholm Congestion Charges – Effects and Lessons Learned). Similarly, London recorded a 27% reduction in car traffic within the charging zone in its first year of operation (Transport for London (2004). Central London Congestion Charging: Impacts Monitoring – First Annual Report) These precedents offer a credible basis for estimating potential demand impacts in Nairobi, although local travel behaviour and system conditions may result in different outcomes. Parking Pricing Reform Current on-street and off-street parking charges in the Nairobi CBD are widely regarded as insufficient to deter car travel, with many informal parking arrangements available at KES 100– 300 per day. A comprehensive parking pricing reform programme is proposed: • Gradually increase metered on-street parking fees in the CBD with a two-year transition period to allow users to adjust. • Introduce a Workplace Parking Levy (WPL) on employers providing more than a defined threshold of free or subsidised parking spaces. The levy rate would be determined through stakeholder consultation to ensure practicality and acceptability. This measure encourages employers to reduce parking provision, pass on the cost, or offer alternative mobility benefits. International experience, such as in Nottingham, demonstrates that workplace parking levies can reduce car commuting while generating sustainable funding for public transport. • Revenue from parking charges should be ring-fenced and directed toward both nonmotorised transport (NMT) infrastructure and public transport subsidies. Carpooling Incentives Programme Carpooling (ridesharing) is a low-cost demand management measure capable of reducing singleoccupancy vehicle trips by approximately 10–15% when supported by appropriate incentives. This range is supported by European evidence, including findings from the European Commission report “The First and Last Mile – The Key to Sustainable Urban Transport” (2019) and evaluations under the CIVITAS Initiative (2018–2022), which document measurable traffic reductions from shared mobility schemes. The proposed programme includes: Carpooling platform: Provide free access to a government-endorsed mobile application that helps commuters along common routes find carpool partners. Congestion charge exemption: Vehicles carrying more than three occupants would be exempt from congestion charges, encouraging higher vehicle occupancy. Employer engagement: Work with major corridor employers to offer financial or other incentives to employees who regularly carpool. Vehicle Importation Policy Reforms Managing the growth of private vehicles in the Nairobi Metropolitan Region requires structural policy measures at the national level. Two reforms are proposed for consideration by the Nairobi Metropolitan Region Road Agency: Increase in import duty on private passenger cars: Gradually raise import duties for private cars, particularly for vehicles with engine displacements above 1,600cc, while maintaining or reducing duties for hybrid and electric vehicles. This measure would help moderate private vehicle fleet growth without restricting access to affordable or lowemission mobility options. Reduction of maximum permissible import age: Lower the age limit for used passenger vehicles from the current 7 years to 5 years. This would encourage a younger, safer, and more fuel-efficient vehicle fleet, reducing emissions and improving road safety. Transitional arrangements would be required to protect legitimate trade and allow for a smooth adjustment. Pillar C: Infrastructure Upgrade Tolled Elevated Expressway To address long-term corridor capacity constraints, the construction of a tolled elevated expressway along the existing Thika Road alignment is proposed. This approach, successfully implemented in Nairobi's western corridor through the Nairobi Expressway (A8) project, adds lane capacity without the land acquisition and displacement costs associated with at-grade widening. The proposed Thika Road Elevated Expressway (TREE) would extend approximately 42 km from the Museum Hill Interchange (linking to the Nairobi Expressway) to the Thika Interchange. Key design features: Configuration: Dual 3-lane elevated structure (three lanes per direction) with gradeseparated access at major nodes including Muthaiga, Survey, Allsops, Garden City, Roysambu/TRM, Githurai 45, Ruiru, the Eastern Bypass, Juja and Thika Design speed: 100 km/h, with an operating speed target of 70–80 km/h under normal conditions. Tolling: Electronic free-flow tolls for passenger cars, with proportionally higher rates for heavy goods vehicles. Development model: Public-Private Partnership (PPP) under a Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) arrangement, following the Nairobi Expressway concession model. At-grade road use: The road beneath the elevated structure would be repurposed for BRT operations, non-motorised transport (NMT), and service roads, improving travel quality for all modes at ground level. Intersection and Junction Improvements/treatments In the short to medium term, targeted upgrades at at-grade intersections along the corridor can provide meaningful congestion relief at relatively low cost while supporting reliable BRT operations. Proposed measures for at-grade junctions: Adaptive Traffic Signal Control (ATSC): Install ATSC systems at all signalised at-grade intersections. These real-time, demand-responsive signals adjust timing dynamically to optimize traffic flow. No-stopping and no-parking enforcement: Prohibit stopping or parking within 100 metres of at-grade junctions using physical measures (raised kerbs, bollards) and CCTVenabled enforcement to prevent blockages. BRT and high-capacity transit priority: Provide signal and lane priority for BRT buses and other high-capacity public transport at all at-grade intersections, consistent with Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP 2016) standards, to ensure reliable and predictable travel times. IMPLEMENTATION METHODOLOGIES Phased Implementation Plan The implementation of the proposed interventions is structured in three phases as outlined below; Phase Phase 1 – Quick Wins Phase 2 – Medium Term Phase 3 – Long Term Tentative Timelines Key Interventions 0–24 Months Adaptive signals, Parking reform, Carpooling platform, PSV incentives initiation, BRT preparation works 2–5 Years BRT Line construction & commissioning, Park-and-Ride Ruiru & Roysambu, Congestion Charging pilot, PSV franchise awards 5–10 Years Elevated Expressway construction, Full congestion charging rollout, BRT fleet expansion, Garden City P&R hub BRT Implementation Methodology The Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system will be implemented through a structured, phased project development process aligned with international best practice, including the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP) BRT Standard (2016) and World Bank urban transport procurement frameworks. The methodology integrates technical, institutional, environmental, and operational considerations to ensure sustainable and efficient delivery. Pre-Feasibility Study (Months 1–3): This phase will establish the preliminary viability of the BRT system through high-level traffic demand modelling, ridership forecasting, and financial/economic analysis. It will also include preliminary corridor alignment design, identification of key constraints, and stakeholder mapping to inform subsequent engagement strategies. Feasibility Study and ESIA (Months 4–12): This phase will involve comprehensive technical and environmental assessments, including detailed traffic surveys, origin-destination studies, and refined demand modelling. An Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) will be undertaken in accordance with national regulations and international safeguards, alongside utility mapping and relocation planning. Structured stakeholder engagement will be conducted with affected communities, businesses, and institutions along the corridor. Detailed Engineering Design (Months 9–18): The design phase will produce construction-ready documentation, including geometric road design, dedicated lane configurations, and intersection treatments. Station design will cover several stations spaced at major intersections incorporating universal accessibility standards. Depot design will include one primary depot at Ruiru and a secondary depot at Roysambu. Additional components will include pavement marking and segregation infrastructure, Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) architecture, and electronic fare collection system design. Procurement (Months 15–24): Procurement will be undertaken in compliance with Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act (PPADA) requirements and international best practices. This will include competitive tendering for civil works contractors, selection of bus operators through a route franchising model, and procurement of fare collection and ITS systems. Clear contractual frameworks and performance-based specifications will be adopted. Construction Phase (Months 24–42): This phase will involve the implementation of all physical infrastructure, including dedicated BRT lanes, station construction, depot development, and installation of ITS components. Works will be phased to minimize disruption to existing traffic and adjacent communities, with traffic management plans implemented throughout the construction period. Trial Operations (Months 40–44): A pilot operational phase will be conducted to test system performance under controlled conditions. This will include limited service deployment, system calibration, staff training, and fare system testing. Reduced promotional fares may be introduced to encourage early adoption and gather user feedback. Full Commercial Operations (Month 44 onwards): Full-scale operations will commence following successful trial validation. This phase will include a comprehensive public communication and marketing campaign, continuous performance monitoring against defined Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), and periodic service reviews to ensure operational efficiency and customer satisfaction. Congestion Charging Implementation Methodology The congestion charging scheme will be introduced in phases to ensure it is well planned, works effectively, and is accepted by the public. Legal and Regulatory Framework (Months 1–6): The first step is to put the right laws in place. This may involve creating new laws or updating existing ones to allow congestion charging, define how it will be enforced, and explain how the revenue will be used. Public participation and stakeholder engagement will be carried out during this stage. Institutional Setup (Months 3–9): A lead agency, such as NMRRA, will be appointed to manage the scheme. Clear roles will be assigned to all involved agencies, including those responsible for enforcement, operations, and revenue management, to ensure good coordination. Technology Procurement (Months 6–18): The necessary systems will be procured and installed. These include ANPR cameras, gantries, and a central system for billing, payments (including mobile money), enforcement, and customer support. Scheme Design and Pricing (Months 9–18): The charging area (likely within the CBD) will be defined, along with the pricing structure. Charges may vary by time of day and type of vehicle. Exemptions and discounts will also be identified. Pricing will be based on traffic data and aimed at being fair and effective. Pilot Implementation (Months 18–30): A pilot scheme will be introduced in a small part of the CBD. This will help test how the system works, allow adjustments to pricing, and understand how users respond before full implementation. Full Rollout (Month 30 onwards): After the pilot is successful, the full scheme will be launched. This will be supported by public awareness campaigns, customer support services, and a clear and fair enforcement and appeals process. Revenue Management: All revenue collected will be placed in a dedicated Corridor Improvement Fund managed by NMRRA. The funds will be used only for improving public transport, walking and cycling facilities (NMT), and traffic management. Park and Ride Implementation Methodology Park-and-ride facility implementation will proceed through the following steps: • Site Identification and Land Acquisition: Detailed site surveys and land status verification for the three proposed P&R locations. Government land should be prioritised to minimise acquisition costs and timelines. Where private land is required, compulsory acquisition under the Land Act 2012 provisions may be necessary. • Feasibility and Design: Traffic access modelling for each P&R site to ensure adequate capacity at entry/exit points; structural design for multi-storey components; integration with BRT station structures. • Procurement and Construction: Civil works procurement through competitive tender. Construction period estimated at 12–18 months per facility. • Operations Model: P&R facilities to be operated by a concessionaire appointed on a 10year operating contract, with pricing and service standards specified by the Metropolitan Road Agency. Revenue-sharing arrangement between concessionaire and NMRRA. Stakeholder Engagement and Change Management The success of the proposed interventions, particularly the demand management measures (congestion charging, parking reform), is critically dependent on public understanding, acceptance, and behavioural response. A proactive stakeholder engagement and communications strategy is essential and must be initiated well in advance of scheme implementation. Key elements include: • Public information campaigns through traditional and digital media, explaining the rationale for each measure, the uses to which revenues will be put, and the benefits to all corridor users. • Business sector engagement to address concerns from corridor businesses regarding potential reduced customer access, and to identify mitigation measures such as delivery hour exemptions and employee commute support. • Matatu operator engagement: Early and transparent engagement with existing matatu SACCO operators regarding the transition to the BRT franchise system, with clear communication of support mechanisms and participation opportunities. • Political stakeholder engagement: Regular briefings to county assembly members, MPs representing Thika Road corridor constituencies, and relevant Cabinet Secretaries to build and maintain political support.
0
You can add this document to your study collection(s)
Sign in Available only to authorized usersYou can add this document to your saved list
Sign in Available only to authorized users(For complaints, use another form )