PROBLEM SET 1 - REPORT
NARIHAN EL YAMANI EL AISSAOUI
Data Analysis 25/26
PROBLEM SET 1 - REPORT
1
NARIHAN EL YAMANI EL AISSAOUI
Data Analysis 25/26
1.​ INTRODUCTION
This report analyses data from the Survey of Living Conditions by the Instituto Nacional de
Estadística (INE). The objective is to study the distribution of two variables in Sample 13
and compare them with the distribution in the full dataset:
-​ SITLAB: Labour market position of the main holder of the household.
-​ TIPO: Type of dwelling.
The analysis includes frequency tables (absolute and relative frequencies) and graphical
representations for both the sample and the entire population (named Group).
2.​ VARIABLE: LABOUR MARKET POSITION (SITLAB)
The variable SITLAB classifies the employment status of the main household holder into six
categories:
1.​ Salaried worked
2.​ Self-employed
3.​ Unemployed
4.​ Retired
5.​ House-keeper
6.​ Other
2.1. FREQUENCY TABLE
2
NARIHAN EL YAMANI EL AISSAOUI
Data Analysis 25/26
The total number of observations in Sample 13 is 138 individuals. The largest group Salaried
worked with 53%, being the dominant category, representing almost half of the
observations. The smallest group is self-employed and housekeepers with 3%.
COMPARISON SAMPLE vs GROUP SITLAB
There is no such a big difference between the group and the sample, except that there’s 1%
less unemployed people in the group.
Overall, Sample 13 appears to be representative of the full population with respect to labour
market position.
REPRESENTATION GRAPHICALLY
3
NARIHAN EL YAMANI EL AISSAOUI
Data Analysis 25/26
3.​ VARIABLE: TYPE OF DWELLING (TIPO)
The variable TIPO classifies the type of housing into three categories:
1.​ Detached house
2.​ Semidetached house
3.​ Apartment in a building
3.1. FREQUENCY TABLES
The total number of observations in Sample 13 is 138 individuals. The largest group has an
apartment in a building with 54%, being the dominant category, representing almost half of
the observations. Followed by semidetached houses with 28% and the smallest group,
detached houses with 18%.
COMPARISON SAMPLE vs GROUP TIPO
There is also no such a big difference between the group and the sample. The dominant
group has an apartment in a building with a higher percentage (63%), being the dominant
category. Followed with a lowest percentage of semidetached houses with 22% and the
smallest group, detached houses with also lower percentage with 15%.
4
NARIHAN EL YAMANI EL AISSAOUI
Data Analysis 25/26
REPRESENTATION GRAPHICALLY
5