Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PMSM) Design Part 1 – General Considerations Permanent Magnet (PM) Motor Characterized by permanent magnets on rotor Known for its simplicity and low maintenance No copper loss on rotor High efficiency Exploded View of a PM Motor J. R. Hendershot and T. J. E. Miller, Design of Brushless Permanent Magnet Machines 2nd Edition, p. 44, Motor Design Books LLC, 2010. Inner Rotor Possibilities (1) surface radial magnet surface parallel magnet breadloaf magnet ring magnet Inner Rotor Possibilities (2) (e) IPM in Toyota Prius Toyota Prius Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV) 3 1. 2. 3. 4. Four cylinder combustion engine; Generator/starter; Electric Motor; Power split device (PSD) J. F. Gieras, Permanent Magnet Motor Technology Design and Applications, 3rd Edition, p. 282, CRC Press, 2010. 2 J. R. Hendershot and T. J. E. Miller, Design of Brushless Permanent Magnet Machines 2nd Edition, p. 34, Motor Design Books LLC, 2010. Segmented Magnets in Large PM Rotor J. R. Hendershot and T. J. E. Miller, Design of Brushless Permanent Magnet Machines 2nd Edition, p. 94 & 602, Motor Design Books LLC, 2010. Rotor Skew stepped magnet Magnetization Profile parallel magnetization radial magnetization most popular radial sine magnetization sine angle or sine direction magnetization Halbach Array (1) R. Krishnan, Permanent Magnet Synchronous and Brushless DC Motor Drives, p. 25-30, CRC press, 2010. Halbach Array (2) FEA Halbach Array (3) Airgap Flux Density Rotor is outside Stator Volume and Size 2 Dl V0 T T Pout m Typically V0 8 ~ 9 in / (ft lb) for 10hp or less (air cooled) 3 V0 4 ~ 5 in / (ft lb) for 10hp or more (water cooled) 3 The unit for D and L is inch. If we design D=L, we have the stator bore (inner) diameter estimated Destimated (TV0 ) 1 3 We can pick up D close to Destimated. Stator Core Design core gap , per half pole pitch leff /P 0 Bg ( a )ris d a 2 /2 D leff Bg , pk cos( ae )d ae 2 P 0 D leff Bg , pk P core DB g , pk leff Bcore , pk d c k i li Pd c k i li (1) tooth l eff B g ( ae ) ri d ae B g , pk s l eff 0 s B g , pk l eff tooth B tooth t s k i li t s k i li (2) Take t s 0.5 s , Bcore , pk 0.8 Btooth dc D 1 .6 P Effect of Pole Number on Yoke Flux Density Finite Element Analysis with the same dc J. R. Hendershot and T. J. E. Miller, Design of Brushless Permanent Magnet Machines 2nd Edition, p. 106, Motor Design Books LLC, 2010. Number of Turns per Coil V , rated where 2 f e Nˆ a g , pk 4 .44 f e Nˆ a g , pk pk 2Bg , pk Dl P Nˆ a kw Na / 1.1 kw k p kd ks Na PqNc / C Na is the number of series turns per phase of armature winding C is the number of parallel circuits of armature winding Nc 1 . 1V , rated C 2 2 f e qk w B g , pk Dl Consider leakage flux Stator Slot Design General Consideration s ts bs0 s d ds1 s0 ds D S 0.4 s ts 0.6 s 3ts d s 7ts Define bs s ts bs 0 (0.1 ~ 0.5)bs d s 0 (0.1 ~ 0.5)bs d s1 (0.1 ~ 0.5)bs Stator Conductor Size Stator current density J s ,copper I a ,rated / C Sa where Sa is stator (armature) conductor cross section area and can be determined from the above formula together with: Air - cooled : 400A/cm 2 J s ,copper 800 A/cm 2 Sa I a ,rated / C J s ,copper Permanent Magnets Samarian Cobalt (SmCo) Operating temperature of up to 350ºC nd strongest rare earth magnet 2 Neodymium Iron Boron (NdFeB) Operating temperature of up to 150ºC Strongest rare earth magnet Permanent Magnet Properties From Yeadon – Handbook of Small Electric Motors Rotor Peripheral Speed The maximum allowable peripheral speed of the rotor is a central consideration in machine design. With present-day steel alloys, rotor peripheral speeds of 50,000 ft/min (or about 250 m/s) represent the design limit. 1 ft/min = 0.0051 m/s Motor Losses (1) Copper loss Typical PCu I 2 R Stray losses Electrical phenomenon such as skin and proximity effect Motor Losses (2) Core (Iron) Loss Hysteresis loss Eddy Current loss PIron h B f n Mechanical loss Windage loss Friction loss c ( Bf ) e ( Bf ) 2 3/ 2 Finite Element Analysis Fundamental harmonic J. R. Hendershot and T. J. E. Miller, Design of Brushless Permanent Magnet Machines 2nd Edition, p. 174-175, Motor Design Books LLC, 2010. Part 2 – Surface Mount Round Rotor Multi-Pole PM Motor Design Magnetic Circuit Analysis For a multi-pole surface mount rotor dm Da D g Poles 2 H g g 2 H m d m 0 gBg 0 H m d m 0 dm Bm Am g 0 H m Ag Bm Am Bg Ag Working Point for Permanent Magnetics (1) Maximum Energy Point B Br BmR 0 Hc 0 HmR Br B (H H c ) Hc 0 H Br BH (H H c )H Hc ( BH ) Br Hc 0 Bm To get (BH) max ,Hm H 2 2 Working Point for Permanent Magnetics (2) rm Br 0 H c 1 rm 1.2 Load Line: Bm d m Ag 0 H m g Am Pc 0 H m Define: Bm m Br H m (1 m ) H c Typically pick up: m 0.5 0.9 Pc is called permeance coefficient Ag / g R m Pg d m Ag Pc g Am Am / d m R g Pm Pc Bm m rm 0H m 1 m Airgap Magnetic Field from PM Rotor PM embrace: B g , rotor PM PM Bm Bm PM PM 2 2 B g , rotor B h 1,3,5... 2 PM electrical angle PM 2 2 PM 2 2 de de Rh P d 2 P B Rh Brh cos( h de ) Brh cos( h d ) 2 PM /2 2 PM /2 B h d cos( ) ( Bm ) cos( h ae )d ae m ae ae PM /2 2 PM /2 pitch factor for the sin h PM 4 th harmonic 2 B h m h k ph sin h PM 2 Brh Phasor Diagram V jX S I A Bnet BS BR EA Typically, design cos 1 at full-load for PMSM. sin 1/3 ( =19.47 ) so that Tfull-load (1 / 3)Tpull out B g , pk cos B r , pk 0.94 B r , pk Ba , pk sin B r , pk 0.33 B r , pk PM Br, pk sin Bm 2 4 Air Gap Size and PM Thickness From: 4 0 Nˆ a 1.5 2 I A,rated Ba , pk gˆ total P Initial total effective air gap size: 4 0 Nˆ a 1.5 2 I A,rated gˆ total Ba , pk P From: gˆ total k c g 'total g 'total g d m / rm dm Pc g Pc Carter’s coefficient g (1 m ) g 'total d m m g 'total rm ( Ag Am ) m rm 1 m Effective Air Gap gˆ total kc g 'total where the Carter’s coefficient kc s 2 b s 0 2 b s 0 bs 0 g ' total ln 1 s atan 2 g ' total 2 ' bs 0 g total approximately kc s bs20 s 5 g ' total bs 0 ts g total bs0 s ds0ds1 ds Rotor Sizing Total rotor diameter, including magnet Rotor inner diameter Di Dr 2d m Dr D 2 g Part 3 – Two Pole Super High Speed PM Motor with Magnet Inserted in Rotor Shaft Prototype Rotor is assembled by heating and cooling. Rotor is welded and well balanced after assembly. Air Gap Size 2 g eff H g H m D r 0 For a 2-pole PM rotor ( Ag Am ) 2 g e ff B m 0 H m D r 0 S Dr N geff Dr / 2 Bm Pc g e ff 0H m Carter’s coefficient g eff ( g Dr D 2 2 1 1 D D 1 D k c (1 ) r kc ) r rm 2 rm 2 Pc 2 Dr Define: Bm m Br Dr Dr kc ( g ) 2 rm 2 rm kc 1 1 kc kc Pc rm H m (1 m ) H c Typically pick up: m 0.5 0.8 D g Pc D Dr 2 Bm m rm 0H m 1 m Effective Air Gap gˆ total kc g 'total gˆ total g eff Dr , 2 rm g 'total g where the Carter’s coefficient kc s 2 bs 0 g ' total bs 0 2 bs 0 ln 1 s atan 2 g ' total 2 ' bs 0 g total approximately kc s bs20 s 5 g ' total bs 0 ts bs0 s g total ds0ds1 ds Dr 2 rm Example - Specifications Design a 2kW, 100krpm, NdFeB-38 PMSM, 2 pole 36 V terminal voltage, Y connected, 90% efficiency.
0
You can add this document to your study collection(s)
Sign in Available only to authorized usersYou can add this document to your saved list
Sign in Available only to authorized users(For complaints, use another form )