PABNA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Department of Statistics Faculty of Science Course Title: Statistical Field Survey Course Code: STAT-4110 Field Survey Report on “The livelihood of rootless people in Pabna City” A Survey Report Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Statistics Submitted by: i. Redwan Islam (201602) ii. Md Rafiur Rahman (201620) iii. Anika Tabassum Raka (201627) iv. Md.Bayezid Molla (201611) v. Md.Hasibul Hossain Anto (201633) vi. Joytirtha Roy (201607) vii. Suharto Mollik (181630) Supervised by: Dr. Md. Shamim Reza Professor Department of Statistics Pabna University of Science and Technology DECLARATION Here, we declare that this survey is an original work submitted by the following group members who have all activity made a contribution. This survey has not been submitted for any degree or examination at any other university. It does not contain any other person’s data, pictures, graphs or other information, unless specifically acknowledged as being sourced from those persons. Any other work of similar nature has been appropriately referenced in this survey. 1.Signed: Date: Redwan Islam 2.Signed: Date: Md.Bayezid Molla 3.Signed: Date: Md Rafiur Rahman 4.Signed: Date: Anika Tabassum Raka 5.Signed: Date: Md.Hasibul Hossain Anto 6.Signed: Date: Joytirtha Roy 7.Signed: Date: Suharto Mollik 2 APPROVAL CERTIFICATE This is hereby to certify that the research students bearing Examination Roll No 201602, 201620, 201627, 201611, 201633, 201607 and 181630 of session 2019-2020, Department Of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Pabna University of Science and Technology, Pabna. We completed the report entitled "The livelihood of rootless people in Pabna city" in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Science (Honor’s in Statistics on 11th January 2025). It is suitable for submission as a 4th year survey report, and no part of this work has been submitted for any other degree or other purposes. ____________________________ Dr. Md. Shamim Reza Professor Department of Statistics Faculty of science Pabna University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh 3 Acknowledgement First and foremost, all praise and gratitude are due to Almighty Allah for granting us the strength, patience, and perseverance to complete this work successfully. We would like to extend our heartfelt appreciation to our respected teachers, Dr. Md. Shamim Reza, Professor, Department of Statistics, Pabna University of Science and Technology, for their continuous guidance, valuable insights, and thoughtful suggestions throughout this study. His encouragement and constructive feedback greatly enriched the quality of our research. We extend our cordial thanks to Dr. Sabba Ruhi and Mira Khatun, the Department of Statistics of Pabna University of Science and Technology teachers, for providing various facilities and encouragement during work. We also wish to express our sincere thanks to all the participants who took part in this survey and contributed their time and opinions. Their cooperation was vital to the successful completion of this work. Finally, we are deeply grateful to our parents and friends for their unwavering love, moral support, and encouragement during every stage of this project. Their constant inspiration has been our greatest strength. We are also grateful to all the other people who supported our field survey. 4 ABSTRACT Homelessness in Bangladesh reflects deep structural inequities that force thousands into instability and social exclusion. This study investigates the socio-economic conditions and livelihood challenges of rootless people in Pabna City, where poverty, unemployment, riverbank erosion, and family disintegration remain critical drivers of displacement. Using a descriptive cross-sectional survey, primary data from 219 respondents were collected through purposive and snowball sampling. A structured questionnaire captured demographic, economic, and social variables, which were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, correlation analysis, and a binary logistic regression model. Logistic regression was applied to identify the determinants of loan accessibility, as financial dependency emerged as a key vulnerability factor. Results show that 96% of respondents are landless, 54% are in debt, and most earn below 5000 BDT per month. Education and access to basic services remain limited, although child vaccination and schooling rates are comparatively high. The findings highlight that economic deprivation, lack of stable employment, and social negligence are the principal causes of rootlessness. Policy interventions emphasizing income generation, microcredit access, and community-based rehabilitation are crucial to restoring stability, dignity, and social inclusion among the rootless population. 5 Table of Contents Chapter 1: Preliminaries 1.1 Introduction……………………………………...…………………………………….10 1.2 Statement of the Problem…………………...…………………………………………10 1.3 Objectives of the Study…………………...……………………………………...........11 1.4 Significance of the Study…………………...…………………………………..……..11 1.5 Research Questions…………………...…………………………………….................12 1.6 Location…………………...……………………………………..................................12 1.7 Scope of the Study and Limitations…………………...………………………..……..13 Chapter 2: Literature Review 2.1 Introduction…………………...…………………………………………………..…..14 2.2 Socio-Economic Factors………………………………………………………….…..14 2.3 Access to Social Services………………………………………………………….....14 2.4 Bangladesh Context…………………………………………………………….…….14 2.5 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………....15 2.6 Research Gap………………………………………………………………….……...15 Chapter 3: Research Methodology 3.1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………..…..16 3.2 Research Design…………………………………………………………………….16 3.3 Study Area…………………………………………………………………………..16 3.4 Target Population…………………………………………………………………...16 3.5 Sampling Technique and Sample Size……………………………………………...17 3.6 Data Collection Instrument and Procedure…………………………………………17 3.7 Data Analysis……………………………………………………………………….18 3.8 Ethical Considerations……………………………………………………………...18 3.9 Limitations………………………………………………………………………….18 Chapter 4: Data Analysis and Presentation 4.1: Introduction……………………………………...…………………………………19 4.2: Frequency analysis 4.2.1 Age of respondents………………………………………………………….19 4.2.2 Gender of respondents………………………………………………………20 4.2.3 Family member count……………………………………………………….21 6 4.2.4 Grade studied……………………………………………………...…….…22 4.2.5 Type of Occupation……………………………………………………...…23 4.2.6 Average monthly income………………………………………………..…25 4.2.7 In debt……………………………………………………………...………26 4.2.8 Loan Source……………………………………………………………..…27 4.2.9 Land Ownership………………………………………………………....…28 4.2.10 Temporary residency……………………………………………….……...29 4.2.11 Residency loss issues………………………………………….………...…30 4.2.12 Seek help after rootless………………………………………………….…31 4.2.13 Government or others help……………………………………………..….32 4.2.14 Meals per day…………………………………………………………...…33 4.2.15 Protein consumption per week………………………………………….…34 4.2.16 Treatment medium……………………………………………………...…35 4.2.17 Child access to education…………………………………………...….….36 4.2.18 Child education medium…………………………………………….….…37 4.2.19 Child vaccination……………………………………………………….…38 4.2.20 National ID……………………………………………………….…….…39 4.2.21 Social negligence……………………………………………………….…40 4.3: Bivariate Analysis 4.3.1 Relationship between occupation status and debt………………………..…42 4.3.2 Relationship between occupation status and gender……………………..…43 4.3.3 Relevance between meals per day and protein consumption…………….…44 4.4: Statistical Analysis and Findings 4.4.1 Association between occupation type and salary range……………….……45 4.4.2 Association between grade studied and average monthly…………..………47 4.4.3 Association between loan amount impact meal consumption………………48 4.4.4 Association between occupation type and loan amount…………….………49 Chapter 5: Model Fitting Analysis 5.1 Model Fitting Analysis………………………………………………………...……50 5.2 Binary Logistic Regression………………………………………….………………50 5.3 Results of the fitted model……………………………………………..……………50 Chapter 6: Conclusion and Recommendation………………………..………54 7 List of Figure Figures No. and Names Page No Figure 4.2.1: Histogram of Age of the respondents 20 Figure 4.2.2: Pie chart of Gender of the respondents Figure 4.2.3: Bar plot of family member count Figure 4.2.4: Bar plot of grade studied Figure 4.2.5: Bar plot of occupation type Figure 4.2.6: Bar plot of income groups 21 22 23 24 25 Figure 4.2.7: Pie chart of debt Figure 4.2.8: Bar diagram of loan source Figure 4.2.9: Bar diagram of Land Ownership Figure 4.2.10: Bar diagram for Temporary residency Figure 4.2.11: Bar diagram for residency loss issues Figure 4.2.12: Pie chart of percentage seek help Figure 4.2.13: Pie chart of percentage received help Figure 4.2.14: Bar diagram of meals per day 26 27 28 29 31 32 33 34 Figure 4.2.15: Bar diagram for protein consumption 35 Figure 4.2.16: Bar diagram of treatment medium 36 Figure 4.2.17: Bar diagram of Child access to education 37 Figure 4.2.18: Pie chart for education medium Figure 4.2.19: Bar diagram of child vaccination Figure 4.2.20: Bar diagram for national ID 38 39 40 Figure 4.2.21: Bar diagram for social negligence Figure 4.2.22: Crosstab figure of occupation status vs in debt Figure 4.2.23: Crosstab figure of occupation status vs gender 41 42 43 Figure 4.2.24: Crosstab figure of meals per day vs protein consumption 44 8 List of Table Table No. and Name Table-4.1: Distribution of Age Table-4.2: Frequency distribution of Gender Table-4.3: Frequency distribution of family member count Table-4.4: Frequency distribution of Grade studied Table-4.5: Frequency distribution of Occupation Table-4.6: Frequency distribution of income Table-4.7: Frequency distribution of debt Table-4.8: Frequency distribution of Loan source Table-4.9: Frequency distribution of Land Ownership Table-4.10: Frequency distribution of Temporary residency Table-4.11: Frequency distribution of Residency loss issues Table-4.12: Frequency distribution of Seek help after rootless Table-4.13: Frequency distribution of Government or others help Table-4.14: Frequency distribution of Meals per day Table-4.15: Frequency distribution of Protein consumption per week Table-4.16: Frequency distribution of Treatment medium Table-4.17: Frequency distribution of Child access to education Table-4.18: Frequency distribution of Child education medium Table-4.19: Frequency distribution of Child vaccination Table-4.20: Frequency distribution of National ID Table-4.21: Frequency distribution of social negligence Table-4.22: Cross tabulation between occupation status and debt Table-4.23: Cross tabulation between occupation status and gender Table-4.24: Cross tabulation between meals per day and protein consumption Table-4.25: Chi-Square tabulation between occupation type and salary range Table-4.26: Chi-Square tabulation between grade studied and average monthly income Table-4.27: Correlation tabulation between loan amount impact meal consumption Table-4.28: Chi-Square tabulation between occupation type and loan amount 9 Page No. 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 42 43 44 45 47 48 49 CHAPTER ONE PRELIMINARIES 1.1 Introduction In an increasingly globalized and conflict-ridden world, the phenomenon of "rootlessness" has become a pressing social, political, and humanitarian issue. Rootless people in individuals or groups who lack a stable connection to a homeland, community, or cultural identity that are found across various contexts, from refugees and stateless individuals to migrants, displaced persons, and even those alienated within their own societies. Whether caused by war, forced migration, political persecution, economic hardship, or cultural disintegration, rootlessness often leads to profound psychological, social, and existential challenges. These individuals frequently struggle with identity crises, marginalization, legal invisibility, and limited access to basic human rights such as education, healthcare, and employment. This survey paper aims to explore the multifaceted dimensions of rootlessness by examining its causes, categories, and consequences. It also investigates how different societies and governments respond to the needs of rootless populations, highlighting both effective and problematic approaches. By surveying literature across health issue, sociology, anthropology, international law, and political science, this paper seeks to provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of rootlessness. Ultimately, the goal is to deepen awareness of this growing issue and to inform more humane and inclusive policies that address the plight of rootless people worldwide. 1.2 Statement of the Problem Homelessness remains a persistent and complex socio-economic issue that reflects structural inequalities within society. Despite rapid urbanization and economic progress, a significant segment of the population continues to live without adequate housing, facing daily struggles for survival. Homeless individuals often experience multiple dimensions of deprivation that lack of access to shelter, healthcare, education, employment opportunities, and social security. In many developing contexts, including Bangladesh, homelessness is not merely a personal misfortune but a manifestation of broader systemic failures such as poverty, unemployment, family disintegration, and insufficient social welfare policies. Yet, comprehensive empirical data on the everyday lives, challenges, and coping strategies of homeless people remain limited. This study seeks to investigate the socio-economic conditions, primary causes, and human rights concerns associated with homelessness. By conducting a field-based survey, the research 10 aims to generate insights that can contribute to the development of informed policies and social interventions targeted at improving the living conditions and dignity of homeless individuals. 1.3 Objectives of the Study The primary objective of this study is to explore and analyze the socio-economic conditions and lived experiences of homeless individuals with an emphasis on understanding the structural and personal factors contributing to homelessness. To achieve this overarching goal, the study sets out the following specific objectives: To examine the socio-economic background of homeless individuals, including their income sources, employment status, and access to basic opportunity. To identify the causes of homelessness, focusing on economic, social, and familial dimensions that influence displacement. To assess the extent to which homeless individuals have access to basic human rights, such as shelter, healthcare, food security, and education. To understand the challenges faced in daily life, including health risks, social problem and safety concerns. To explore coping mechanisms and survival strategies adopted by homeless people in urban and rural contexts. To provide evidence-based insights and recommendations for policymakers, social workers, and non-governmental organizations to formulate effective interventions aimed at reducing homelessness and improving the quality of life for homeless populations. 1.4 Significance of the Study This study on the lifestyle of homeless people provides critical insights into their socioeconomic conditions, causes of homelessness, and access to basic rights. It highlights the challenges faced by one of the most vulnerable groups and identifies gaps in support systems. The findings can inform policymakers and NGOs in designing targeted interventions, enhance public awareness and advocacy and contribute to academic research on urban poverty and social inequality. By understanding the root causes and daily struggles of homelessness, the study supports preventive measures and strategies to improve the well-being and inclusion of homeless individuals. 11 The findings of this study are important for several reasons: Policy and Program Development: The insights can guide government and non-governmental organizations in creating effective programs and interventions to support homeless populations, ensuring better access to food, shelter, healthcare, and education. Awareness and Advocacy: By documenting the lived experiences of homeless individuals, the study raises social awareness, fostering empathy and encouraging community involvement in addressing homelessness. 1.5 Research Questions What are the socio-economic profiles of homeless individuals in terms of age, gender, education, and occupation? What are the main causes contributing to homelessness and how do these factors vary across individuals? How long have been experiencing homelessness and what factors influence the duration of their condition? To what extent do homeless individuals have access to essential rights including food, shelter, safe drinking water, healthcare, and education? What coping strategies and support systems are utilized by homeless individuals to manage their daily needs? How aware are homeless individuals of governmental and non-governmental programs intended to support them? What are the most pressing needs and challenges that affect the well-being and quality of life of homeless individuals? 1.6 Location This study was conducted in Pabna covering [districts] to ensure a representative sample of rootless people. 12 1.7 Scope of the Study and Limitations Scope of the Study: This study focuses on examining the lifestyle of homeless individuals, emphasizing their socioeconomic conditions, primary causes of homelessness, and access to basic rights such as food, shelter, healthcare, and education. It explores demographic characteristics, coping strategies, and awareness of government and non-government support programs. The research is geographically limited to Pabna District, providing an in-depth understanding of homelessness within this context. Both quantitative and qualitative data are collected to offer a comprehensive perspective on the daily experiences and challenges faced by homeless populations. While the study does not aim to generalize findings to all regions, it provides valuable insights to inform policy, social interventions, and further research on urban homelessness. Limitations of the Study: While this research offers valuable insights, several limitations must be noted. Methodologically, the reliance on non-probability sampling (snowball and purposive) enhances access to a hidden population but limits the statistical representativeness of the sample, potentially skewing results towards more socially connected individuals. The crosssectional design captures a snapshot of rootlessness but cannot establish causality or trace its development over time. Conceptually, the study's dependence on self-reported data introduces the potential for biases, including social desirability and subjective interpretation of the core concept of "rootlessness." Furthermore, the focus on Pabna District, while specific, constrains the direct generalizability of the findings to other regions with different socio-environmental dynamics. Finally, practical constraints of time and resources limited the sample size and depth of qualitative investigation. Despite these limitations, the study provides a crucial foundation for understanding the nuanced experience of rootlessness and highlights the need for broader, longitudinal research in the future. 13 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Introduction Homelessness is a pervasive social issue that reflects the intersection of poverty, unemployment, family disruption, and inadequate social safety nets. Scholars have defined homelessness as the condition of individuals lacking a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence, often leading to severe deprivation in health, education, and social participation (UN-Habitat, 2020). Various studies across developing countries, including Bangladesh, indicate that homelessness is not merely a lack of shelter but a manifestation of multidimensional poverty. 2.2 Socio-Economic Factors Socio-economic factors play a crucial role in shaping the living conditions of homeless people. Research shows that most homeless individuals come from low-income families, experience unstable employment, and face challenges in accessing health care and education (Tipple & Speak, 2009). The lack of permanent shelter leads to insecurity, poor nutrition, and exposure to violence and disease. Many studies have also highlighted that natural disasters, family disputes, addiction, and indebtedness are significant causes of homelessness in South Asia. 2.3 Access to Social Services Access to social services and government support remains a persistent challenge. Despite various policy frameworks aimed at poverty alleviation and social protection, many homeless individuals remain excluded due to lack of identification documents and bureaucratic barriers (Islam & Hossain, 2018). Women and children are particularly vulnerable, often exposed to abuse, malnutrition, and limited educational opportunities. 2.4 Bangladesh Context In Bangladesh, urban migration and rapid urbanization have worsened the housing crisis. Studies by BRAC and UNDP (2019) reveal that homeless populations in Dhaka and other major cities often depend on informal work, irregular income, and community-based support for survival. However, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and social workers have been instrumental in providing temporary shelter, healthcare, and vocational training to help reintegrate homeless people into society. 14 2.5 Conclusion The literature suggests that homelessness is both a cause and consequence of socio-economic marginalization. Effective policy responses must therefore address structural inequalities, create employment opportunities, ensure access to basic services, and strengthen communitybased rehabilitation programs. Understanding these dimensions through survey data can help design evidence-based interventions to improve the well-being of rootless and homeless populations. 2.6 Research Gap Despite extensive research on homelessness, existing studies predominantly emphasize structural causes, policy frameworks, or specific vulnerable groups often in developed Pabna district contexts. There is a notable lack of empirical studies that investigate the daily lifestyles, coping mechanisms, and lived experiences of homeless individuals, particularly in urban areas of developing countries. Furthermore, while socio-economic conditions and access to basic rights have been studied separately, few studies examine the inter play between demographic factors, primary causes of homelessness, and accessibility of essential services. Additionally, awareness and utilization of government and non-government support programs remain insufficiently documented. Addressing these gaps, the present study seeks to provide a comprehensive understanding of the socio-economic conditions, causes, and access to basic rights of homeless populations, offering evidence-based insights for policy, social interventions, and future research. 15 CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 3.1 Introduction This chapter outlines the methodological framework employed to investigate the socioeconomic and psychological conditions of rootless people in Pabna District. It details the research design, study area, population, sampling techniques, data collection instruments, procedures, and ethical considerations. 3.2 Research Design A descriptive cross-sectional survey design was adopted for this study. This design was appropriate as it facilitates the systematic collection of data from a sample of the population at a single point in time to describe the characteristics and correlates of rootlessness. A mixed-methods approach was utilized, integrating both quantitative and qualitative data collection. This allowed for the quantification of key variables while also capturing the rich, narratives and lived experiences of the rootless population. 3.3 Study Area The study was conducted in Pabna District, located in north-western Bangladesh. Specific upazilas (sub-districts) such as Pabna Sadar, Bagchipara, Akdonto, Chor, Ashutoshpur were purposively selected due to their high vulnerability to riverbank erosion (Padma and Jamuna rivers), significant rates of out-migration, and the presence of both char (river island) and urban populations, which are critical for capturing diverse experiences of rootlessness. 3.4 Target Population The target population for this study was defined as people who exhibit characteristics of rootlessness, operationalized as: Individuals displaced at least once due to river erosion. Landless agricultural laborers with no ownership of homestead land. Long-term migrants who have returned to Pabna. Residents of unstable char areas. Individuals expressing a strong sense of disconnection from their community or place. 16 3.5 Sampling Technique and Sample Size Sampling Technique: Given the absence of a definitive sampling frame for the "rootless" population, a multi-stage non-probability sampling technique was employed. Purposive Sampling was used to select the study Pabna Sadar and upazilas known for erosion and migration. Snowball Sampling was then used to identify and recruit participants through referrals from initial contacts, as this is effective for reaching hidden or hard-to-reach populations. Sample Size: The area in Pabna district is covered by the survey. All of the rootless people in Bangladesh consider as population. Here sampling units are the rootless people in Pabna. 𝑧 2 𝑝(1 − 𝑝) 𝑛= 𝐸2 Z = z-value (1.96 for 95%confidence level) p= estimated proportion (0.5 for maximum variability) E = margin of error (0.0662 or 6.62%) A total of 219 participants were surveyed. Data collection continued until thematic saturation was reached for the qualitative component. 3.6 Data Collection Instrument and Procedure Socio-Demographic Profile: Age, gender, education, occupation, land ownership, migration history, number of displacements. Qualitative Section: Comprised open-ended questions exploring the meaning of "home," experiences of displacement, challenges, coping strategies, and aspirations. Livelihood and Assets: Questions on income sources, debt, and access to services. 17 Procedure: Data was collected over a one-month period. Trained enumerators conducted face-to-face interviews in Bengali (the local language), each lasting approximately 15-20 minutes. Informed consent was obtained verbally before each interview. 3.7 Data Analysis Quantitative Data: Data from the closed-ended questions were coded, entered into Microsoft Excel, and analyzed using SPSS (Version 26). Descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages, means, standard deviations) were used to summarize the data. Qualitative Data: Responses to open-ended questions were transcribed and translated into English. Thematic Analysis was employed to identify, analyze, and report patterns (themes) within the data through a process of coding and theme development. 3.8 Ethical Considerations Ethical principles were strictly observed. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, emphasizing voluntary participation and the right to withdraw at any time. Confidentiality and anonymity were maintained, with personal identifiers excluded and data securely stored. Interviews were conducted with empathy and cultural sensitivity to avoid distress. The study adhered to principles of beneficence, aiming to provide insights for policy and social interventions to improve the well-being of homeless populations. 3.9 Limitations The use of non-probability sampling limits statistical generalizability, and reliance on selfreported data introduces potential biases. The cross-sectional design captures only a snapshot of homelessness, and the geographic focus on Pabna District limits applicability to other regions. Despite these constraints, the study offers a foundational understanding of the lifestyle, challenges, and needs of rootless populations in the district. 18 CHAPTER FOUR Data Analysis and Presentation 4.1 Introduction In this chapter, results of the questionnaires surveyed respondents’ data will be analyzed. In order to know the nature and characteristics of the data, frequency distribution and graphical representation could very useful. We have used different graphical methods for presenting frequency of my data. Lastly this chapter is concluded with a summary on the hypothesis findings. 4.2 Frequency Analysis At first, we would like present frequency distribution and relevant graphs to have a quick look of the data. 4.2.1 Age: Table-4.1: Distribution of Age 19 Figure 4.2.1: Histogram of Age of the respondents Comment: The average age of the sampled individuals are about 43. The distribution of age shows most of the respondent consists of the age group between 20 to 40 and very few are of age greater than 80. 4.2.2 Gender: Table-4.2: Frequency distribution of Gender 20 Figure 4.2.2: Pie chart of Gender of the respondents Comment: The participants consist of 60% of male and 40% of female. 4.2.3 Family member count: Table-4.3: Frequency distribution of family member count 21 Figure 4.2.3: Bar plot of family member count Comment: Among the surveyed people we have found most of the families consist of 4 member which is about 30% and then family of 2 members which is about 23%. Only 5% of the families consist of 6 members. 4.2.4 Grade studied: Table-4.4: Frequency distribution of Grade studied 22 Figure 4.2.4: Bar plot of grade studied Comment: About 57% of the respondents have no educational background and only 15% of the respondents have studied up to grade 5. Very few have reported to study in higher grades. 4.2.5 Type of Occupation: Table-4.5: Frequency distribution of Occupation 23 Figure 4.2.5: Bar plot of occupation type Comment: In analysis of working professionals we have observed 36% of the respondents are unemployed. Most of the working people are involved in Labor jobs which is about 13%, in Brickyard with 8.7%,shopkeeper and farmer about 5%. 24 4.2.6 Average monthly income: Table-4.6: Frequency distribution of income Figure 4.2.6: Bar plot of income groups Comment: The average monthly income of the most of the individuals are under 5000.Only 7% of the respondents reported to have monthly income above 15000. 25 4.2.7 In debt: Table-4.7: Frequency distribution of debt Figure 4.2.7: Pie chart of debt Comment: Among the respondents 54% have reported to be in debt and 46% have no debt. 26 4.2.8 Loan Source: Table-4.8: Frequency distribution of Loan source Figure 4.2.8: Bar diagram of loan source Comment: About 44% of the people did not reveal their loan sources. Among the NGOs BRAC has provided most of the loans followed by ASA and TAF. 27 4.2.9 Land Ownership : Table-4.9: Frequency distribution of Land Ownership Figure 4.2.9: Bar diagram of Land Ownership Comment: 96% of the respondents reported they do not own any land and only 3% have reported to have their own land. 28 4.2.10 Temporary residency : Table-4.10: Frequency distribution of Temporary residency Figure 4.2.10: Bar diagram for Temporary residency Comment: Most of the people have been living in temporary residency for 5 years. 29 4.2.11 Residency loss issues : Table-4.11: Frequency distribution of Residency loss issues Residency loss issues Percentage Debt 8.22% Family Issue 28.77% Health Issue 6.39% Loan 0.46% Loss In Business After Buying Vehicle 0.46% Natural Disaster 9.13% Never Had A Permanent House 44.29% Temporary 0.91% Work Issue 1.37% 30 Figure 4.2.11: Bar diagram for residency loss issues Comment: The analysis on residency loss issues show that 44% of the people never had a permanent residency.28% lost their residency due to family issues, 9% due to natural disaster and 8% due to debt. 4.2.12 Seek help after rootless : Table-4.12: Frequency distribution of Seek help after rootless 31 Figure 4.2.12: Pie chart of percentage seek help Comment:53% of the respondents stated that they seek help after being rootless. 4.2.13 Government or others help : Table-4.13: Frequency distribution of Government or others help 32 Figure 4.2.13: Pie chart of percentage received help Comment: 56% of the respondents said to have receive help from government and other NGOs. 4.2.14 Meals per day: Table-4.14: Frequency distribution of Meals per day 33 Figure 4.2.14: Bar diagram of meals per day Comment: About 75% of the respondents reported to have meals 3 times a day and 25% reported to have 2 meals per day. 4.2.15 Protein consumption per week: Table-4.15: Frequency distribution of Protein consumption per week 34 Figure 4.2.15: Bar diagram for protein consumption Comment: Most of the people consuming protein 2 to 3 times per week. Only 2% have reported that they consume protein almost everyday. 4.2.16 Treatment medium: Table-4.16: Frequency distribution of Treatment medium Treatment medium Percentage Treatment taken from Government hospital 84.76% Homeopathy treatment 0.48% Non-government and government hospital 6.19% Non-Government hospital 3.33% Village doctor 5.24% 35 Figure 4.2.16: Bar diagram of treatment medium Comment: About 85% of the respondents stated that they receive treatment from government hospital and very few about 1% seek homeopathy treatment. 4.2.17 Child access to education: Table-4.17: Frequency distribution of Child access to education 36 Figure 4.2.17: Bar diagram of Child access to education Comment: The people are aware of their child education.82% of the respondents said they send their child to school. 4.2.18 Child education medium: Table-4.18: Frequency distribution of Child education medium 37 Figure 4.2.18: Pie chart for education medium Comment: The children are mostly getting their education from Government school. Only 7% from Madrasha and Non-Government school and very few from BRAC. 4.2.19 Child vaccination: Table-4.19: Frequency distribution of Child vaccination Row Labels Count of Child vaccination ensured Yes 100.00% (blank) 0.00% 38 Figure 4.2.19: Bar diagram of child vaccination Comment: All children are ensured vaccination. 4.2.20 National ID: Table-4.20: Frequency distribution of National ID Row Labels Have National ID No 5.48% Yes 94.52% 39 Figure 4.2.20: Bar diagram for national ID Comment: 95% of the people have their national id. 4.2.21 Social negligence: Table-4.21: Frequency distribution of social negligence Row Labels Social Negligence No 75.34% Yes 24.66% 40 Figure 4.2.21: Bar diagram for social negligence Comment: 75% of the respondents reported to experience social negligence. 41 4.3 Bivariate Analysis In bivariate analysis we observe the relationship between two variables. 4.3.1 Relationship between occupation status and debt Table-4.22: Cross tabulation between occupation status and debt Figure 4.2.22: Crosstab figure of occupation status vs in debt Comment: The persons who have jobs are more in debt than the unemployed or it can be said that the employed persons are provided more loans. 42 4.3.2 Relationship between occupation status and gender Table-4.23: Cross tabulation between occupation status and gender Figure 4.2.23: Crosstab figure of occupation status vs gender Comment: In occupation status we see male have more presence then female. Men are more actively involved in jobs than women. 43 4.3.3 Relevance between meals per day and protein consumption Table-4.24: Cross tabulation between meals per day and protein consumption Figure 4.2.24: Crosstab figure of meals per day vs protein consumption Comment: Those who have meal 3 times a day are more likely to consume protein per week but mostly 2 times per week. 44 4.4 Statistical Analysis and Findings A chi square test is a statistical test commonly used for testing independence and goodness of fit. Testing independence determines whether two or more observations across two populations are dependent on each other. In both cases the equation to calculate the chi square statistic is, 𝑛 (𝑂𝑖 − 𝐸𝑖 )2 𝑥 =∑ 𝐸𝑖 2 𝑖=1 𝑊ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒, 𝑂𝑖 = 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑦 𝐸𝑖 = 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑦 n=𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑛𝑜. 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑠 4.4.1 Association between occupation type and salary range Table-4.25: Chi-Square tabulation between occupation type and salary range 𝐻0 : There is no association 𝐻1 : Association exists Comment: Asymptotic significance shows the observed p value is less than 1% level of significance which means we can reject the null hypothesis and the test is significant. So the conclusion is salary range is significantly different for different occupation types. 45 We observe those involved in Labor, shopkeeper, brickyard, painter, farmer are more in higher salary range compared to others. 46 4.4.2 Association between grade studied and average monthly income Table-4.26: Chi-Square tabulation between grade studied and average monthly income 𝐻0 : There is no association 𝐻1 : Association exists Grade studied 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Female 21.46% 0.00% 2.28% 1.37% 3.65% 5.48% 2.74% 1.83% 0.46% 0.46% Male 36.07% 0.91% 4.57% 1.83% 1.37% 9.59% 0.00% 1.83% 3.65% 0.46% 47 Comment: From the chi square test we see that observed p value less than the level of significance of 1%. It means we reject the null hypothesis and there is a significant association between grade studied and average monthly income category. The analysis of grade studied to income group shows that people who have studied up to 5th grade are more likely to be in higher income groups. But the analysis also shows that people with higher than 5th grade study are less in high income groups. It is because we see less individuals have studied more than 5th grade so the proportion of their working status is less. We can also see that people with no educational background are more in numbers in high income groups. This phenomena can be explained by the fact that the jobs they are involved in does not require any educational qualification rather it requires people with more experience. So because of experience of work people are earning more than the people in education. 4.4.3 Association between loan amount impact meal consumption Table-4.27: Correlation tabulation between loan amount impact meal consumption Comment: There is a positive correlation between loan amount and meals per day. It means people are affected in their livelihood because of loans. 48 4.4.4 Association between occupation type and loan amount Table-4.28: Chi-Square tabulation between occupation type and loan amount Comment: The chi square test between occupation type and loan source shows a significant association which means different amount of loan are provided to different professionals. 49 CHAPTER FIVE Model Fitting Analysis 5.1 Model Fitting Analysis: Model Fitting describes the relationship between a response variable and one or more predictor variables. There are many different models that one can fit including simple linear regression, multiple linear regression, logistic regression (binary logistic regression, nominal logistic regression, ordinal logistic regression) and so on. In this survey, binary logistic regression is used. There are many situations when we would like to predict an outcome that is Ordinal (for instance Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree). In such situation, we can use Ordinal Logistic Regression to assess the impact of one of more predictor variables on the outcomes. Binary Logistic regression analysis is a method to determine the reason-result relationship of independent variable(s) with dependent variable. 5.2 Binary Logistic Regression: Binary logistic regression is used in this survey to model the relationship between a binary dependent variable and one or more independent variables (e.g., screen time duration, device usage, and parental monitoring). This statistical technique predicts the probability of an outcome (e.g., "Yes" for affected vision) based on the predictors and provides insights into their significance and strength of association. Odds ratios (Exp(B)) help interpret the effect of each independent variable on the likelihood of vision problems, while Nagelkerke R² assesses the model's explanatory power. 5.3 Results of the fitted model 50 Comment: The Nagelkerke R Square value is 0.424 means that approximately 42% of the variation in the dependent variable can be explained by the independent variables in the logistic regression model. 51 52 Summary of hypothesis: Hypothesis: 𝐻0 : There is no significant association between dependent variable and independent variables. Alternative Hypothesis DF P-value Decision 𝐻1 : There is a significant association between age and having loan 1 <0.01 𝐻0 accepted 𝐻1 : There is a significant association between gender and having loan 1 .881 𝐻1 rejected 𝐻1 : There is a significant association between occupation time and having loan 19 .815 𝐻1 rejected 𝐻1 : There is a significant association between average monthly income and having loan 1 .487 𝐻1 rejected Comment: Age has a significant impact on loan access. The odds ratio of age is .951 indicating for each year increase in age people are less likely to receive loan. It means younger adults are more likely to receive loans. 53 CHAPTER SIX Conclusions and Recommendations Conclusion The present field survey titled “The Livelihood of Rootless People in Pabna City” provides an in-depth understanding of the socio-economic conditions and daily struggles of homeless individuals living in the Pabna district. The findings reveal that most of the respondents are landless and live in temporary shelters without stable income or job security. Poverty, unemployment, family conflicts, and natural disasters were identified as the main causes behind their rootlessness. More than half of the respondents are in debt, mostly through NGO microloans, while government assistance remains limited. Recommendation Government Support and Policy The government should create long-term rehabilitation programs, including housing schemes, skill training, and employment opportunities for rootless people. Access to Education and Health Free primary education and healthcare facilities should be made available through mobile or community-based services. Social Awareness Awareness campaigns should be organized to reduce social stigma and discrimination against rootless individuals. NGO and Community Involvement NGOs and local communities should collaborate to provide food, shelter, counseling, and vocational training. Data Collection and Monitoring A national database should be created to identify rootless populations and track their progress over time. Psychological Support Counseling and mental health support programs should be developed, especially for children and women living without shelter Public–Private Partnership Encourage private sectors and businesses to support social housing and employment initiatives for the rootless. 54 References 1. BRAC & UNDP. (2019). Urban poverty and homelessness in Bangladesh: A situational analysis. Dhaka, Bangladesh: BRAC Research and Evaluation Division. 2. Islam, M. S., & Hossain, M. A. (2018). Homelessness and access to social services in Bangladesh: A policy perspective. Bangladesh Development Studies, 41(2), 87–104. 3. Tipple, G., & Speak, S. (2009). The hidden millions: Homelessness in developing countries. Routledge. 4. UN-Habitat. (2020). World cities report 2020: The value of sustainable urbanization. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme. 5. World Bank. (2021). Poverty and equity brief: Bangladesh. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. 6. Rahman, M. M., & Akter, S. (2022). Socio-economic factors influencing urban homelessness in Bangladesh. Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 8(4), 55–68. 55 Survey Questionnaire on the Lifestyle of Rootless People 1) What is your age? _______ 2) What is your gender? ☐ Male ☐ Female ☐ Other 3) What is your marital status? ☐ Married ☐ Unmarried ☐ Other 4) How many members are there in your family? _______ 5) What is your highest level of education completed? _______ 6) Are you currently employed? ☐ Yes ☐ No If yes, what kind of work do you do? _______ 7) What is your average monthly income? ☐ Below 5,000 BDT ☐ 5,000–10,000 BDT ☐ 10,000–15,000 BDT ☐ Above 15,000 BDT 8) Do you currently have any loans? _______ 9) From where did you take the loan and what is the amount? _______ 10) Where did you previously live (district/area)? Did you own any land or property there? _______ 11) How long have you been living without a permanent home? _______ 12) What do you think is the main reason for losing your home? ☐ Job loss ☐ Family conflict ☐ Natural disaster ☐ Addiction ☐ Health issue ☐ Debt ☐ Other (please specify): _______ 56 13) Have you received help from anyone after becoming homeless? ☐ Yes ☐ No 14) Have you received any government or non-governmental assistance? ☐ Yes ☐ No If yes, what kind of benefit did you receive? _______ 15) How many times do you eat per day? _______ 16) Do you have access to safe drinking water? ☐ Yes ☐ No 17) How much do you spend on food per week (rice, meat, etc.)? _______ 18) When you get sick, where do you seek treatment? _______ 19) Do your children have access to education? ☐ Yes ☐ No If yes, where or through which institution? _______ 20) Are you and your family able to eat three meals a day regularly? ☐ Yes ☐ No 21) Do you have a National ID card? ☐ Yes ☐ No 22) Do you feel socially excluded? ☐ Yes ☐ No Thanks for cooperation That’s all for now 57
0
You can add this document to your study collection(s)
Sign in Available only to authorized usersYou can add this document to your saved list
Sign in Available only to authorized users(For complaints, use another form )