1
Should The Global Community Invest in Economic Policies to Close the Gap Between
Developing and Developed Nations?
6527
Robert Morgan Senior High
9239: Global Perspectives and Research
Mrs. Katharine Rego Figuerola
February 19, 2025
2
Global economic inequality has been a major issue for decades. Wealthier nations have
kept a strong advantage over developing countries. Industrialization, globalization, and resources
have contributed to this separation. While progress has been made, like the rapid growth in parts
of Asia and Latin America, the gap between rich and poor countries remains large. Some argue
that the global community should invest in policies to help close this gap. This would boost
trade, increase productivity, and make a fairer global economy. These policies include things like
trade, investments, and cooperation between nations. Supporters state the benefits of
globalization and the moral responsibility in bringing economic equality. Critics argue that these
policies may worsen inequality and harm weaker economies. They believe that focusing on
national policies and independence leads to stronger overall development.
Supporters of investment in global economic equality say that reducing inequality
benefits all nations. Vox EU CEPR explains that “reducing inequality increases trade and world
demand, with potential to benefit both developing and developed nations”(Stocker, et.al, 2017).
As the economy of poorer nations get stronger they can buy more products and services from
richer nations, increasing world trade.
Another significant part affecting this gap is immigration, which can quickly bring
growth to an economy. The Penn Wharton Budget Model shows how immigration boosts
productivity in developed nations by “filling jobs and promoting innovation” (University of
Pennsylvania, 2016). This works to boost the world's economy by supplying workers.
Historical facts also show that focused investments help developing nations build up. Our
World in Data provides proof of how investments in medicine, education, and infrastructure have
3
reduced inequality in Asia and Latin America. These investments make jobs, improve living
conditions, and ensure long term stability.
Apart from economics, there is also an argument for global investment in equality.
Cambridge Core highlights the moral responsibility of advanced nations to change systems that
heavily benefit wealthier countries, but not the lower ones that need it. “The majority of global
institutions, such as the International Monetary Fund and World Trade Organization, have been
shaped by advanced nations in ways that tend to favor wealthier countries” (Cambridge
University Press, 2020).
Arguments say that economic policies of the world for equality are not successful. Wiley
Online Library states that, “in the majority of cases, globalization has increased inequality,
specifically in those countries poorly governed” (Roser, 2017). While economic opportunities
are provided by globalization, it generally leads to the exploitation of resources, labor, and
markets in the poor countries.
However, financial globalization has not really led to economic development in poorer
countries. SpringerLink states that the majority of developing countries are unable to benefit
from foreign investment because of “corruption, inferior infrastructure, and unpredictable
economies” (Prasad, et.at, 2005). Instead of helping nations develop, financial globalization
often hurts them by making them rely more on foreign aid and investment.
The second biggest challenge is the struggle to start any sort of fair global economic
policy. Brookings Institution explains that “global reforms are resisted by powerful nations and
institutions, and therefore it is difficult to apply them successfully” (Daalder & Linsay, 2003).
4
Wealthy nations may prioritize their interests, leading to policies that do not benefit developing
nations as planned.
Certain experts say that local strategies have better chances of success than global
policies. JagranJosh includes countries that have managed to establish their economies on their
own. For instance, certain “Asian nations have established policies focusing on local industries,
education, and innovation, leading to long-term success” (Pasricha, 2024). This means that
countries may be more successful focusing on their own development rather than relying on
other countries intervening and helping.
A more even approach balancing international assistance and national indpendance may
be the best way to reduce economic inequality. This method addresses both the benefit of foreign
investment and the need for national policy. SpringerLink suggests that “investments must go
towards supporting developing nations in building good institutions, including open governments
and good financial systems”(Prasad, et.at, 2005). Good institutions reduce corruption and
quickly bring stronger economic policies.
Improvement in global economic organizations could also bring fairer trading. Brookings
reports that institutions like the “IMF and WTO must be restructured so that developing
countries have more clout in making decisions”(Litan, 2000). This quote states a more balanced
world economy where all countries have a chance of becoming successful would be possible if
done.
At the same time, countries must build policies according to their needs. Our World in
Data and JagranJosh reflect on the need for economic policies focusing on local areas, education,
5
and infrastructure but at the same time making use of international resources to promote growth.
With this, countries can benefit from globalization without being dependent on foreign aid.
The other important action is regulating capital flows to protect weak economies.
Cambridge Core suggests that uncontrolled financial globalization can lead to economic crises in
developing economies. Institutes or rules that control foreign investments coming in and going
out of a nation can stabilize economies and prevent financial collapses. Policies are not enough
to lower the economic inequality around the globe. You must take advantage and knowledge of
past trends, a nation's economic structure, and cooperation between nations. While policies have
an influence, they depend on how well they are being executed and various other factors.
Education is one of the key factors involved in reversing inequality. Our World in Data
says that quality education plays a significant role in economic opportunities for developing
nations. Countries that spend money on education will likely have better economic growth
because an educated society is more productive. However, most poor countries suffer from
worse education systems that limit their ability to improve. To close this gap, the developed
world and global institutions can give financial aid and technical assistance to improve education
quality in lesser nations.
Another important factor is health. The World Health Organization states that healthy
people are more productive and make a greater contribution to economic growth. Weak health
systems affect most developing countries, leading to less outcome and growth. Spending on
health can bring improving effects to economic stability.
6
On top of these basic needs, technology plays a big role in reducing economic inequality.
The International Telecommunication Union states that digital access can have developing
nations be able to contribute more to the world economy. With enhanced internet status, digital
programs, and access to financial technology, developing nations are able to improve faster.
Digital banking and electronic trade, for example, allow small businesses in remote locations to
access international markets, with more potential for profit.
Trade policy is a significant factor of the income inequality. Some say free trade
agreements help developing countries by opening markets and bringing investment from other
countries. However, critics argue that these regulations on the global economy often benefit
richer nations and make it difficult for poorer nations to compete.
The World Trade Organization says that fair trade policies can even out the economy by
reducing tariffs and trade barriers for developing nations. However, past trade agreements
sometimes brought exploiters rather than development. For example, Oxfam International states
some trade agreements have pressured developing nations to lower their environmental and labor
standards to attract foreign investors. This brought the explotion of workers and more.
To create a more balanced world economy, trade policy needs to be more fair and more
free markets will be needed. The Brookings Institution suggests that industrialized nations
provide trade with countries that have fair labor standards and environmental policies. Also,
international agreements need to ensure that small corporations in developing nations get access
to international markets rather than being exploited by larger corporations.
7
Another approach to lowering inequality is encouraging regional trade alliances. An
example of a regional agreement that increased trade among African nations is the African
Continental Free Trade Area. This let them develop economically without over dependence on
richer nations. These kinds of policies promote economic self-reliance while continuing to gain
from worldwide trades.
Foreign help has been considered to help reduce worldwide economic inequality but its
effectiveness is questionable. Some experts believe that aid can improve education, health, and
infrastructure in developing nations, leading to overall growth. Others argue that assistance
creates dependency and discourages dependance.
Cambridge Core research shows that the efficacy of foreign aid depends on its use.
Support in the form of food and medicine during crises is most needed. Long term aid must be
done carefully so that it doesn't make a country rely on foreign aid. For example, things like
businesses and employment related aid may be more effective than money.
The Gates Foundation shows the importance of using aid correctly in things like
agricultural growth, clean energy, and digital technology. By helping developing nations develop
industries rather than relying on foreign money, aid can help these nations become an
independent source of what they might've been lacking.
The growth of struggling economies is required for reducing inequality. However, it
should not come at the cost of our environment or social tensions. Some developing nations
face the challenge of economic growth at the cost of their environment.
8
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals highlight the fact that economic
development has to acknowledge environmental protection. Uncontrolled industrialization can
lead to pollution, deforestation, and climate change, which affect developing nations the most.
Using policies that support green energy, organic agriculture, and careful use resources is crucial
to maintaining economic stability.
Social factors like workers rights and gender equality also affect economic development.
The World Economic Forum says that countries that invest in gender equality are more likely to
see better economic growth. Equal access to education, employment, and economic opportunities
enhances economic stability overall and eliminates poverty.
Getting rid of global economic inequality requires a mix of policies, technological
advances, and collaboration between countries. Investment in education and employment
training must be provided to allow employees from poorer nations to have the same opportunities
as anyone else. Fair trade agreements must be beneficial for developing nations in the market
rather than exploitation. Giving more access to technology, especially to the internet, can also
give new economic opportunities for low income communities.
Foreign aid should focus on sustainable development and not in the entrepreneurship and
infrastructure development. Environmental sustainability should be included in economic
policies to ensure lasting prosperity. Policies that focus on equitable wages, labor protection, and
gender equality also help keep the economy stable.
This research shows that global inequality is a complex issue with no simple solution.
Some sources like Our World in Data and the CEPR report support global investment by
showing benefits like increased trade and reduced poverty. Others like Wiley Online Library and
9
SpringerLink claim that globalization can sometimes make inequality worse, especially in
countries with weak infrastructure. These sources are strong because they use real data, but some
lack details about how policies work in specific places. More research is needed on how local
governments can use global support effectively and how to make global policies fair for
everyone. While some arguments are more convincing, like the benefits of shared growth, the
challenges raised by critics are important and can’t be ignored. This research helped show how
different perspectives connect, and why both global and local efforts matter in solving inequality.
The topic of world economic inequality is complicated with various factors on both sides.
Global politicians believe that investments in infrastructure and trade and education can make all
nations equal. Other people think that globalization makes nations dependent, leads to exploits
and economic instability. International cooperation and national freedom are some of the most
important goals to get close to our equal society. By restructuring world trade policies,
education, technological things, and fair economic policies, the world can move towards an equal
community. lowering global inequalities needs both immediate action and long term efforts that
aim for fairness, innovation, and cooperation. Ultimately, while economic inequality will
probably never be eliminated completely, policy and collaboration can make opportunities for all
nations to grow into a more unified world.
(1,925)
10
References
Daalder, I. H., & Lindsay, J. M. (2003, January 1). The Globalization of Politics:
American Foreign Policy for a New Century. Brookings; Brookings.
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-globalization-of-politics-Americanforeign-policy-for-a-new-century/
Frieden, J. A. (1991). Invested interests: the politics of national economic policies in a world of
Global Finance Internataional, 45(04)425.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300033178
Heimberger, P. (2020). Does economic globalization affect income inequality? A meta‐
analysis. The World Economy, 43(11), 2960–2982.
https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13007
Litan, R. E. (2000, March 1). The “Globalization” Challenge: The U.S. Role in Shaping World
Trade and Investment. Brookings; Brookings.
The "Globalization" Challenge: The U.S. Role in Shaping World Trade and Investment
Pasricha, A. (2024, August 2). These Are 7 Major U.S. Economic Policies That Shaped
Nation. Jagranjosh.com; Jagran Josh.
https://www.jagranjosh.com/us/explainers/these-are-7-major-us-economicpolicies-that- shaped-the-nation-1722620295
the
11
Prasad, E., Rogoff, K., Wei, SJ., Kose, M.A. (2005). Effects of Financial Globalization on
Developing Countries: Some Empirical Evidence. In: Tseng, W., Cowen, D. (eds) India’s
and China’s Recent Experience with Reform and Growth. Procyclicality of Financial
Systems in Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9780230505759_9
Roser, M. (2017). The history of global economic inequality. Our World in Data.
https://ourworldindata.org/the-history-of-global-economic-inequality\
Stocker, M. (2017, February 27). Understanding the global role of the US economy.
CEPR.
https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/understanding-global-role-us-economy
University of Pennsylvania. (2016, June 27). The Effects of Immigration on the United States’
Economy. Penn Wharton Budget Model; University of Pennsylvania.
https://budgetmodel.wharton.upenn.edu/issues/2016/1/27/the-effects-of-immigration-onthe-united-states-economy