tion -exactinformationexample
Gill write the exact definition
.
Question1c)
Pick
describe
>
-
the
perspective
these up from
paraphrase
1) Issue
2) Cause
:
:
Structure
source
the
,
little
and
write
a
What the
made
What
3) Consequence
writer
What
:
thinks
is
the
them
&
problem
problem happen ?
the
happens
after
the
problem ?
1) Values Who/what is affected by the problem?
:
5) Action
this
is
:
to
how
a
solve
6-mark
of explanation
is
the
problem ?
question
.
so
structure
and
important
/youcan addmultiple
points in
one
aspo a
a
bit
Id greatestimpactonthe
&
on
significant
(()
a
pol
"
Y
ethically/morally
>
-
most
important
multiple negative/positive consequences
vicious
cycle
(never-ending loop)
Reflects expert opinion
most
you2
have
DEV
strategy
to
write
4
don't
just
DEVELOPEPED
marks
ENDENCE
↳
easy/difficult to solve
very impo
:
from the
points
so
each
state
the
point provide
sources
&
explain .
,
point
=
purpose
of research /no clear purpose
&
> quotation from
E
Question 2
Clear
a
research
-
Research
was
interview . I no evidence
ethical /not ethical
/no primary research
.
information /lack of depth
strength
↳ no /authentic
, testimony , experience
4 source
evidence
Ino source
↳ multiple (noof
ways of research
data
complete
primary
- detailed
-
research
1)ntenbiased
may Imay not a fully
triangulation
Soyou
have
b
to
- Strengths
.
write
&
I
and nation a
CLEAR , DISTINCT
point, To
weaknesses .
again,don't
juststate thepointjusta
E Primary
Question &b
"do research"
secondary
ence ↳
↳4
1
>
-
interviews
> observation
-
3 Questionnaires
↳
Surveys
↳ Review
of
Internet &
case
documents
media
search
methods
and
&
write
studies .
any
material
You
&
have
write
develop
-
quantitative infor
qualitative
to
them
Then
write
them
.
two
two
primary
secondary methods
Reasoni
n
g
Sength
3
⑫n
argument
zoa
of
"
↳
↳
bias/
rested interest
local
economic
personal
values
experience .
4 Evidence
I↳
<
go
2
OBVIOUS
that
You
are
and
range
and
sample
depth of into
(sufficient)
source
opinion/testimony.
8 marks
per
of
atleast
weakness .
one
your
an
,
write
.
lock
if there is
favorable person write
I
strength of the
person ,
the
argument
non-repetitive
per person (to
developed points
CANNOT write
person's
and
5
weakness
weaker
,
measured
↳ relevance
expert
marks)
there
exaggerated precise
.
(reliable ?)
date Coutdated info ? )
how
many types of into
have to write
>
-
-
emotive ,
>
-
↳ size
[
>
-
Youin
language
person's strength
points
have
to
as
another
be
distinct
,
-
solves the root
stonective
benefit
!
G cost-effective
↳ Boosts
burden
↓
↳ human
G
on
↳ immediate
Sifal
· economye
services .
scalability
s
↳
rig hts works
(large
↳
↳
solving
.
.
to
↳International
potential
cractical
I
implement
Quick
to
-asibility
C
!
execute
low resistance
-SDGs
relevance
issues .
replicate
-
problem
En
multiple
political support
cross-party
driven
Global
addresses
acceptance
Innovation
↳ creative
rate
funding model.
-wide
community
to
sustainable
Stakeholder
support
&
high
success
for
populations
easy
E
impact
↓
morally
justificable
public
cause
.
low
mitigation
unintended
consequences
cooperation
adaptable
&
Multiple options
a
-
-
Write
20
.
points
suggestion and briefly
justification points [5 points
State your
Intro :
the
-
overall
.
DEVELOP
those
points
para :
State & explain
with
para
[5 points]
1st para :
explanation
-
-
And
3rd
[5 points J
amount
-
-
write
:
Again
,
evidence
Cleast favorable option)
(negatives)
(neutral point) write balanced
+
points (developed)
of
conclusion :
by evidence &
,
-
.
summary of
write
DISTINCT
the
justification
.
points
justification points.
(agree
disagrees
Ente
statement
-
Intro
:
aut
-
1st
brief overview (poses
rishs/unnecessary--etc )
+
your opinion
para
:
the para
seven
-
2nd para :
the
three
-
or
Conclusion :
under
DEVELOPED
your
.
opinion's
points
arguments
AGAINST
.
DEVELOPED points
summary of
signific-
.
justification
favor
,
your Opinion,
.
pointe