pubs.acs.org/est Article Microbial Transformation of Dissolved Organic Sulfur during the Oxic Process in 47 Full-Scale Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants Caifeng Liu,† Kewei Liao,† Jinfeng Wang, Bing Wu, Haidong Hu,* and Hongqiang Ren Downloaded via NANJING UNIV on May 14, 2023 at 19:10:40 (UTC). See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles. Cite This: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 2118−2128 ACCESS Metrics & More Read Online Article Recommendations sı Supporting Information * ABSTRACT: Dissolved organic sulfur (DOS) is a significant part of effluent organic matter of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and poses a potential ecological risk for receiving waters. However, the oxic process is a critical unit of biological wastewater treatment for microorganisms performing organic matter removal, wherein DOS transformation and its mechanism are poorly understood. This study investigated the transformation of DOS during the oxic process in 47 full-scale municipal WWTPs across China from molecular and microbial aspects. Surprisingly, evident differences in DOS variations (ΔDOS) separated sampled WWTPs into two groups: 28 WWTPs with decreased DOS concentrations in effluents (ΔDOS < 0) and 19 WWTPs with increased DOS (ΔDOS > 0). These two groups also presented differences in DOS molecular characteristics: higher nitrogen/carbon (N/C) ratios (0.030) and more peptide-like DOS (8.2%) occurred in WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0, implying that peptide-like DOS generated from microbes contributed to increased DOS in effluents. Specific microbe−DOS correlations (Spearman correlation, p < 0.05) indicated that increased effluent DOS might be explained by peptide-like DOS preferentially being produced during copiotrophic bacterial growth and accumulating due to less active cofactor metabolisms. Considering the potential environmental issues accompanying DOS discharge from WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0, our study highlights the importance of focusing on the transformation and control of DOS in the oxic process. KEYWORDS: dissolved organic sulfur, molecular characteristics, microbial community, FT-ICR−MS, wastewater treatment in aquatic ecosystems.7,9 The oxic process in municipal WWTPs is the critical contributor for the degradation and removal of various organic matter, which are biologically utilized or decomposed via microbial biochemical reactions in the presence of oxygen.10,11 Microbes in the oxic process are deemed responsible for the changes in dissolved organic matter, including dissolved organic carbon, dissolved organic nitrogen, dissolved organic phosphorus, and DOS.5,10,11 So far, transformation characteristics of carbon, nitrogen, or phosphorus parts in dissolved organic matter have been documented. However, the transformation of DOS and the microbial mechanisms during the oxic process remain poorly understood. 1. INTRODUCTION Effluents from municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are an important source of dissolved organic sulfur (DOS) entering water bodies. Wastewater-derived DOS originates from the sulfidation process of natural organic matter and anthropogenic release of sulfur-containing chemicals (e.g., micropollutants of detergents, surfactants, and drugs) and from microbial metabolism in biological treatment processes in WWTPs (e.g., microbial products of sulfurcontaining amino acids and peptides).1−3 DOS in wastewater, which has a potential endocrine disruption effect and exceptionally strong binding affinity with mercury, may reduce water quality in receiving waters.4−6 Additionally, as a major component of dissolved organic matter, DOS presents a special property of forming mercury−DOS complexes, differentiating from other components in dissolved organic matter (e.g., dissolved organic carbon or dissolved organic nitrogen).7,8 The mercury−DOS complexes alter the mobility and bioavailability of mercury and promote the production of neurotoxic methylmercury.7,8 As a consequence of environmental risks posed by DOS, two consecutive publications in the journal Science highlighted that DOS is critical for ecological security © 2023 American Chemical Society Received: September 15, 2022 Revised: December 24, 2022 Accepted: December 27, 2022 Published: January 6, 2023 2118 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c06776 Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 2118−2128 Environmental Science & Technology pubs.acs.org/est Article 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS 2.1. Sample Collection and Processing. The sampling campaign was carried out between the fall of 2020 and spring of 2021 using a uniform sampling protocol that was designed according to publications involving the broad-scale survey of municipal WWTPs.18 We tried to collect samples in the same season and in relatively stable conditions at municipal WWTPs (between 10:00 and 16:00 h without rainfall events). In brief, municipal WWTPs for sampling were selected based on the following criteria: (1) sampling spanned latitude (from 19.996 to 45.814°) and longitude (from 86.079 to 126.715°) and covered six different climate types in China to account for substantial impacts of climate zone and geographical location. (2) Multiple WWTPs were sampled, and multiple samples per WWTP were collected in individual cities to ensure that samples were obtained on a broad spatial scale. (3) anaerobic/ anoxic/oxic process (A2O), anoxic/oxic (AO), and their modified processes are the most common types of biological nitrogen removal processes in WWTPs in China19 and thus we sampled the aerobic zone of these processes. Sample positions were set based on the administrative divisions, including northeast, north, east, central, south, northwest, and southwest China. We collected samples from WWTPs in each province per division as much as possible and intensively sampled in divisions with a high population density. Details of WWTPs (e.g., locations of wastewater treatment processes and wastewater properties) are listed in the Supporting Information. In the oxic process of each WWTP, wastewater samples (influent and effluent) were collected in 10 L precleaned polypropylene bottles without headspace, and sludge samples were transferred into 50 mL sterile tubes. Samples were kept at 4 °C and transported to the laboratory by express delivery.17 Once in the laboratory, wastewater samples were filtered through 0.45 μm pore-size cellulose filters and frozen (≤4 °C) before analysis, while sludge samples were centrifuged and stored at −80 °C until DNA extraction. The filtered wastewater samples were used for analysis of bulk chemical properties, DOS concentrations, and DOS molecular compositions. Details on analysis methods for bulk chemical properties and procedures for solid-phase extraction were described in our previous study.20 Briefly, first, aliquots were used for the analysis (in triplicate) of bulk chemical properties including chemical oxygen demand, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, nitrate, nitrite, and ammonia. We measured the conductivity, pH, dissolved oxygen, and temperature in situ and collected operation parameters from WWTP technicians. Second, 1 L wastewater samples were loaded onto solid-phase extraction tubes using PPL cartridges (500 mg, 6 mL Supelclean-ENVI-Chrom P SPE Tube, USA), to extract DOS.6,20 The extracted DOS was eluted with methanol and concentrated to 1 mL for instrumental analysis. Extractable DOS was isolated from bulk DOS in sampled wastewater, and inorganic sulfur (e.g., sulfate) was removed to ensure the sulfur in this study belongs to the organic species. It should be noticed that the term of “DOS” remained unchanged for simplification, but its content indicated for extractable DOS and differentiated from the bulk DOS before solid-phase extraction. Method blank (Milli-Q water) was analyzed identically for blank correction and quality control. 2.2. DOS Concentration Analysis. Before HR-ICP−MS analysis, 200 μL was taken from 1 mL extracted DOS of each DOS characteristics depend on its chemical composition. The accessibility of Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR−MS) with ultrahigh resolving power (>200,000) and mass accuracy (error < 1 ppm) enables molecular-level identification of DOS in complex environmental samples.3,8,12 Currently, our knowledge of DOS characteristics in wastewater is derived from a small number of sulfur-containing organic compounds that are interpreted from dissolved organic matter data. For example, Geng et al.4 found that the majority of identified organic molecules included CHO5S1 formulas, and they regarded these molecules as sulfur-containing transformation products from WWTP influents. Previous research has mainly focused on the highly abundant mass peaks and nonbiologically originated DOS from wastewater influent.4,13 Unfortunately, a considerable amount of DOS from biological treatment processes that predominantly consists of sulfur-containing microbial metabolites and high-molecular-weight mercaptans has not been characterized thus far.13 These DOS compounds that originate from microbes, often presenting as CHONS class species, are linked to excretion during microbial activity, but they have received less attention owing to the challenge of identifying compounds originating from microbes during transformation processes in DOS mixtures. The transformation of DOS in biological treatment processes presumably involves a series of microbial activities through which DOS is returned to inorganic-form sulfur by microbial mineralization or sulfur-containing products are generated by microbial metabolism.14−16 Recent work of Tang et al.16 coupling high-throughput sequencing with FT-ICR− MS found that microbial species can modify the compositions and properties of DOS, such as the stoichiometry, oxidation state, and aromaticity, all of which have consequences for DOS transformation. However, the deduction regarding microbe− DOS relationships is based on the information from only one WWTP and could be contradictory when differences in the sampling scale and wastewater treatment systems are present. Consequently, the DOS transformation mechanisms underlying microbe−DOS relationship requires further investigation on a broad scale. To fill this gap, a broad-scale survey of the transformation characteristics of DOS in the oxic process was conducted at 47 full-scale municipal WWTPs located in 28 provinces across China. Other valuable information (i.e., details on the sampling) obtained from this survey has been published recently.17 In this study, we quantitatively analyzed DOS concentrations in influents and effluents of the oxic process and specifically profiled DOS molecular compositions using high-resolution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (HR-ICP−MS) and FT-ICR−MS. Since the bulk DOS in wastewater is at a low concentration mixing with various inorganic salts, we isolated it as DOS extracts by solid-phase extraction for DOS-related analysis (i.e., analysis of DOS concentration and molecular compositions). Furthermore, we integrated DOS molecules and 16S rRNA sequencing data and applied statistical tools to elucidate the underlying mechanism that determines DOS transformation in the oxic process in terms of microbial composition and function. This study contributes to a mechanistic understanding of the DOS transformation characteristics in the oxic process and is beneficial for the reduction of its ecological risk. 2119 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c06776 Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 2118−2128 Environmental Science & Technology pubs.acs.org/est Article Figure 1. Variations of DOS concentrations in the oxic processes of 47 WWTPs across China, wherein the distribution map shows the sampling location in 28 provinces, and boxplots classify the oxic processes presenting increased effluent DOS concentrations (ΔDOS > 0) and the oxic processes presenting decreased effluent DOS concentrations (ΔDOS < 0). highly unsaturated-like (H/C < 1.5, AImod ≤ 0.5), polyphenollike (0.5 < AImod ≤ 0.66), and condensed aromatic-like (AImod > 0.66) compounds. 2.4. Microbial Composition and Function Analysis. DNA was extracted in triplicate using a FastDNA Spin Kit (MP Biomedicals, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol, and the sequencing analysis targeting V3/V4 region of 16S rRNA was performed on an Illumina-MiSeq platform (Shanghai Majorbio Bio-pharm Technology Co., Ltd). The raw sequence data were quality filtered using fastp (v0.20.0) and then merged using FLASH (v1.2.11). Based on 97% consensus threshold, operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were clustered by UPARSE (v7.1), and representative OTUs were assigned by taxonomy according to the SILVA database (v138). Microbial function was predicted using the R PICRUST2 package based on annotation information from 16S rRNA in the SILVA database, inferred using the KEGG pathway database, and extracted from the tier 2 categories.25 Details of 16S rRNA sequencing and analysis can be found in the Supporting Information. 2.5. Statistical Analysis. The corresponding sections in Text S4 show details of statistical analysis clearly in terms of the following: (1) DOS molecular accumulation and rank abundance curves were calculated following Kellerman et al.,23 and identification of produced, shared, and removed molecules follows our previous research.26 (2) Calculations involving microbes followed Zhou et al.,27 including indicator species, microbial co-occurrence networks of OTUs, and network properties (i.e., degree, betweenness centrality, within-module connectivity, among-modules connectivity of each node); based on within-module and among-module connectivity, nodes in networks were categorized into peripheral nodes, connectors, module hubs, and network hubs. (3) Spearman correlations were evaluated between indicator species and DOS, and structural equation modeling (SEM) by partial leastsquares path modeling approach (PLS-PM) was conducted to quantify their links. (4) Variation partitioning analysis (VPA) sample, dried with nitrogen gas, and then redissolved in 2% nitric acid solution (LC−MS grade). Redissolved extracted DOS was analyzed using HR-ICP−MS (Element XR, Thermo Scientific, USA). The instrument settings were specified according to the published method with modifications: scan mode, electrical scanning; resolving power, medium (m/Δm = 4000); radio frequency power, 1200 W; nebulizer gas flow, 1.03 L/min; auxiliary gas flow, 0.97 L/min; cooling gas flow, 15 L/min; and sample uptake time, 25 ms.21,22 The variation and removal rate of DOS in the oxic process were calculated using eqs 1 and 2, respectively. DOS (variation of DOS concentration) = conc. (DOSeff ) Removal rate = conc. (DOSinf ) (1) DOS/conc. (DOSinf ) (2) where “DOSinf” and “DOSeff” represent DOS in the influent and effluent of the oxic process, respectively; “conc.” represents concentrations. Specifically, ΔDOS < 0 represents the effluent DOS concentration lower than the influent DOS concentration with a positive removal rate and effective reduction of DOS, while ΔDOS > 0 represents the effluent DOS concentration higher than the influent DOS concentration with a negative removal rate and an increase in DOS. 2.3. DOS Molecular Composition Analysis. The remaining extracted DOS was analyzed using a FT-ICR−MS system (Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany) with a 15.0 T actively shielded superconducting magnet and an electrospray ionization source and was annotated following Kellerman et al.23 with some modifications (details are shown in the Supporting Information). Assigned DOS formulas can be classified into six compound categories by molecular traits [i.e., nitrogen (N), hydrogen/carbon (H/C) ratios, and modified aromaticity index (AImod)] according to Kellerman et al.23 and Poulin et al.24 with some modifications, including saturated fatty acid-like (H/C ≥ 2.0), peptide-like (1.5 ≤ H/C < 2.0, N > 0), unsaturated aliphatic-like (1.5 ≤ H/C < 2.0, N = 0), 2120 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c06776 Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 2118−2128 Environmental Science & Technology pubs.acs.org/est was used to assess the relative contribution of different factors to DOS variations. account for important components of DOSeff. In particular, previous studies have provided evidence for substantial microbial products released in the oxic process.29,30 Although small differences (e.g., operational conditions) exist among the oxic processes of sampled WWTP, previous studies have reported that significant influences from these differences could exist only when WWTPs are located near each other and fed by similar influents.18,31 More importantly, our VPA results also suggest that microbial factors outcompeting other factors largely dominated DOS variations (Figure S1d). Therefore, we speculate that the phenomenon of “DOSeff > DOSinf” can be attributed to the generation of sulfur-containing microbial products. This hypothesis will be further substantiated in Section 3.2. 3.2. Patterns of DOS Molecular Transformation Characteristics during the Oxic Process. To understand the phenomenon of “DOSeff > DOSinf,” the transformation characteristics of DOS molecules in the oxic process of WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 and WWTPs with ΔDOS < 0 were further identified. Based on the molecular accumulation curve of 47 WWTPs, a total of 32,808 (698 on average) DOS molecular formulas were detected, in which 6226 formulas occurred in >3 sampled WWTPs (Figure S3a). Moreover, 95% DOS molecular richness was achieved in 23 of the 47 WWTPs (Figure S3a), and DOS molecules with normalized relative peak intensities in the highest 5% were present in >83.2% samples (Figure S3b). These results revealed that although the abundances of DOS molecules varied in different samples, a core group of DOS molecules were ubiquitous in the oxic process of sampled WWTPs. DOS molecular transformation in each WWTP is shown in Figures 2 (S8−S36 in Supporting Information presenting details in each WWTP), presenting complex changes in DOS molecular compositions during the oxic processes. DOS molecules were identified into the produced, shared, and removed classes, and these three classes of molecules were further sorted into six compound categories in van Krevelen diagrams (Figure 2). A higher proportion of peptide-like compounds were found in new produced DOS molecules in the processes of WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 (19.4%) compared to those in WWTPs with ΔDOS < 0 (18.6%). It implies that more peptide-like DOS molecules produced in the oxic process of WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 may account for increased concentrations of DOSeff. Traits of molecular formulas, such as AImod and ratios of H/C, oxygen/carbon (O/C), and nitrogen/carbon (N/C), were calculated, which may provide information complementary to molecular transformation processes.10,12,32 Lee et al.32 found previously that compounds with a higher N/C ratio were associated with microbial products. As expected, distinct variation in DOS molecules in the oxic process of WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 and WWTPs with ΔDOS < 0 was observed (Table 1). In the oxic processes of WWTPs with ΔDOS < 0, N/C and P/C ratios in DOSeff were comparable to those in DOSinf. However, N/C and P/C ratios increased from 0.023 to 0.007, respectively, in DOSinf to 0.03 and 0.009 in DOSeff of WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 (Table 1). Molecular compositions of DOSeff in WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 shifted toward higher nitrogen and phosphorus contents, which was not found in WWTPs with ΔDOS < 0. Collectively, increased nitrogen in the molecular content of DOSeff (i.e., N/ C) suggested that microbial products may be generated in the oxic processes of WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0. For the phenomenon of “DOSeff > DOSinf,” this shift in the N/C 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3.1. Variations of DOS Concentrations during the Oxic Process. Influent DOS (DOSinf) concentrations ranged from 54.4 to 287.1 μg/L, and effluent DOS (DOSeff) concentrations ranged from 46.7 to 407.6 μg/L in the oxic process of 47 municipal WWTPs located in 28 provinces across China (Figures 1 and S8−S36 in the Supporting Information, presenting details of DOS variations in each WWTP). Previous studies have reported DOS concentrations in natural aquatic environments of 3.2 μg/L in estuarine or riverine environments8 and 2.6−9.6 μg/L in the ocean surface.9 Clearly, compared with these natural aquatic environments, DOS concentrations are at higher levels in DOSeff. Therefore, it can be expected that effects of DOSeff on receiving waters might be pronounced when DOSeff is discharged into receiving waters. Due to the relevance and potential contribution of DOSeff to DOS reservoirs, variations of DOS (ΔDOS) during the oxic process cannot be ignored. DOS removal rates in the oxic processes across sampled municipal WWTPs ranged from −184.1 to 59.9% (−5.1% on average) and had no significant correlation with latitude or administrative divisions (Figure S1). Interestingly, more than 40% of sampled WWTPs had negative DOS removal rates (DOSeff > DOSinf; Table 1) in the oxic process. This Table 1. DOS Average Concentrations and DOS Molecular Traits of Influent and Effluent in the Oxic Processes of WWTPs WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 WWTPs with ΔDOS < 0 items influent effluent influent effluent Cavg (μg/L)a H/Cb O/Cc N/Cd S/Ce P/Cf AImodg DBEh 126.8 1.42 0.38 0.023 0.065 0.007 0.080 6.66 171.5 1.38 0.39 0.030 0.066 0.009 0.074 7.37 148.8 1.43 0.38 0.021 0.065 0.006 0.078 6.56 119.2 1.40 0.39 0.021 0.065 0.006 0.100 6.79 Article a Cavg: average concentration. bH/C: hydrogen/carbon. cO/C: oxygen/carbon. dN/C: nitrogen/carbon. eS/C: sulfur/carbon. fP/C: phosphorus/carbon. gAImod: modified aromaticity index. hDBE: double bond equivalence. phenomenon indicates that the removal of DOS during the oxic process is not necessarily effective and that concentrations of DOSeff may even be higher than that of DOSinf. Based on this phenomenon, WWTPs with negative DOS removal rates (−39.1% on average; DOSeff > DOSinf) were grouped as “ΔDOS > 0,” while WWTPs with positive DOS removal rates (18.4% on average; DOSeff < DOSinf) were grouped as “ΔDOS < 0.” Moreover, the phenomenon of “DOSeff > DOSinf” further suggested the production of additional DOS during the oxic process, which likely had a bacterial origin. Wastewater bacteria manipulate most of the degradation and transformation of organics (e.g., organic sulfur and organic carbon) in the oxic process by means of microbial activities.10,11,28 Owing to these processes, microbial products, such as cysteine-, methionine-, and sulfur-containing peptides, are released by exudation or lysis of microbial cells,29 which might 2121 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c06776 Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 2118−2128 Environmental Science & Technology pubs.acs.org/est Article Figure 2. van Krevelen diagrams of DOS molecular transformation in the oxic processes of WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 and WWTPs ΔDOS < 0. Five aeras are separated by dotted lines, showing six compound categories of DOS molecules (saturated fatty acids, peptide, unsaturated aliphatics, highly unsaturated, polyphenols, or condensed aromatics). Circle colors denote variations of DOS molecules in the oxic processes, including produced (blue), shared (brown), and removed DOS molecules (orange). ratio supports our speculation that increased DOS concentrations in effluents were related to the formation of sulfurcontaining microbial products during oxic processes. Specifically, there were clear differences between WWTPs with ΔDOS < 0 and WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 in terms of aromaticity. After the oxic process, AImod decreased by 0.006 in WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0, whereas this value increased by 0.022 in WWTPs with ΔDOS < 0 (Table 1). Interestingly, it was reported previously that after biological treatment processes, molecular compositions of dissolved organic matter became more aromatic, more complex, and less bioavailable.28 DOS, as an important component of dissolved organic matter, in contrast, showed the opposite pattern in WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 relative to this previous report. Generally, wastewater microbes tend to utilize and convert easily degradable molecules into more recalcitrant compounds, resulting in an increase in aromaticity.28 Consequently, the opposite pattern indicates the formation of active DOS in WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0. Variations of DOS traits suggested more active molecules in DOSeff of WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0. In this case, compared with WWTPs with ΔDOS < 0, molecular compositions in DOSeff of WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 would present higher environmental concerns for receiving waters. Clearly, differ- ences were observed in the relative abundances of six compound categories (Figure 3). Among DOSeff molecules, lower relative abundances of unsaturated aliphatics (7.5%) and highly unsaturated (22.3%) categories were observed in WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 compared with 11.3 and 25.6%, respectively, in WWTPs with ΔDOS < 0. Other fractions in WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 had higher relative abundances than the corresponding fractions in WWTPs with ΔDOS < 0. However, it is interesting that only differences between relative abundances of peptide-like DOS in WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 (8.2%) and WWTPs with ΔDOS < 0 (5.9%) were statistically significant (Mann−Whitney U test, p < 0.05; Figure 3). Molecules assigned as peptides were previously reported to be associated with microbial products from microbial metabolism.4,7 This result indicated that molecules in peptide categories would play a critical role in differences of DOSeff between WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 and ΔDOS < 0 and thus peptide-like DOS deserves more attention. Specifically, prior studies have demonstrated high bioavailability in peptide-like molecules,24,33 meaning that DOS in peptide categories is liable to bind with trace heavy metals in receiving waters via its abundant sulfhydryl groups.24,29 Therefore, the presence of relatively more peptide-like molecules in DOSeff from the oxic 2122 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c06776 Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 2118−2128 Environmental Science & Technology pubs.acs.org/est Article analysis of microbes with DOS molecules was performed to further confirm the speculation in Section 3.2. 3.3.1. Links between Microbial Composition and Molecular Components. Indicator species enable the comprehensive description of prevalent and rare microbial species in microbial communities,34 which were used for elucidating microbial composition−DOS relationships (Tables S3 and S4). Among microbial composition−DOS relationships, microbes in WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 and ΔDOS < 0 were classified into two distinct clusters (Figure S7). Cluster 1 consisted of 11 indicator species involved in the oxic processes of WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 (e.g., Bacteroidia and SAR324_cladMarine_group_B). These taxa had significantly positive correlations with peptide categories (p < 0.05) but negative correlations with highly unsaturated and unsaturated aliphatic categories (p < 0.05). Cluster 2 contained five indicator species assigned by taxonomy at the phylum or class level (e.g., Alphaproteobacteria and Chloroflexia) in WWTPs with ΔDOS < 0. In contrast, indicator species in cluster 2 showed reverse associations with DOS molecules in comparison with microbial composition− DOS relationships in cluster 1 (Figure S7). These results indicated that microbial communities in the oxic processes of WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 or ΔDOS < 0 displayed distinct functions in manipulating DOS transformation. Microbial drivers of significantly increased peptide-like DOS molecules can be found by microbial composition−DOS relationships. In the oxic processes of WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0, peptide-like DOS showed positive correlations with Bacteroidia, Calditrichia, SAR324_cladeMarine_group_B, and Anaerolineae (r = 0.077−0.455, p < 0.05; Figure 4a), wherein the strongest interactions were Bacteroidia−DOS in peptide categories. Notably, the presence of these microbial species might be evidence for the increase of peptide-like DOS, since copiotrophic attributes were found in these microbial species; they tend to grow and accumulate in circumstances with abundant bioavailable compounds.35,36 An increase in peptidelike DOS may allow the assembly of copiotrophic bacteria, Figure 3. Relative abundance of six compound categories of DOS molecules, including condensed aromatics, polyphenols, highly unsaturated, unsaturated aliphatics, peptide, and saturated fatty acids. processes of WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 would result in an increase in the ecological risk of WWTP discharge. 3.3. Microbial Mechanisms of DOS Transformation during the Oxic Process. Our findings in Section 3.2 suggest that the increased concentrations of DOSeff in the oxic processes of WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 might be caused by microbial activities generating sulfur-containing microbial products. Additionally, VPA results revealed that DOS variations can be best explained by microbial effects (Figure S1d). Moreover, results in Section 3.2 indicate that the formation of peptide-like DOS may be a significant contributor to those microbial products. In this case, Spearman correlation Figure 4. (a) Spearman’s correlation coefficients of microbial indicator species with peptide-like DOS. Significant correlations are denoted as * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01), or *** (p < 0.001). Classification of microbial species in microbial co-occurrence networks in the oxic processes of (b) WWTPs with ΔDOS < 0 and (c) WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0. Areas are separated into four parts in terms of module hub, network hub, peripheral hub, and connector. 2123 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c06776 Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 2118−2128 Environmental Science & Technology pubs.acs.org/est Article Figure 5. (a) Spearman’s correlation between DOS molecules and microbial functions. Only significant correlation with p < 0.05 are shown. (b) Spearman’s correlation coefficients of microbial functions with peptide-like DOS (* denoting p < 0.05). such as Bacteroidia, and promote their metabolic activities, and vice versa. However, in the oxic process of WWTPs with ΔDOS < 0, increased peptide-like DOS negatively correlated with indicator species of Alphaproteobacteria (r = −0.17, p < 0.05; Figure 4a), which dominate in oligotrophic conditions and enable the utilization of refractory organic compounds.37 Therefore, relative abundances of peptide-like DOS decreased with the decomposition activities of oligotrophic bacteria (i.e., Alphaproteobacteria), which might explain the lower peptidelike DOS in the oxic process of WWTPs with ΔDOS < 0. Altogether, these results confirmed that the discrepancy between DOS transformation in the oxic processes of WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 and WWTPs with ΔDOS < 0 is related to divergent effects of microbial compositions on DOS components. Specifically, microbial composition−DOS relationships supporting this deduction also highlight the role of microbial functions in regulating DOS transformation. For example, in the oxic processes of WWTPs with ΔDOS < 0, almost all nodes (96.2%) of microbial co-occurrence networks were assigned to peripheral nodes, representing the specialist microbes (Figure 4b,c).38,39 It was previously reported that microbes belonging to peripheral nodes had excellent capabilities for xenobiotic degradation and metabolism.39 Thus, effective degradation would be performed due to abundant peripheral nodes in microbial composition−DOS networks, which might explain the higher aromaticity and lower bioavailability of DOS molecules in the oxic process of WWTPs with ΔDOS < 0. 3.3.2. Links between Microbial Function and Molecular Components. 46 metabolic functions of microbes in oxic processes were annotated, containing 12 abundant metabolic functions with a relative abundance >1% (Table S5). Significant differences in microbial functions between the oxic processes of WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 and WWTPs with ΔDOS < 0 were verified. For example, lipid metabolism had a higher abundance in the oxic processes of WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 in comparison with WWTPs with ΔDOS < 0 (Mann−Whitney U test, p < 0.05). Additionally, the relative 2124 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c06776 Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 2118−2128 Environmental Science & Technology pubs.acs.org/est Article Figure 6. (a) SEM quantifying causal−effect relationships between microbes and DOS. Rectangles are reflective indicators in the outer model and ellipses are latent variables in the inner model. (b) Variation portioning analysis on the contribution of microbial composition and function to variation in the DOS composition. abundances of energy and cofactor metabolisms were significantly lower in the oxic processes of WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 (p < 0.05). These metabolisms were the most abundance functions with relative abundances greater than 4% in the oxic processes of WWTPs with ΔDOS < 0 and WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 and could contribute to differences in DOS compositions. Microbial function−DOS relationships demonstrated evident differences in the oxic processes of WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 and WWTPs with ΔDOS < 0. For example, only cofactor metabolism appeared to be significantly related to peptide-like DOS (r = −0.245, p < 0.05; Figure 5), while other metabolisms among the 12 predominant metabolisms in Table S5 had no significant associations with those molecules (p > 0.05; Figure 5). To an extent, peptide-like DOS content is maintained by cofactor metabolism activities, and thus changes in peptide-like DOS will follow variations in cofactor metabolism. Furthermore, we showed that the relative abundance of cofactor metabolism in the oxic processes of WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 was significantly lower than that in WWTPs with ΔDOS < 0 (p < 0.05; Table S5). This result implied that less active cofactor metabolism is responsible for a higher relative abundance of peptide-like DOS in the oxic processes of WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0. For example, cysteine, the key precursor of coenzyme A biosynthesis,40 would be decreasingly utilized when biosynthesis becomes less active. In turn, cysteine could contribute to DOS components, and peptide-like DOS might increase as a result of cysteine accumulation. Besides cofactor metabolism, cysteine is a key metabolite participating in other metabolism pathways, for example, glutathione metabolism. Effects of cysteine accumulation may delivery to cysteine-related metabolisms, leading to an increase in sulfur-containing compounds.7,41 A previous study of Kertesz et al.41 investigated compounds such as cysteine regenerated during the metabolic activities of heterotrophs (i.e., Pseudomonas putida) on inorganic matter. This indicates that cysteine may be a crucial factor that can give a deeper explanation on differences in DOS trans- formation, which can be explored in the future study. Collectively, these results reflect differences in microbial functions and their correlations with DOS molecules between the oxic processes in WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 and WWTPs with ΔDOS < 0. In particular, increased peptide-like DOS could be primarily attributed to less active cofactor metabolism in the oxic processes in WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0. Differences in microbial mechanisms of DOS transformation in the oxic processes of WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 and WWTPs with ΔDOS < 0 were revealed by microbe−DOS relationships. A deeper analysis using SEM by PLS−PM was conducted to quantify causal−effect relationships between microbes and DOS transformation in the oxic process (Figure 6a). High loadings of links in the outer model (e.g., 0.842 for Anaerolineae-microbial composition) reveal that these reflective indicators in the outer model can well explain latent variables in the inner model. Specifically, cofactor metabolism reflected microbial functions to a great extent (loading = −0.814), and microbial functions had the strongest effects on DOS composition which was well represented by peptide-like DOS (loading = −0.929). Results of PLS−PM confirmed that cofactor metabolism was responsible for the accumulation of sulfur-containing microbial products. In particular, microbial composition related to DOS composition (loadings = 0.568) probably impact DOS molecules through links of microbial composition−microbial function (loading = 0.4741) and microbial function−DOS composition (loading = −0.623). This deduction was supported by VPA (Figure 6b), showing that 24.3% of variation in DOS composition was explained by microbial composition and function together. More importantly, VPA results revealed that DOS composition was best explained by microbial functions (58.5%) rather than microbial composition (41.5%; Figure 6b). In summary, all of these causal effects corroborate that peptide-like molecules generated from copiotrophic bacterial metabolism and accumulating in cofactor metabolism are the major contributors to increased DOS concentrations in WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0. Moreover, 2125 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c06776 Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 2118−2128 Environmental Science & Technology pubs.acs.org/est microbial functions played a more important role during this process. 3.4. Implications. Traditionally, oxic processes enable efficient treatment of wastewater with low organic loading (treated wastewater from anaerobic or anoxic processes) by assimilating organic matter and nutrients.10,11 However, based on data from 47 municipal WWTPs, an interesting finding was obtained: 28 of the sampled WWTPs had decreased DOSeff concentrations in the oxic processes, while the other 19 WWTPs showed increased concentrations (Figures 1 and S1). That is, DOS is an important component of organic matter in wastewater, and it did not necessarily appear that DOS concentrations decreased effectively after oxic processes. This finding opposes our traditional understanding of pollutant variation in oxic processes. More importantly, our results suggest that not only poor DOS degradation but also new DOS production (e.g., peptide-like DOS) originating from microbial activities occur in the oxic processes of WWTPs with ΔDOS > 0 (Figure 2). A considerable portion of peptide-like compounds were low-molecular-weight (<3 kDa) molecules with a relatively high biodegradability, which would be transformed into disinfectant byproducts in subsequent chlor(am)ination processes and persist during UV irradiation.42−44 Moreover, due to the hydrophilic functional groups and low-molecular-weight molecules in DOS, the complexation and adsorption of DOS by conventional metal salt coagulants and organic coagulants are not effective. Therefore, such DOS molecules pose a problem not only in the oxic process but also in a tertiary treatment process. There are two approaches to reduce DOS entering receiving waters. One is to regulate operations to minimize effluent DOS of the oxic process and another is to remove DOS by a tertiary treatment process. Since sulfur-containing microbial products are deduced to be responsible for increased effluent DOS in the oxic process, for the former, previous studies on microbial products (i.e., SMP) may provide relevant ideas for developing DOS control strategies or techniques.45−47 Operational parameters in the biological (oxic) treatment processes are the effective cost tools to control microbial products, for example, the optimal solid retention time for minimizing SMP formation in the oxic process is 2−15 d,45 which may also have positive effects on DOS control. Furthermore, a previous study found that some microbial species, for example, Pannonibacter, can effectively mineralize DOS with a sulfonate group as a carbon source for growth.48 Therefore, the technique accumulating such functional microbes or estimating whether operational parameters can effectively act in DOS control could become the next step of the work on DOS in the oxic process. For the latter approach, a new coagulant having a higher positive charge density and a higher degree of polymerization shows a greater removal efficiency in comparison with the conventional coagulants in terms of removal of sulfur-containing low-molecular-weight molecules.4 As such, the application of effective coagulants may be another practicable alternative for DOS control. Finally, DOS in the oxic process in effluents of WWTPs deserves more special attention. HR-ICP−MS analysis; FT-ICR−MS analysis; 16S rRNA sequencing; statistical analysis; information on 47 WWTPs; description of treatment processes; indicator species; microbial functions; DOS concentrations and removal rates; bulk chemical properties; DOS molecular distribution; microbial compositions; microbial cooccurrence networks; microbial compositions−DOS correlations; DOS concentration and molecular transformation in 47 WWTPs; and van Krevelen diagrams of DOS molecules in 47 WWTPs (PDF) FT-ICR−MS data have been deposited in figshare, which are publicly accessible at: https://figshare.com/ articles/dataset/FTICR_MS_formula/21621246 ■ ■ Article AUTHOR INFORMATION Corresponding Author Haidong Hu − State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, China; orcid.org/ 0000-0003-0193-0333; Phone: +86 25 89680512; Email: hdhu@nju.edu.cn; Fax: +86 25 89680569 Authors Caifeng Liu − State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, China Kewei Liao − State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, China; orcid.org/ 0000-0001-5303-8828 Jinfeng Wang − State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, China; orcid.org/ 0000-0001-9001-1413 Bing Wu − State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, China; orcid.org/ 0000-0001-7117-580X Hongqiang Ren − State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, China; orcid.org/ 0000-0002-6434-692X Complete contact information is available at: https://pubs.acs.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c06776 Author Contributions † C.L. and K.L. contributed equally to this work. Notes The authors declare no competing financial interest. ■ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study was funded by the Research Program of State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse (PCRRZZ-202104) and the Excellent Research Program of Nanjing University (ZYJH005). ■ ABBREVIATIONS dissolved organic sulfur dissolved organic sulfur in effluents of the oxic process DOSinf dissolved organic sulfur in influents of the oxic process DOS DOSeff ASSOCIATED CONTENT * Supporting Information sı The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.2c06776. 2126 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c06776 Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 2118−2128 Environmental Science & Technology pubs.acs.org/est ΔDOS (15) Ossola, R.; Clerc, B.; McNeill, K. Mechanistic insights into dissolved organic sulfur photomineralization through the study of cysteine sulfinic acid. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 13066−13076. (16) Tang, G.; Li, B.; Zhang, B.; Wang, C.; Zeng, G.; Zheng, X.; Liu, C. Dynamics of dissolved organic matter and dissolved organic nitrogen during anaerobic/anoxic/oxic treatment processes. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 331, 125026. (17) Mu, H.; Li, J.; Chen, L.; Hu, H.; Wang, J.; Gu, C.; Zhang, X.; Ren, H.; Wu, B. Distribution, source and ecological risk of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in Chinese municipal wastewater treatment plants. Environ. Int. 2022, 167, 107447. (18) Wu, L.; Ning, D.; Zhang, B.; Li, Y.; Zhang, P.; Shan, X.; Zhang, Q.; Brown, M. R.; Li, Z.; Van Nostrand, J. D.; Ling, F.; Xiao, N.; Zhang, Y.; Vierheilig, J.; Wells, G. F.; Yang, Y.; Deng, Y.; Tu, Q.; Zhang, T.; He, Z.; Keller, J.; Nielsen, P. H.; Alvarez, P. J. J.; Criddle, C. S.; Wagner, M.; Tiedje, J. M.; He, Q.; Curtis, T. P.; Stahl, D. A.; Alvarez-Cohen, L.; Rittmann, B. E.; Wen, X.; Zhou, J.; Global Water Microbiome Consortium. Global diversity and biogeography of bacterial communities in wastewater treatment plants. Nat. Microbiol. 2019, 4, 1183−1195. (19) Zhang, Q. H.; Yang, W. N.; Ngo, H. H.; Guo, W. S.; Jin, P. K.; Dzakpasu, M.; Yang, S. J.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X. C.; Ao, D. Current status of urban wastewater treatment plants in China. Environ. Int. 2016, 92-93, 11−22. (20) Hu, H.; Jiang, C.; Ma, H.; Ding, L.; Geng, J.; Xu, K.; Huang, H.; Ren, H. Removal characteristics of DON in pharmaceutical wastewater and its influence on the N-nitrosodimethylamine formation potential and acute toxicity of DOM. Water Res. 2017, 109, 114−121. (21) Beauchemin, D. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 4455−4486. (22) Giner Martínez-Sierra, J.; Galilea San Blas, O.; Marchante Gayón, J. M.; García Alonso, J. I. Sulfur analysis by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry: A review. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B 2015, 108, 35−52. (23) Kellerman, A. M.; Dittmar, T.; Kothawala, D. N.; Tranvik, L. J. Chemodiversity of dissolved organic matter in lakes driven by climate and hydrology. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3804. (24) Poulin, B. A.; Ryan, J. N.; Nagy, K. L.; Stubbins, A.; Dittmar, T.; Orem, W.; Krabbenhoft, D. P.; Aiken, G. R. Spatial dependence of reduced sulfur in everglades dissolved organic matter controlled by sulfate enrichment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 3630−3639. (25) Li, Y.; Xu, C.; Zhang, W.; Lin, L.; Wang, L.; Niu, L.; Zhang, H.; Wang, P.; Wang, C. Response of bacterial community in composition and function to the various DOM at river confluences in the urban area. Water Res. 2020, 169, 115293. (26) Liao, K.; Ma, S.; Liu, C.; Hu, H.; Wang, J.; Wu, B.; Ren, H. High concentrations of dissolved organic nitrogen and N-nitrosodimethylamine precursors in effluent from biological nutrient removal process with low dissolved oxygen conditions. Water Res. 2022, 216, 118336. (27) Zhou, L.; Zhou, Y.; Yao, X.; Cai, J.; Liu, X.; Tang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Jang, K.-S.; Jeppesen, E. Decreasing diversity of rare bacterial subcommunities relates to dissolved organic matter along permafrost thawing gradients. Environ. Int. 2020, 134, 105330. (28) Maizel, A. C.; Remucal, C. K. The effect of advanced secondary municipal wastewater treatment on the molecular composition of dissolved organic matter. Water Res. 2017, 122, 42−52. (29) Yu, H.-Q. Molecular insights into extracellular polymeric substances in activated sludge. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 7742− 7750. (30) Han, H.; Miao, H.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, M.; Huang, Z.; Ruan, W. Carbonaceous and nitrogenous disinfection byproduct precursor variation during the reversed anaerobic−anoxic−oxic process of a sewage treatment plant. J. Environ. Sci. 2018, 65, 335−346. (31) Zhang, B.; Ning, D.; Van Nostrand, J. D.; Sun, C.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Wen, X. Biogeography and assembly of microbial communities in wastewater treatment plants in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 5884−5892. variation of dissolved organic sulfur concentrations, that is, dissolved organic sulfur concentrations in effluents minus those in influents ΔDOS > 0 dissolved organic sulfur concentrations in effluents higher than those in influents, that is, DOSeff > DOSinf ΔDOS < 0 dissolved organic sulfur concentrations in effluents lower than those in influents, that is, DOSeff < DOSinf ■ Article REFERENCES (1) Göbel, A.; McArdell, C. S.; Suter, M. J. F.; Giger, W. Trace determination of macrolide and sulfonamide antimicrobials, a human sulfonamide metabolite, and trimethoprim in wastewater using liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 4756−4764. (2) Greenwood, P. F.; Berwick, L. J.; Croué, J. P. Molecular characterisation of the dissolved organic matter of wastewater effluents by MSSV pyrolysis GC-MS and search for source markers. Chemosphere 2012, 87, 504−512. (3) Su, S.; Xie, Q.; Smith, A. J.; Lang, Y.; Hu, W.; Cao, D.; Yue, S.; Chen, S.; Zhu, J.; Xu, Y.; Bell, N. G. A.; Uhrín, D.; Fu, P. A new structural classification scheme for dissolved organic sulfur in urban snow from north China. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2022, 9, 366−374. (4) Geng, C. X.; Cao, N.; Xu, W.; He, C.; Yuan, Z. W.; Liu, J. W.; Shi, Q.; Xu, C. M.; Liu, S. T.; Zhao, H. Z. Molecular characterization of organics removed by a covalently bound inorganic-organic hybrid coagulant for advanced treatment of municipal sewage. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 12642−12648. (5) Michael-Kordatou, I.; Michael, C.; Duan, X.; He, X.; Dionysiou, D. D.; Mills, M. A.; Fatta-Kassinos, D. Dissolved effluent organic matter: Characteristics and potential implications in wastewater treatment and reuse applications. Water Res. 2015, 77, 213−248. (6) Ossola, R.; Tolu, J.; Clerc, B.; Erickson, P. R.; Winkel, L. H. E.; McNeill, K. Photochemical production of sulfate and methanesulfonic acid from dissolved organic sulfur. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 13191−13200. (7) Ksionzek, K. B.; Lechtenfeld, O. J.; McCallister, S. L.; SchmittKopplin, P.; Geuer, J. K.; Geibert, W.; Koch, B. P. Dissolved organic sulfur in the ocean: Biogeochemistry of a petagram inventory. Science 2016, 354, 456−459. (8) Gomez-Saez, G. V.; Pohlabeln, A. M.; Stubbins, A.; Marsay, C. M.; Dittmar, T. Photochemical alteration of dissolved organic sulfur from sulfidic porewater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 14144− 14154. (9) Levine, N. M. Putting the spotlight on organic sulfur. Science 2016, 354, 418−419. (10) Tseng, L. Y.; Gonsior, M.; Schmitt-Kopplin, P.; Cooper, W. J.; Pitt, P.; Rosso, D. Molecular characteristics and differences of effluent organic matter from parallel activated sludge and integrated fixed-film activated sludge (IFAS) processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 10277−10284. (11) Zhang, B.; Shan, C.; Hao, Z.; Liu, J.; Wu, B.; Pan, B. Transformation of dissolved organic matter during full-scale treatment of integrated chemical wastewater: Molecular composition correlated with spectral indexes and acute toxicity. Water Res. 2019, 157, 472− 482. (12) Brünjes, J.; Seidel, M.; Dittmar, T.; Niggemann, J.; Schubotz, F. Natural asphalt seeps are potential sources for recalcitrant oceanic dissolved organic sulfur and dissolved black carbon. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 9092−9102. (13) Gonsior, M.; Zwartjes, M.; Cooper, W. J.; Song, W.; Ishida, K. P.; Tseng, L. Y.; Jeung, M. K.; Rosso, D.; Hertkorn, N.; SchmittKopplin, P. Molecular characterization of effluent organic matter identified by ultrahigh resolution mass spectrometry. Water Res. 2011, 45, 2943−2953. (14) Sievert, S. M.; Kiene, R. P.; Schulz-Vogt, H. N. The sulfur cycle. Oceanography 2007, 20, 117−123. 2127 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c06776 Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 2118−2128 Environmental Science & Technology pubs.acs.org/est (32) Lee, W.; Westerhoff, P.; Esparza-Soto, M. Occurrence and removal of dissolved organic nitrogen in US water treatment plants. J. AWWA 2006, 98, 102−110. (33) Lusk, M. G.; Toor, G. S. Dissolved organic nitrogen in urban streams: Biodegradability and molecular composition studies. Water Res. 2016, 96, 225−235. (34) Legendre, P.; De Cáceres, M. Beta diversity as the variance of community data: Dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning. Ecol. Lett. 2013, 16, 951−963. (35) Fierer, N.; Bradford, M. A.; Jackson, R. B. Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecol 2007, 88, 1354−1364. (36) Landa, M.; Cottrell, M. T.; Kirchman, D. L.; Kaiser, K.; Medeiros, P. M.; Tremblay, L.; Batailler, N.; Caparros, J.; Catala, P.; Escoubeyrou, K.; Oriol, L.; Blain, S.; Obernosterer, I. Phylogenetic and structural response of heterotrophic bacteria to dissolved organic matter of different chemical composition in a continuous culture study. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 1668−1681. (37) Kiersztyn, B.; Chróst, R.; Kaliński, T.; Siuda, W.; Bukowska, A.; Kowalczyk, G.; Grabowska, K. Structural and functional microbial diversity along a eutrophication gradient of interconnected lakes undergoing anthropopressure. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 11144. (38) Zhou, L.; Zhou, Y.; Hu, Y.; Cai, J.; Liu, X.; Bai, C.; Tang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Jang, K.-S.; Spencer, R. G. M.; Jeppesen, E. Microbial production and consumption of dissolved organic matter in glacial ecosystems on the Tibetan Plateau. Water Res. 2019, 160, 18−28. (39) Wu, X.; Wu, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, P.; Li, Q.; Zhou, J.; Hess, N. J.; Hazen, T. C.; Yang, W.; Chakraborty, R. Microbial interactions with dissolved organic matter drive carbon dynamics and community succession. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1234. (40) Leonardi, R.; Jackowski, S. Biosynthesis of pantothenic acid and coenzyme A. EcoSal Plus 2007, 2, 1−28. (41) Kertesz, M. A.; Kölbener, P.; Stockinger, H.; Beil, S.; Cook, A. M. Desulfonation of linear alkylbenzenesulfonate surfactants and related compounds by bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994, 60, 2296−2303. (42) Shah, A. D.; Mitch, W. A. Halonitroalkanes, Halonitriles, Haloamides, and N-Nitrosamines: A Critical Review of Nitrogenous Disinfection Byproduct Formation Pathways. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 46, 119−131. (43) Peng, J.; Huang, H.; Zhong, Y.; Yin, R.; Wu, Q.; Shang, C.; Yang, X. Transformation of dissolved organic matter during biological wastewater treatment and relationships with the formation of nitrogenous disinfection byproducts. Water Res. 2022, 222, 118870. (44) Meng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Han, Q.; Xue, N.; Sun, Y.; Gao, B.; Li, Q. Trihalomethane (THM) formation from synergic disinfection of biologically treated municipal wastewater: Effect of ultraviolet (UV) irradiation and titanium dioxide photocatalysis on dissolve organic matter fractions. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 303, 252−260. (45) Barker, D. C.; Stuckey, D. C. A review of soluble microbial products (SMP) in wastewater treatment systems. Water Res. 1999, 33, 3063−3082. (46) Ferrer-Polonio, E.; White, K.; Mendoza-Roca, J. A.; Bes-Piá, A. The role of the operating parameters of SBR systems on the SMP production and on membrane fouling reduction. J. Environ. Manage. 2018, 228, 205−212. (47) Zhang, X.; Sun, Y.; Ma, F.; Li, A.; Zhao, H.-p.; Wang, A.; Yang, J. In-situ utilization of soluble microbial product (SMP) cooperated with enhancing SMP-dependent denitrification in aerobic-anoxic sequencing batch reactor. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 693, 133558. (48) Zeng, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zan, F.; Khanal, S. K.; Hao, T. Biogenic sulfide for azo dye decolorization from textile dyeing wastewater. Chemosphere 2021, 283, 131158. Article Recommended by ACS Integrated Modeling and Lab-Scale Investigations Demonstrate the Impact of Sulfide on a Membrane Aerated Biofilm Reactor Jeseth Delgado Vela, Nancy G. Love, et al. NOVEMBER 22, 2022 ACS ES&T WATER READ Tapping the Potential of Wastewater Treatment with Direct Ammonia Oxidation (Dirammox) Yuan Pan and Dong-Feng Liu APRIL 28, 2023 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY READ Study on Growth Influencing Factors and Desulfurization Performance of Sulfate Reducing Bacteria Based on the Response Surface Methodology Yanrong Dong, Yunfeng Wang, et al. JANUARY 20, 2023 ACS OMEGA READ Improving Methane Production from Waste Activated Sludge Assisted by Fe(II)-Activated Peroxydisulfate Pretreatment via Anaerobic Digestion: Role of Interspecifi... Zhixuan Cui, Aijuan Zhou, et al. FEBRUARY 08, 2023 ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING READ Get More Suggestions > 2128 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c06776 Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 2118−2128
0
You can add this document to your study collection(s)
Sign in Available only to authorized usersYou can add this document to your saved list
Sign in Available only to authorized users(For complaints, use another form )