Atmospheric Environment 34 (2000) 5191}5198 A climatology of regional background ozone at di!erent elevations in Switzerland (1992}1998) S. BroK nnimann *, E. Schuepbach , P. Zanis , B. Buchmann, H. Wanner Institute of Geography, University of Berne, Hallerstrasse 12, CH-3012 Berne, Switzerland Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research EMPA, U$ berlandstr. 129, CH-8600 Du( bendorf, Switzerland Received 13 December 1999; received in revised form 6 March 2000; accepted 24 March 2000 Abstract The ozone records of several monitoring stations in Switzerland from 1992 to 1998 are investigated with respect to the variability observed during regional background conditions, i.e. conditions with little detectable local or regional-scale in#uences as evident by NO and CO concentrations. The sites cover di!erent altitudes between 490 and 3600 m asl. V They are characteristic of near-surface conditions, the top of the planetary boundary layer or residual layer, the complex atmosphere in an alpine valley, and the free troposphere. The results reveal a distinctly di!erent ozone variability (diurnal cycles, seasonal cycles, trends) during regional background conditions compared to all days. The estimated annual average ozone concentration under these conditions is between 33 and 50 ppb, dependent on altitude, with a spring maximum and an autumn/winter minimum. Di!erences in background ozone are found depending on the synoptic weather type. For all sites a positive ozone trend is calculated for background conditions that is larger than for all data. For the latter, the trends appear to be stronger positive for the last 7 years than for the last 11 years. 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Background air; Ozone; NO ; Photo-oxidants; Carbon monoxide; Synoptic weather types V 1. Introduction The concentrations of lower tropospheric ozone in Europe exhibit di!erent temporal and spatial scales of variability. To evaluate the e!ect of emission control strategies taken in one region it is important to know the contribution of mechanisms on di!erent scales to the observed temporal development of surface ozone (Jacob et al., 1999). These mechanisms comprise hemispheric or continental scale chemical and transport processes, in#ux from the stratosphere, regional scale ozone formation, mesoscale meteorological processes and regional wind systems, urban plumes, local ozone titration, and depos- * Corresponding author. Fax: #41-31-631-8511. E-mail address: broenn@giub.unibe.ch (S. BroK nnimann). Now at: Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Campus Box 149, 54006 Thessaloniki, Greece. ition. Several studies have shown that di!erent features of temporal ozone variability emerge from these mechanisms, overlapping in a single ozone record. By splitting the ozone time series of Mace Head, Ireland, by the origin of air masses, Simmonds et al. (1997) found positive and negative trends in polluted and unpolluted air masses, respectively. At the high-alpine site Jungfraujoch (3580 m asl) in the Swiss Alps, di!erent frequency distributions, changes in the seasonal ozone cycles, and nonstationary trends were found when splitting the ozone record by the two main wind directions, wind speed and time windows (Schuepbach et al., 1999, 2000). In this study, the focus is on lower tropospheric ozone in Switzerland during relatively unpolluted conditions, by which we understand air masses with little detectable local to regional scale in#uences, often referred to as `background conditionsa. The term background ozone is loaded with some confusion. Following Kourtidis et al. (1997), `natural backgrounda and `regional backgrounda can be distinguished. Natural background 1352-2310/00/$ - see front matter 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. PII: S 1 3 5 2 - 2 3 1 0 ( 0 0 ) 0 0 1 9 3 - X S. Bro( nnimann et al. / Atmospheric Environment 34 (2000) 5191}5198 5192 means ozone generated chemically in the troposphere from biogenic or geogenic emissions plus ozone transported from the stratosphere. `Regional backgrounda ozone is the ozone level over a large area (1000;1000 km) produced by the mixing of air masses of di!erent origin outside and inside the de"ned area (Kourtidis et al., 1997). Ozone concentrations under the so-called background conditions have been widely studied at di!erent locations in Europe (Scheel et al., 1997 and references therein). One motivation for these studies is to obtain knowledge about ozone budgets in relatively undisturbed conditions. Yet, even these relatively undisturbed conditions have been anthropogenically perturbed for decades. Surface ozone concentrations have roughly doubled since pre-industrial times (Volz and Kley, 1988). Since about 1950 ozone concentrations have increased in much of the lower and midtroposphere at northern midlatitudes by 1}2% yr\, with a suggested levelling o! since about 1980 (Staehelin et al., 1994; Logan et al., 1999). Background conditions are often addressed by analysing ozone at remote or high altitude sites, which are far from emission sources, or coastal sites with distinct clean air wind sectors. The present study makes use of six time series measured at di!erent elevations and distance from emission sources in Switzerland to investigate the spatiotemporal variation in ozone concentrations that is related to regional background conditions. The study focuses on the altitude dependence, diurnal and seasonal cycles, the dependence on synoptic weather types, and possible trends. which O , NO , and CO are used in this study. The V measurements are described in more detail by EMPA (1994). The sites are displayed in Fig. 1, the most important features are given in Table 1. The locations cover di!erent altitudes between 490 and 3600 m asl. Payerne, a rural site on the Swiss Plateau, and LaK geren on a forested slope are relatively close to emission sources. Chaumont and Rigi, at around 1100 m asl, have little local in#uence but can be a!ected by polluted air masses from the Swiss Plateau. The Davos site is on a forested slope in an alpine valley; it can be in#uenced by emissions from the nearby road across the FluK ela pass, but is generally only weakly polluted. Finally, Jungfraujoch is a high-alpine site with negligible local emissions. Each site is characteristic of either near-surface conditions, the top of the planetary boundary layer or residual layer, 2. Data and methods Time series from six sites in the Swiss Air Quality Network NABEL are investigated. The data comprise di!erent chemical and meteorological measurements of Fig. 1. Map showing the location of the monitoring sites used in this study. Shaded areas are located above 1000 m (light) and 2000 m asl (dark), respectively. Table 1 Characteristics of the measurement sites used in this study. Ozone and NO are annual averages from 1992 to 1998. SP"Swiss Plateau V Site Altitude (m asl) O (ppb) NO (ppb) V Description of the sites Payerne 494 24.7 14.4 LaK geren 732 31.1 10.4 Rigi Chaumont Davos 1030 1140 1669 39.0 40.9 39.2 5.7 4.9 3.2 Jungfraujoch 3580 50.2 0.5 Rural, on the SP, 400 m from road (ca 7000 vehicles day\) Forested slope, on a 45 m tower, 350 m above the SP, 4 km from highway on the SP (ca 80'000 vehicles day\), S exposition Rural, on a terrace, 600 m above the SP, NW exposition Rural, on a ridge, 700 m above the SP, SE exposition Forested slope, on a 35 m tower, 100 m above valley #oor, 500 m from road (ca 3000 vehicles day\) High alpine, on a saddle, NW/SE wind channelling S. Bro( nnimann et al. / Atmospheric Environment 34 (2000) 5191}5198 the complex atmosphere in an alpine valley, or the free troposphere, respectively. The NABEL network has experienced di!erent changes in instrumentation and quality assurance procedures. Shift inhomogeneities are present in the ozone data before and in 1991, when the network was modernised and extended to include Chaumont and Rigi. From 1992 onwards, however, the quality is good and no further inhomogeneities were found for the sites examined in this study (BroK nnimann et al., 2000; Zanis et al., 1999; Schuepbach et al., 2000). For this reason, we restrict our analysis to records from 1992 to 1998. NO measureV ments at all sites but Jungfraujoch are overestimated due to cross-sensitivities (BUWAL, 1994). Regional background conditions are selected with chemical "lters such as NO (at all sites) and CO concenV trations (only at Chaumont, since January 1997, and at Jungfraujoch since June 1996). No procedure was found to be adequate for all analyses, therefore, di!erent "ltering concepts and thresholds were used and the results were compared. For brevity's sake, only a part of the results is presented here. There are two main "ltering concepts: setting an absolute threshold for daily mean or median NO concentration enables a comparison of V samples at di!erent sites with respect to the chemical composition of the air masses. In this case, using the same threshold for all seasons means that the captured spatial scales vary with season because of the changing lifetime of NO (or NO ) and hence transport distances. For V W most analyses, a relative threshold based on percentiles is used, where the percentiles are de"ned separately for each site and season. This method may be more adequate for comparing di!erent seasons at a given site. However, when using the same percentile for all sites the threshold will capture a di!erent spatial scale at each site. The 5193 cross-sensitivities of NO measurements are not expected V to generally disturb their suitability as a "lter because they tend to increase the lifetime of the measured pollutant mixture. The problem is that the cross-sensitivities are not exactly known and may be variable and that NO measurements at Jungfraujoch have less crossV sensitivities than those at other sites. Nevertheless, the e!ect of these uncertainties is reduced when relative thresholds are used. The synoptic situation is analysed using the Alpine Weather Statistics (AWS) (SMA, 1985; Wanner et al., 1998). This method was used to study air masses and transport conditions at high alpine sites before (cf. Lugauer et al., 1998). We formed six groups: the convective types `higha and `lowa pressure, the advective types (based on the 500 hPa wind direction) `northa, `westa, and `south/easta (pooled), and the group `resta with all other situations. For all analyses, climatological seasons (MAM, JJA, SON and DJF) are considered, and annual average denotes the average of the seasonal means. 3. Results 3.1. Ozone concentrations on days with low CO Regional background air masses are expected to exhibit relatively low CO concentrations. Di!erent authors report on annual mean concentrations of around 120} 130 ppb for North Atlantic background air and northern mid-latitude air, respectively, with a distinct seasonal cycle (Khalil and Rasmussen, 1994; Derwent et al., 1998). Daily mean CO and ozone values for Chaumont (1997 and 1998) and Jungfraujoch (June 1996}1998) are displayed in Fig. 2. CO shows a spring or winter/spring Fig. 2. Scatter plots of daily mean values of ozone versus CO at Chaumont (1997 and 1998, top) and at Jungfraujoch (June 1996}1998, bottom) for climatological seasons. 5194 S. Bro( nnimann et al. / Atmospheric Environment 34 (2000) 5191}5198 maximum and a summer minimum. Annual averages of around 125 ppb, comparable to North Atlantic background air, are obtained at Chaumont (126.1 ppb) and Jungfraujoch (126.3 ppb) when considering only days within the lowest 10% (Chaumont) and 50% (Jungfraujoch) of CO values in each climatological season, respectively. The corresponding annual averages of NO are 3.13 and 0.24 ppb. This gives a broad indication V for the relation between threshold values or percentiles and a spatial scale. At low CO concentrations, daily mean ozone concentrations converge to values around 40 ppb (higher for Jungfraujoch). These situations are supposed to indicate background ozone levels. In the proximity of precursor sources, increasing ozone concentrations are expected with increasing CO in air masses that are subject to photochemical ozone formation. This is the reason for the strong positive correlation between CO and O at Chaumont in summer. On the other hand, decreasing ozone with increasing CO may indicate air masses that have undergone ozone titration by NO emissions. In spring and autumn, it seems that both types of air masses frequently reach Chaumont. The contribution of titration becomes evident when replacing O with O V ("O #NO ) (not shown). Many of the data points that contributed to a negative correlation are shifted towards a constant function. However, other mechanisms may also contribute (cf. Chin et al., 1994). The correlation between daily mean values of CO and NO at Chaumont is excellent in winter (0.88) and spring V (0.80) but somewhat worse in summer (0.54) and autumn (0.66). A "lter based on NO will capture similar conV ditions than a CO "lter. The situation is di!erent at Jungfraujoch, where transport processes play a dominant role, and the correlation between CO and NO is relaV tively poor and depends on the weather situation (cf. Forrer et al., 2000). 3.2. Ozone concentrations on days with low NO V For a comparison of the sites, we applied two "lters basing on daily mean NO concentrations using an absoV lute ()3 ppb) and a relative threshold ()10-percentile). Fig. 3 (left, middle) shows the seasonal and annual averages of the "ltered ozone values (daily means) as a function of altitude. Also, incorporated are logarithmic least-squares "ts to the annual averages. Compared to the pro"le, one would obtain with all data (Table 1), we "nd a smaller ozone increase with height for both "lters. The calculated ozone values vary with height from around 33 ppb at the surface (Payerne) to 49 or 50 ppb at 3600 m asl (Jungfraujoch). In previous studies, a background concentration of 40 ppb was estimated for February to April at Chaumont (BroK nnimann, 1999), and Schuepbach et al. (2000) calculated background levels around 40 ppb for Jungfraujoch (1988}1997). Simmonds et al. (1997) report 35 ppb for unpolluted air masses at ground-level at Mace Head and Scheel et al. (1997) isolated similar values for di!erent European sites. The sample sizes produced by both "lters are similar in the middle altitudes but very di!erent at low or high elevations. Using the absolute threshold, 98.5% of all days are selected at Jungfraujoch but only 1.5 and 1.2% at Payerne and LaK geren, respectively. While for Jungfraujoch the results are similar (some high-ozone days in spring and summer are excluded with the relative threshold), di!erences are apparent between the two "lters for Payerne and LaK geren. The relative threshold Fig. 3. Seasonal and annual averages of daily mean ozone concentrations at all sites as a function of altitude and season on days with daily mean NO concentrations less or equal to the 10-percentile for each site and season (left and less or equal to 3 ppb (middle). `Yeara V denotes the annual average, de"ned as the average of the seasonal means. The solid lines are logarithmic "ts on `Yeara. Annual averages of afternoon (12}16 CET) and nighttime (0}4 CET) mean ozone concentrations for days with daily mean NO )3 ppb and for all days V (right). S. Bro( nnimann et al. / Atmospheric Environment 34 (2000) 5191}5198 produces a larger seasonal cycle, especially at LaK geren. This is an indication that local to regional pollution events cannot be fully excluded at all sites with the 10-percentile threshold. Fig. 3 (right) shows vertical pro"les of annual averages of afternoon (12}16 CET) and nighttime (0}4 CET) mean ozone for all days and for the record "ltered with the absolute threshold (3 ppb). Considering afternoon ozone values, the di!erence between all days and the "ltered days is small, with slightly higher ozone values during the "ltered days in the lowest kilometre. The nighttime values are lower for all days than for the "ltered days, leading to a larger diurnal cycle. A possible reason for the low nighttime values at Payerne for all days is ozone titration by NO emissions in the stable nocturnal boundary layer. At LaK geren and Davos, the two tower sites on forested slopes, the diurnal cycle is large for both all days and the "ltered days. In addition to chemical ozone destruction, a possible cause is enhanced dry deposition of ozone within the drainage #ow. At the three sites Chaumont, Rigi, and Jungfraujoch, which are not on slopes, the afternoon}nighttime di!erences are small and almost disappear in the "ltered days. 3.3. Seasonal ozone cycles for diwerent NO levels V For investigating the seasonal cycle, we used thresholds based on percentiles. The percentiles 2, 5, 10, 25, 5195 and 50 of daily median NO concentrations were calV culated for each site and season, and daily mean ozone concentrations were averaged for the respective fraction of days below or equal to the di!erent percentiles. The daily median NO value instead of the daily mean was V chosen because the frequency distribution of all halfhourly NO measurements of a day changes with the V degree of pollution. Thus, the median is more adequate for comparing di!erent percentiles. Note that the spatial scale captured with these "lters decreases with increasing percentile. The resulting seasonal cycles are shown in Fig. 4. The curves are very similar at all sites when daily median NO is below or equal to its 2-percentile for each season. V In agreement with the often cited spring maximum of photo-oxidants in the unpolluted Northern Hemisphere (Simmonds et al., 1997), a spring ozone maximum appears at all sites. It is most pronounced at Davos, where it appears for all thresholds. Jungfraujoch exhibits a summer maximum when using percentiles greater than 2, mainly due to high-pressure and indi!erent weather types (cf. Section 3.4). It seems that, at Jungfraujoch, a NO -based "lter tends to capture some regional ozone V episodes. A "lter based on daily average CO concentrations (5- or 10-percentile, 1996}1998) gives somewhat lower spring and summer ozone levels with a slight spring maximum. A more detailed discussion about the shift in the seasonal ozone cycle at Jungfraujoch when Fig. 4. Seasonal averages of daily ozone mean values at all sites for days with daily median NO values lower or equal to the 2-, 5-, 10-, V 25-, and 50-percentile for the respective site and season. 5196 S. Bro( nnimann et al. / Atmospheric Environment 34 (2000) 5191}5198 regional background conditions are isolated can be found in Schuepbach et al. (2000). Increasing the percentile threshold for daily median NO levels has a large e!ect upon ozone concentrations V in summer, but also in winter. In spring and summer, ozone concentrations are higher when more NO is adV mitted due to photochemical ozone production on a local to regional scale. The opposite is the case in winter, i.e. ozone concentrations are lower when air masses with more NO are advected. This is possibly indicative of V ozone titration due to NO. A similar e!ect on the seasonal cycle was already observed in Fig. 3. 3.4. Dependence of ozone concentrations on synoptic weather types Fig. 5 shows the occurrence of the synoptic weather types as de"ned in Section 2 for days "ltered with the 10-percentile threshold of daily median NO . Regional V background conditions occur with di!erent synoptic situations at each site. With increasing altitude, highpressure situations become more frequent in the sample. This is especially the case in winter, when high-pressure situations are characterised by a pronounced inversion which suppresses convective transport of polluted air to the sites above around 1000 m asl (Lugauer et al., 1998). LaK geren and Payerne are then usually below the inversion over the Swiss Plateau. There, clean air situations in winter occur mainly with advective weather types, when the polluted air on the Swiss Plateau is replaced by in#owing fresh air. In summer, when convective mixing reaches higher up, the di!erences between the three sites Payerne, LaK geren and Rigi are small. The daily mean ozone values for each synoptic weather type, site, and season are displayed in the lower part of Fig. 5. Westerly situations show the smallest seasonal variability of background ozone values at most sites. These situations are probably associated with maritime air masses with short residence time over the continent and limited potential for photochemistry upwind of Switzerland because of often overcast skies. Furthermore, `northa situations appear to be associated with slightly lower background ozone concentrations than `south/ easta. High-pressure situations in summer are accompanied with high ozone levels at LaK geren, Chaumont, and Rigi due to pollution episodes. The pronounced spring maximum at Davos appears for all synoptic weather types and cannot be explained by circulation di!erences. Generally, a spring maximum is found for `lowa and for the advective weather types. 3.5. Interannual variability and trends Trends of both the "ltered data and all data were calculated in a three-step approach. To avoid large gaps in the temporal coverage we used the 25-percentile of daily median NO rather than the 10-percentile. Note V that this threshold does not exclude all local-to-regional Fig. 5. Upper part, left legend: Frequency of occurrence (left axis) of the synoptic weather types `higha (H), `lowa (L), `westa (W), `northa (N), `south/easta (SE) and `resta (R) during background conditions for each season (daily median NO below or equal to the V 10-percentile for each site and season). Lower part, right legend: Daily mean ozone values for the synoptic weather types during background conditions (see above) for each season. Only averages of classes with at least "ve cases are shown. S. Bro( nnimann et al. / Atmospheric Environment 34 (2000) 5191}5198 5197 Table 2 Trends of monthly mean ozone values from 1988 to 1998 (Jungfraujoch, 1996) and trends of D and e from 1992 to 1998 for all days and R R for days within the lowest 25% of daily median NO values (de"ned separately for each site and season). D and e are time series of V R R seasonal averages, based on deseasonalised daily mean ozone values (D ) and the di!erence between the deseasonalised daily mean R ozone value and the mean value for the corresponding weather type and season (e ). All trends are in [ppb yr\], given with 95% R con"dence interval. [1] from BroK nnimann et al. (2000), calculated from deseasonalised monthly means, the series Payerne and LaK geren were adjusted for shifts before and in 1991, [2] from Zanis et al. (1999) calculated from monthly means, adjusted for a shift in 1989 Site Payerne LaK geren Rigi Chaumont Davos Jungfraujoch Longer period trend 1988}1998#0.27$0.21 [1] 1988}1998#0.46$0.21 [1] 1988}1998#0.32$0.17 [1] 1988}1996#0.48$0.48 [2] 1992}1998, all days 1992}1998, "ltered days D R e R D R e R #0.58$0.47 #0.75$0.45 #1.09$0.49 #1.32$0.51 #0.52$0.29 #0.98$0.33 #0.53$0.35 #0.81$0.38 #1.15$0.42 #1.40$0.43 #0.58$0.25 #0.99$0.32 #0.84$0.37 #0.97$0.50 #1.04$0.77 #0.94$0.55 #0.78$0.30 #1.19$0.50 #0.78$0.32 #0.84$0.45 #1.29$0.56 #1.09$0.45 #0.72$0.26 #1.22$0.51 pollution events. First, we removed the seasonal cycle from a sample by subtracting the function >"a#b sin (X#d)#c sin (2X#e), where X has a period of one year, a, b, c, d, and e were "tted with the method of least-squares. A deseasonalised series was called D , where i is the observation number in G the sample. Second, all elements of a series D were G grouped by climatological season s and weather type w and the averages of the groups de"ned the function AWS (s, w). A series D was then expressed as G D "AWS (s , w )#e . G G G G D and e were then averaged in consecutive seasons, G G yielding the new series D and e . Third, trends of D and R R R e were calculated with linear regression, where the "rst R (Jan/Feb 1992) and last (December 1998) cases were weighted and , respectively. All trends are signi"cantly (p(0.05) positive (Table 2). Except for Chaumont and Rigi, the trends are stronger positive for the "ltered record than for all days, even for e , i.e. after the subtracR tion of the synoptic component. It should be noted that the AWS weather types are useful for addressing di!erences within background situations but may be inadequate for representing meteorological in#uences on local chemistry in `all daysa. Table 2 also displays trends in monthly mean ozone values since 1988 for four of the sites. There is some indication that the positive ozone trend has strengthened in recent years; this is in agreement with recent "ndings from Zugspitze (Scheel et al., 1999) and from Hohenpeissenberg soundings at 500 hPa (Logan et al., 1999). However, the time series are very short and it should be noted that, in Switzerland, 1998 was an ozone-rich year with outstanding episodes in May and in August (BUWAL, 1999), although this is only to a small degree apparent in D and e . For R R Jungfraujoch, a re"ned statistical analysis of trends and changes in the seasonal ozone cycle (1988}1997) is given by Schuepbach et al. (2000). 4. Summary and conclusions An attempt was made to isolate the most important features of the temporal and spatial variability of ozone in Switzerland for conditions without local or strong regional in#uences, termed regional background. These features encompass altitudinal and geographical di!erences, diurnal and seasonal cycles, the dependence on synoptic weather types, and trends. For some of these features, a di!erent behaviour was found for the regional background conditions compared to all days. Regional background ozone shows a weaker altitude dependence, and diurnal cycles are smaller, mainly due to the exclusion of NO -rich air masses that are depleted in ozone. V The seasonal cycles reveal a spring maximum and an autumn/winter minimum at most sites in regional background situations, but a summer maximum when the "lter is tuned towards more polluted air masses. Di!erences in ozone under regional background conditions were also found with respect to synoptic weather types, which can be explained in terms of di!erent transport conditions. Trends of daily mean ozone from 1992 to 1998 are higher for background conditions than for all days. Also, they are stronger positive in the last 7 years than in the last 11 years. It seems that, with decreasing local to regional emissions of ozone precursors (a likely assumption for Central Europe for the last years and the near future), processes on the regional to large scale such as transport or large-scale chemical mechanisms 5198 S. Bro( nnimann et al. / Atmospheric Environment 34 (2000) 5191}5198 may become increasingly important in determining the variability of ozone in a monitoring network. Acknowledgements S.B. is funded by the Swiss Agency for Environment, Forests, and Landscape (SAEFL) under contract FE/BUWAL/810.98.7. E.S. would like to acknowledge funding from the Swiss Dept. of Science and Education (NachwuchsfoK rderungsprogramm). NABEL measurements were provided by SAEFL, CO data by the Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research (EMPA). The Swiss Meteorological Institute (SMI) provided the Alpine Weather Statistics. References BroK nnimann, S., 1999. Early spring ozone episodes: occurrence and case study. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 24C, 531}536. BroK nnimann, S., Buchmann, B., Schwarzenbach, B., Wanner, H., 2000. Ozonmessungen im Schweizer NABEL-Messnetz: Datenkontrolle, HomogenitaK t und Trends. In: Kommission Reinhaltung der Luft (KRdL) im VDI und DIN } Normenausschuss (Ed.), KRdL-Schritenreihe, Vol. 32, DuK sseldorf, pp. 395}400. BUWAL (Swiss Agency for Environment, Forests, and Landscape), 1994. Sticksto!eintrag aus der Luft in ein Naturschutzgebiet. Umweltmaterialien No. 28, Bern, 136 pp. BUWAL (Swiss Agency for Environment, Forests, and Landscape), 1999. NABEL. Luftbelastung 1998. Schriftenreihe Umwelt No. 311, Bern, 194 pp. Chin, M., Jacob, D.J., Munger, J.W., Parrish, D.D., Doddridge, B.G., 1994. Relationship of ozone and carbon monoxide over North America. Journal of Geophysical Research 99, 14565}14573. Derwent, R.G., Simmonds, P.G., Seuring, S., Dimmer, C., 1998. Observation and interpretation of the seasonal cycles in the surface concentrations of ozone and carbon monoxide at Mace Head, Ireland, from 1990 to 1994. Atmospheric Environment 32, 145}157. EMPA (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research), 1994. Technischer Bericht zum Nationalen Beobachtungsnetz fuK r Luftfremdsto!e (NABEL) 1994. DuK bendorf. Forrer, J., RuK timann, R., Fischer, A., Schneiter, D., Buchmann, B., Hofer, P., 2000. Variability of trace gases at the high Alpine site Jungfraujoch caused by meteorological transport processes. Journal of Geophysical Research 105, 12241}12252. Jacob, D.J., Logan, J.A., Murti, P.P., 1999. E!ect of rising Asian emissions on surface ozone in the United States. Geophysical Research Letters 26, 2175}2178. Khalil, M.A.K., Rasmussen, R.A., 1994. Global decrease in atmospheric carbon monoxide concentration. Nature 370, 639}641. Kourtidis, K., Ziomas, I., Zerefos, C., Balis, D., Suppan, P., Vasaras, A., Kosmidis, V., Kentarchos, A., 1997. On the background ozone values in Greece. In: Larsen, B., Versino, B., Angeletti, G. (Eds.), The oxidizing capacity of the troposphere, Proceedings of 7th European symposium on the physico-chemical behaviour of atmospheric pollutants. Venice, 2}4 Oct 1996. Logan, J. A., 20 co-authors, 1999. Trends in the vertical distribution of ozone: a comparison of two analyses of ozonesonde data. Journal of Geophysical Research 104, 26373}26400. Lugauer, M., Baltensperger, U., Furger, M., GaK ggeler, H.W., Jost, D.T., Schwikowski, M., Wanner, H., 1998. Aerosol transport to the high Alpine sites Jungfraujoch (3454 m asl) and Colle Gnifetti (4452 m asl). Tellus 50B, 76}92. Scheel, H.E., Areskoug, H., Geiss, H., Gomiscek, B., Granby, K., Haszpra, L., Klasinc, L., Kley, D., Laurila, T., Lindskog, A., Roemer, M., Schmitt, R., Simmonds, P., Solberg, S., Toupance, G., 1997. On the spatial distribution and seasonal variation of lower-tropospheric ozone over Europe. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry 28, 11}28. Scheel, H.E., Sladkovic, R., Kanter, H.-J., 1999. Ozone variations at the Zugspitze (2962 m asl). In: Borrell, P.M., Borrell, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of EUROTRAC Symposium '98, Vol. 1. WIT press, Southampton, pp. 264}268. Schuepbach, E., Zanis, P., Penkett, S.A., Monks, P.S., Buchmann, B., 1999. The Long-Term (1986}1996) Ozone record at the alpine site at Jungfraujoch in Switzerland: homogeneity analysis, trends and in-situ photochemistry. In: Borrell, P.M., Borrell, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the EUROTRAC Symposium '98, Vol. 1. WIT press, Southampton, pp. 214}220. Schuepbach, E., Friedli, T.K., Zanis, P., Monks, P.S., Penkett, S.A., 2000. State space analysis of changing seasonal ozone cycles (1988}97) at Jungfraujoch (3580 m asl), submitted for publication. Simmonds, P.G., Seuring, S., Nickless, G., Derwent, R.G., 1997. Segregation and interpretation of ozone and carbon monoxide by air mass origin at the TOR Station Mace Head, Ireland, from 1987 to 1995. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry 28, 45}59. SMA (Swiss Meteorological Institute), 1985. Alpenwetterstatistik. Witterungskalender. Beschreibung der einzelnen Parameter. Schweizerische Meteorologische Anstalt, Abteilung Forschung, Zurich, 26 pp. Staehelin, J., Thudium, J., BuK hler, R., Volz-Thomas, A., Graber, W., 1994. Trends in surface ozone concentrations at Arosa (Switzerland). Atmospheric Environment 28, 75}87. Volz, A., Kley, D., 1988. Ozone measurements in the 19th Century: an evaluation of the Montsouris series. Nature 332, 240}242. Wanner, H., Salvisberg, E., Rickli, R., SchuK epp, M., 1998. 50 years of Alpine weather statistics (AWS). Meteorologische Zeitschrift, Neue Folge 7, 99}111. Zanis, P., Schuepbach, E., Scheel, H.E., Baudenbacher, M., Buchmann, B., 1999. Inhomogeneity and trends in the surface ozone record (1988}1996) at Jungfraujoch in the Swiss Alps. Atmospheric Environment 33, 3777}3786.
0
You can add this document to your study collection(s)
Sign in Available only to authorized usersYou can add this document to your saved list
Sign in Available only to authorized users(For complaints, use another form )