Question 1
a.
Just need to identify the key details or provide the key words
b.
i. Direct quotations or detail/example identifications from relevant source
ii.



Definition from your own words – 1 sentence (i.e. A fact is …)
Further describe with relevant points and briefly explain the link between the example
and definition provided. Should also provide a relevant example as part of your
reasoning (i.e. The statement/example above is a fact because …) - 2-3 sentences
Make it clear and relevant yet concise
c.



Only 1 paragraph required - it will describe 3 elements of the perspective (the aspects to
consider - cause, consequence, issue, value, action)
Provide at least 2 relevant details or examples from the source to back up your points of
analysis
Briefly state what the issue/value/consequence/etc. is and explain. - 1-2 sentences
o Issue: What’s about the issue? (i.e. growing problem, serious matter currently,
etc.)
o Cause/Consequence/Value/Action: What’s the […] of the perspective? What can
be further demonstrated?
Sample Work:
The journalist in Source 2 strongly emphasizes freedom of expression as a core value that
would be threatened by media regulation. He argues, “If governments start deciding what news
is acceptable, we risk losing our right to freedom of expression,” highlighting how such
regulation would undermine democratic principles by restricting access to diverse viewpoints.
The cause of this concern lies in the belief that government control over what constitutes
“acceptable” news would lead to suppression of opinions. He states, “If governments start
deciding what news is acceptable, we risk losing our right to freedom of expression,”
emphasizing the danger of restricting the press’s independence. The consequence of media
regulation, according to the journalist, would be censorship, where only state-approved
narratives would be allowed to circulate, preventing the free exchange of ideas. This
demonstrates the potentially constrained effect regulation could have on media diversity
d.
Which [an aspect of the issue - cause, consequence, etc.] do you think is the most significant?

2 paragraphs, supported by relevant details/examples/quotations from the 2 sources

Identify & pick 1 cause/consequence/etc.

Provide 2 reasons. Make sure the reason can clearly highlight why the chosen one is
most significant. Should use a mix of information from source 1 & 2 and your own
reasoning.

No need to compare with others. Solely focus on the chosen one
Most significant  can consider, but not limited to:

Scale of impact
o Huge – local/national/international impacts
o Long-lasting or permanent
o Intense

Stakeholders affected – number of groups affected; to what extent; etc.

Ethics & morality – most serious, extreme, etc.

Multiple negative or positive outcomes - financial, social, environmental, sustainable,
etc.

Hard to tackle or solve effectively
Sample work:
The most significant consequence of media regulation is the loss of freedom of expression, and
one reason this is the most significant is because it raises serious ethical and moral issues. In
Source 2, the journalist states, “If governments start deciding what news is acceptable, we risk
losing our right to freedom of expression.” The ethical concern here is the violation of
fundamental human rights. Freedom of expression is essential, as it allows individuals to voice
dissents, challenge injustices, or freely access information. This directly undermines a society’s
morality, as it enables governments to control the narrative, potentially silencing those who are
in need of protection or those advocating for reform.
Another reason why loss of freedom of expression is the most significant consequence is
because it would have a long-lasting impact on both the citizens and governments. Once
media regulation limits free speech, the effects spread beyond just journalists and media
outlets. As Source 2 highlights, if governments control the news, the public's ability to access
diverse perspectives would be severely restricted. This would restrain public debate by only
allowing a limited set of state-approved ideas, reducing the variety of information available for
people to make informed decisions. This restriction of access to diverse viewpoints will,
therefore, affect government accountability and weaken citizens' trust in the long run.
Question 2a
Explain the strengths and weaknesses of the research outlined in Source …
Some possible strengths & weaknesses to consider, but are not limited to:
Strengths:










Primary research based on personal testimony and experience.
Detailed notes were taken to ensure accuracy in the interview.
Case study provides in-depth and relevant information.
Uses direct quotations from the interview as supporting evidence.
Research findings are backed or conducted by reputable organizations or experts in
relevant fields
Evidence includes both qualitative (testimony) and quantitative (statistical) data.
Research is clearly communicated with a reasonable and neutral tone.
Balanced viewpoint or diverse perspective
Use of relevant research to support findings.
Overall response is thoughtful, relevant, and well-structured.
Weaknesses:









Limited to one research method, reducing diversity of data.
Interview data may be incomplete or unreliable due to poor audio quality or background
condition.
No verification or cross-checking of data.
Small sample size, which may not be representative.
Interviewee may be biased or have a vested interest, affecting data reliability and/or
objectivity
Presence of others during the interview may influence responses, compromising
confidentiality.
Some assertions made without sufficient factual or statistical support.
Limited acknowledgment of counterarguments or alternative viewpoints.
Insufficient citation of sources or references to support claims.
Structure:



4 paragraphs
Different strengths & weaknesses
Points of analysis frequently supported by quotations/details from the source
mentioned & clearly relevant and convincing
Question 2b
Explain how the given claim could be tested. Consider different methods and evidence that
could be used
For example, with the claim ““Women leaders are often better than men at encouraging
teamwork.”, some methods & evidence can be, but not limited to:
Methods (what to do to test)

Interviews with employees who have worked under both male and female leaders.

Observation of teamwork dynamics in companies led by men and women.

Review of secondary sources such as management studies, leadership research, and
business reports.

Surveys of employees regarding their experiences with male and female managers.

Questionnaires assessing employees’ perceptions of teamwork under different
leadership styles.

Case studies of companies with female leadership to analyze teamwork effectiveness.

Internet and media search for reports, studies, or expert opinions on gender and
leadership styles.
Evidence (what kind of data used to test)

Statistics on teamwork effectiveness in companies led by women versus men.

Employee testimony/personal experience on teamwork under female and male
leaders.

Data in research reports from business schools, HR studies, or management firms.

Materials from organisations that promote gender diversity in leadership.

Quantitative and qualitative data from workplace studies on leadership styles.

Information from businesses that have studied the impact of female leadership on
teamwork.

Findings from trade unions or professional associations about workplace collaboration
and leadership.
Structure:

4 paragraphs with different methods and evidence used

Points of analysis clearly relevant and convincing
For each paragraph, these following points should be delivered:

What does the method/evidence provide? Or what do people do with such?

Why is the method/evidence relevant to the context (the issue being discussed)?
o I.e. Issue = birth rate => Relevance of interviews with experts: “They study
demographic & family planning trends, which is why the insights are crucial and
reliable in understanding changes in changes in childbearing preferences”

How does the method/evidence help test the claim?
o If the outcome is A (positive/negative; true/false, favourable/unfavourable;
agreed/disagreed, etc.), the claim is true/supported/false/in need of
revision/weakened/etc.
Question 3
Which argument is more convincing, A’s or B’s?
Consider BOTH arguments & Evaluate different aspects of both parties (reasoning, evidence,
use of language, etc.) & a throughout judgement (or conclusion)
Some possible aspects of an argument to consider, but are not limited to:









Source
Relevance
Sufficiency
Depth
Currency/Date
Testimony
Credibility
Language/Tone of Evidence/Reasoning
Acceptability
Note: Some of the following aspects are more likely to be available in the debate given.
However, don’t take them for granted - view as some references





Ideas from acquaintance – lack academic research or statistical proofs or insights from
experts VS information backed by experts or renowned organizations in relevant fields
Evidence with no or vague citations VS with clear & verifiable & recent sources
Narrowed assessments – apply a part of the issue for a big picture VS
comprehensive/broader assessments
Bias - favor one side, perspective, or outcome over others, leading to unfair or
unbalanced viewpoints. Or data can come from someone close that makes the speaker
favour more. Or only assess 1 side of the issue (i.e. only drawbacks and not include
advantages)
Vested interest - motivated by the potential benefits or advantages they stand to gain
from a particular result => disregard other matters of the issue


Emotive or strong language VS calm, neutral, balanced tone
Assumptions or generalization VS logical & specific evidence or research
Structure:

3 main paragraphs (3 developed points) + conclusion
Note:






Use words and phrases to show contrast or opposition such as in contrast; on the other
hand; however; nonetheless; although; while; unlike; etc.
Frequent use of relevant materials taken from the source is required
DON’T go overboard with describing the arguments – ANALYZE how certain aspects
contribute to the 2 arguments (strengthen or weaken?) & provide CLEAR COMPARISION
Detailed & reasoned explanation – make sure to clearly specify the aspect being
discussed and its impact on his/her argument (Does it strengthen or weaken that
argument?)
Conclusion to be clear & supported & consistent with reasoning provided in main
paragraphs – Paraphrase, don’t just copy and paste.
The entire work should clearly explain and judge who is more convincing OVERALL
Question 4
Which one of these 3 suggestions provided would you recommend and why
Can consider some of the following, but not limited to:
•
Reference to scale of impact.
•
Speed of impact.
•
Ethical or moral issues.
•
Reference to different consequences and implications for individuals/different age
groups/government.
•
The influence of individuals and groups on other people.
•
The role of vested interests and power differences.
•
Potential conflicts of interest.
•
Difficulties in planning and coordinating improvements.
•
Cost and resource issues.
•
Other reasonable response.
Structure:

4 main paragraphs + conclusion
Note:



Some use of the material found in sources 1 to 4 required - but DON’T just simply repeat
or recycle without interpretation
Make sure to read the question carefully and meet the requirements:
o Recommend ONE action
 Provide clear reasoning & justification why one is chosen from your POV or
why that specific one is clearly better than the others
o Back your explanation with both materials from given sources and own ideas
Conclusion should be:
o Clearly indicate why the chosen one is recommended, not the other two.
o Judgement thorough and consistent with the arguments provided in the main
paragraphs
o Paraphrase, don’t just copy and paste