Bombardier Document Reference
BAT-CL600-OSD-FC
Name / Signature
Maryse Lalumière Maryse Lalumiere
Digitally signed by Maryse Lalumiere
DN: cn=Maryse Lalumiere
Date: 2019.07.16 13:25:59 -04'00'
Operational Suitability Data (OSD)
Flight Crew
Bombardier Challenger CL-600-2B16
(Challenger 604, 605, 650)
“This document contains confidential financial, commercial, scientific and/or technical information that is proprietary to
Bombardier Inc., its divisions, subsidiaries and/or affiliates (“Bombardier”) and/or contains proprietary rights of third parties
and also constitutes trade secrets of Bombardier and/or third parties. Bombardier provides this information in confidence,
which is not to be used, reproduced, disclosed or released to anyone without the express written consent of Bombardier.
Bombardier considers this proprietary confidential information excluded from the application of the Access to Information
Act (Canada), the Freedom of Information Act (USA), the Freedom of Information Act (England) and other similar
legislation, including without limitation similar legislation of all jurisdictions where TC, FAA and EASA exercise their
authority. Any full or partial disclosure or release of this information would be harmful to Bombardier and/or third parties
and is prohibited. Any intention to disclose would be harmful to Bombardier and/or third parties and is prohibited. Any
intention to disclose, release or reproduce such information, or part thereof, must be notified in advance and in writing to
the Vice-President, Contracts and Legal Services, Bombardier Business Aircraft, and must be approved by relevant
government authorities if the information to be disclosed, released or reproduced involves the export, re-export or retransfer
of information controlled under applicable export or domestic control laws. If consent to disclosure, release or reproduction
is provided by Bombardier, this proprietary information notice and the notice set forth on each page of this document shall
appear in such full or partial disclosure, release and/or reproduction. The information contained in this document may also
be controlled by Canadian, U.S.A. or U.K. export control or domestic control laws. Unauthorized export, re-export or
retransfer of any data is prohibited.”
It is understood that this documentation, comprising technical data and other information in any media shall not be modified,
translated, reverse assembled, reverse engineered or decompiled and shall be used exclusively and solely for training
purposes.
02 July 2019
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
Bombardier Challenger CL-600-2B16
(Challenger 604, 605, 650)
Operational Suitability Data (OSD) – Flight Crew
Revision Record
Rev. No.
Content
Date
(J)OEB
Revision 0
(J)OEB Report Challenger 604, 605
22 Oct 2006
OSD FC
Initial Issue
Conversion of (J)OEB report to OSD FC, evaluation
of the Challenger 650
04 Dec 2015
OSD FC
Revision 1
Add results of Challenger 650 MTO/FLEX
evaluation
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
02 July2019
Page 2 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
Contents
Page
Revision Record .......................................................................................................................... 2
Contents ...................................................................................................................................... 3
Acronyms .................................................................................................................................... 5
Preamble ...................................................................................................................................... 8
1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 8
2. Operational Evaluation of the CL 604, 605, 650 models .............................................................. 8
3. Certification Basis ...................................................................................................................... 9
Operational Suitability Data (OSD) – Flight Crew .................................................................... 10
1. Aircraft Type Designation and Pilot License Endorsement ...................................................... 10
2. Aircraft Specifics ...................................................................................................................... 10
2.1
Challenger 604 and 605 .......................................................................................... 10
2.2
Challenger 650 ........................................................................................................ 11
2.3
Aircraft Approach Category ..................................................................................... 12
2.4
Part-CAT, Subpart D – Instruments, Data, Equipment ............................................. 12
3. Operator Differences Requirements (ODR) ............................................................................. 12
4. Master Differences Requirements (MDR) ................................................................................ 13
4.1
MDR Tables ............................................................................................................. 13
5. Specifications for Training ........................................................................................................ 13
5.1
Challenger 604, 605 and 650 Initial Type Rating Training ........................................ 14
5.2
Differences Training from the Challenger 604 to the Challenger 605/650 and
vice versa ................................................................................................................ 14
5.3
Familiarization Training from the Challenger 605 to the Challenger 650 and
vice versa ................................................................................................................ 14
5.4
RNP-AR Training ..................................................................................................... 14
5.5
Maximum Take-off Thrust (MTO)/ Reduced Take-off Thrust (FLEX) .......................... 16
5.6
Training Areas of Special Emphasis (TASE) ............................................................ 16
5.7
Alternative Training and Qualification Programme (ATQP) ...................................... 18
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
Page 3 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
6. Recurrent Training ................................................................................................................... 18
7. Specifications for Checking ...................................................................................................... 19
7.1
Recurrent Checking ................................................................................................. 19
7.2
Line Checks ............................................................................................................. 19
8. Recent Experience and Currency ............................................................................................. 19
8.1
Recent Experience .................................................................................................. 19
8.2
Currency .................................................................................................................. 20
9. Line Flying Under Supervision (LIFUS) / Familiarization Flights .............................................. 20
9.1
LIFUS / SOE ............................................................................................................ 20
9.2
LIFUS following initial type rating training ............................................................... 20
9.3
Supervised Operating Experience (SOE) ................................................................ 20
Appendix 1
ODR Tables ..................................................................................................................... 21
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
Page 4 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
Acronyms
AC ........................... Advisory Circular
ADG .......................... Air Driven Generator
AEG .......................... Aircraft Evaluation Group
AFCS ........................ Automatic Flight Control System
AFM ......................... Airplane Flight Manual
AMC.......................... Acceptable Means of Compliance
AOC ......................... Air Operator Certificate
AOM ........................ Aircraft Operating Manual
APR .......................... Automatic Performance Reserve
ATO ......................... Approved Training Organisation
ATQP ....................... Alternative Training and Qualification Programme
AWO ......................... All Weather Operations
BA ............................ Bombardier Aerospace
BATC ........................ Bombardier Aerospace Training Centre
CBT .......................... Computer Based Training
CCP .......................... Cursor Control Panel
CDU .......................... Control Display Unit
CPD .......................... Common Procedure Document for conducting Operational Evaluation Boards
dated June 10, 2004 signed jointly by JAA, FAA and TCCA
CPDLC ..................... Controller-Pilot Data-Link Communications
CS-FCD ................... Certification Specifications for Operational Suitability Data (OSD) Flight Crew
Data CS-FCD, Initial issue, 31 January 2014
CS-FSTD(A) ............ Certification Specifications for Aeroplane Flight Simulation Training Devices of
4 July 2012
CRM ........................ Crew Resource Management
DCP .......................... Display Control Panel
DRP .......................... Display Reversionary Panel
Difference Level ....... a designated level of difference as defined in CS-FCD
EASA ........................ European Aviation Safety Agency
ECL........................... Electronic Check List
EFB........................... Electronic Flight Bag
EFIS.......................... Electronic Flight Instrument System
EGPWS .................... Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System
EICAS ....................... Engine Indication and Crew Alerting System
ETOPS ..................... Extended range operations for two-engine aeroplanes
FAA .......................... Federal Aviation Administration
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
Page 5 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
FANS ........................ Future Air Navigation System
FLEX......................... Reduced Maximum Take-off Thrust
FMA .......................... Flight Mode Annunciator
FCL .......................... Flight Crew Licensing
FFS .......................... Full Flight Simulator
FMA .......................... Flight Mode Annunciator
FMS ......................... Flight Management System
FPV........................... Flight Path Vector
FSB .......................... FAA Flight Standardization Board
FSTD ....................... Flight Simulation Training Device
FTD .......................... Flight Training Device
GPWS ...................... Ground Proximity Warning System
IFIS ........................... Integrated Flight Information System
JAA ........................... Joint Aviation Authorities
JOEB ........................ JAA Joint Operational Evaluation Board
LIFUS ....................... Line Flying Under Supervision
LPV ........................... Localizer Performance with Vertical Guidance
LVO .......................... Low Visibility Operations
MDR ......................... Master Differences Requirements
MTO.......................... Maximum Take-off Thrust
NAA .......................... National Aviation Authority
ODR.......................... Operator Differences Requirements
OEB .......................... Operational Evaluation Board
OTD ......................... Other Training Device
Part-ARA .................. Annex VI to Commission Regulation (EU) No 290/2012 of 30 March 2012
amending Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 laying down technical requirements
and administrative procedures related to civil aviation aircrew pursuant to
Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council
(as amended)
Part-ARO .................. Annex II to Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 of 05 Oct 2012 laying
down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to air
operations pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European
Parliament and of the Council (as amended)
Part-CAT ................... Annex IV to Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 of 05 Oct 2012 laying
down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to air
operations pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European
Parliament and of the Council (as amended)
Part-FCL ................... Annex I to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 of 3 November 2011
laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to
civil aviation aircrew pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the
European Parliament and of the Council (as amended)
Part-ORA .................. Annex VII to Commission Regulation (EU) No 290/2012 of 30 March 2012
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
Page 6 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
amending Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 laying down technical requirements
and administrative procedures related to civil aviation aircrew pursuant to
Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council
(as amended)
Part-ORO .................. Annex III to Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 of 05 Oct 2012 laying
down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to air
operations pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European
Parliament and of the Council (as amended)
Part-SPA................... Annex V to Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 of 05 Oct 2012 laying
down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to air
operations pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European
Parliament and of the Council (as amended)
PIC ........................... Pilot In Command
PFD ......................... Primary Flight Display
PM ........................... Pilot Monitoring
RAAS ........................ Runway Awareness Advisory System
RNP AR ................... Required Navigation Performance Authorization Required
Route Sector ............ as defined in Part-FCL [“Route sector" means a flight comprising take-off,
departure, cruise of not less than 15 minutes, arrival, approach and landing
phases]
TCAS ....................... Traffic Alert Collision Avoidance System
TCCA ........................ Transport Canada Civil Aviation
ZFTT ........................ Zero Flight Time Training
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
Page 7 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
Preamble
1. Introduction
Where references are made to requirements and where extracts of reference texts are provided,
these are at the amendment state at the date of evaluation or publication of this document. Users
should take account of subsequent amendments to any references, in particular concerning
requirement for civil aviation aircrew and air operations.
Determinations made in this document are based on the evaluations of specific configurations of
aircraft models, equipped in a given configuration and in accordance with current regulations and
guidance.
Modifications and upgrades to the aircraft evaluated require additional OSD assessment for type
designation, training / checking / currency, operational credits, and other elements within the scope
of the OSD evaluations.
In accordance with Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No
69/2014 of 27 Jan 2014, the Operational Suitability Data contained in this document are identified
as follows:
[M] ............. mandatory Operational Suitability Data, bearing the status of rule (see GM No 3 to
21A.15(d))
[AMC] ......... non-mandatory Operational Suitability Data, bearing the status of Acceptable Means of
Compliance (see GM No 3 to 21A.15(d))
2.
Operational Evaluation of the CL 604, 605, 650 models
2.1
Operational Evaluation of the CL 604, 605 models
A joint operational evaluation of the CL 605 was performed by TCCA, FAA and JAA/EASA during the
months of August - October 2006. Initial type rating training for the 605 and differences training from
the 604 to the 605 and vice versa were evaluated.
The evaluation was performed in compliance with the JOEB Handbook and the JAA Terms of
Reference for JOEBs. Further guidance was found in the Common Procedures for Conducting
Operational Evaluations (CPD), and the applicable regulations at the time of the relevant evaluations,
laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to civil aviation aircrew
and to air operations.
2.2
Operational Evaluation of the Challenger 650 model
A joint operational evaluation of an electronics update for the CL604/605 was performed by TCCA,
FAA and EASA during the months of September - November 2015. This evaluation was performed
in two phases, starting with interim modifications of an avionics upgrade, followed by an evaluation
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
Page 8 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
of the RNP AR functionality. The evaluation included assessment of the eLearning module, FFS
sessions and in aircraft validation. The modified aircraft is named Challenger 650 for marketing
purposes.
A joint operational evaluation of the Maximum Take-off Thrust (MTO)/ Reduced Take-off Thrust
(FLEX) was performed by TCCA, FAA and EASA during the month of May 2019.
The evaluation included assessment of the Instructor-Led material, FFS validation session and in
aircraft validation. The MTO/FLEX feature is only applicable to the Challenger 650 model with
production aircraft serial number cut-in 6147 and by Retrofit for aircraft serial number 6050 to 6136
and 6138 to 6146.
3.
Certification Basis
The data contained in this document are agreed on the certification basis of CS-FCD, Initial Issue,
dated 31 Jan 2014 (elect to comply).
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
Page 9 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
Operational Suitability Data (OSD) – Flight Crew
1. Aircraft Type Designation and Pilot License Endorsement [M]
With reference to Part-FCL, FCL.010 (‘type of aircraft’) and GM1 FCL.700, the Bombardier CL-6002B16 series aircraft have been evaluated for aircraft categorisation and license endorsement.
All Bombardier CL-600-2B16 series aircraft contained in the table below have been assessed as
variants requiring familiarization or differences training, as applicable.
The license endorsement is established as "CL604/605".
Manufacturer
Bombardier Inc.
Aircraft
Model / Name
License
Endorsement
Variants
CL604/605
X
CL-600-2B16
- Challenger 604
Complex
SP /
SP HPA /
MP
OEB FC
REPORT /
OSD FC
available
X
MP
X
Remarks
OSD FC CL604/605,
dated 04 Dec 2015
CL-600-2B16
- Challenger 605
CL-600-2B16
- Challenger 650
2.
Aircraft Specifics
The Bombardier model CL-600-2B16 is identified as Challenger 604 (up to serial number 5700), as
Challenger 605 (from serial number 5701), and as Challenger 650 with avionics upgrades to existing
in-service Challenger 605 aircraft. Most of the avionics upgrades are offered via Service Bulletins to
upgrade existing in-service Challenger 605 aircraft. Currently, these avionics upgrades are not
available for the Challenger 604.
2.1
Challenger 604, 605
The Challenger 605 is a swept wing executive aircraft, designed for up to 19 passengers and 2
cockpit crew. The MTOW is 21,863 kg (48,200 lb). It is capable of cruise speeds up to Mach 0.83 in
RVSM airspace (Mmo = 0.85) at a maximum altitude of 41,000 ft MSL.
The aircraft is equipped with two general Electric CF 34-3B high by-pass ratio turbofan engines. The
engines are flat-rated to ISA + 15 degrees C. Normal thrust rating is 8729 pounds per engine. An
APR system, when armed for take-off, increases the thrust on the operating engine in case of an
engine failure. An Auto Throttle System is installed to maintain reference airspeed or engine fan
speed.
The primary flight controls, elevators, rudders and ailerons, are hydraulically operated. Artificial
control loading is provided at the individual control columns, control wheels and rudder pedals. The
Automatic Flight Control System, a subsystem of the Collins ProLine 21 avionics system, is a fully
integrated flight control system. It includes a dual channel two-axis autopilot.
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
Page 10 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
Hydraulically operated spoilers provide drag for use in flight as well as on the ground. The trailing
edge flaps are electrically operated and can be selected to 4 positions: 0 – 20 – 30 – 45 degrees.
Trim systems are installed for rudder, aileron and elevator and operated electrically.
A flight management system, controlled by MCDU’s on each, side is fully integrated in the operation
of the aircraft. It calculates take-off and landing performance parameters, it builds an operational
flight plan from take-off until landing and calculates a vertical path.
The Challenger 605 configuration features a new passenger cabin interior, enlarged and repositioned
passenger windows, a new tail cone design, reduced aircraft weight, autothrottle as standard
equipment, and introduces the Rockwell Collins Pro-Line 21 avionics suite which consists of 4 multifunction flat panel LCD units. The 604 and 605 share identical handling characteristics and in-flight
operational procedures.
2.2
Challenger 650
In 2015, Bombardier incorporated Rockwell Collins Proline 21 avionics upgrades into the Challenger
605 production configuration. For marketing purposes, the production aircraft’s marketing designator
was changed from the Challenger 605 to the Challenger 650.
Most of the avionics upgrades are offered via Service Bulletins to upgrade existing in-service
Challenger 605 aircraft. Currently, these avionics upgrades are not available for the Challenger 604.
The Challenger 650 avionics upgrade includes the following features:
FMS (automatic POS INIT using GPS Position, increased worldwide database memory size, LPV
and RNP AR approaches, supports FANS 1/A CPDLC and ADS-C, provides ALD calculations for
contaminated runways, provides for manual landing factor calculations on APPROACH REF page,
supports Airway to Airway transitions)
Primary Flight Display – PFD (enlarges upper ADI display, rescales pitch ladder, permits selection of
Flight Path Vector on PFD)
Integrated Flight Information System – IFIS (allows for splitting charts into Briefing, Minimums, and
Profile sections on approach, provides for automatic display of airport diagram charts upon landing,
adds increased coverage for XM Weather).
Synthetic Vision System – SVS (allows for selection of SVS by the pilot, provides situational
awareness of surrounding terrain and obstructions for the aircrew during ground and flight operations)
MultiScan™ Weather Radar Upgrade (provides for an Automatic mode that controls: multiscan
beam control, ground clutter suppression, smart scan, overflight protection, path attenuation
compensation, temperature compensation, and geographic weather correlation; controls all weather
radar functionally in Automatic mode from takeoff to landing)
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
Page 11 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
SmartRunway™ and SmartLanding™ (provides aural and visual advisories to supplement aircrew
awareness of aircraft position relative to an airport during ground and flight operations; includes
Runway Awareness Advisory System – RAAS, Stability Approach Monitor, Corrected Altitude Monitor,
Takeoff Flap Configuration Monitor, and Long Landing Monitor; SmartRunway™ alerts are focused
on runway/taxiway risks. SmartLanding™ alerts increase the probability of achieving a stabilized
approach and minimizing landing risks and runway excursions).
In 2019, an operational evaluation was successfully completed for the addition of the Maximum
Take-off Thrust (MTO) and the Reduced Thrust Take-off (FLEX) Features.
The MTO feature enables higher take-off thrust settings to increase payload or fuel loads for takeoffs from short runways.
The FLEX feature allows for take-offs accomplished utilizing a reduced thrust setting under the
existing conditions of temperature and pressure altitude. Advantages of FLEX take-off include
reduced engine wear and reduced maintenance costs.
2.3
Aircraft Approach Category
With reference to Part-CAT, CAT.OP.MPA.320(b) the approach category for the CL604/605 aircraft
is as follows:
Aircraft
Category
Challenger 604
Challenger 605
Challenger 650
C
Categories are based on the approach speed provided by the Manufacturer and need to be
reconsidered if operators increase the approach speed.
2.4
Part-CAT, Subpart D – Instruments, Data, Equipment
EU operators must show compliance with applicable elements of Annex IV to EU Regulation
956/2012 (Part-CAT, Subpart D), prior to beginning commercial air transport operations.
Compliance with Part-CAT, Subpart D was not evaluated for the CL604/605.
3.
Operator Differences Requirements (ODR)
[M] Approved ODR tables as reproduced at Appendix 1 are part of the operational suitability data
and constitute the basis for familiarisation and differences training.
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
Page 12 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
[M] All familiarisation and differences training contained in this document must address the items
listed in the pertinent ODR tables.
ODR tables are Bombardier generic and therefore may not include items that are applicable to
particular operators.
[AMC] Operators using more than one variant must have approved ODR tables pertinent to their
fleet.
4.
Master Differences Requirements (MDR) [M]
4.1
MDR Tables
MDR tables for the Challenger 604/605/650 series aircraft are shown below. Definitions of the
various levels for Training / Checking / Currency are those used in CS-FCD.
Master Differences Requirements (MDR) Table
TO AIRCRAFT
FROM AIRCRAFT
Challenger 604
(CL-600-2B16)
Challenger 605
(CL-600-2B16)
Challenger 650
(CL-600-2B16)
Challenger 604
(CL-600-2B16)
---
C/B/B
C/B/B
Challenger 605
(CL-600-2B16)
C/B/A
---
B/B/B
Challenger 650
(CL-600-2B16)
C/B/A
B/B/B
---
Note: Addition of RNP-AR requires additional training (difference levels D/C/C).
5.
Specifications for Training
With reference to Part-ORA, AMC2 ORA.ATO.125(b), familiarisation training for CL604/605 variants
may be included in the theoretical knowledge training of the initial type rating course. Flight training
should be conducted on a single variant.
[AMC] Less experienced pilots would benefit from an extra course covering EFIS and FMS
operations, before entering the Type Rating training course.
Early exposure to the FCP, FMA and FMS is important, especially for pilots with no previous EFIS
or FMS experience. Establishing early confidence in manually flying the aircraft, converting from
manual to automatic (FMS controlled) flight mode and back is equally important due to heavy
reliance on the Automatic Flight Control System (AFCS). In the event of a flight path deviation due
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
Page 13 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
to input error or system malfunction, the flight crew must be able to comfortably transition from
automatic to manual mode and back.
5.1
Challenger 604, 605 and 650 Initial Type Rating Training
[AMC] Initial type rating training for the Challenger 604, 605 or 650 should include the following
elements:

a minimum of 50 hours of theoretical training distributed over 9 days (4 full days followed by
5 days which may include the FTD sessions);
5.2

6 FTD sessions of 2 hours each for checklist familiarization and procedures training;

5 FFS sessions of 4 hours each (not including time for briefing/de-briefing).
Differences Training from Challenger 604 to Challenger 605/650 and vice versa
[M] Differences training between the Challenger 604 and 605/650 models is defined as Level C.
[AMC] Differences training should consist of a one-day instructor led training supported by desk top
interactive computer based instruction. Interactive computer based training is suitable to impart the
necessary knowledge. ATOs should ensure the training is consolidated through the use of a device
which provides for tactile manipulation of system related controls and switches, and emulates panel
and instrument indications. An acceptable device is one that replicates the functionality, operation
and installation of the Collins Proline Avionic system in the Challenger 604 or 605, as appropriate,
and may include, but is not limited to, an FTD, aircraft simulator, or aircraft.
5.3
Familiarization Training from the Challenger 605 to the Challenger 650 and vice versa
[M] Familiarization training from the Challenger 605 to the Challenger 650 and vice versa is defined
as Level B and must address the elements identified in the corresponding ODR tables.
[AMC] Familiarization training should include a minimum of 6 hours and address the following
elements: Navigation, FMS, and Flight Instruments.
[AMC] Optional CPDLC training should include a minimum of 3.5 hours.
5.4
RNP-AR Training
RNP-AR training requirements are contained in AMC 20-26.
5.4.1. Prerequisites
[M] To conduct training and execute the privilege of flying RNP-AR approaches, the applicant must
be current and qualified on the Challenger 650, hold a current instrument rating and have passed an
MCC course.
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
Page 14 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
5.4.2. Theoretical Training
[AMC] Theoretical training should consist of a minimum of 4 hours, which may be delivered through
eLearning and a minimum of one hour by instructor-led training.
[M] Theoretical training must include the following subjects:
 Approach Criteria;
 Operating Procedures;
 Contingency Procedures; and
 Limitations.
[AMC] Theoretical training should be completed by a knowledge exam which may be multiple-choice,
with a minimum pass rate of 80%.
5.4.3. Practical Training
[AMC] Practical training should include one FFS session of 4 hours (2 hours as PF and 2 hours as
PM), not including time for briefing and de-briefing. Depending on previous experience, additional
FFS sessions may be required to attain proficiency.
[M] Practical training must include the following training areas of special emphasis:

procedures for verifying altimeter settings;

use of aircraft avionics (TAWS,RADAR, GPWS) for track monitoring;

application of CRM for RNP-AR operations;

effect of reducing flaps, bank angle and decreasing or increasing speed;

importance of aircraft configuration;

programming and operating FMS, Auto-throttles, GPS, INS, EFIS, PDF and any RNP-AR
supporting avionics;

TOGA during turn and executing go-around;

loss of GPS signal during turn;

contingency procedures in case of loss of RNP capability; and

wind shear during final approach or during turn.
5.4.4 RNP-AR Recurrent Training
[AMC] RNP training that addresses the unique AR characteristic should be incorporated into regular
recurrent training. 2 RNP-AR approaches should be performed (one as PF and one as PM) during
recurrent training.
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
Page 15 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
5.4.5 RNP-AR Currency
[M] RNP-AR currency is maintained by performing one RNP-AR approach as PF within 90 days.
5.5
Maximum Take-off Thrust (MTO)/Reduced Take-off Thrust (FLEX)
[AMC] Theoretical training should consist of a minimum of 2 hours and may be integrated into the
Initial or Differences course.
5.6
Training Areas of Special Emphasis (TASE) [M]
Part-FCL, FCL.710(a) and FCL.725(a) address training requirements for type rating, differences and
familiarization training to include the relevant elements as defined in the operational suitability
evaluation. Part-ORO, ORO.FC.145(b) addresses operator requirements to include the relevant
elements as defined in the operational suitability evaluation when establishing the training
programmes and syllabi.
5.6.1
TASE for Challenger 604, 605 and 650 Training
The following aircraft systems or procedures must receive special emphasis:

Systems Integration Training
 Flight Control Panel (FCP)
 Flight Mode Annunciator (FMA)
 Flight Management System (FMS)
 Display Control Panel (DCP) – 605 only
 Cursor Control Panel (CCP) – 605 only
 Integrated Flight Information System (IFIS) – 605 only, if installed

Flight Training (FFS Level C or D and/or aircraft)
 Dual hydraulic system malfunctions (system 1 or 2, and system 3)
 Air Driven Generator (ADG) deployment
 Instrument flying on standby instruments
 Primary Flight Display (PFD), Multifunction Display (MFD), EICAS status page
reversionary modes
 Flight Control System Jam procedures
 Fuel leaks
 Smoke procedures, including smoke removal
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
Page 16 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
 Integrated use of EICAS messages, switch positions and synoptic pages to determine
aircraft system status. Some switches (i.e. L/R to aux fuel transfer, fuel crossflow, and
AC essential bus transfer) are not represented by EICAS messages)
 Dutch Roll characteristics following a yaw damper failure and specific technique
(rudder inputs) to maintain control
 Roll control during multiple hydraulic system failures, crosswind landing and rollout,
and zero-flap landing.
 Zero-flap approaches and landings to a full stop (the aircraft’s trailing edge flap is
powered by the electrical system and there is no alternate means of flap operation in
the case of electrical system failure. The aircraft has a relatively high approach and
landing speed and has a tendency to “float” if normal landing flare technique is used.
Thrust reverser deployment during a zero flap landing tends to cause the nose to
pitch-up, requiring significant pilot input to maintain nose wheel contact with the
runway)
 Operations with inoperative Auto Throttle – 605 only.
5.6.2 TASE for Challenger 650 Training
In addition to the common TASE for al CL604/605 variants, the following items must receive special
emphasis for the Challenger 650:

the use of SmartRunway™ and SmartLanding™ (RAAS) during normal or abnormal
operations, including limitations and awareness of simultaneous other independent aural
alerts;

understanding and execution of LPV approaches (Localiser Performance with vertical
Guidance);

procedures for Airway to Airway intercepts using the FMS 6200;

accepted abbreviations for textual inputs from pilot to FMS for CPDLC communications;

limitations on the use of SVS during flight and approaches;

procedures for calling up textual and graphical weather using XM Weather (if applicable);
and

½ bank application during single engine takeoffs (Heading vs. LNAV).
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
Page 17 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
5.7
Challenger CL604/605
Alternative Training and Qualification Programme (ATQP)
[AMC] Part-ORO, ORO.FC.A.245 addresses the alternative training and qualification programme.
Where an ATQP has been approved by the Competent Authority, the programme should be
consistent with these data, taking into account any training areas of special emphasis and ODR
tables, as applicable.
6.
Recurrent Training
Recurrent training must be compliant with EU regulations for civil aviation aircrew and air operations,
as applicable, and include the Training Areas of Special Emphasis on a rotational basis.
[AMC] These requirements should be considered as a minimum and expanded, as appropriate, for
pilots who have had only limited exposure and/or who do no longer fulfil the currency requirements.
Operators must establish an approved recurrent training and checking programme which is relevant
to the aircraft variant flown and its intended operation. The recurrent training programme may vary
with several factors which have a significant influence. Some of these factors are: actual exposure
of the flight crew member(s), specific routes and aerodromes used by the operator and new
developments in technology. These factors and/or a combination thereof will determine the required
recurrent training.
Recurrent training should incorporate special events training as described in this report, on a
rotational basis.
[M] Recurrent training performed on any CL604/605 variant is valid all variants flown, provided that
the differences are addressed.
[AMC] When operating more than one variant, recurrent training should be alternated between the
CL604/605 variants flown, as applicable.
[M] Special emphasis must be placed on the following items, with regard to the capabilities installed
in the particular variant used for the recurrent training:

proficiency in manual and automatic flight (including FMS and auto-throttle) in normal,
abnormal, and emergency situations;

the use of manual modes to operate systems such as electrical, hydraulic, pressurization,
flight controls, etc. and emergency equipment, such as the ADG.
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
Page 18 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
7.
Challenger CL604/605
Specifications for Checking
License skill tests and operator proficiency checks must be performed in accordance with applicable
EU regulations for civil aviation aircrew and air operations.
[M] Where Level B checking is required in accordance with the MDR tables, a check of knowledge
must be completed at the end of training and during recurrent checking. The knowledge check may
be in the form of oral questioning, written or computer base testing, or skill demonstration.
Satisfactory completion must be documented..
7.1
Recurrent Checking
Recurrent checking is addressed in Part-ORO, specifically in ORO.FC.130, ORO.FC.220,
ORO.FC.230, AMC1 ORO.FC.230, GM1 ORO.FC.230, ORO.FC.240, and AMC1 ORO.FC.240.
Low Visibility Operations (LVO) recurrent training and checking should be in accordance with AMC1
SPA.LVO.120 (f).
[M] Recurrent checking performed on any CL604/605 variant is valid all variants flown, provided that
the differences are addressed.
[AMC] When operating more than one variant, recurrent checking should be alternated between the
CL604/605 variants flown, as applicable.
[M] Special emphasis must be placed on the following items, with regard to the capabilities installed
in the particular variant used for the recurrent checking:

proficiency in manual and automatic flight (including FMS and auto-throttle) in normal,
abnormal, and emergency situations;

the use of manual modes to operate systems such as electrical, hydraulic, pressurization,
flight controls, etc. and emergency equipment, such as the ADG.
7.2
Line Checks
[M] With reference to Part-ORO, AMC1 ORO.FC.240(a)(4)(vii), a line check performed on any
CL604/605 variant is valid for all variants.
8.
Recent Experience and Currency
8.1
Recent Experience
[M] In accordance with Part FCL, FCL.060(b)(4) and with Part-ORO, ORO.FC.140(a), full credit is
given for recent experience requirements when operating any Challenger 604, 605 or 650 variant:
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
Page 19 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
8.2
Challenger CL604/605
Currency
[M] When operating multiple variants, Level B currency, as specified in the MDR tables, is maintained
by operating the variant aircraft within the previous 180 days. Level B currency may be re-established
by a self-review of Placards, Limitations, Systems and Operating Procedures prior to operating the
variant.
9.
Line Flying Under Supervision (LIFUS) / Supervised Operating Experience (SOE)
9.1
LIFUS / SOE
LIFUS should be performed in accordance with ORO.FC.220 and AMC1 ORO.FC.220(e).
Furthermore, GM1 ORO.FC.220(d) provides guidelines for operators to use when establishing their
individual requirements. Supervised Operating Experience (SOE) may be established in accordance
with Part-FCL, FCL.720.A (g) through the operational suitability evaluation.
[AMC] Where there is a change of operating conditions or route structure this should be taken into
account and may need additional route sectors to address these elements.
9.2
LIFUS following initial type rating training
[AMC] Pilots completing an initial type rating training on a CL604/605 should perform a minimum of
8 route sectors of LIFUS (as PF) including a line check. This may be reduced at the discretion of the
competent Authority, taking in account these data and previous experience of the pilots.
9.3
Supervised Operating Experience (SOE)
[AMC] For operations which do not require LIFUS, an equivalent amount of SOE should be
performed.
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
Page 20 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
Appendix 1
ODR Tables
Explanations:
Difference Level
Training
Abbreviation
A
Handout
HO
B
Slide/Tape presentations
Tutorial Computer Based Training
Stand-up lectures
Video Tapes/DVD
S/T
TCBT
SU
VT
C
Interactive Computer Based
Training Cockpit System Simulators
Cockpit Procedures Trainers
Part Task Trainers
Flight Training Devices (level 4-5)
ICBT
CSS
CPT
PTT
FTD
D
Flight training devices (Level II)
Full Flight Simulators (Level A – D)
FTD II
FFS A-D
E
Full Flight Simulators (Level C or D)
Aircraft
FFS C-D
ACFT
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
Page 21 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
ODR Tables: Challenger 604 to Challenger 605/650
Note: * Indicates aircraft with Avionics Upgrade Service Bulletin (SB). Difference does not apply to the 605
without SB.
DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT CL-600-2B16 (605/650)
BASE AIRCRAFT: CL-600-2B16 (604)
COMPLIANCE METHOD
TRAINING
DESIGN
Air Gen
Air Gen
REMARKS
FLT PROC LVL LVL LVL LVL
CHAR CHNG
A
B
C
D
CHKG/CURR
CHK
CURR
605/650
Passenger cabin windows
increased in size and raised.
Over wing emergency exit
raised.
No
No
X
A
A
605/650
Aerodynamic tail cone
redesigned
No
No
X
A
A
DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT CL-600-2B16 (605/650)
BASE AIRCRAFT: CL-600-2B16 (604)
COMPLIANCE METHOD
TRAINING
SYSTEM
REMARKS
FLT PROC LVL LVL LVL LVL
CHAR CHNG A
B
C
D
CHKG/CURR
CHK
CURR
21 Air
605/650
conditioning & Thermostatically controlled pilot
pressurization and co-pilot heated floor mats
installed
No
No
X
A
A
21 Air
605/650
conditioning & Footwarmers and windshield
pressurization heater and fan deleted.
Copilot Demist handle and
CKPT HEAT switch on air
conditioning panel removed
No
No
X
A
A
21 Air
605/650
conditioning & 2nd CPAM installed, standby
pressurization cabin altitude indicator removed.
No
Minor
X
A
A
21 Air
605/650
conditioning & Cabin temperature control
pressurization transfer switch (CABIN TEMP
CONT XFER) added to air
conditioning control panel
No
Minor
X
A
A
22 Auto Flight 605/650
Auto-throttle is standard
equipment
No
Minor
X
A
A
22 Auto Flight 605/650
Auto-throttle control panel and
switches installed on left
glareshield
No
Minor
X
A
A
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
Page 22 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT CL-600-2B16 (605/650)
BASE AIRCRAFT: CL-600-2B16 (604)
COMPLIANCE METHOD
TRAINING
SYSTEM
REMARKS
22 Auto Flight Optional 605*/650
½ bank not allowed in LNAV
mode below 31,600 ft.
FLT PROC LVL LVL LVL LVL
CHAR CHNG A
B
C
D
CHKG/CURR
CHK
CURR
No
Minor
X
B
A
No
Minor
X
A
A
No
Major
X
B
B
605/650
AC utility switch/light added to
Electrical Power panel and minor
changes in electrical power
distribution
No
Minor
X
A
A
605/650
STALL annunciators removed
from glareshield, replaced by
STALL indications on PFD
No
Minor
X
A
A
No
Major
B
A
No
No
X
A
A
No
No
X
A
A
No
No
X
A
A
31 Indicating Optional 605*/650
and Recording Capable of supporting optional:
Enhanced map displays,
XM/Universal weather display,
etc.
No
Minor
A
B
31 Indicating 605/650
and Recording Over speed test (OVSP TEST)
switch removed, No preflight
over speed test required.
No
Minor
A
A
23 Comm
23 Comm
24 Electrical
Power
27 Stall
Protection
605/650
Radio Tuning Units (RTU)
removed, tuning functions
performed by CCP/MFD
Optional 605*/650

FANS 1A+
(CPDLC plus ADS-C) via
FMS 6200 CDU.
31 Indicating 605/650
and Recording Pro Line 21 replaces Pro Line 4
6 displays replaced by 4 large
(10 X 12) displays
Air Data Reference Panel (ARP),
Display Control Panel (DCP),
Weather Radar Control Panel
(WXP), EICAS Control Panel
(ECP) removed, replaced by
Display Control Panel (DCP)
(On-side PFD) and Cursor
Control Panel (CCP) (On-side
MFD) Industry standard color
convention for displays adopted.
31 Indicating 605/650
and Recording EICAS - CAS messages
combined into single stack, same
stacking philosophy.
31 Indicating 605/650
and Recording APU temperature and RPM
display on MFD is different in
format.
31 Indicating 605/650
and Recording EFIS - Advisory AOA indicator
available on each PFD
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
X
X
X
Page 23 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT CL-600-2B16 (605/650)
BASE AIRCRAFT: CL-600-2B16 (604)
COMPLIANCE METHOD
TRAINING
SYSTEM
REMARKS
31 Indicating 605/650
and Recording EICAS – Single warning/caution
switch/light on glareshield (one
per side)
31 Indicating 605/650
and Recording Standby instruments, Electropneumatic standby
Altitude/Airspeed and Attitude
instruments replaced by an
integrated standby instrument
(ISI)
FLT PROC LVL LVL LVL LVL
CHAR CHNG A
B
C
D
CHKG/CURR
CHK
CURR
No
No
X
A
A
No
Minor
X
A
A
No
No
X
A
A
Optional 605*/650
Synthetic Vision System (SVS)
provides situational awareness
(advisory) to the crew by adding
3D terrain and runway data
superimposed on the PFDs. SVS
is pilot selectable.
No
No
B
A
605/650
Circuit breaker and integral
cockpit panel lighting and some
switch/lights changed to LEDs
No
No
X
A
A
605/650
Pulsating landing lights are
standard equipment
No
No
X
A
A
34 Navigation 605/650
Baro knob functionality and
location is modified
No
Minor
X
A
A
No
Norm
A
B
No
Minor
X
A
A
No
Minor
X
A
A
31 Indicating 605/650
and Recording Electronic clocks (2) replaced
with a single GPS-capable clock
31
Indicating/
Recording
33 Lighting
33 Lighting
X
34 Navigation Optional 605*/650
FMS 6200 new features
•
Auto Position Initialization
•
Vspeed out of Range
messages
•
ALD operation with
X
contaminated runway
•
Remote (DBU-Initiated)
Database Dataload
•
Manual Landing Factor
•
Airway to Airway Transitions
34 Navigation 605/650
IRS system capable of in-flight
nav alignment
34 Navigation 605/650
FMS CDU. Smaller CDU- 6200
installed. Alpha-numeric key
layout differs.
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
Page 24 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT CL-600-2B16 (605/650)
BASE AIRCRAFT: CL-600-2B16 (604)
COMPLIANCE METHOD
TRAINING
SYSTEM
REMARKS
CHKG/CURR
FLT PROC LVL LVL LVL LVL
CHAR CHNG A
B
C
D
CHK
CURR
34 Navigation 605/650
FMS Color convention on PFD
differs
No
No
X
A
A
34 Navigation 605/650
TAWS altitude callouts available
for both DH and MDA
No
Minor
X
A
A
34 Navigation Optional 605*/650
Traffic Surveillance System
TSS-4100 (TCAS/Transponder)
installed.
No
Minor
X
A
A
34 Navigation Provides future growth for ADSB Out and ADS B – In.
(not evaluated)
--
--
--
--
--
No
Minor
X
A
B
No
Major
X
B
B
No
Minor
X
A
B
No
Minor
X
A
A
No
Minor
X
A
A
34 Navigation Optional 605*/650*
SBAS Localizer Performance
with Vertical Guidance (LPV)
--
--
--
[0.3 approach with RF legs
capable not evaluated.]
34 Navigation Optional 605*/650
SmartRunway and SmartLanding
34 Navigation Optional 605*/650
Multi-Scan weather radar with
turbulence detection
Controlled at DCPs and
Multiscan™ Radar Menu and
annunciations
Enhanced ground clutter
suppression, allowing usable
weather detection on ranges up
to 320 nm.
Provisions for predictive
windshear detection growth.
46 Information Optional 605*/650
Systems
Integrated Flight Information
System (IFIS) Version 7.0
upgrade. Enhances electronic
charts display and satellite
graphical weather:
- new XM weather capabilities
for Canada and Puerto Rico.
- Enroute charts
All new capabilities are available
via commercial subscription
service.
49 APU
605/650
APU Honeywell 36-150 is
standard.
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
Page 25 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT CL-600-2B16 (605/650)
BASE AIRCRAFT: CL-600-2B16 (604)
COMPLIANCE METHOD
TRAINING
MANEUVER
REMARKS
No Maneuver differences
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
FLT
CHAR
---
CHKG/CURR
PROC LVL LVL LVL LVL
CHK
CHNG A
B
C
D
---
---
---
---
---
---
CURR
---
Page 26 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
ODR Tables: Challenger 605/650 to Challenger 604
DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT CL-600-2B16 (604)
BASE AIRCRAFT: CL-600-2B16 (605/650)
COMPLIANCE METHOD
TRAINING
DESIGN
Air Gen
Air Gen
REMARKS
FLT PROC LVL LVL LVL LVL
CHAR CHNG
A
B
C
D
CHKG/CURR
CHK
CURR
Passenger cabin windows are
smaller in size and situated
lower. Over wing emergency exit
is situated lower.
No
No
X
A
A
Different aerodynamic tail cone
No
No
X
A
A
DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT CL-600-2B16 (604)
BASE AIRCRAFT: CL-600-2B16 (605/650)
COMPLIANCE METHOD
TRAINING
SYSTEM
REMARKS
21 Air
No thermostatically controlled
conditioning & pilot and co-pilot heated floor
pressurization mats installed
FLT PROC LVL LVL LVL LVL
CHAR CHNG
A
B
C
D
CHKG/CURR
CHK
CURR
No
No
X
A
A
21 Air
Forced air foot-warming and
conditioning & windshield demist provided. Fan
pressurization and electric heater controlled by
CKPT HEAT switch on Air
conditioning panel
Full foot warmer/full windshield
vent control knob installed on
copilot side panel removed
No
No
X
A
A
21 Air
Single CPAM installed, standby
conditioning & cabin altitude indicator provided
pressurization beneath glareshield.
No
Minor
X
A
A
21 Air
No cabin temperature control
conditioning & transfer switch on air
pressurization conditioning control panel
No
Minor
X
A
A
22 Auto Flight Auto-throttle is optional
equipment
No
Minor
X
A
A
22 Auto Flight Autopilot mistrim icons appear
on PFD.
No
Minor
X
A
A
No
Norm
X
A
A
No
Minor
A
A
22 AFCS
23 Comm
½ bank allowed in LNAV mode
below 31,600 ft.
Radio tuning functions
performed at Radio Tuning Units
(RTU) vice CCP/MFD
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
X
Page 27 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT CL-600-2B16 (604)
BASE AIRCRAFT: CL-600-2B16 (605/650)
COMPLIANCE METHOD
TRAINING
SYSTEM
23 Comm
REMARKS
FLT PROC LVL LVL LVL LVL
CHAR CHNG
A
B
C
D
CHKG/CURR
CHK
CURR
Challenger 604 FMS does not
support:

FANS 1A+
(CPDLC plus ADS-C)
ATN/LINKS 2000+ (future
upgrade)
No
No
X
A
A
24 Electrical
Power
No AC utility switch/light on
Electrical Power panel and minor
changes in electrical distribution.
No
Minor
X
A
A
27 Stall
Protection
STALL annunciators on left and
right glareshield, vice PFD
No
Minor
X
A
A
31 Indicating Pro Line 4 avionics suite
and Recording installed vice Pro Line 21.
Four (4) displays replaced by six
(6) smaller displays
Air Data Reference Panel (ARP),
Display Control Panel (DCP),
Weather Radar Control Panel
(WXP), EICAS Control Panel
(ECP) installed, vice Cursor
Control Panel (CCP) Nonstandard FMS color conventions
used for displays.
No
Major
B
A
31 Indicating EICAS - CAS messages
and Recording displayed on two EICAS
Displays same stacking
philosophy although two stacks.
No
No
X
A
A
No
No
X
A
A
31 Indicating Over speed test (OVSP TEST)
and Recording switch installed to facilitate
testing during preflight.
No
Minor
X
A
A
31 Indicating EICAS – Separate
and Recording warning/caution switch/lights on
glareshield (one warning and
one caution per side)
No
No
X
A
A
31 Indicating APU temperature and RPM
and Recording display on MFD is different in
format.
No
No
X
A
A
31 Indicating Standby instruments, Electroand Recording pneumatic standby
Altitude/Airspeed and Attitude
instruments installed.
No
Minor
X
A
A
No
No
X
A
A
No
No
X
A
A
31 Indicating EFIS – No Advisory AOA
and Recording indicator on PFDs
31 Indicating Two (2) Electronic clocks
and Recording installed no GPS interface.
31
Indicating/
Recording
No Synthetic Vision System
(SVS).
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
X
Page 28 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT CL-600-2B16 (604)
BASE AIRCRAFT: CL-600-2B16 (605/650)
COMPLIANCE METHOD
TRAINING
SYSTEM
33 Lighting
REMARKS
Circuit breaker and integral
cockpit panel lighting and
switch/lights are incandescent
FLT PROC LVL LVL LVL LVL
CHAR CHNG
A
B
C
D
CHKG/CURR
CHK
CURR
No
No
X
A
A
No
No
X
A
A
No
Norm
A
A
No
Minor
X
A
A
No
Minor
X
A
A
FMS CDU alpha-numeric key
layout differs.
No
No
X
A
A
34 Navigation FMS Color convention on PFD
differs
No
No
X
A
A
34 Navigation TAWS altitude callouts available
for radio altitude (DH) only
No
Minor
X
A
A
34 Navigation Challenger 604 is not RNP AR
>0.3 capable.
No
No
X
A
A
No
No
X
A
A
34 Navigation No optional SmartRunway and
SmartLanding
No
No
X
A
A
34 Navigation Radio Altitude, pilot initiated test
function provided.
No
Minor
X
A
A
34 Navigation Weather radar is not
Multi-Scan.
No
Minor
X
A
A
33 Lighting
Pulsating landing lights available
as optional equipment only.
34 Navigation FMS 6000 in 604 does not
support
•
Auto Position Initialization
•
Vspeed out of Range
messages
•
ALD operation with
contaminated runway
•
ETP/PNR
•
Remote (DBU-Initiated)
Database Dataload
•
Manual Landing Factor
•
Airway to Airway Transitions
34 Navigation Baro knob functionality and
location differs
34 Navigation IRS system not capable of inflight nav alignment
34 Navigation
34 Navigation Challenger 604 is not SBAS
Localizer Performance with
Vertical Guidance (LPV)
capable.
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
X
Page 29 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT CL-600-2B16 (604)
BASE AIRCRAFT: CL-600-2B16 (605/650)
COMPLIANCE METHOD
TRAINING
SYSTEM
REMARKS
FLT PROC LVL LVL LVL LVL
CHAR CHNG
A
B
C
D
46 Information No Integrated Flight Information
Systems
System (IFIS) capability.
49 APU
CHKG/CURR
CHK
CURR
No
No
X
A
A
No
Minor
X
A
A
APU GTCP-36-100E is standard.
DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT CL-600-2B16 (604)
BASE AIRCRAFT: CL-600-2B16 (605/650)
COMPLIANCE METHOD
TRAINING
MANEUVER
REMARKS
No Maneuver differences
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
FLT
CHAR
---
CHKG/CURR
PROC LVL LVL LVL LVL
CHK
CHNG A
B
C
D
---
---
---
---
---
---
CURR
---
Page 30 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
ODR Tables: Challenger 605 (without avionics upgrade service bulletin) to Challenger 650
DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Avionics Upgrade (650)
BASE AIRCRAFT: CL-600-2B16 (605)
COMPLIANCE METHOD
TRAINING
DESIGN
REMARKS
No Design differences
FLT PROC
CHAR CHNG
---
---
CHKG/CURR
LVL
A
LVL
B
LVL
C
LVL
D
CHK
CURR
---
---
---
---
---
---
DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Avionics Upgrade (650)
BASE AIRCRAFT: CL-600-2B16 (605)
COMPLIANCE METHOD
TRAINING
SYSTEM
REMARKS
22 Auto
Flight
½ bank is not allowed in LNAV mode
below 31,600 ft.
23 Comm
FANS–1A+
CPDLC and ADS-C controlled via FMS
6200 CDU
FLT PROC
CHAR CHNG
LVL
A
Synthetic Vision System (SVS) provides
situational awareness (advisory) to the
crew by adding 3D terrain and runway
data superimposed on the PFDs. SVS is
pilot selectable.
34
Traffic Surveillance System TSS-4100
Navigation (TCAS/Transponder) installed. New
TCAS audio “ Level Off, Level Off“
replaces “Adjust Vertical Speed”.
LVL
C
LVL
D
CHK
CURR
No
Minor
S/T
SU
TCB
B
A
No
Norm
S/T
SU
TCB
B
B
No
No
S/T
SU
TCBI
B
A
No
Norm
Abnorm
A
A
No
Norm
S/T
SU
TCB
A
B
No
Norm
X
A
B
No
No
S/T
SU
TCBI
B
B
[ATN/Links 2000 + available for base
and variant aircraft not evaluated]
31
Indicating/
Recording
LVL
B
CHKG/CURR
HO
34
SBAS Localizer Performance with
Navigation Vertical Guidance (LPV)
[0.3 approach with RF legs capable (not
AR or SAAAR at this time) not evaluated]
SBAS = WAAS and EGNOS
Not Applicable if base aircraft has STC
for WAAS LPV.
34
FMS 6200 new features
Navigation •
Auto Position Initialization
•
Vspeed out of Range messages
•
ALD operation with contaminated
runway
•
Remote (DBU-Initiated) Database
Dataload
•
Manual Landing Factor
•
Airway to Airway Transitions
34
Optional SmartRunway and
Navigation SmartLanding
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
Page 31 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Avionics Upgrade (650)
BASE AIRCRAFT: CL-600-2B16 (605)
COMPLIANCE METHOD
TRAINING
SYSTEM
REMARKS
34
Multi-Scan weather radar with turbulence
Navigation detection
Controlled at DCPs and Multiscan™
Radar Menu and annunciations
Enhanced ground clutter suppression,
allowing usable weather detection on
ranges up to 320 nm.
Provisions for predictive windshear
detection growth.
46
Optional Integrated Flight Information
Information System (IFIS) Version 7.2 upgrade.
Systems
Enhances electronic charts display and
satellite graphical weather:
- new XM weather capabilities for
Canada and Puerto Rico.
- Enroute charts
FLT PROC
CHAR CHNG
LVL
A
LVL
B
LVL
C
CHKG/CURR
LVL
D
CHK
CURR
No
Norm
S/T
SU
TCBI
A
B
No
Norm
S/T
SU
TCBI
A
B
All new capabilities are available via
commercial subscription service.
DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Avionics Upgrade (650)
BASE AIRCRAFT: CL-600-2B16 (605)
COMPLIANCE METHOD
TRAINING
Maneuver
REMARKS
No Manoeuver differences
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
FLT PROC
CHAR CHNG
---
---
CHKG/CURR
LVL
A
LVL
B
LVL
C
LVL
D
CHK
CURR
---
---
---
---
---
---
Page 32 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
ODR Tables: Challenger 650 to Challenger 605 (without avionic upgrade service bulletin)
DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: CL-600-2B16 (605)
BASE AIRCRAFT: Avionics Upgrade (650)
COMPLIANCE METHOD
TRAINING
DESIGN
REMARKS
No Design differences
FLT PROC
CHAR CHNG
---
---
CHKG/CURR
LVL
A
LVL
B
LVL
C
LVL
D
CHK
CURR
---
---
---
---
---
---
DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: CL-600-2B16 (605)
BASE AIRCRAFT: Avionics Upgrade (650)
COMPLIANCE METHOD
TRAINING
SYSTEM
REMARKS
FLT PROC
CHAR CHNG
LVL
A
LVL
B
LVL
D
CHK
CURR
B
A
22 Auto
Flight
½ bank is allowed in LNAV mode below
31,600 ft.
No
Minor
23 Comm
Basic 605 is not FANS–1A, CPDLC or
ADS-C capable
No
Norm
HO
A
A
31
Indicating/
Recording
34
Navigation
Basic 605 is not Synthetic Vision System
capable
No
No
HO
A
A
No
Norm
A
A
No
Norm
Abnorm
HO
A
A
No
Norm
HO
A
A
No
No
HO
A
A
Basic 605
FMS 6000 does not support
•
Auto Position Initialization
•
Vspeed out of Range messages
•
ALD operation with contaminated
runway
•
ETP/PNR
•
Remote (DBU-Initiated) Database
Dataload
•
Manual Landing Factor
•
Airway to Airway Transitions
34
Basic 605 does not support Traffic
Navigation Surveillance System TSS-4100
(TCAS/Transponder)
TCAS audio “Adjust Vertical Speed
Adjust Vertical Speed“ replaces “Level
Off, Level Off”
34
Basic 605 is not SBAS capable.
Navigation Localizer Performance with Vertical
Guidance (LPV) 0.3 approach not
available
S/T
SU
TCB
LVL
C
CHKG/CURR
S/T
SU
TCBI
34
Basic 605 does not support
Navigation SmartRunway and SmartLanding
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
Page 33 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: CL-600-2B16 (605)
BASE AIRCRAFT: Avionics Upgrade (650)
COMPLIANCE METHOD
TRAINING
SYSTEM
REMARKS
FLT PROC
CHAR CHNG
LVL
A
LVL
B
LVL
C
CHKG/CURR
LVL
D
CHK
CURR
34
Basic 605 does not support Multi-Scan
Navigation weather radar with turbulence Provisions
and predictive windshear
No
Norm
HO
A
A
34
Basic 605 is not RNP AR > 0.3 capable.
Navigation
--
--
HO
A
A
No
Norm
HO
A
A
46
Basic 605 does not have Integrated
Information Flight Information System (IFIS) Version
Systems
7.2
DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: CL-600-2B16 (605)
BASE AIRCRAFT: Avionics Upgrade (650)
COMPLIANCE METHOD
TRAINING
Maneuver
REMARKS
No Manoeuver differences
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
FLT PROC
CHAR CHNG
---
---
CHKG/CURR
LVL
A
LVL
B
LVL
C
LVL
D
CHK
CURR
---
---
---
---
---
---
Page 34 of 35
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew
Challenger CL604/605
ODR Tables: Challenger 650 to Challenger 650 MTO/FLEX
UPGRADE: CL-600-2B16 (650) MTO/FLEX
BASE : CL-600-2B16 (650)
APPROVED BY
(POI)____________________________
COMPLIANCE METHOD
TRAINING
DESIGN
REMARKS
Limitations
MTO AFM Supp. 21
Limitations
Flex AFM Supp. 22
FLT
CHAR
PROC
CHNG
NO
NO
NO
NO
LVL
A
LVL
B
LVL
C
CHKG/CURR
LVL
D
CHK
CURR
X
A
A
X
A
A
COMPLIANCE METHOD
UPGRADE: CL-600-2B16 (650) MTO/FLEX
BASE : CL-600-2B16 (650)
APPROVED BY
(POI)____________________________
TRAINING
SYSTEM
ATA
REMARKS
FLT
CHAR
PROC
CHNG
LVL
A
LVL
B
22Autoflight
31-Ind. &
Recording
31-Ind. &
Recording
34Navigation
Auto-throttle system mode
status display
Abnormal indications for
MTO
EICAS and MFD updates
for MTO and Flex
FMS – MTO and Flex
Thrust Limit page
NO
NO
X
NO
NO
X
NO
NO
X
NO
YES
X
UPGRADE: CL-600-2B16 (650) MTO/FLEX
BASE : CL-600-2B16 (650)
APPROVED BY
(POI)____________________________
LVL
C
CHKG/CURR
LVL
D
REMARKS
FLT
CHAR
CURR
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
COMPLIANCE METHOD
TRAINING
MANEUVER
CHK
PROC
CHNG
LVL
A
LVL
B
LVL
C
CHKG/CURR
LVL
D
CHK
CURR
No Differences
OSD FC Challenger CL604/605/650 – Revision 1
Page 35 of 35