Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications Andrea Bevilacqua University of Padova andrea.bevilacqua@dei.unipd.it © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Outline Introduction Physical principles Self and mutual inductance Integrated transformers Interim Q&A session Transformers in amplifiers Baluns Couplers and combiners Matching networks Transformers in oscillators Doubly-tuned resonators Varactor coupling Multiple resonance tanks Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 2 of 78 Conventional Use of Transformers Electrical energy distribution network (grid) Conversion of electrical energy Power management Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 3 of 78 Transformers in Integrated Circuits 20MHz power transfer 22-30GHz PA [Wang19] [Pellerano19] 2-3GHz DPLL 71-76GHz TRX [Yue19] [Liu19] Transformers are ubiquitous in analog, RF and mm-wave integrated circuits Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 4 of 78 What Can I Do with a Transformer? Galvanic isolation ac coupling Single-ended to differential conversion (balun) Signal/power combining Phase inversion feedback networks Passive voltage/current gain Impedance transformation (matching network) Higher-order resonator useful for LC oscillators and filters Multi-mode oscillator Phase noise optimization Implicit frequency multiplication Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 5 of 78 Working Framework of this Tutorial Quasi-static approximation Lumped element devices We will not discuss higher frequency phenomena: Distributed circuits (t-lines) Radiative effects (antennas) Others topics we will not touch are: EM simulation techniques Inductor/transformer compact modeling and circuit simulation Design rule related issues (e.g. density rules-compliant layouts) Measurement and characterization techniques Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 6 of 78 Ampère’s Law Orientation of contour C and direction of current I are related by right-hand rule A.-M. Ampère Relates magnetic field (H) to its sources (currents) It is a powerful tool to compute H in case of cylindrical symmetry Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 7 of 78 Magnetic Field in a Solenoid Because of symmetry the field lines are along the coil axis Assuming very long core can show that H is approximately: Uniform within the core Null outside the core Ampère’s law yields: Core with permeability μ>μ0 Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 8 of 78 Magnetic Flux and Inductance Magnetic flux is Flux density is B=μΗ, hence: Flux is proportional to current Core with permeability μ>μ0 Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Inductance Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 9 of 78 Flux Linkage Core with permeability μ>μ0 The flux produced by current I2 crossing surface S1 is Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 10 of 78 Mutual and Self Inductance μ>μ0 Swapping the roles of the coils: Mutual coupling is reciprocal: Mutual inductance Mutual (M) and self (L) inductance only depend on the geometry of the system and the properties of the core material (μ) Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 11 of 78 Faraday’s Law μ>μ0 Orientation of contour C and surface S are related by right-hand rule M. Faraday Big discovery: crossed by a time-varying magnetic flux the coil behaves as a generator! Induced emf creates a magnetic field opposing the flux that generated it Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 12 of 78 Coupled Inductors Consider magnetic flux density generated by both coils 1 and 2 Conveniently define voltages V1 and V2 as: μ>μ0 Combine Faraday’s law and definition of self and mutual inductance to describe the coupled inductors as a two-port Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 13 of 78 Dot Convention dot convention swapped port polarity Current flows into the dot of one coil the induced voltage has positive polarity at the dotted terminal of the other coil M is positive If we swap the polarity of one electrical port (e.g. V’2, I’2) 180° phase shift M is negative Self inductances L1, L2 are always positive, but mutual inductance can be M≷0 Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 14 of 78 Flux Leakage In general, some of the flux density B generated by one coil does not link to the other coil flux leakage μ>μ0 Only the smaller coil surface (between S1 and S2) crossing the flux of B1 and B2 is relevant for the mutual inductance Hence M2 ≤ L1L2 Define magnetic coupling k |k| ≤ 1 Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 15 of 78 Equivalent Circuit for Coupled Inductors leakage inductance Can describe coupled inductors with an equivalent circuit: magnetizing inductance ideal transformer Magnetizing inductance models the need to establish magnetic flux Leakage inductance models flux leakage Ideal transformer with ratio 1:nk V’2/V1 = -I’1/I2 = nk Turn ratio: Impedance transformation V’2/I2 = (-V1/I’1)n2k2 Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 16 of 78 Magnetic Transformer The coupled inductors make a magnetic transformer, that approximates an ideal transformer if |k|1 and L1∞ |k|1 L1∞ Materials with high permeability μ, coils with many turns and large coil section (to have large inductance), and tightly wound coils (to have |k|1) help implementing a good transformer Transformers are inherently bulky Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 17 of 78 Inductor Series Resistance Coil wire has resistivity ρ≠0 Inductor is lossy μ>μ0 Assuming a wire with diameter d the inductor series resistance is: Wire section Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Total coil length Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 18 of 78 Inductor Quality Factor Assume to connect the inductor to a lossless capacitor LC resonator with resonance frequency The resonator quality factor is defined as: μ>μ0 Stored energy Dissipated power Only the coil has losses, that we assume only due to the wire resistance R The inductor quality factor is: Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 19 of 78 Integrated Inductors center tap Integrated inductors are implemented as a planar version of the solenoid geometry spiral shape Can have several shapes: circular, octagonal, square, etc… Can be symmetric and have a center tap Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 20 of 78 Estimation of Integrated Inductance Computation of the inductance is complex. Can approximately say [Mohan99]: Square Octagonal K1 2.34 2.25 K2 2.75 3.55 Assuming octagonal coil, w=10μm, s=5μm: L [nH] N dout [μm] 0.1 1 70 1 2 170 10 7 300 Fill factor Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 21 of 78 Limitations of Integrated Inductors Magnetic materials are typically not available (μ=μ0) larger device size for a given inductance Planar device Non-uniform H field L prop. to coil diameter, not area Spiral shape Limited coupling between turns (inner turns have smaller area) Inductance is not proportional to N2 larger size Inner turns contribute less additional inductance and more loss hollow spiral layout (typically limit fill factor ρd<0.5) Inductance is proportional to Np with p<2, but series resistance still approximately increases with N Q is proportional to Lb with b≈0.2, 0.3 The circle has the best area/perimeter ratio highest Q Circular inductor are not always allowed by design rules Regular polygon can approximate a circle Octagon is usually all right Square inductor has higher Q than rectangular inductor Bottom line: try use hollow (i.e. few turns) octagonal inductors Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 22 of 78 Inductor Self Resonance Parasitic capacitance between inductor traces and substrate and from trace to trace inductor turns into a capacitor beyond self resonance frequency ωsrf Approximately: Want operation frequency to be a fraction of ωsrf there is a maximum value of inductance that can be used for a given operation frequency progressively more difficult to use large inductances at higher frequencies Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 23 of 78 High Frequency Losses Simulation at 300 MHz At higher frequency the current is not uniformly distributed in the coil trace The current tends to flow on a thin region near the trace surface (skin effect) The thickness of this region is related to the skin depth Trace resistance increases as δ decreases Simulation at 60 GHz Current tends to flow along the least inductance path crowds at inner coil side Substrate coupling increase losses Capacitive coupling Eddy currents More relevant for larger inductors Current density Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 24 of 78 Integrated Transformers Stacked layout k=0.6-0.8 Larger capacitive parasitics Lower coil made of thinner metal Coplanar interwound layout k=0.5-0.7 Can use thicker metal for both coils Andrea Bevilacqua Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Concentric coplanar layout k=0.3-0.5 Minimum capacitance between primary and secondary 25 of 78 Transformer Design Considerations The requirements on desired magnetic coupling influence the transformer layout to be selected Larger k trades off with larger capacitive parasitics between primary and secondary coils Typical achievable k ranges from 0.2 to 0.8 leakage inductance is never negligible To have n»1 or n«1 we need one inductor much larger than the other, but: Larger inductors have a lower self resonance frequency and more substrate losses Mutual coupling depends on the coil with the smaller area limited magnetic coupling if coils have very different sizes Typical achievable turn ratio for integrated transformers: 0.5<n<2 For a given technology, same achievable Q as for inductors, except if: One coil is implemented in a thinner metal (stacked layout) Layout requires the use of lower (and much thinner) metals for the underpasses Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 26 of 78 Design Example (1) dout ≈ 280μm w ≈ 9μm [Vallese09] Operation frequency: 3—5 GHz Coplanar interwound layout Relatively large turn ratio Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference L1 [nH] L2 [nH] k Q1 Q2 1.8 6.4 0.7 8 10 Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 27 of 78 Design Example (2) dout ≈ 100μm w ≈ 4μm [Padovan16] Operation frequency: 15—40 GHz Hybrid interwound/stacked layout Moderate magnetic coupling Compact size Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference L1 [pH] L2 [pH] k Q1 Q2 680 580 0.65 21 20 Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 28 of 78 Physical Principles Summary In integrated processes high permeability materials are typically not available large area for inductors and transformers Self and mutual inductance depend on device geometry Mutual inductance depends on the area of the smaller coil integrated transformers have limited magnetic coupling Self resonance frequency limits the maximum inductance for a given frequency of operation Quality factor increases (although weakly) with inductance for small inductors; use of large inductances is limited by substrate losses and ωsrf Skin effect, current crowding and substrate coupling limit Q at higher frequencies Cannot effectively couple inductors with very different inductance values limitation in achievable transformer turn ratios Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 29 of 78 Interim Q&A Session Please ask questions that you feel is essential to follow the rest of this tutorial Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 30 of 78 Outline Introduction Physical principles Self and mutual inductance Integrated transformers Interim Q&A session Transformers in amplifiers Baluns Couplers and combiners Matching networks Transformers in oscillators Doubly-tuned resonators Varactor coupling Multiple resonance tanks Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 31 of 78 Balun Can use transformer for single-ended to differential signal conversion balanced port if L2=L3 and k12=k13 If L2=L3 and k12=k13 No common-mode ac signal at balanced port Layout symmetry is essential Can use center tap to provide bias at balanced port Galvanic isolation Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 32 of 78 Balun Non-Idealities Magnetizing and leakage inductance are unwanted but unavoidable ideally actually How do we cope with it? Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 33 of 78 Embedding Balun Parasitics in a Ladder Can conveniently embed magnetizing and leakage inductance in amplifier input/output networks Example: LNA with inductive degeneration Use transformer parasitics as part of a ladder network explicit cap + pad parasitics 2-section ladder Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 34 of 78 Coupled Input and Degeneration Inductors Coupling Lg and Ls in an inductively degenerated amplifier allows to reduce the inductor size additional Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 35 of 78 Layout of Coupled Lg and Ls Coupling Lg and Ls leads to a particularly compact and convenient layout, especially in a differential design Can easily route signals to transistors [Padovan16] Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 36 of 78 DM/CM Inductance Take two identical symmetrically-wound coils bifilar transformer with unitary turn ratio Different behavior in differential mode or common mode Differential mode: I2=I1 For each branch: I1 Common mode: I2=-I1 For each branch: Can also change coil winding to get k<0 I2 Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 37 of 78 Differential Artificial T-Line Can use symmetric bifilar transformer to implement a differential artificial t-line with compact layout Example: lumped-element Wilkinson divider [Caruso14] section of differential artificial t-line Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 38 of 78 Quadrature Hybrid Lumped element implementation of quadrature hybrid directional coupler Useful for I/Q generation Power combining (balanced amplifier, Doherty amplifier) Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 39 of 78 Design of Quadrature Hybrid Design equations: Operating frequency: Layout example of a differential implementation Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference [Park15] Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 40 of 78 Series Power Combiner Combine the power of NS amplifiers by series connecting the secondary windings of identical transformers Load voltage is shared among amplifiers: VL=NSV2 decreased voltage stress Intrinsic load impedance transformation: IL=-I2, VL=NSV2 If k=1 m=n Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 41 of 78 Parallel Power Combiner Combine the power of NP amplifiers by parallel connecting the secondary windings of identical transformers Intrinsic load impedance transformation: IL=- NPI2, VL=V2 Can also do series/parallel combiner As for the balun, we need to embed transformer parasitics into the combiner network (e.g. as a ladder) Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 42 of 78 Transformer-Based Matching Networks interstage network output network input network Transformers are broadly used in input, interstage and output networks Inherent impedance transformation It is key to embed parasitics in network design ladder or doubly-tuned networks Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 43 of 78 Doubly-Tuned Matching Network (1) explicit or parasitic caps When shunt capacitances C1 and C2 are not negligible doubly-tuned matching network Two magnetically-coupled LC tanks Fourth-order resonator We derive equivalent 2nd order circuits in order to more easily evaluate: The transformed load impedance at resonance The equivalent loss resistance network efficiency Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 44 of 78 Doubly-Tuned Matching Network (2) The loading effect of RL on the reactive network is quantified by: If QS»1 two parallel resonances Transformer behavior If QS<1 degenerate case explicit or parasitic caps Single resonance Impedance inverter behavior Network behavior depends on ratio ξ of LC products of coupled tanks Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 45 of 78 Parallel Resonances (High-QS Case) The two parallel resonance frequencies are: Pole splitting occurs as the magnetic coupling k is increased: ξ«1 ξ=1 Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 46 of 78 Equivalent Circuit in the High-QS Case In the neighborhood of the parallel resonances the doubly-tuned matching network can be approximated as a second-order circuit ωL ωH Load impedance gets transformed by factor Av21 R’=RL/(Av21)2 For ξ = 1 |Av21|=n regardless the value of k Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications R’(ωH) is proportional to ξ2 47 of 78 Loss Resistance at ωL Req models the losses of the matching network can use to assess network efficiency (smaller Req lower efficiency) At ωL a higher magnetic coupling results in a larger Req,L Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 48 of 78 Loss Resistance at ωH Similarly at the higher frequency resonance we have: Req,H is approximately proportional to ξ2 A larger magnetic coupling results in a smaller parallel loss resistance Req,H higher k results in lower efficiency Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 49 of 78 Low-QS Case impedance inverter If QS is low C2 is negligible as it is shunted by a low RL Circuit degenerates and shows a single parallel resonance at In the neighborhood of resonance the circuit behaves as an impedance inverter Zin(ωS)=(Z0)2/(RL+Req,S) Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 50 of 78 Design of the Matching Network matching network efficiency (power gain) High-QS Case Low-QS Case More degrees of freedom but more complexity than second-order tank Design constraints: desired input impedance and operating frequency ω0 Desired design goal: minimization of the power loss of the doubly-tuned transformer matching network want to maximize network efficiency High-QS case: for a given operating frequency it is more convenient to work at the lower parallel resonance ωL=ω0 Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 51 of 78 Impedance Step-Down Typical situation in the design of a (CMOS) power amplifier Efficiency η is maximized if Req,L is maximized Req,L is maximized if transformer inductances and k are maximized Req,L is maximized if ξ is about unity (L2C2≈L1C1) Impedance transformation ratio achieved by using turn ratio n Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 52 of 78 Step-Down Design Example Q1=Q2=20 pad capacitance η 87% k 0.85 L1 75pH L2 150pH C1 200fF C2 100fF 30GHz 18dBm differential power amplifier with 1V supply R’=25Ω Assume given pad capacitance C2=100fF Select ξ=1, maximize inductance and k Set ωL=ω2/(1+k)1/2=ω0 Set n=1.4 to transform RL=50Ω into desired R’ Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 53 of 78 Impedance Step-Up Often the case in inter-stage matching networks Large inductors and small RL low QS case R’≈(Z0)2/RL Should minimize Req,S minimize n There is an optimum value of the magnetic coupling k that minimizes Req,S Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 54 of 78 Step-Up Design Example Q1=Q2=20 η 56% k 0.5 L1 220pH L2 110pH C1 166fF C2 100fF 30GHz inter-stage network for a cascode amplifier: RL=10Ω, R’=200Ω Set n=0.7 and select k=0.5 which is optimum if Q1=Q2 Desired impedance transformation ratio yields Z0 and thus sets L2 Adjust C1 to set ωS=ω1/(1-k2)1/2=ω0 Value of C2 is not relevant as long as it is not too large Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 55 of 78 Broadband Matching Network Can use doubly-tuned transformer network to achieve broadband operation To achieve R’(ωL)=R’(ωH)=RL/n2 ξ=1 Minimize ripple between ωL and ωΗ |k|QS=1 The choice of k sets the bandwidth Req,L > Req,Η but Req,Η proportional to ξ2 can equalize losses increasing ξ Increasing ξ over unity increases bandwidth can compensate decreasing k Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 56 of 78 Broadband Matching Design Example Q1=Q2=20 k 0.85 L1 405pH L2 810pH C1 133fF C2 125fF amplifier gain matching network efficiency (power gain) Wideband 30GHz power amplifier Maximize bandwidth k=0.85 Set n=1.4 to transform RL=50Ω into R’=25Ω First set ξ=1 and |k|QS=1 obtain L1, L2, C1, and C2 Then increase ξ to 1.9 by decreasing C1 to 133fF to equalize response Passband is from 8 to 53GHz Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 57 of 78 Transformers in Amplifiers Summary Transformers are key in amplifier design as they provide Galvanic isolation, single-ended to differential conversion, power/signal combining and impedance transformation Coupling inductors also enables area savings and different circuit behavior in differential and common mode operation Transformers can be conveniently used in lumped-element implementations of distributed components In integrated implementations magnetizing and leakage inductances cannot be made negligible it is imperative to embed them into the design: Ladder networks Doubly-tuned networks Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 58 of 78 Outline Introduction Physical principles Self and mutual inductance Integrated transformers Interim Q&A session Transformers in amplifiers Baluns Couplers and combiners Matching networks Transformers in oscillators Doubly-tuned resonators Varactor coupling Multiple resonance tanks Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 59 of 78 Oscillators with Transformer Resonator Use doubly-tuned network as resonator two possible oscillation modes at ωL and ωH Connect resonator to negative resistance 1-port oscillator Close feedback around resonator 2-port oscillator Topologies that combine both approaches are possible 1-port oscillator Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference 2-port oscillator Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 60 of 78 Start-up of 1-Port Oscillator Q1/Q2=1 region with oscillations at ωL boundary depends on Q1/Q2 region with oscillations at ωH Oscillations start if GmReq>1 Req,H is proportional to ξ2 while Req,L is weakly dependent on ξ=(L2C2)/(L1C1) oscillations start at ωH if ξ is large enough, otherwise start at ωL Can select oscillation mode choosing the port where -Gm is connected Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 61 of 78 Start-up of 2-Port Oscillator Root locus Gm<0 ω0=ωH Gm>0 ω0=ωL Oscillations start if Av21GmReq>1 Sign of Av21 is positive at ωL and negative at ωH choosing the sign of Gm (the connections of the transconductor) we select the oscillation mode Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 62 of 78 Tank Equivalent Reactive Components Leq,L,H and Ceq,L,H have non-trivial expressions, but: Notice that Ceq,L,H is larger than both C1 and C2 For ξ=1 Leq,L,H=L1(1±|k|)/2 and Ceq,L,H=2C1 The resonator quality factor is QL,H=Req,L,H/(ωL,HLeq,L,H)=ωL,HCeq,L,HReq,L,H Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 63 of 78 Quality Factor of Transformer Resonator Q1/Q2=1 Q1/Q2=1 region with oscillations at ωH in 1-port oscillator ΨL ΨH Resonator quality factor can be written as: QL,H=Q1(ωL,H) ΨL,H(ξ,k,Q1/Q2) ΨL,H is symmetric in ξ only if Q1/Q2=1 if Q1/Q2=1 choose ξ=1 for best Q If operating at single frequency ω0 Operate at ωL=ω0 for higher Q If want to use both modes Can get QL≈QH as Q1 increases with ωL,H Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 64 of 78 Comparison with LC tank parallel inductors tank at ω0 transformer resonator at ωL=ω0 Same Q series inductors tank at ω0 Mutual inductance increases Q of transformer resonator at ωL The same happens if primary and secondary are wired as a single inductor No intrinsic Q improvement due to transformer Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 65 of 78 Phase Noise Neglecting flicker noise, phase noise is: transistor excess noise factor Transformer resonator helps achieving a smaller Req for a given Q For a target amplitude of oscillation V1 phase noise improves but current consumption increases 1-port osc. 2-port osc. Can leverage Av21 to decrease excess noise factor F in 2-port oscillator Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 66 of 78 Varactor Coupling varactor bipolar Transformer provides low-loss ac varactor coupling, particularly at mm-waves CMOS Can use all tuning curve with single-supply Can use turn ratio to decrease swing on the varactor (especially useful for pn-varactors) If C1«C2 ξ»1 and ωL≈ω2 tuning as in LC tank Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 67 of 78 Using Multiple Resonances Using both modes of oscillation at ωL and ωH expands the tuning range [Bevilacqua06], [Li12] Setting ωH to 2nd harmonic resonance decreases 1/f noise upconversion [Shahmohammadi15], [Murphy15] Simultaneous resonances at fundamental and 3rd harmonic increases the slope of the voltage waveform class-F oscillator [Babaie13] Tuning ωH to 3rd harmonic enables 3rd harmonic extraction implicit frequency multiplication [Zong16], [Hu18] Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 68 of 78 Example of Dual-Mode Oscillator Phase noise at 3MHz offset Dual mode resonator with simple mode-selection circuitry [Bhat19] 40% tuning range from 25-to-38GHz Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 69 of 78 Example of 2nd Harmonic Resonance 4GHz inverse class-F oscillator [Lim18] Limits 1/f noise upconversion into phase noise Improves the power efficiency (1.2mW power consumption) Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 70 of 78 Example of Harmonic Generation Phase noise at 1MHz offset 10GHz oscillator 30GHz buffer 10GHz VCO with 3rd harmonic extraction [Hu18] 14% tuning range Low 1/f3 flicker corner Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 71 of 78 Papers to See at ISSCC 2020 Session 17 “Frequency Synthesizers & VCOs” 17.4 “A 18.6-to-40.1GHz 201.7dBc/Hz FoMT Multi-Core Oscillator Using E-M Mixed-Coupling Resonance Boosting” 17.9 “A 9mW 54.9-to-63.5GHz Current-Reuse LO Generator with a 186.7dBc/Hz FoM by Unifying a 20GHz 3rd-Harmonic-Rich Current-Output VCO…” Session 24 “RF & mm-Wave Power Amplifiers” 24.2 “A Reconfigurable Series/Parallel Quadrature-Coupler-Based Doherty PA in CMOS SOI with VSWR Resilient Linearity and Back-Off PAE for 5G MIMO Arrays” 24.6 “An Instantaneously Broadband Ultra-Compact Highly Linear PA with Compensated Distributed-Balun Output Network…” 24.7 “A 15 dBm 12.8%-PAE Compact D-Band Power Amplifier with Two-Way Power Combining in 16nm FinFET CMOS” Session 29 “Emerging RF & THz Techniques” 29.3 “Non-Magnetic 0.18μm SOI Circulator with Multi-Watt Power Handling Based on Switched-Capacitor Clock Boosting” Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 72 of 78 Summary Microelectronic planar processes limit the obtainable magnetic coupling k and turn ratio n of integrated transformers Magnetizing and leakage inductance will not be negligible, so try and embed them in your design Magnetically coupling inductors allows to decrease coil footprints and help implement lumped element versions of distributed passive circuits Transformers are key to amplifiers’ design, especially at mm-waves, because they provide low loss ac coupling, yield impedance transformation, and enable power combining Transformers do not increase the resonators’ Q per se, but they are useful to make oscillators with low phase noise and wide tuning range Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 73 of 78 References (1) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. [Wang19] F. Wang, T. Li and H. Wang, "A Highly Linear Super-Resolution Mixed-Signal Doherty Power Amplifier for High-Efficiency mm-Wave 5G Multi-Gb/s Communications," in IEEE ISSCC, 2019, pp. 88-90. [Liu19] H. Liu et al., "A 265μW Fractional-N Digital PLL with Seamless Automatic Switching Subsampling/Sampling Feedback Path and Duty-Cycled Frequency-Locked Loop in 65nm CMOS," in IEEE ISSCC, 2019, pp. 256-258. [Pellerano19] S. Pellerano et al., "A Scalable 71-to-76GHz 64-Element Phased-Array Transceiver Module with 2×2 Direct-Conversion IC in 22nm FinFET CMOS Technology," in IEEE ISSCC, 2019, pp. 174-176. [Yue19] Z. Yue et al., "A 52% Peak-Efficiency >1W Isolated Power Transfer System Using Fully Integrated Magnetic-Core Transformer,“ in IEEE ISSCC, 2019, pp. 244-246. [Niknejad07] A. M. Niknejad, Electromagnetics for High-Speed Analog and Digital Communication Circuits, Cambridge University Press, 2007. [Feynman63] R. Feynman, R. B. Leighton and M. Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, 1963, [Online]. Available: http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/ [Long00] J. R. Long, "Monolithic transformers for silicon RF IC design," in IEEE Journal of SolidState Circuits, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1368-1382, Sept. 2000. Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 74 of 78 References (2) 8. [Nguyen90] N. M. Nguyen, R. G. Meyer, “Si IC-Compatible Inductors and LC Passive Filters”, in IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1028-1031, Oct. 1990. 9. [Mohan99] S. S. Mohan, M. del Mar Hershenson, S. P. Boyd and T. H. Lee, "Simple accurate expressions for planar spiral inductances," in IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1419-1424, Oct. 1999. 10. [Vallese09] A. Vallese, A. Bevilacqua, C. Sandner, M. Tiebout, A. Gerosa and A. Neviani, "Analysis and Design of an Integrated Notch Filter for the Rejection of Interference in UWB Systems," in IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 331-343, Feb. 2009. 11. [Padovan16] F. Padovan, M. Tiebout, A. Neviani and A. Bevilacqua, "A 15.5–39GHz BiCMOS VGA with phase shift compensation for 5G mobile communication transceivers," in IEEE ESSCIRC, 2016, pp.363-366. 12. [Bassi15] M. Bassi, J. Zhao, A. Bevilacqua, A. Ghilioni, A. Mazzanti and F. Svelto, "A 40–67 GHz Power Amplifier With 13 dBm PSAT and 16% PAE in 28nm CMOS LP," in IEEE Journal of SolidState Circuits, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 1618-1628, July 2015. 13. [Caruso14] M. Caruso, A. Bevilacqua and A. Neviani, "An X-Band Lumped-Element Wilkinson Combiner With Embedded Impedance Transformation," in IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 689-691, Oct. 2014. Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 75 of 78 References (3) 14. [Park15] J. S. Park and H. Wang, "A Transformer-Based Poly-Phase Network for Ultra-Broadband Quadrature Signal Generation," in IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol.63, no. 12, pp. 4444-4457, Dec. 2015. 15. [Frye03] R. C. Frye, S. Kapur and R. C. Melville, "A 2-GHz quadrature hybrid implemented in CMOS technology," in IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 550-555, March 2003. 16. [Niknejad12] A. M. Niknejad, D. Chowdhury and J. Chen, "Design of CMOS Power Amplifiers," in IEEE Trans. on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 1784-1796, June 2012. 17. [Mazzanti18] A. Mazzanti and A. Bevilacqua, "Second-Order Equivalent Circuits for the Design of Doubly-Tuned Transformer Matching Networks," in IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 4157-4168, Dec. 2018. 18. [Mazzanti15] A. Mazzanti and A. Bevilacqua, "On the Phase Noise Performance of TransformerBased CMOS Differential-Pair Harmonic Oscillators," in IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 2334-2341, Sept. 2015. 19. [Vigilante17] M. Vigilante and P. Reynaert, "On the Design of Wideband Transformer-Based Fourth Order Matching Networks for E-Band Receivers in 28-nm CMOS," in IEEE Journal of SolidState Circuits, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 2071-2082, Aug. 2017. Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 76 of 78 References (4) 20.[Padovan15] F. Padovan, M. Tiebout, K. L. R. Mertens, A. Bevilacqua and A. Neviani, "Design of Low-Noise K-Band SiGe Bipolar VCOs: Theory and Implementation," in IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 607-615, Feb. 2015. 21.[Wagner18] E. C. Wagner and G. M. Rebeiz, "A 9.4–11.7 GHz VCO in 0.12 µm SiGe BiCMOS with −123 dBc/Hz Phase Noise at 1 MHz Offset for 5G Systems," in IEEE RFIC, 2018, pp. 16-19. 22.[Bevilacqua06] A. Bevilacqua, F. P. Pavan, C. Sandner, A. Gerosa and A. Neviani, "A 3.4-7 GHz Transformer-Based Dual-mode Wideband VCO," in IEEE ESSCIRC, 2006, pp. 440-443. 23.[Liu12] G. Li, L. Liu, Y. Tang and E. Afshari, "A Low-Phase-Noise Wide-Tuning-Range Oscillator Based on Resonant Mode Switching," in IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1295-1308, June 2012. 24.[Shahmohammadi15] M. Shahmohammadi, M. Babaie and R. B. Staszewski, "A 1/f noise upconversion reduction technique applied to Class-D and Class-F oscillators," in IEEE ISSCC, 2015, pp. 1-3. 25.[Murphy15] D. Murphy, H. Darabi and H. Wu, "A VCO with implicit common-mode resonance," in IEEE ISSCC, 2015, pp. 1-3. 26.[Babaie13] M. Babaie and R. B. Staszewski, "A Class-F CMOS Oscillator," in IEEE Journal of SolidState Circuits, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 3120-3133, Dec. 2013. Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 77 of 78 References (5) 27.[Zong16] Z. Zong, M. Babaie and R. B. Staszewski, "A 60 GHz Frequency Generator Based on a 20 GHz Oscillator and an Implicit Multiplier," in IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 51, no.5, pp. 1261-1273, May 2016. 28.[Hu18] Y. Hu, T. Siriburanon and R. B. Staszewski, "A Low-Flicker-Noise 30-GHz Class-F23 Oscillator in 28-nm CMOS Using Implicit Resonance and Explicit Common-Mode Return Path," in IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 1977-1987, July 2018. 29.[Bhat19] A. Bhat and N. Krishnapura, "26.3 A 25-to-38GHz, 195dB FoMT LC QVCO in 65nm LP CMOS Using a 4-Port Dual-Mode Resonator for 5G Radios," in IEEE ISSCC, 2019, pp. 412-414. 30.[Lim18] C. Lim, J. Yin, P. Mak, H. Ramiah and R. P. Martins, "An inverse-class-F CMOS VCO with intrinsic-high-Q 1st- and 2nd-harmonic resonances for 1/f2-to-1/f3 phase-noise suppression achieving 196.2dBc/Hz FOM," in IEEE ISSCC, 2018, pp. 374-376. Andrea Bevilacqua © 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Fundamentals of Integrated Transformers: from Principles to Applications 78 of 78
0
You can add this document to your study collection(s)
Sign in Available only to authorized usersYou can add this document to your saved list
Sign in Available only to authorized users(For complaints, use another form )