“Castration or Decapitation?” by Hélène
Cixous and Annette Kuhn: Summary and
Critique
“Castration or Decapitation?” by Hélène Cixous and Annette Kuhn first appeared in the 1981
issue of the feminist journal Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.
Introduction: “Castration or Decapitation?” by Hélène Cixous and Annette Kuhn
“Castration or Decapitation?” by Hélène Cixous and Annette Kuhn first appeared in the
1981 issue of the feminist journal Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.
Translated into English by Annette Kuhn herself, this essay holds a significant place in
literary theory and feminist thought. It challenges traditional psychoanalytic notions of
castration anxiety and introduces the concept of “decapitation” as a metaphor for
women’s experiences of oppression and erasure in patriarchal societies.
Summary of “Castration or Decapitation?” by Hélène Cixous and Annette Kuhn




The Castration Anxiety vs. Decapitation Analogy: Cixous and Kuhn challenge
traditional psychoanalytic notions of castration anxiety, arguing that for women, the
threat might be a symbolic “decapitation” rather than castration. This metaphor
suggests a silencing and erasure from cultural representation, highlighting the unique
ways in which women are oppressed within patriarchal societies. As Cixous states, “It’s
a question of submitting feminine disorder, its laughter, its inability to take the
drumbeats seriously, to the threat of decapitation” (Cixous and Kuhn, 1981, p. 43).
Women’s Historical Absence: Throughout history, women have been relegated to a
passive and subordinate role. This is evident in fairytales like Sleeping Beauty and
Little Red Riding Hood, where women are often portrayed as helpless and confined to
domestic spaces. Cixous and Kuhn argue that these narratives perpetuate harmful
stereotypes and reinforce women’s marginalization within culture. As Cixous writes,
“She is always to be found on or in a bed: Sleeping Beauty is lifted from her bed by a
man because, as we all know, women don’t wake up by themselves: man has to
intervene, you understand” (Cixous and Kuhn, 1981, p. 43).
The Power of Language: Language itself is structured by a male-dominated order. The
way questions are phrased, like “What do women want?” reinforces this power
imbalance. Cixous and Kuhn argue that by examining how language shapes our
understanding of gender, we can begin to challenge these patriarchal structures. As
Cixous explains, “As soon as the question ‘What is it?’ is posed, from the moment a
question is put, as soon as a reply is sought, we are already caught up in masculine
interrogation” (Cixous and Kuhn, 1981, p. 45).
Women Outside the Symbolic Order: Psychoanalysis positions women as “outside
the Symbolic,” meaning they lack access to language and cultural meaning-making.
This is linked to the concept of the phallus, a central symbol in Lacanian theory, which
women are said to lack. Cixous and Kuhn argue that this exclusion from the Symbolic
order reinforces women’s subordination and marginalization. As they write, “Woman
does not have the advantage of the castration complex—it’s reserved solely for the little
boy” (Cixous and Kuhn, 1981, p. 46).



Man as the Teacher: Men are seen as the instructors who introduce women to the
symbolic order and the concept of lack. This reinforces the idea that women are
incomplete without men. Cixous and Kuhn critique this notion, arguing that it
perpetuates a patriarchal power dynamic. As they explain, “It’s man who teaches
woman (because man is always the Master as well), who teaches her to be aware of
lack, to be aware of absence, aware of death” (Cixous and Kuhn, 1981, p. 46).
The Need to Deconstruct the Couple: The binary opposition of man/woman is a
central pillar of cultural organization. Cixous and Kuhn argue that we need to challenge
this structure and work towards a more equitable relationship between the sexes. As
they suggest, “The couple as terrain, as space of cultural struggle, but also as terrain, as
space demanding, insisting on, a complete transformation in the relation of one to the
other” (Cixous and Kuhn, 1981, p. 44).
The Importance of Language Work: Dismantling the patriarchal order requires a
critical examination of language itself. By questioning how language shapes our
understanding of gender, we can work towards change. Cixous and Kuhn emphasize
the importance of language work, arguing that “women will have to speak, start
speaking, stop saying that she has nothing to say!” (Cixous and Kuhn, 1981, p. 50).
Literary Terms/Concepts in “Castration or Decapitation?” by Hélène Cixous and Annette Kuhn
Concept
Explanation
Écriture
féminine
A concept introduced by Cixous advocating for a type of writing that
expresses the female body and experience, breaking away from
traditional, male-dominated discourse.
Castration
Complex
Explored in psychoanalytic theory, particularly in relation to the phallus
and its symbolic role in gender and power dynamics. In this article, it
relates to masculine fears.
Decapitation
Used metaphorically to describe the silencing and marginalization of
women, particularly in how they are “decapitated” or cut off from power
and speech in patriarchal societies.
Binary
Oppositions
The article critiques the traditional binary oppositions such as
male/female, active/passive, and their hierarchical nature that positions
women as subordinate.
Hysteria
Examined as a condition historically attributed to women, seen as a form
of rebellion against the constraints imposed by male-dominated society.
Masculine
Economy
Refers to the structured, rational, and dominating way of organizing
society, which often suppresses the fluid and non-linear qualities
associated with femininity.
The Other
Cixous often discusses “the other” as a figure of the marginalized,
specifically women, who are positioned as the “other” to the male “self”
in a patriarchal context.
Subversion
Language
of
Myth of
Phallus
the
The article suggests that women must subvert traditional language
structures, which are rooted in masculine logic, to express their own
identities and experiences.
In Lacanian psychoanalysis, the phallus is a symbol of power and
identity. Cixous challenges this by exploring what it means for women
to lack this symbol within society.
Contribution of “Castration or Decapitation?” by Hélène Cixous and Annette Kuhn to Literary
Theory/Theories
1. Feminist Theory

Contribution: Cixous’ work is foundational in feminist theory, particularly in
developing the concept of écriture féminine (women’s writing). This concept
challenges the phallocentric structures of traditional literary discourse, arguing for a
writing style that is more fluid, non-linear, and closely connected to the female body
and experience.

Quotation: “We must take culture at its word, as it takes us into its Word, into its
tongue… And so in the end woman, in man’s desire, stands in the place of not knowing,
the place of mystery.” This quotation illustrates the marginalization of women in the
symbolic order and the necessity for women to articulate their own experiences outside
the constraints of patriarchal language.
2. Psychoanalytic Theory

Contribution: Cixous engages with psychoanalytic theory, particularly through the
critique of Freud and Lacan. She challenges the notion that women are defined by their
lack of the phallus and are thus outside the symbolic order. Instead, she argues that
women are subject to a different kind of symbolic violence, which she metaphorically
terms “decapitation.”

Quotation: “If man operates under the threat of castration, if masculinity is culturally
ordered by the castration complex, it might be said that the backlash, the return, on
women of this castration anxiety is its displacement as decapitation, execution, of
woman, as loss of her head.” This passage critiques the psychoanalytic focus on
castration as the central trauma and instead introduces the concept of decapitation to
describe the symbolic violence against women.
3. Deconstruction

Contribution: Cixous’ text is a key example of deconstructive feminist criticism. She
deconstructs binary oppositions such as male/female, active/passive, and challenges the
hierarchical structures embedded in language and culture that perpetuate gender
inequality.

Quotation: “The couple as terrain, as space of cultural struggle, but also as terrain, as
space demanding, insisting on, a complete transformation in the relation of one to the
other.” This statement reflects the deconstructive effort to unravel the binary
oppositions that structure cultural and gendered identities, calling for a reconfiguration
of relationships beyond hierarchical dualisms.
4. Poststructuralism

Contribution: The article contributes to poststructuralism by questioning the stability
of meaning and the authority of the phallus as a transcendental signifier. Cixous
emphasizes the fluidity of identity and the multiplicity of meanings, which align with
poststructuralist ideas about the instability of language and the subject.

Quotation: “What psychoanalysis points to as defining woman is that she lacks lack.
She lacks lack? Curious to put it in so contradictory, so extremely paradoxical, a
manner: she lacks lack.” This paradoxical statement destabilizes fixed meanings and
highlights the fluid nature of identity, a core idea in poststructuralist thought.
5. Gender Studies

Contribution: Cixous’ work is pivotal in gender studies, particularly in its exploration
of how gender is constructed through language and culture. She critiques the ways in
which women are defined and constrained by masculine structures and argues for a new
understanding of gender that allows for multiplicity and difference.

Quotation: “It’s hard to imagine a more perfect example of a particular relationship
between two economies: a masculine economy and a feminine economy, in which the
masculine is governed by a rule that keeps time… An order that works by inculcation,
by education: it’s always a question of education.” This passage critiques the way
gender is constructed through societal norms and education, reinforcing binary gender
roles and power dynamics.
6. Postcolonial Theory

Contribution: While not directly addressing postcolonial issues, Cixous’
deconstruction of binary oppositions and her critique of hierarchical structures in
language and culture can be applied to postcolonial theory. Her work provides tools for
analyzing the ways in which colonial discourses marginalize and silence the “Other,”
particularly in terms of gender and race.

Quotation: “It’s the classic opposition, dualist and hierarchical. Man/Woman
automatically means great/small, superior/inferior… means high or low, means
Nature/History, means transformation/inertia.” This analysis of binary oppositions can
be extended to postcolonial contexts, where colonizer/colonized, civilized/savage, and
other binaries function similarly to perpetuate power imbalances.
7. Critical Theory

Contribution: Cixous’ work also intersects with critical theory in its critique of
ideology and power structures. She examines how language, education, and culture
perpetuate gender inequality and calls for a radical transformation of these structures.

Quotation: “Women have no choice other than to be decapitated, and in any case the
moral is that if they don’t actually lose their heads by the sword, they only keep them
on condition that they lose them—lose them, that is, to complete silence, turned into
automatons.” This metaphor highlights how ideological power operates to silence and
control women, a key concern of critical theory.
8. Cultural Studies

Contribution: The article contributes to cultural studies by examining how cultural
narratives, myths, and symbols reinforce gender roles and power dynamics. Cixous uses
examples from literature, mythology, and psychoanalysis to critique these cultural
forms and their impact on women’s identities.

Quotation: “And grandmothers are always wicked: she is the bad mother who always
shuts the daughter in whenever the daughter might by chance want to live or take
pleasure.” This reference to cultural narratives illustrates how myths and stories
perpetuate negative stereotypes of women, a key focus in cultural studies.
Examples of Critiques Through “Castration or Decapitation?” by Hélène Cixous and
Annette Kuhn
Literary Work
Critique Through “Castration or Decapitation”
Shakespeare’s Hamlet
Hamlet’s indecision and melancholic state can be interpreted
as a response to the castration anxiety associated with
masculinity. His inability to act decisively can be seen as a
manifestation of the fear of losing his masculine identity.
The novel’s portrayal of women as objects of desire and their
limited choices within marriage can be analyzed through the
Jane Austen’s Pride and
lens of decapitation. The characters of Elizabeth Bennet and
Prejudice
Darcy represent the societal pressures faced by women to
conform to traditional gender roles.
Virginia Woolf’s To
Lighthouse
Gabriel
Márquez’s One
Years of Solitude
Woolf’s novel explores the limitations imposed on women’s
creativity and expression. The character of Mrs. Ramsay can
the
be seen as a victim of the symbolic decapitation, as her
artistic aspirations are constantly hindered by societal
expectations and domestic responsibilities.
The novel’s portrayal of women as victims of patriarchal
García oppression and violence can be analyzed through the lens of
Hundred decapitation. Characters like Rebeca and Úrsula Iguarán
represent the ways in which women are silenced and erased
within the patriarchal structures of the Buendia family.
Walker’s novel explores the intersection of race and gender
in the American South. The character of Celie can be seen as
Alice Walker’s The Color a victim of both racial and gender-based oppression. Her
Purple
experiences of sexual abuse and violence can be interpreted
as a form of symbolic decapitation, as she is denied her
agency and voice.
Criticism Against “Castration or Decapitation?” by Hélène Cixous and Annette Kuhn

Essentialism: Critics argue that Cixous’ emphasis on the inherent differences between
men and women, particularly through concepts like écriture féminine, can reinforce
essentialist views of gender, suggesting that women have a natural, intrinsic way of
being that is different from men.

Obscurity and Ambiguity: The text is often criticized for its complex, metaphorical
language and abstract concepts, which can make it difficult to understand and open to
multiple, sometimes contradictory, interpretations.
Limited Accessibility: Cixous’ dense theoretical language and reliance on
psychoanalytic and philosophical references can be inaccessible to readers who are not
familiar with these intellectual traditions, limiting the text’s broader appeal and impact.


Overemphasis on Psychoanalysis: Some critics argue that Cixous relies too heavily
on psychoanalytic theory, particularly Lacanian concepts, which can be seen as
reinforcing the very phallocentric structures she aims to critique.

Neglect of Intersectionality: The text has been criticized for not adequately addressing
how race, class, and other forms of social difference intersect with gender, focusing
primarily on gender in a way that can overlook the experiences of marginalized women.
Idealization of Feminine Writing: Cixous’ celebration of feminine writing as
inherently subversive and different from masculine writing has been critiqued for
romanticizing and idealizing women’s writing, potentially simplifying the complexities
of literary production.
Lack of Practical Application: Some critics point out that while Cixous’ theories are
provocative, they offer little in the way of concrete strategies or actions for achieving
the radical change she envisions, making it difficult to translate her ideas into practical
feminist activism.

