725737
research-article2017
2017
JIVXX
XXX
X10.1177/0886260517725737
10.1177/0886260517725737Journal of Interpersonal ViolenceRamos Salazar
Article
Cyberbullying
Victimization as
a Predictor of
Cyberbullying
Perpetration, Body
Image Dissatisfaction,
Healthy Eating and
Dieting Behaviors, and
Life Satisfaction
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
2021, Vol. 36(1-2) 354­–380
© The Author(s) 2017
Reprints and permissions:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517725737
DOI: 10.1177/0886260517725737
journals.sagepub.com/home/jiv
Leslie Ramos Salazar1
Abstract
Cyberbullying victimization and perpetration continues to be a serious
public health, criminal justice, victimology, and educational problem
in middle schools in the United States. Adolescents are at a higher risk
of experiencing cyberbullying as a victim and/or as a bully given the
frequency of their use of the Internet via social networking sites such as
Facebook and mobile devices such as cell phones and tablets. To address
this important problem, the purpose of this investigation was to examine
cyberbullying victimization through communication technology as a
predictor of cyberbullying perpetration, body image, healthy eating and
dieting behaviors, and life satisfaction of sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-gradelevel middle school students. The World Health Organization recruited
participants by using a Health Behavior in School-Aged Children (HBSC)
1West Texas A&M University, Canyon, USA
Corresponding Author:
Leslie Ramos Salazar, Assistant Professor, College of Business, West Texas A&M University,
WTAMU Box 60268, Canyon, TX 79016-0001, USA.
Email: lsalazar@wtamu.edu
Ramos Salazar
355
survey. In this in-class questionnaire, 6,944 middle school students were
asked about their cyberbullying experiences as a victim and as a bully via
Internet, email, and mobile communication technologies to obtain their
evaluations of their body image, eating and dieting habits, and perceptions
of life satisfaction. After controlling for demographic factors such as sex,
age, and class level, this study found that cyberbullying victimization was
a predictor of cyberbullying perpetration, body image dissatisfaction,
dieting behaviors, and life satisfaction. However, this study did not find
a correlation between cyberbullying victimization and students’ healthy
eating behaviors. This study also discussed each of the findings in the
context of previous research findings. In addition, the study provides the
strengths, limitations, and future directions for the future examination of
cyberbullying victimization in middle schools.
Keywords
bullying, Internet and abuse, youth violence
Introduction
Cyberbullying is a public health, criminal justice, victimology, and educational problem that continues to affect the well-being of young children in
middle schools across the United States. Cyberbullying is a multilayered
problem because it negatively affects children’s use of electronic communication (Roberto, Eden, Savage, Ramos-Salazar, & Deiss, 2014a), children’s
mental and physical health (Smokowski, Evans, & Cotter, 2014), and children’s exposure to peer-to-peer violence in education (Mason, 2008). These
negative effects stimulate the criminal justice system to enact anticyberbullying laws to inform victimology experts about protecting cyberbullying victims (Coburn, Connolly, & Roesch, 2015; Katzer, Fetchenhauer, & Belschak,
2009). Because building intimate relationships with peers with the use of the
Internet and mobile devices is valuable to young children and adolescents,
this exposure increases young children and adolescents’ risk for cyberbullying perpetration and victimization (Ang, 2015). Several studies have found
that cyberbullying victimization has negative health outcomes for young
children and adolescents including mental health issues such as anxiety,
depression, and suicide ideation (Hinduja & Patchin, 2010; Raskauskas &
Stoltz, 2007), physical health issues such as body image issues and substance
abuse (Calvete, Orue, & Gámez-Guadix, 2016; Selkie, Kota, Chan, &
Moreno, 2015), and relational issues such as experiences of social anxiety
and isolation (Ang, Chong, Chye, & Huan, 2012). Thus far, a few studies
356
Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36(1-2)
have examined the correlation between cyberbullying victimization and
cyberbullying perpetration (Roberto, Eden, Savage, Ramos-Salazar, & Deiss,
2014b), body image dissatisfaction (Calvete et al., 2016), healthy eating
behaviors (DeSmet et al., 2014; Farrow & Fox, 2011), and life satisfaction
(DeSmet et al., 2014; Moore, Huebner, & Hills, 2012). To understand potential risk factors that may affect adolescents who are being victimized by
cyberbullying behaviors, this study will extend prior correlational research
by examining health-related variables such as body image, eating, dieting,
and life satisfaction. As previous studies did not control for demographic
variables in their middle school samples, this study will control for age, sex,
and grade level. Thus, the purpose of this study is to control for demographic
variables and examine cyberbullying victimization as a predictor of cyberbullying perpetration, body image dissatisfaction, healthy eating behaviors,
and life satisfaction.
Defining Cyberbullying Victimization
Cyberbullying occurs when “an individual or group willfully [uses] information and communication involving electronic technologies to facilitate deliberate and repeated harassment or threat to another individual or group by
sending or posting cruel text and/or graphics using technological means”
(Mason, 2008, p. 323). Roberto and Eden (2010) defined cyberbullying as
“the deliberate and repeated misuse of communication technology by an individual or group to threaten or harm others” (p. 201). Kowalski and Limber
(2013) also added the communication channels in which cyberbullying
occurs, which include via Internet through email, instant messages, social
media (e.g., Facebook), and through text messages in mobile/tablet devices.
Thus far, researchers have included victimization in their conceptualizations of cyberbullying experiences (Kowalski & Limber, 2013; Mason,
2008). In this study, cyberbullying victimization refers to receiving cyberbullying messages by one or more persons (Brown, Demaray, & Secord, 2014).
Receiving aggressive messages via electronic communication or social media
such as, “you’re ugly,” “you’re stupid,” or “go kill yourself” are examples of
cyberbullying victimization. Cyberbullying victimization differs conceptually from traditional victimization in that cyberbullying victimization requires
the use of communication technology and/or the Internet to communicate
aggressive messages and it can occur inside and/or outside of the boundaries
of the school (Mitchell, Ybarra, & Finkelhor, 2007). Cyberbullying victimization also occurs by an anonymous aggressor who may be known or
unknown to the victim and who is not physically present in the victim’s environment (Mitchell et al., 2007).
Ramos Salazar
357
Prevalence of Cyberbullying Victimization and
Perpetration in Middle School Students
In the past decade, scholars have examined cyberbullying perpetration and
victimization of middle school students in grade levels sixth through eighth.
A study found that middle school students are more vulnerable to online bullying victimization through the Internet and through communication technology (e.g., cell phones, tablets) in comparison with elementary or high school
students (Williams & Guerra, 2007). Several studies report that cyberbullying victimization rates in middle schools range from 6.6% to 11.5% (Kowalski
& Limber, 2007; Patchin & Hinduja, 2013; Rice et al., 2015). Studies also
indicate that cyberbullying perpetration rates in middle schools vary by
occurrence from 3.9% (within the past month; Patchin & Hinduja, 2013),
4.0% (within the past 2 months; Kowalski & Limber, 2007), and 5% (within
the past year; Rice et al., 2015). Moreover, studies report that perpetratorvictim rates in middle schools range from 4.3% to 7% (Kowalski & Limber,
2007; Rice et al., 2015). Interestingly, a study conducted by Brown et al.
(2014) focused on the prevalence of cyberbullying victimization of middle
school students and they found no differences in grade level nor gender in the
experience of cyberbullying victimization. However, the study found that
cyberbullying victimization was positively related to experiencing negative
social emotional outcomes such as anxiety, depression, and social stress
among middle school students (Brown et al., 2014). Therefore, cyberbullying
victimization and perpetration continue to be a prevalent public health and
educational problem in middle school students.
Cyberbullying Victimization and Cyberbullying
Perpetration
Numerous studies have shown that cyberbullying perpetration is positively
correlated to cyberbullying victimization. Middle school students who are
being cyberbullied by their peers are also likely to experience cyberbullying by others in a given time period (Kowalski & Limber, 2007; Roberto,
Eden, Savage, Ramos-Salazar, & Deiss, 2014a). In a longitudinal study,
Gámez-Guadix, Gini, and Calvete (2015) found that individuals who were
cyberbullied during their adolescent years also reported cyberbullying others for retaliation purposes, and these young individuals were characterized with a “bully-victim status.” Previous studies have confirmed a
moderate positive correlation between cyberbullying victimization and
cyberbullying perpetration (Gámez-Guadix et al., 2015; Kowalski &
Limber, 2007; Li, 2007).
358
Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36(1-2)
In addition, several criminology studies have established a strong association between the victim–offender overlap among adolescents in physical and
virtual environments (Averdijk, Van Gelder, Eisner, & Ribeaud, 2016;
Klevens, Duque, & Ramirez, 2002; Lauritsen, Sampson, & Laub, 1991;
Novo, Pereira, & Matos, 2015; Turanovic & Pratt, 2013). For instance, criminology reviews have documented that victims of interpersonal violence are
more likely to become offenders of others (Jennings, Piquero, & Reingle,
2012; Lauritsen & Laub, 2007). Most recently, a health study by Roberto
et al. (2014b) found evidence that cyberbullying perpetration predicted
cyberbullying victimization, which suggests that victims are also offenders.
Although researchers have established the correlations between demographics, cyberbullying perpetration, and victimization (Kowalski & Limber,
2007; Li, 2007), studies have not adequately controlled for sex, age, and
grade level. Therefore, this study will control for these variables in the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 1: After controlling for demographic variables, cyberbullying
victimization experiences will have a positive effect on cyberbullying
perpetration.
Cyberbullying Victimization and Body Image
Satisfaction
Previous studies have found that one of the reasons for cyberbullying victimization has been adolescents’ self-evaluations of their own body image. Body
image appearance refers to the level of satisfaction with one’s own physical
or body appearance (Rieves & Cash, 1996). Adolescents in middle school
place a high value in their peers’ opinions of their body’s image and this
shows when adolescents post photographic images of their bodies using
social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter. In fact, adolescents are
motivated to share pictures of their bodies with their mobile or tablet devices
to obtain social approval by their peers (Calvete et al., 2016). However, sharing body images through the Internet and through mobile devices places adolescents at a higher risk for cyberbullying victimization.
Studies have shown that adolescents are reporting cyberbullying victimization experiences due to displaying “selfies,” or images of their face and/or
body through social media. For example, receiving negative electronic messages about being “fat” or looking “ugly” on a picture can negatively affect
an adolescent’s perception of his or her own body image (Frisén, Berne, &
Lunde, 2014). In part, body image dissatisfaction has been correlated to being
cyberbullied by school peers in online settings (Frisén et al., 2014; Lunde &
Ramos Salazar
359
Frisén, 2011). Victims of cyberbullying report being teased by their peers
about their body’s physical appearance through social media and electronic
messages, and as a result report having poor body esteem, self-esteem, and
weight problems than noncyberbullying victims (Frisén et al., 2014).
Unfortunately, being dissatisfied with one’s own body image has negative
outcomes such as depressive symptoms (Rawana, Morgan, Nguyen, & Craig,
2010), body shame (Hyde, Mezulis, & Abramson, 2008), and low self-esteem
(Menzel et al., 2010). A recent study by Calvete et al. (2016) also found that
individuals who reported being cyberbullied in the past also reported being
dissatisfied with their body image appearance.
Although prior studies have examined cyberbullying and body image dissatisfaction, no previous work has focused on examining the effect of cyberbullying on body image dissatisfaction in middle school students.
Understanding whether cyberbullying victimization serves as a predictor of
adolescents’ body image dissatisfaction can inform applied researchers and
educational counselors to understand victims’ negative feelings about their
body image. Thus, the following hypothesis will be addressed in this study.
Hypothesis 2: After controlling for demographic variables, cyberbullying
victimization experiences will have a positive effect on body image
dissatisfaction.
Cyberbullying Victimization and Healthy Eating
Behaviors
Studies have also examined whether cyberbullying victimization is linked to
adolescents’ healthy eating behaviors. Healthy eating patterns include eating
healthy foods such as fruits and vegetables and unhealthy eating patterns
include consuming sugary drinks, sugary snacks, and fast food meals
(Iannotti, 2013). Studying adolescents’ healthy eating patterns is valuable
because it is positively associated with overall health and well-being
(MacNicol, Murray, & Austin, 2003). If adolescents develop healthy eating
patterns in middle school, adolescents may continue these eating patterns in
adulthood (Currie, Todd, & Thomson, 1994). Thus far, the literature demonstrates a clear association between school bullying and eating patterns in adolescents. For example, Kaltiala-Heino, Rimpelä, Rantanen, and Rimpelä
(2000) found that bullying victimization is correlated with eating disorders
such as bulimia and anorexia. Also, Libbey, Story, Neumark-Sztainer, and
Boutelle (2008) assessed overweight adolescents who were being bullied
about their excessive body weight, and they found that these adolescents
engaged in unhealthy eating decisions (e.g., eating cookies). The frequency
360
Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36(1-2)
of bullying affected adolescents’ eating thoughts and eating patterns, such
that those who were bullied engaged in binge eating behaviors of unhealthy
food in comparison with those who were not bullied (Libbey et al., 2008).
Similarly, Farrow and Fox (2011) found a correlation between cyberbullying
victimization and the eating choices of both boys and girls, but mainly in
girls. Finally, in a cross-sectional study, Sampasa-Kanyinga, Roumeliotis,
Farrow, and Shi (2014) found that the breakfast skipping behavior of adolescents was positively associated with their cyberbullying victimization
experiences.
A reason why these constructs are associated may be that cyberbullying
victims who receive aggressive electronic messages may suffer from selfesteem issues (Brewer & Kerslake, 2015) and as a result may alter their eating behaviors to comfort themselves. Although these cross-sectional studies
have provided substantial evidence of the correlation among these variables,
no study has examined the effect of cyberbullying victimization on healthy
eating patterns in middle school students. Thus, to expand the previous correlational findings, the following hypothesis will be examined.
Hypothesis 3: After controlling for demographic variables, cyberbullying
victimization experiences will have a negative effect on healthy eating
habits.
Cyberbullying Victimization and Dieting Behaviors
Studies are beginning to examine the cyberbullying victimization link with
adolescents’ dieting habits. In a national study, Arat (2015) found that cyberbullying victimization was correlated to students’ dieting behaviors such as
their green salad intake, potato intake, and carrot intake. Similarly, SampasaKanyinga and Willmore (2015) found a positive correlation between breakfast
skipping behavior and cyberbullied experiences in adolescent students.
Another study found that cyberbullying victimization was correlated to their
dietary lifestyle habits (DeSmet et al., 2014). In particular, cyberbullying victims who internalize peers’ aggressive messages about their overweight or
obese physical appearance, may diet to lose weight to cope with this issue
(Puhl, Peterson, & Luedicke, 2013). For example, a study by Gonsalves,
Hawk, and Goodenow (2013) found that bullied adolescents are at a higher
risk of engaging in unhealthy weight control behaviors such as excessive dieting to lose weight, which may lead to eating disorders if continued overtime.
In addition, another study found that bullying victimization was moderately correlated with eating disorders, which may lead to dieting behaviors to
lose weight (Carmona-Torres, Cangas, Langer, Aguilar-Parra, & Gallego,
Ramos Salazar
361
2015). If adolescents receive cyberbullying victimization messages such as,
“you’re fat” via Facebook, then this may pressure adolescents to engage in
dieting behaviors to manage their weight (Anderson, Bresnahan, & Musatics,
2014). Dieting behavior may promote the initial well-being when adolescents’ body mass index (BMI) scores go down, but it can also become a disordered eating pattern if adolescents engage in binge dieting behaviors, or
purging behaviors (Anderson et al., 2014). Although these studies suggest
that cyberbullying victimization may influence adolescents’ dieting behavior,
no previous study has examined cyberbullying victimization as a predictor of
dieting behaviors to lose weight in middle school students. Therefore, this
study seeks to address this limitation in the cyberbullying victimization literature by posing the following hypothesis.
Hypothesis 4: After controlling for demographic variables, cyberbullying
victimization experiences will have a positive effect on dieting to lose
weight.
Cyberbullying Victimization and Life Satisfaction
Cyberbullying victimization has also been shown to be correlated to life satisfaction. Because cyberbullying victimization often leads to negative outcomes such as mental health, substance use, and overweight problems
(Merrill & Hanson, 2016), being victimized may negatively affect adolescents’ quality of life. For instance, Moore (2013) examined a total of 843
seventh- and eighth-grade level middle school students and found that students who reported being cyberbullied also indicated having lower life satisfaction with their family, environment, and school in comparison with those
who were not victimized. Similarly, Bilic, Flander, and Rafajac (2014) found
that children who experienced both traditional bullying and cyberbullying
had lower life satisfaction ratings in comparison with children who did not
have such experiences. Another study also found that cyberbullying was negatively correlated with psychological well-being and life satisfaction
(Navarro, Ruiz-Oliva, Larrañaga, & Yubero, 2015). Most recently, Fullchange
and Furlong (2016) found negative effects of cyberbullying victimization in
children’s emotional well-being and satisfaction with engaged living. In sum,
these studies explain that receiving harmful electronic messages from peers
via social media or the Internet may influence adolescents’ evaluations of
their life in various domains. However, a limitation of the literature is that
most studies have relied on examining the associations of cyberbullying and
life satisfaction, and this limits the examination of control variables that may
be influencing this relationship. Additional studies are needed to examine
362
Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36(1-2)
whether cyberbullying victimization serves as a negative predictor of life satisfaction in middle school students. To address this limitation, this study will
examine the following hypothesis.
Hypothesis 5: After controlling for demographic variables, cyberbullying
victimization experiences will have a negative effect on life satisfaction.
Method
Participants
The sample included (48% females and 52% males) 6,944 students in 157 participating urban, suburban, and rural American middle schools. Officials of eligible
schools were asked whether they would provide consent to administer the survey
in middle school classrooms, and out of 314 schools 157 agreed to administer the
survey in their classrooms. The administration of surveys was delegated to teachers who agreed to distribute the paper-based survey to the students during class
time. With this recruitment approach, the student response rate was 90%. The
average age of the participants was 12 years (SD = 1.01). The ethnic background
of the participants was composed of 48.5% White or European American, 18.5%
Black or African American, 1.5% Native American, 0.6% Native Hawaiian or
Pacific Islander, 4.2% Asian American, 19.7% Hispanic American, and 7.0%
Other/mixed races. The grade levels of the participants in the middle schools
included 2,050 sixth graders, 2,420 seventh graders, and 2,474 eighth graders.
Procedures
Participants were recruited by the 2013 Health Behavior in School-Aged
Children (HBSC) survey in collaboration with the World Health Organization
(Iannotti, 2013). The middle school representatives read scripts that explained
the procedures of this paper–pencil format survey. The student survey took
approximately 45 min to complete by hand and a middle school representative
(e.g., teacher, counselor, etc.) administered it in classroom settings. Participants
were asked to respond to questions about their demographics, cyberbullying
victimization experiences, cyberbullying perpetration behaviors, body image,
healthy eating behaviors, dieting behaviors, and life satisfaction.
Measures
Cyberbullying victim. The Olweus Victim Questionnaire (Solberg & Olweus,
2003; Wang, Iannotti, & Nansel, 2009) was used to assess middle school
Ramos Salazar
363
students’ perceptions of their own cyberbullying victimization experiences in
and out of school settings. The questionnaire included a definition of being a
cyberbullied victim to ensure that adolescents understood the term. Sample
items of this scale included, “how often have you got bullied using a
computer/e-mail?” and “how often have you got bullied using a cell phone?”
Items ranged from 1 (I have not been bullied by another student in this way
in the past couple of months), 2 (only once or twice), 3 (2 or 3 times a month),
4 (about once a week), and 5 (several times a week). The higher the ratings,
the higher the frequency of being cyberbullied by another peer. The alpha
reliability for this scale was .92.
Cyberbullying perpetration. The Olweus Bully Questionnaire (Solberg &
Olweus, 2003; Wang, Iannotti, & Nansel, 2009) was used to assess middle
school students’ perceptions of their own cyberbullying perpetration in and
out of school settings. A definition of cyberbullying perpetration was provided to ensure that adolescents understand the term prior to completing the
questionnaire. The items included, “how often have you bullied others using
a computer/e-mail?” and “how often have you bullied others using a cell
phone?” Participants indicated the extent to which they have bullied others
using communication technology from 1 (I have not bullied another student
in this way in the past couple of months), 2 (only once or twice), 3 (2 or 3
times a month), 4 (about once a week), and 5 (several times a week). The
higher the ratings, the higher the frequency of bullying perpetration. The
alpha reliability of these set of items was .94.
Body image dissatisfaction. The body image dissatisfaction subscale, which
is a part of The Body Investment Scale (BIS; Orbach & Mikulincer, 1998)
was used to assess individual’s feelings toward their body image. Six items
asked participants to respond to their dissatisfied feelings about their body
image, including whether they were frustrated with their appearance, hated
their body, and felt anger toward their body. This scale ranged from 1
(strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree), and higher scores indicated a
higher level of body image dissatisfaction. The alpha reliability for this
scale was .85.
Healthy eating behaviors. Two items designed by Iannotti (2013) were used to
assess the frequency of healthy eating behaviors. Sample items included,
“how often do you eat or drink vegetables?” and “how often do you eat or
drink fruits?” Participants indicated their agreement in the scale, 1 (never), 2
(less than once a week), 3 (once a week), 4 (2-4 days a week), 5 (5-6 days a
week), 6 (once a day, every day), and 7 (every day more than once). The
364
Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36(1-2)
higher the ratings, the higher the frequency of healthy eating behaviors. The
alpha reliability of this scale was .68.
Dieting to lose weight. Dieting to lose weight was assessed with an item developed by Iannotti (2013) to determine whether participants were currently dieting
to lose weight. The item asked participants whether they were presently on a diet
to lose weight. Participants’ responses ranged from 1 (no, my weight is fine), 2
(no, but I should lose some weight), 3 (no, because I need to put on some weight),
and 4 (yes). Items were dichotomized for dieting behavior “yes” and “no.”
Life satisfaction. The Cantril’s (1965) Ladder of Life Satisfaction Scale was
used to assess participants’ perceived life satisfaction. This scale is a visual
scale that is tailored for middle-aged children and it provides a picture of a
ladder. In this ladder, participants were asked to rank their satisfaction with
their present life from 0 (worst possible life) to 10 (best possible life). The
alpha reliability for this study was .82.
Demographic characteristics. The following demographic variables were used
as control variables: sex, age, and grade level. These demographic characteristics were obtained by asking participants demographic questions regarding
their sex, age, and middle school grade level.
Analysis
Correlations and descriptive information among the main variables of this
study are displayed in Tables 1 and 2. Cyberbullying victimization experiences were positively correlated with cyberbullying, (r = .47, p < .001), body
dissatisfaction (r = .13, p < .001), and dieting to lose weight (r = .05, p < .001).
Cyberbullying victimization experiences were also negatively correlated with
healthy eating (r = −.03, p < .01) and life satisfaction (r = −.05, p < .001). In
addition, the tolerance statistics (TS) and variance inflation factor were also
examined in the regression analyses to uncover any possible multicollinearity
issues among the demographic (sex, age, and class level) independent variables. The lowest tolerance statistic was .25 and the highest variance inflation
factor was .70, which showed that multicollinearity was not a main concern in
this study given Mertler and Vannatta’s (2002) recommendations.
Main Analysis and Results
Prior to the main analysis, the prevalence of cyberbullying from the sample
of this study was investigated. Of those who reported being cyberbullied,
365
Ramos Salazar
Table 1. Reporting Means, Standard Deviations, Skew, and Kurtosis of Variables.
Measure
M
SD
Skew
Kurt
1. Cyber victim
2. Cyberbully
3. Body dissatisfaction
4. Healthy eating
5. Dieting to lose weight
6. Life satisfaction
1.14
1.11
2.58
4.82
1.92
7.54
0.55
0.5
1.08
1.54
1.15
1.99
4.88
5.62
0.83
−0.36
0.87
−0.89
5.82
3.93
0.3
−0.64
0.78
0.67
Table 2. Reporting Means, Standard Deviations, and Zero-Order Correlation
Matrix.
Measure
1. Cyber victim
2. Cyberbully
3. Body dissatisfaction
4. Healthy eating
5. Dieting to lose weight
6. Life satisfaction
M
SD
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
.47**
.13**
−.03*
.05**
−.05**
1.15
0.56
1
.08**
−.05**
.04**
−.05**
1.11
0.5
1
−.13**
.38**
−.34**
2.58
1.08
1
−.03*
.14**
4.82
1.54
1
−.13**
1.92
1.15
1
7.54
1.99
*p < .05. **p < .01.
7.7% reported being bullied via computer using the Internet or via email and
6.7% reported being cyberbullied via cell phone through text messaging or
through a mobile application. Of those who reported cyberbullying others,
5.2% reported cyberbullying others using the Internet or via email and 5.7%
reported cyberbullying others through text messaging or through a mobile
application.
A series of hierarchical multiple regressions were used to analyze
Hypotheses 1 to 5. For summaries of the multiple regression findings please
see Table 3. The first hypothesis predicted that after controlling for sex, age,
and grade level, cyberbullying victimization experiences will positively
effect cyberbullying perpetration. The multiple regression analysis revealed a
significant model, R2 = .24, F(4, 6167) = 492.141, p < .001, after putting the
controlling variables in the first block and cyber-victim experiences in the
second block. In the first block (R2 = .01), sex (β = −.04, t = −3.49, p < .001,
pr2 = −.04), age (β = .12, t = 5.55, p < .001, pr2 = .07), and grade in school
366
pr2
t
β
pr2
0.13
0.16
0.03
0.02
Body Dissatisfaction
(R2 = .01)
(R2 = .03)
−0.04
−0.04 12.39**
0.16
0.12
−0.07 2.45*
0.05
−0.09
−0.05 1.21
0.03
(ΔR2 = .24)
(ΔR2 = .05)
43.66**
0.49
0.49 9.68**
0.13
−3.49**
5.55**
−4.06**
β
Note. β = standardized beta coefficients.
*p < .05. **p < .01.
Block 1
Sex
Age
Grade level
Block 2
Cyber victim
t
Cyberbullying
β
(R2 = .01)
0.04
−0.06
0.01
(ΔR2 = .01)
−1.78
−0.02
2.67*
−2.68*
0.55
t
Healthy Eating
−0.02
β
(R2 = .01)
0.03
−0.01
0.03
(ΔR2 = .01)
3.80**
3.79
t
0.05
0.03
−0.01
0.02
pr2
Diet to Lose Weight
0.04
1.98*
−0.04 −0.06
0.01
1.22
pr2
β
(R2 = .01)
−0.04
−0.04
−0.06
(ΔR2 = .01)
−4.05**
−0.05
−3.0*
−1.84
−2.76*
t
Life Satisfaction
−0.05
−0.04
−0.02
−0.04
pr2
Table 3. Results of Multiple Regression Analyses Between the Demographic and Cyberbullied Variable and Dependent Variables.
Ramos Salazar
367
(β = −.08, t = −4.05, p < .001, pr2 = −.05) were found to be predictors of
cyberbullying perpetration. In the second block after accounting for the
demographic variables (R2 = .24), cyberbullying victimization experiences
(β = .48, t = 43.66, p < .001, pr2 = .48) positively impacted cyberbullying
perpetration. Thus, the first hypothesis was supported.
The second hypothesis predicted that after controlling for sex, age, and
grade level, cyberbullying victimization experiences will positively effect
body image dissatisfaction. The multiple regression analysis revealed a significant model, R2 = .05, F(4, 5720) = 68.89, p < .001, after putting the controlling variables in the first block and cyber-victimization experiences in the
second block. In the first block (R2 = .03), sex (β = .16, t = 12.39, p < .001,
pr2 = .03) and age (β = .05, t = 2.45, p < .02, pr2 = .01) were found to be predictors of body image dissatisfaction, but grade level in school was not found
to be a predictor (β = .02, t = 1.21, p > .05, ns). In the second block after
accounting for the demographic variables (R2 = .04), cyberbullying victimization experiences (β = .12, t = 9.68, p < .001, pr2 = .12) positively affected
body image dissatisfaction. Thus, the first hypothesis was supported.
The third hypothesis predicted that after controlling for sex, age, and grade
level, cyberbullying victimization experiences will negatively effect healthy
eating behaviors. The multiple regression analysis revealed a significant
model, R2 = .06, F(4, 5926) = 6.71, p < .001, after putting the controlling
variables in the first block and cyber-victim experiences in the second block.
In the first block (R2 = .01), sex (β = .03, t = 2.67, p < .01, pr2 = .03) and age
(β = −.06, t = −2.68, p < .01, pr2 = −.03) were found to be predictors of
healthy eating behaviors, but grade level in school was not found to be a predictor (β = .01, t = .54, p > .05, ns). In the second block after accounting for
the demographic variables (R2 = .01), cyberbullying victimization experiences (β = −.02, t = −1.78, p > .05, ns) did not impact healthy eating behaviors. Thus, the third hypothesis was not supported.
The fourth hypothesis predicted that after controlling for sex, age, and
grade level, cyberbullying victimization experiences will positively effect
dieting to lose weight. The multiple regression analysis revealed a significant
model, R2 = .06, F(4, 6239) = 5.47, p < .001, after putting the controlling
variables in the first block and cyber-victim experiences in the second block.
In the first block (R2 = .01), sex (β = .02, t = 1.97, p < .05, pr2 = .02) was
found to be predictor of dieting to lose weight, but age (β = −.01, t = 1.22, p
> .05, ns) and grade level in school (β = .02, t = 1.22, p > .05, ns) were not
found to be predictors of dieting to lose weight. In the second block after
accounting for the demographic variables (R2 = .01), cyberbullying victimization experiences (β = .04, t = 3.79, p < .001, pr2 = .04) positively predicted
dieting to lose weight. Thus, the fourth hypothesis was supported.
368
Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36(1-2)
The fifth hypothesis predicted that after controlling for sex, age, and grade
level, cyberbullying victimization experiences will negatively effect life satisfaction. The multiple regression analysis revealed a significant model, R2 =
.01, F(4, 6245) = 19.13, p < .001, after putting the controlling variables in the
first block and cyber-victim experiences in the second block. In the first
block (R2 = .01), sex (β = –.03, t = −2.99, p < .01, pr2 = −.03) and grade in
school (β = −.05, t = −2.75, p < .01, pr2 = −.03) were found to be predictors
of cyberbullying perpetration. However, age (β = −.07, t = −1.83, p > .05, ns)
was not a significant predictor of life satisfaction. In the second block after
accounting for the demographic variables (R2 = .01), being cyberbullied (β =
−.05, t = −4.05, p < .001, pr2 = −.05) negatively effected life satisfaction.
Thus, the fifth hypothesis was supported.
Discussion
The main purpose of this study was to examine cyberbullying victimization
as a predictor of cyberbullying perception and health-related variables. The
first significant finding revealed that cyberbullying victimization experiences
were moderately associated to cyberbullying perpetration and there was evidence that cyberbullying victimization served as a strong predictor after controlling for the demographic variables. This finding is consistent to
Gámez-Guadix et al. (2015) longitudinal study, supporting the idea that
cyberbullied students also report cyberbullying other adolescents in middle
schools regardless of students’ demographic characteristics (e.g., sex, age).
Similarly, this finding is consistent across previous correlational findings that
have established a moderate link between cyberbullying perpetration and
cyberbullying victimization (Kowalski & Limber, 2007; Li, 2007; Roberto
et al., 2014b). As previously suggested, this study’s finding suggests that
cyberbullying victimization is a moderate predictor of cyberbullying perpetration regardless of sex, age, and grade level.
Diversity differences in this study also suggest that these factors explain
cyberbullying victimization and perpetration rates. For instance, post hoc
analyses revealed that females reported higher cyberbullying victimization
rates than did the males, and males reported higher cyberbullying perpetration rates than females did. Because of these sex differences, controlling for
sex provides valuable evidence that cyberbullying victimization remains a
predictor of cyberbullying perpetration. The argumentative skill deficiency
model explains that middle school students might not have developed effective conflict management skills, which leads them to retaliate against others
by cyberbullying others, when being cyberbullied (Roberto, 1999; Roberto
et al., 2014a). Another explanation may be that given that adolescents spend
Ramos Salazar
369
more time on the Internet and use mobile/tablet devices, adolescents may be
more exposed to sending and receiving aggressive messages, which can
explain why students can be cyberbullies and cyber victims at the same time
regardless of grade level (Ang, 2015; Kowalski & Limber, 2007).
Cyberbullying victimization was also found to have an effect on body
image dissatisfaction in middle school students. Previously, Frisén et al.
(2014) found that being victimized by school peers over the Internet is linked
to victim’s low perceptions of his or her own body image. A possible bidirectional relationship might exist between cyberbullying victimization and body
image dissatisfaction. For instance, if an adolescent is dissatisfied with his or
her body, and posts about this dissatisfaction online, then peers may make
negative virtual remarks about this adolescent’s appearance. Another reason
for this phenomenon is explained by self-presentation theory that suggests
that adolescents are likely to post images of their body through social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter to seek others’ approval, which
exposes them to higher levels of peer criticism about their body image
(Dredge, Gleeson, & de la Piedad Garcia, 2014; Lunde & Frisén, 2011).
An alternative reason for this finding is that cyberbullying victimization
has been correlated with having poor self-esteem and having poor self-evaluations of their own body image (Patchin & Hinduja, 2010; Tokunaga, 2010).
Because cyberbullying victimization by Internet and/or mobile devices leads
to negative mental states, such as depression, low self-esteem, and anxiety
(Rawana et al., 2010), it may also lead to feelings of poor body image.
Interestingly, sex and age differences were apparent in students’ levels of
poor body image when controlling for these factors. Future studies may need
to investigate additional factors that can explain why females are less satisfied with their bodies than males after being victimized. Also, studies may
need to explore why age differences play a role in being dissatisfied with
one’s body image. Thus, future studies still need to develop theoretical causal
links between cyberbullying victimization and the evaluations of students’
body image.
Interestingly, cyberbullying victimization was not associated with middle school students’ healthy eating behaviors. Eating healthy food such as
fruits and vegetables was not affected by students’ cyberbullying victimization experiences. This finding is not consistent with Kaltiala-Heino et al.’s
(2000) study that found a correlation between cyberbullying and healthy
eating patterns in adolescents. Previously, Farrow and Fox (2011) also
found a correlation between cyberbullying victimization and the healthy
eating choices of adolescents. One reason for not finding a correlation
among these two variables might have been that some middle school students prefer to not eat healthy foods such as fruits and vegetables at that age
370
Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36(1-2)
level (Story, Neumark-Sztainer, & French, 2002), which might have
affected the findings of this study. Some studies suggest that middle school
students do not always make the healthiest food choices (Sun, Schutz, &
Maffeis, 2004) and cyberbullying victimization might not have influenced
their decision-making process of eating healthier meals. However, future
studies may continue to explore whether cyberbullying victimization affects
high school or college students’ eating behaviors.
However, cyberbullying victimization positively predicted dieting to lose
weight across middle school students after controlling for the demographic
variables. Dieting emphasized adolescents’ decision to diet to lose weight to
improve their body’s image, which may be to eat less food, or to modify their
diet so that they lose weight. The finding of this study is consistent with
Arat’s (2015) study that found that cyberbullying victimization was correlated with young students’ dieting behaviors. Similarly, Sampasa-Kanyinga
and Willmore (2015) found that cyberbullied students were more likely to
skip breakfast to lose weight in comparison with those who were not cyberbullied. Although dieting behaviors may be healthy in the short term, these
behaviors can become disordered eating patterns in the long term (Loth et al.,
2015). One reason why cyberbullying victimization may be a predictor of
dieting to lose weight is that receiving aggressive messages such as “you’re
fat” or “you’re ugly” can deeply affect students’ psyche, which can affect
their decisions to diet to lose weight so that they feel better about themselves
(Anderson et al., 2014; DeSmet et al., 2014). Also, other studies suggest that
cyberbullied students are more likely to engage in eating disorders such as
anorexia and bulimia (Carmona-Torres et al., 2015).
Furthermore, studies report that sex differences occur in dieting behavior.
Post hoc analyses revealed that victimized females exhibited dieting behavior
than the males did, which is consistent with a previous study by Salafia and
Lemer (2012) that found that females in middle school experience disordered
eating habits to lose weight in comparison with males. However, cyberbullying alone may not be the sole predictor of eating behaviors; additional factors
may also explain why adolescents are exhibiting dieting behaviors such as
poor self-esteem and depression (Rasmus, Anna-Lisa, Mauri, Riittakerttu, &
Kaj, 2010). Therefore, future studies should continue to investigate this phenomenon controlling for factors such as sex, self-esteem, and depression.
Finally, being cyberbullied had a negative impact on students’ life satisfaction. This finding is stable across the literature; for instance, Moore (2013)
also found that cyberbullied middle school students were less satisfied with
their family, environment, and school life. In addition, Navarro and colleagues (2015) also found a negative correlation between cyberbullying victimization and life satisfaction of middle school students. Because being
Ramos Salazar
371
cyberbullied leads to negative outcomes such as social anxiety, isolation,
depression, and suicide ideation (Ang et al., 2012; Hinduja & Patchin, 2010),
this reduces the amount of perceived life satisfaction of middle school students. Studies have shown that cyberbullying victimization negatively affects
students’ quality of life both inside the school and outside of the school
boundaries into their personal family and social life (Ang et al., 2012).
In addition, a bidirectional explanation can also explain the relationship
between these constructs. For instance, if adolescent students are experiencing low life satisfaction, this can lead students to spend more time on social
media websites or on their mobile devices to obtain peer approval, which
may increase students’ exposure to cyberbullying victimization (Vigil & Wu,
2015). When examining the demographic factors, sex differences emerged in
life satisfaction; specifically, victimized males reported being less satisfied
with their life in comparison with victimized females. This finding suggests
that victimized males may need additional support after being victimized.
Future studies may need to continue to examine sex differences in cyberbullying victimization, and control for this variable. Thus, studies should continue to examine the negative impacts of cyberbullying victimization on
students’ reports of life satisfaction after controlling for demographic
variables.
Strengths of the Study
This cyberbullying victimization study had several strengths that will be discussed. First, because this study included a large national sample of middle
school students, it reduced the amount of variance. Second, this sample was
ethnically diverse, which represents a diverse population across the United
States. Third, this is one of the few studies that has controlled for demographic variables (sex, age, and grade level) in the examination of cyberbullying victimization as a predictor of the variables examined in this study.
Because differences exist in these diverse factors, cyberbullying victimization studies may continue to control for sex, age, and grade level. Fourth, this
is one of the first studies to examine cyberbullying victimization as a predictor of body image dissatisfaction and healthy eating behaviors in middle
school students.
Limitations and Future Directions
There are limitations that will also be discussed along with future directions.
First, this study included self-reported survey data, which relied on children’s
perceptions. Future studies should adopt the use of other-reported survey
372
Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36(1-2)
data, such as friends or relatives’ reports of participants’ perceived health
behaviors. Second, this study was a cross-sectional study, which focused on
collected data at one point in time. Future studies may adopt the use of longitudinal data of the same participants from sixth grade through eighth grade.
This will allow researchers to determine whether cyberbullying victimization
remains a strong predictor of the variables investigated in this study across
the middle school years. Conducting longitudinal design methods can also
enable researchers to detect the development of the possible effects of cyberbullying victimization overtime such as body image dissatisfaction, dieting
to lose weight, and reduced life satisfaction.
Third, because online and social media sites often have age restrictions,
not all participants in this sample may have equal access to these platforms
because the average age of the sample was 12. This age restriction may
exclude participants who did not have access to social media platforms such
as Facebook, which requires users to be 13 years old. Also, participants living
in economically disadvantaged situations may have limited access to online
forums. Future studies may include questions addressing the accessibility of
online and social media platforms to determine the types of social media
websites that are accessible to younger children who are younger than 13
years of age. Also, studies may control for economical disadvantages that
children may face to determine whether this limits children’s access to online
platforms. Fourth, this study did not adopt the use of a specific theoretical
framework because previous scholarship had only emphasized the correlations of the variables investigated in this study. The findings from this study
may build theoretical models of the variables with the inclusion of additional
variables such as social self-efficacy from Bandura’s (2001) social cognitive
theory to examine whether social self-efficacy regulates the attitudes and
behaviors of cyberbullying victims. Future studies could also assess relevant
theories such as self-concept theory (Baumeister, 1999) to examine how
cyberbullying victims’ body dissatisfaction and dieting behavior influence
their self-concept.
Policy Implications for Intervention
Findings of this study inform recommendations for potential policy implications to manage cyberbullying victimization affairs in middle schools. Because
of the negative effects of cyberbullying victimization, policy makers can
encourage the development of cyberbullying victimization policies in middle
school districts to avoid legal ramifications from the state and to address students’ negative body image and dieting patterns. Developing anticyberbullying policies at the district level can encourage school administrators and
Ramos Salazar
373
counselors to integrate intervention programs to prevent cyberbullying victimization behavior by supporting victims and providing consequences for
cyberbullying behaviors (Franek, 2006). Interventions that focus on educating
counselors, teachers, and parents about cyberbullying victimization policies
can be effective in helping stakeholders respond appropriately to cyberbullying victimization episodes (Beale & Hal, 2007; Bhat, 2008). For example, if
an educator becomes a witness of cyberbullying perpetration behavior, he or
she can refer to the policy on the consequences of such behavior, and may
penalize the behavior appropriately (e.g., suspending the adolescent) before it
continues to affect other victimized children.
In addition, given the establishment of the victim–offender link, interventions may target victims of cyberbullying. By educating victims about the
strategies to cope with cyberbullying and alerting them of the negative consequences of cyberbullying behavior, practitioners can prevent the “victimoffender” cycle in peer relationships (Lauritsen & Laub, 2007). For example,
the KiVA program, a peer-support program of cyberbullying victims has been
shown to be effective at reducing both cyberbullying and cyber-victimization
rates in middle schools (Karna et al., 2013).
To address students’ body image and dieting issues, anticyberbullying
policies should recommend mental and behavioral health assessments, and
support mechanisms. Administrators, teachers, or counselors who detect
cyberbullying victimization can assess victims’ and bullies’ mental and
behavioral well-being to address these risk factors. These student assessments can examine the possible symptoms of being victimized (e.g., body
image issues) to offer counseling support to victims of cyberbullying.
Intervention programs that emphasize both reporting and response mechanisms through intervention teams in schools can enable victims and peer
bystanders to report cyberbullying victimization occurrences through textual
alert systems, and provide response mechanisms to enable educators, counselors, and providers the means to address cyberbullying victimization as it
emerges (Sabella, 2012). Future intervention research may continue to assess
policy implementations in middle schools (sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-grade
levels) to determine the effectiveness of anticyberbullying policies in students, teachers, administrators, and counselors to halt future victimization
patterns.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the focus of this investigation was to examine cyberbullying
victimization as a predictor of cyberbullying perpetration, body image dissatisfaction, healthy eating behaviors, and life satisfaction in middle school
374
Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36(1-2)
students. After controlling for the demographic factors, this study found that
cyberbullying victimization predicted cyberbullying perpetration, which suggests that those who cyberbully others may also be cyberbullied by others.
Another finding of this study was that cyberbullying victimization experiences positively predicted body image dissatisfaction. However, after controlling for the demographic factors, cyberbullying victimization did not
predict healthy related eating behaviors. However, cyberbullying victimization did predict students’ dieting behaviors to lose weight after controlling for
the demographic variables. Finally, this study found that cyberbullying victimization negatively affected students’ perceived life satisfaction after controlling for the demographic factors. Therefore, this investigation underscores
the value of examining how cyberbullying victimization affects middle
school students’ cyberbullying perpetration, body image dissatisfaction, and
life satisfaction.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research,
authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
Anderson, J., Bresnahan, M., & Musatics, C. (2014). Combating weight-based cyberbullying on Facebook with the dissenter effect. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and
Social Networking, 17, 281-286. doi:10.1089/cyber.2013.0370
Ang, R. P. (2015). Adolescent cyberbullying: A review of characteristics, prevention
and intervention strategies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25(2015), 35-42.
doi:10.1016/j.avb.2015.07.011
Ang, R. P., Chong, W. H., Chye, S., & Huan, V. S. (2012). Loneliness and generalized problematic Internet use: Parents’ perceived knowledge of adolescents’
online activities as a moderator. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1342-1347.
doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.019
Arat, G. (2015). Emerging protective and risk factors of mental health in Asian
American students: Findings from the 2013 Youth Risk Behavior Survey.
Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 10, 192-205. doi:10.1080/17450128.2
015.1045437
Averdijk, M., Van Gelder, J.-L., Eisner, M., & Ribeaud, D. (2016). Violence begets
violence . . . but how? A decision-making perspective on the victim-offender
overlap. Criminology, 54, 282-306. doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12102
Ramos Salazar
375
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review
of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
Baumeister, R. F. (1999). The self in social psychology. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology
Press.
Beale, A. V., & Hal, K. R. (2007). Cyberbullying: What schools and administrators
(and parents) can do. The Clearing House, 81, 8-12.
Bhat, C. S. (2008). Cyberbullying: Overview and strategies for school counselors,
guidance officers, and all school personnel. Australian Journal of Guidance and
Counseling, 18, 53-66.
Bilic, V., Flander, G. B., & Rafajac, B. (2014). Life satisfaction and school performance of children exposed to classic and cyber peer bullying. Collegium
Antropologicum, 38, 21-29.
Brewer, G., & Kerslake, J. (2015). Cyberbullying, self-esteem, empathy and loneliness. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 255-260. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.073
Brown, C. F., Demaray, M. K., & Secord, S. M. (2014). Cyber victimization in
middle school and relations to social emotional outcomes. Computers in Human
Behavior, 35, 12-21. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.014
Calvete, E., Orue, I., & Gámez-Guadix, M. (2016). Cyberbullying victimization and
depression in adolescents: The mediating role of body image and cognitive schemas in a one-year prospective study. European Journal of Criminal Policy and
Research, 22(2), 271-284. doi:10.1007/s10610-015-9292-8
Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers
University Press.
Carmona-Torres, J. A., Cangas, A. J., Langer, A. I., Aguilar-Parra, J. M., & Gallego,
J. (2015). Bullying and its relationship with the drug use and eating disorders: A
comparison between Chilean and Spanish adolescents. Behavioral Psychology,
23, 507-527.
Coburn, P. I., Connolly, D. A., & Roesch, R. (2015). Cyberbullying: Is federal criminal legislation the solution? Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal
Justice, 57, 566-579.
Currie, C., Todd, J., & Thomson, C. (1994). Health behaviours of Scottish school
children, Report 4: The cross-national perspective: Scotland compared to
other European countries and Canada. Edinburgh: Health Education Board of
Scotland.
DeSmet, A., Deforche, B., Hublet, A., Tanghe, A., Stremersch, E., & De
Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2014). Traditional and cyberbullying victimization as correlates of psychosocial distress and barriers to a healthy lifestyle among severely
obese adolescents—A matched case-control study on prevalence and results from
a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 14, Article 224. doi:10.1186/14712458-14-224
Dredge, R., Gleeson, J., & de la Piedad Garcia, X. (2014). Presentation on Facebook
and risk of cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 40, 1622. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.035
Farrow, C. V., & Fox, C. L. (2011). Gender differences in the relationships between
bullying at school and unhealthy eating and shape-related attitudes and behaviours.
376
Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36(1-2)
The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 409-420. doi:10.1348/000709
910z525804
Franek, M. (2006). Foiling cyberbullies in the new wild west. Educational Leadership,
63(4), 39-43.
Frisén, A., Berne, S., & Lunde, C. (2014). Cybervictimization and body esteem:
Experiences of Swedish children and adolescents. European Journal of
Developmental Psychology, 11, 331-343. doi:10.1080/17405629.2013.825604
Fullchange, A., & Furlong, M. J. (2016). An exploration of effects of bullying victimization from a complete mental health perspective. SAGE Open, 6, 1-12.
doi:10.1177/2158244015623593
Gámez-Guadix, M., Gini, G., & Calvete, E. (2015). Stability of cyberbully victimization among adolescents: Prevalence and association with bully–victim status and psychosocial adjustment. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 140-148.
doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.007
Gonsalves, D., Hawk, H., & Goodenow, C. (2013). Unhealthy weight control behaviors and related risk factors in Massachusetts Middle and High School Students.
Maternal and Child Health Journal, 18, 1803-1813. doi:10.1007/s10995-0131424-5
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives
of Suicide Research, 14, 206-221.
Hyde, J. S., Mezulis, A. H., & Abramson, L. Y. (2008). The ABCs of depression:
Integrating affective, biological, and cognitive models to explain the emergence
of the gender difference in depression. Psychological Review, 115, 291-313.
Iannotti, R. J. (2013). Health behavior in school-aged children (HBSC), 2009-2010.
Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
doi:10.3886/ICPSR34792.v1
Jennings, W. G., Piquero, A., & Reingle, J. M. (2012). On the overlap between victimization and offending: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent
Behavior, 17, 16-26.
Kaltiala-Heino, R., Rimpelä, M., Rantanen, P., & Rimpelä, A. (2000). Bullying at
school—An indicator of adolescents at risk for mental disorders. Journal of
Adolescence, 6, 661-674. doi:10.1006/jado.2000.0351
Karna, A., Voeten, M., Little, T. D., Alanen, E., Poskiparta, E., & Samivalli, C.
(2013). Effectiveness of the KiVa antibullying program: Grades 1-3 and 7-9.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 535-551. doi:10.1037/a00304I7
Katzer, C., Fetchenhauer, D., & Belschak, F. (2009). Cyberbullying: Who are the victims? A comparison of victimization in Internet chatrooms and victimization in
school. Journal of Media Psychology, 21, 25-36. doi:10.1027/1864-1105.21.1.25
Klevens, J., Duque, L. F., & Ramirez, C. (2002). The victim-perpetrator overlap and
routine activities: Results from a cross-sectional study in Bogota, Colombia.
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 206-216.
Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school
students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S22-S30. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017
Ramos Salazar
377
Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2013). Psychological, physical and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health,
53, S13-S20. doi:10.1016/j.adohealth.2012.09.018
Lauritsen, J. L., & Laub, J. H. (2007). Understanding the link between victimization
and offending: New reflections on an old idea. In M. Hough & M. Maxfield
(Eds.), Surveying crime in the 21st century (pp. 55-75). Monsey, NY: Criminal
Justice Press.
Lauritsen, J. L., Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1991). The link between offending and
victimization among adolescents. Criminology, 29, 265-291.
Li, Q. (2007). New bottle but old wine: A research of cyberbullying in schools. Computers
and Human Behavior, 23(4), 1777-1791. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.10.005
Libbey, H. P., Story, M. T., Neumark-Sztainer, D. R., & Boutelle, K. N. (2008).
Teasing, disordered eating behaviors, and psychological morbidities among overweight adolescents. Obesity, 16(2), S24-S29. doi:10.1038/oby.2008.455
Loth, K., Wall, M., Choi, C.-W., Bucchianeri, M., Quick, V., Larson, N., . . . NeumarkSztainer, D. (2015). Family meals and disordered eating in adolescents: Are the
benefits the same for everyone? International Journal of Eating Disorders, 48,
100-110.
Lunde, C., & Frisén, A. (2011). On being victimized by peers in the advent of adolescence: Prospective relationship to objectified body consciousness. Body Image,
8, 309-314. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2011.04.010
MacNicol, S. A. M., Murray, S. M., & Austin, E. J. (2003). Relationships between
personality, attitudes and dietary behaviour in a group of Scottish adolescents.
Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1753-1764.
Mason, K. L. (2008). Cyberbullying: A preliminary assessment for school personnel.
Psychology in the Schools, 45, 323-348. doi:10.1002/pits.20301
Menzel, J. E., Schaefer, L. M., Burke, N. L., Mayhew, L. L., Brannick, M. T., &
Thompson, J. K. (2010). Appearance-related teasing, body dissatisfaction, and
disordered eating: A meta-analysis. Body Image, 7, 261-270. doi:10.1016/j.
bodyim.2010.05.004
Merrill, R. M., & Hanson, C. L. (2016). Risk and protective factors associated with
being bullied on school property compared with cyberbullied. BMC Public
Health, 16, Article 145. doi:10.1186/s12889-016-2833-3
Mertler, C. A., & Vannatta, R. A. (2002). Advanced and multivariate statistical
methods: Practical application and interpretation (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA:
Pyrczak.
Mitchell, K. J., Ybarra, M., & Finkelhor, D. (2007). The relative importance of online
victimization in understanding depression, delinquency, and substance use. Child
Maltreatment, 5, 312-324. doi:10.1177/1077559507305996
Moore, P. M. (2013). Electronic bullies, victims, and bully-victims: An examination of
life satisfaction in middle school students. Dissertation Abstracts International,
74, 1-79.
Moore, P. M., Huebner, E. S., & Hills, K. J. (2012). Electronic bullying and victimization and life satisfaction in middle school students. Social Indicators Research,
107, 429-447. doi:10.1007/s11205-011-9856-z
378
Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36(1-2)
Navarro, R., Ruiz-Oliva, R., Larrañaga, E., & Yubero, S. (2015). The impact of cyberbullying and social bullying on optimism, global and school-related happiness
and life satisfaction among 10-12-year-old schoolchildren. Applied Research in
Quality of Life, 10, 15-36. doi:10.1007/s11482-013-9292-0
Novo, F., Pereira, F., & Matos, M. (2015). Cyber-aggression among Portuguese adolescents: A study on perpetration, victim offender overlap and parental supervision. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 8, 94-110.
Orbach, I., & Mikulincer, M. (1998). The Body Investment Scale: Construction and
validation of a body experience scale. Psychological Assessment, 10, 415-425.
doi:10.1037/1040-3590.10.4.415
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2010). Cyberbullying and self-esteem. Journal of
School Health, 80, 614-621. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2010.00548.x
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2013). Cyberbullying among adolescents: Implications
for empirical research. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53, 431-432. doi:10.1016/j.
jadohealth.2013.07.030
Puhl, R. M., Peterson, J. L., & Luedicke, J. (2013). Weight-based victimization:
Bullying experiences of weight loss treatment-seeking youth. Pediatrics, 131,
e1-e9. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-1106
Raskauskas, J., & Stoltz, A. D. (2007). Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 43, 564-575.
doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.564
Rasmus, I., Anna-Lisa, I., Mauri, M., Riittakerttu, K., & Kaj, B. (2010). Psychological
distress and risk for eating disorders in subgroups of dieters. European Eating
Disorders Review, 18(4), 296-303. doi:10.1002/erv.1004
Rawana, J. S., Morgan, A. S., Nguyen, H., & Craig, S. G. (2010). The relation between
eating- and weight-related disturbances and depression in adolescence: A review.
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 13, 213-230. doi:10.1007/s10567010-0072-1
Rice, E., Petering, R., Rhoades, H., Winetrobe, H., Goldbach, J., Plant, A., . . . Kordic,
T. (2015). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among middle-school
students. American Journal of Public Health, 105(3), e66-e72. doi:10.2105/
AJPH.2014.302393
Rieves, L., & Cash, T. F. (1996). Social development factors and women’s bodyimage attitudes. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 63-78.
Roberto, A. J. (1999). Applying the argumentative skill deficiency model of interpersonal violence to adolescent boys. Communication Research Reports, 16, 325332. doi:10.1080/08824099909388733
Roberto, A. J., & Eden, J. (2010). Cyberbullying: Aggressive communication in the
digital age. In T. A. Avtgis & A. S. Rancer (Eds.), Arguments, aggression, and
conflict: New direction in theory and research (pp. 198-216). New York, NY:
Routledge.
Roberto, A. J., Eden, J., Savage, M. W., Ramos-Salazar, L., & Deiss, D. M. (2014a).
Outcome evaluation results of school-based cybersafety promotion and cyberbullying prevention intervention for middle school students. Health Communication,
29, 1029-1042. doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.831684
Ramos Salazar
379
Roberto, A. J., Eden, J., Savage, M. W., Ramos-Salazar, L., & Deiss, D. M. (2014b).
Prevalence and predictors of cyberbullying perpetration by high school seniors.
Communication Quarterly, 62, 97-114. doi:10.1080/01463373.2013.860906
Sabella, R. A. (2012). Cyberbullying: How school counselors can help. In J. W.
Patchin & S. Hinduja (Eds.), Cyberbullying prevention and response: Expert
perspectives (pp. 72-92). New York, NY: Routledge.
Salafia, E. B., & Lemer, J. L. (2012). Associations between multiple types of stress
and disordered eating among girls and boys in middle school. Journal of Child
and Family Studies, 21, 148-157. doi:10.1007/s10826-011-9458-z
Sampasa-Kanyinga, H., Roumeliotis, P., Farrow, C. V., & Shi, Y. F. (2014).
Breakfast skipping is associated with cyberbullying and school bullying victimization. A school-based cross-sectional study. Appetite, 79, 76-82. doi:10.1016/j.
appet.2014.04.007
Sampasa-Kanyinga, H., & Willmore, J. (2015). Relationships between bullying victimization psychological distress and breakfast skipping among boys and girls.
Appetite, 89, 41-46. doi:1016/j.appet.2015.01.020
Selkie, E. M., Kota, R., Chan, Y.-F., & Moreno, M. (2015). Cyberbullying, depression, and problem alcohol use in female college students: A multisite study.
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18, 79-86. doi:10.1089/
cyber.2014.0371
Smokowski, P. R., Evans, C. R., & Cotter, K. L. (2014). The differential impacts of episodic, chronic, and cumulative physical bullying and cyberbullying: The effects
of victimization on the school experiences, social support, and mental health of
rural adolescents. Violence and Victims, 29, 1029-1046. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.
VV-D-13-00076
Solberg, M. E., & Olweus, D. (2003). Prevalence estimation of school bullying
with Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 239-268.
doi:10.1002/ab.10047
Story, M., Neumark-Sztainer, D., & French, S. (2002). Individual and environmental influences on adolescent eating behaviours. Journal of American Diet
Association, 102, S40-S51. doi:10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90421-9
Sun, M., Schutz, Y., & Maffeis, C. (2004). Substrate metabolism, nutrient balance
and obesity development in children and adolescents: A target for intervention?
Obesity Review, 5, 183-188. doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2004.00154.x
Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and
synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human
Behavior, 26, 277-287. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.0
Turanovic, J. J., & Pratt, T. C. (2013). The consequences of maladaptive coping:
Integrating general strain and self-control theories to specify a causal pathway
between victimization and offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 29,
321-345.
Vigil, T. R., & Wu, H. D. (2015). Facebook users’ engagement and perceived life
satisfaction. Media and Communication, 3(1), 5-16. doi:10.17645/mac.v3i1.199
380
Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36(1-2)
Wang, J., Iannotti, R. J., & Nansel, T. R. (2009). School bullying among adolescents
in the United States: Physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. Journal of Adolescent
Health, 45(4), 368-375. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.03.021
Williams, K. R., & Guerra, N. G. (2007). Prevalence and predictors of internet
bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S14-S21. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.018
Author Biography
Leslie Ramos Salazar (PhD, Arizona State University) is an Assistant Professor of
Business Communication and Decision Management at the College of Business at
West Texas A&M University. Her research interests include health communication,
business communication, conflict management, and interpersonal communication.
Copyright of Journal of Interpersonal Violence is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and
its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the
copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email
articles for individual use.