LEARNING UNIT 9 Analysis and interpretation of financial statements Learning outcomes .............................................................................................................. 264 Key concepts........................................................................................................................ 264 9.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 265 9.2 The objective of financial statements analysis........................................................... 265 9.3 The application of financial statements analysis ....................................................... 266 9.4 The limitation of financial statements analysis........................................................... 270 9.5 Exercises and solutions.............................................................................................. 271 Self-assessment .................................................................................................................. 283 263 Learning outcomes After studying this learning unit, you should be able to do the following: • Discuss the nature, scope and objectives of financial statement analysis. • Explain the need for financial statement analysis. • Define, calculate and interpret the following ratios: • − Return on equity − Return on total assets − Gross profit percentage − Profit margin − Financial leverage and leverage effect − Current ratio − Acid test ratio − Trade receivables control collection period − Inventory turnover rate − Inventory-holding period − Debt-equity ratio − Times interest earned ratio Discuss the limitations of financial statement analysis. Key concepts • Financial statement analysis • Ratio analysis • Profitability ratios • Liquidity ratios • Solvency ratios • Limitations of financial statement analysis 264 9.1 Introduction Financial statement analysis is characteristically associated with ratio analysis, defined as the analysis of relationships among various financial statement items both at a point in time and over time. When ratio analysis is performed, financial statements are used in a unique manner to provide a different viewpoint about the business entity. To complete a ratio analysis, the financial statements are used to calculate a set of ratios. Each ratio emphasises a particular aspect of the statement of financial position and/or statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income. The calculated set of ratios are then compared to industry averages or historical standards to assess the financial performance and position of the business entity. The general rule is that ratios deviating largely on either side from industry standards may necessitate further analysis on the aspects affecting that particular ratio. Ratios for any one year can be misleading because they are high or low for some temporary reason. Therefore, it is also important to analyse trends in the ratios to assess changes in the business entity’s performance over time. A trend analysis involves graphs of the various ratios, where each graph consists of a particular ratio plotted against time, usually expressed in years. Thread analysis of the ratios adds depth to the study because it looks at several years and assist in distinguishing between isolated instances of suspicious ratios and the pervasive deterioration of ratios that indicates trouble. Time trends in a business entity’s ratios are useful, but it is often more useful to compare the entity trends with industry trends. This comparison illustrates how well an entity has been doing over time relative to its competitors and may assist in explaining trends in the entity’s ratios. If the entity’s profit margin is declining over time, for example, the user of the analysis would like to know whether this decline is mainly because of declining industry profit margins or whether the entity is not competitive when compared with other entities operating in same industry. 9.2 The objective of financial statement analysis The objective of financial statement analysis is to assess the entity's performance and financial position in relation to risk. The information gathered from the analysis of the financial statements can be used to pinpoint areas in the entity that require further investigation and to plan for the future. The significance of financial statement analysis relates to a wide range of aspects pertaining a business entity. The following are some of the aspects that may be gleaned from financial statements analysis: ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ the earning capacity or profitability of a business entity the operational efficiency and managerial effectiveness the short-term as well as long-term solvency position of a business entity identification of the reasons for change in profitability and financial position of a business entity ➢ monitoring of trends within the business and across businesses 265 ➢ assisting in making forecasts about future prospects of the business Basically, there are three groups of financial ratios that are commonly used to assess the aspects mentioned above, namely profitability, liquidity, solvency. A fourth category, market ratios, is also useful in assessing the entity but falls outside the scope of this module. 9.3 Application of financial statement analysis Ratios are classified according to the information they provide. The following ratios are dealt with in this module: • • • Profitability ratios Liquidity ratios Solvency ratios 9.3.1 Profitability ratios The objective of a business entity is to earn a reasonable profit on the capital invested. Profitability ratios measure the profits of the entity relative to sales, assets, or equity. Profitability ratios describe an entity’s past profitability. Investors are usually supplied with information to the effect that a business earned a certain percentage of profit on equity during the previous year and therefore should earn the same or higher percentage during the current year. However, because there is little evidence that past profitability results predict future profitability, it is important that the reader of such information avoids attaching too much importance to these numbers, as they are historical. They certainly tell a story about where the business entity has been; not where it is going. Therefore, the importance of profitability ratios is that it provides several different meanings relating to the success of an entity in generating a return on capital employed. Ratios that measure profitability of a business include: • • • • • Return on equity Return on total assets Gross profit percentage Profit margin Financial leverage and leverage effect 3.3.1.1 Return on equity The return on equity is used to measure how profitable the investment of capital is for the owners of the entity. Return on equity is a two-part ratio as in its calculation it brings together the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income and the statement of financial position, where the profit for the year (profit before tax) is compared to the total equity. The derived ratio represents the total return on equity capital and shows the entity’s ability to turn equity investments into profits. It measures the profits made for each rand from equity holders. 3.3.1.2 Return on total assets 266 The return on total assets is a measure of how effectively an entity's assets are being used to generate comprehensive income. This ratio indicates how well a business is performing by comparing the profit before interest (and tax) to the capital a business has invested in assets. The higher the return, the more productive and efficient management is in utilising economic resources. 3.3.1.3 Gross profit percentage The gross profit percentage is a measure of the gross profit earned on sales. The gross profit margin considers the entity's cost of goods sold but does not include any selling costs. It shows how much profit a business entity makes after paying off its cost of goods sold. In other words, the ratio indicates the percentage of each rand of revenue that the entity retains as gross profit. This ratio also shows how well management is able to control costs relating to sales when the entity is compared with its competitors. The gross profit percentage is an important yardstick as it indicates the percentage of profit that is left from sales to meet other operating expenses after deducting the cost of sales. Without a good cushion of gross profit, a business entity will struggle to pay for its operating expenses. 3.3.1.4 Profit margin The profit margin expresses the percentage of every sales rand a business entity was able to convert into net income. The profit margin ratio shows profit (before tax) for the year as a percentage of sales. Flowing from gross profit, the profit margin is one of the important measures of the overall results of a business entity, showing management’s ability to operate an entity profitably by recovering the costs relating to sales, other expenses relating to operating a business, and the interest payable on borrowed funds. This is also an important measure of good management stewardship in containing the operating expenses to ensure that a reasonable amount of profit is available to the owners as compensation for investing in the entity. 3.3.1.5 Financial leverage and leverage effect The financial leverage ratio and financial leverage effect are measures of the extent to which an entity benefits from the use of debt in contrast to equity. Business entities that utilise debt to finance their activities face more business risk than purely equity financed entities. Since such entities are obligated to make regular interest payments to lenders, they are also more operationally leveraged. The financial leverage ratio is an assessment of how a business entity an entity is using borrowed funds. It measures whether a business is generating positive returns on the borrowed funds, that is, returns that are higher than the cost thereof. A financial leverage ratio of one is generally regarded as an acceptable standard, as that is a break-even point between the cost on borrowed funds (interest) and the benefits (return) of using borrowed funds. A leverage ratio that exceeds one indicates that an entity is generating higher returns on the borrowed funds than the cost thereof. Conversely, a leverage ratio of less than one indicates that the cost on borrowed funds exceeds the return thereon. The exact impact of the profitability of borrowed funds on the entity can be measured by calculating the financial leverage effect. The financial leverage effect is expressed as the 267 difference between the return on equity and return on assets. The analysis of the leverage effect is important to equity investors as it provides an indication of the return that is attributable to them from the use of borrowed funds. A positive result on the calculation of the leverage effect is desirable as it will indicate that borrowed funds are used profitably to increase the wealth of the equity investors (owners) of the business. 9.3.2 Liquidity ratios Liquidity ratios are used to provide information about the entity's ability to meet its short-term (current) financial obligations with its current assets as they become due. These ratios are of interest to short-term creditors of the entity. Ratios that measure the liquidity of a business include: • • • • • • Current ratio Acid test ratio Trade receivables collection period Trade payables settlement period Inventory turnover rate Inventory-holding period 9.3.2.1 Current ratio The current ratio measures the capability of a business to meet its short-term obligations that are due within a year. The ratio contrasts current assets with current liabilities to assess the extent to which current liabilities are covered by current assets. Relatively high current ratios are interpreted as an indication that a business entity is liquid and in good position to meet its current obligations, and vice versa. The current ratio supposedly measures liquidity because it relates the business entity’s pending need for cash to the entity’s present cash and near cash position. 9.3.2.2 Acid test ratio The acid test ratio, otherwise known as the quick ratio, is the same as the current ratio except that the current assets component excludes the inventory. Inventory is excluded because it is deemed to be the least liquid item of the current assets. Like the current ratio, the acid test ratio is meant to reflect the entity’s ability to pay its short-term obligations, and the higher the acid test ratio, the more liquid the entity’s position. 9.3.2.3 Trade receivables collection period The trade receivables collection period ratio represents the time lag between a credit sale and receiving payment from the customer. As trade receivables relate to credit sales, the credit sales figure is used to calculate the ratio. The closing and opening balances of trade receivables are averaged and used in the calculation. This ratio is normally calculated in the number of days that a business takes to collect cash from the trade receivables. This ratio highlights both the collection efforts made by the business and the quality of trade receivables. The shorter is the collection period of receivables, the better for a business entity. 268 9.3.2.4 Trade payables settlement period The trade payables settlement period ratio represents the time lag between a credit purchase and making payment to the supplier. As trade payables relate to credit purchases, credit purchases figure should be used in calculating this ratio. The closing and opening balances of trade payables are averaged and used in the calculation. Like other ratios, this ratio is observed over a period of time and compared with the other businesses in the same industry. In addition, the trade payables payment period is compared with the trade receivables collection period to compare the pace of receiving and paying cash on trading activities. 9.3.2.5 Inventory turnover rate The inventory turnover ratio is one of the yardsticks that are used to measure the efficiency with which the entity’s inventory is being managed. It is a rough measure of how many times per year the inventory level is replaced (turned over). It is calculated by dividing the cost of sales by the average of closing and opening inventories. Generally, higher than average inventory turnovers are suggestive of good inventory management. Low turnovers may result from excessive inventory levels. On the other hand, abnormally high inventory turnovers may indicate inventory levels so low that shortages of inventory will occur, and future sales opportunities may be jeopardised. 9.3.2.6 Inventory-holding period The inventory-holding period measures the number of days it takes to convert inventory into sales. The inventory-holding period is calculated by multiplying the average inventory by the number of days in a year (365) and dividing the result by the cost of sales for that period. The higher this period, the higher the investment in inventory, which indicates that funds that could be used to improve the entity’s ability to meet its short-term obligations are tied up in inventory. 9.3.3 Solvency ratios Solvency ratios are used to measure the extent to which an entity can meet its long-term obligations and remain solvent. An entity's financing is obtained from equity and the borrowing of money. The greater the proportion of the loans (debt) regarding the equity, the greater the risk will be for the entity and the financier. The following are two basic solvency ratios covered in this module: • • Debt-equity ratio Times interest earned ratio 9.3.3.1 Debt-equity ratio The debt-equity ratio is a leverage ratio that measures the weight of total debt and financial liabilities against total equity. This ratio highlights how the entity’s capital structure is leaned toward either debt or equity financing. The debt-equity ratio is calculated by dividing total longterm debt (non-current liabilities) by total equity. A higher debt-equity ratio indicates a levered entity, which may be preferable for an entity that is stable with significant cash flow generation, but not preferable for an entity that is in decline. Conversely, a lower ratio indicates an entity 269 that is less levered and closer to being fully equity financed. The appropriate debt to equity ratio varies by industry. 9.3.3.2 Times interest earned ratio The times interest earned ratio measures the entity’s ability to meet its interest on debt obligations on a periodic basis. This ratio can be calculated by dividing the entity’s profit before interest (and tax) by interest expense. The ratio shows the number of times that an entity could, theoretically, pay its interest expenses should it devote all of its profit before interest (and tax) to interest payment. The times interest earned's main purpose is to help quantify the entity’s probability of default on interest payment. This, in turn, helps determine relevant debt parameters such as the appropriate interest rate to be charged or the amount of debt that a company can safely absorb. Generally, the higher the times interest earned ratio, the better. 9.4 The limitations of financial statement analysis Financial statement analysis is widely used by the entity’s management, its creditors, and potential investors. It is an important technique, and anyone wishing to have a complete understanding of managerial finance must have a good grasp of it. Nevertheless, financial analysis has limitations and potential problems, including the following: ➢ Financial statements are prepared following the accrual basis of accounting and are historical in nature. The figures presented on the current financial statements may thus not be closely related to cash flows. ➢ Because of alternative accounting treatments, comparisons among entities within the same industries, may be difficult. Furthermore, one entity’s accounting procedures may change over time, making trend analysis less reliable. ➢ Large entities have multiple divisions operating in multiple industries. Compilation of the industry averages may therefore be difficult, and the benchmarking can be inaccurate. ➢ Inflationary periods can significantly distort an entity’s recorded values relative to the actual market values. Inventory costs and depreciation charges may affect the calculation of profits. Inflation can distort the comparison of ratios for several entities, or one entity’s ratios over time. ➢ Financial ratios can be used to assess whether the performance of an entity is satisfactory, by comparing it with other entities operating in the same industry, and by comparing current period results with those achieved in the previous accounting periods. However, ratios do not always provide explanations for observed changes, and further inquiry is sometimes needed. Therefore, the interpretation of calculated ratios requires a certain level of knowledge about the entity and the industry in which the entity operates to arrive at an informed decision. The above limitations do not make the ratio analysis less useful but highlight problems that analysts should be aware of when interpreting the ratios. Ratio analysis conducted in a blunt manner can be dangerous, but if used carefully, it can provide useful insight into an entity’s performance and financial position. 270 9.6 Exercises and solutions Work through the exercises, noting how the different ratios are calculated and the very basic interpretation of the ratios when comparing them with those for the previous year. EXERCISE 9.1 The following information pertains to Usuthu CC. USUTHU CC STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED 28 FEBRUARY 20.15 20.15 20.14 R R Revenue 360 000 307 500 Cost of sales (270 000) (225 000) Inventory (1 March 20.14) 66 000 58 000 Purchases 273 000 233 000 339 000 291 000 Inventory (28 February 20.15) (69 000) (66 000) Gross profit Other income Interest income 90 000 1 000 1 000 82 500 1 000 1 000 Distribution, administrative and other expenses Administration expenses Depreciation Remuneration: Accounting officer Finance costs Interest on long-term loan 91 000 (69 000) 45 000 9 000 15 000 (15 000) (15 000) 83 500 (61 000) 43 000 8 000 10 000 10 000 10 000 Profit before tax Income tax expense Profit for the year Other comprehensive income for the year Total comprehensive income for the year 7 000 (2 000) 5 000 5 000 12 500 (3 600) 8 900 8 900 271 EXERCISE 9.1 (continued) USUTHU CC STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET INVESTMENT OF MEMBERS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 28 FEBRUARY 20.15 Members' Retained contriTotal earnings butions R R R Balances at 1 March 20.14 100 000 19 000 119 000 Members' contributions 23 000 23 000 Total comprehensive income for the year 5 000 5 000 123 000 24 000 147 000 USUTHU CC STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 28 FEBRUARY 20.15 20.15 R ASSETS Non-current assets 115 000 Property, plant and equipment 107 000 Fixed deposit 8 000 Current assets 137 000 Inventories 69 000 Trade receivables 68 000 20.14 R 100 000 92 000 8 000 123 000 66 000 57 000 Total assets 252 000 223 000 EQUITY AND LIABILITIES Total equity Members' contributions Retained earnings Total liabilities Non-current liabilities Long-term borrowings Current liabilities Trade payables Bank overdraft 147 000 123 000 24 000 105 000 50 000 50 000 55 000 41 000 14 000 119 000 100 000 19 000 104 000 50 000 50 000 54 000 36 000 18 000 Total equity and liabilities 252 000 223 000 Additional information 1. Credit sales amounted to R330 000 and R270 000 for years 20.15 and 20.14 respectively. 2. All of the purchases for both years were on credit. 3. The fixed deposit was acquired at the Second National Bank at 12,5% interest per annum. The money was invested on 1 March 20.13 for five years. 272 EXERCISE 9.1 (continued) 4. The balance of trade receivables and trade payables in year 20.13 amounted to R55 000 and R34 000 respectively. 5. The closing balance of inventory on 28 February 20.13 amounted to R63 000. REQUIRED Calculate and comment on the profitability, liquidity and solvency ratios of Usuthu CC. SOLUTION 9.1 1. PROFITABILITY Return on equity: 20.15 Return on equity = Profit before tax 20.14 R7 000 R12 500 × 100 : × 100 R147 000 R119 000 = 4,76% : = 10,50% × 100 = Total equity There is a remarkable deterioration in the return on equity of 5,74% (10,5 – 4,76%) in 20.15. Return on total assets: 20.15 20.14 Return Profit before interest and tax R22 000 R22 500 on total = × 100 = × 100 : × 100 Total assets R252 000 R223 000 assets = 8,73% : = 10,09% Profit before interest and tax: 2015: R(7 000 + 15 000) = R22 000 2014: R(15 500 + 10 000) = R22 500 There was a deterioration in the return on assets of 1,36% (10,09% – 8,73%) in 20.15. Gross profit percentage: Gross profit percentage = Gross profit Sales × 100 = 20.15 R90 000 R360 000 = 25,00% × 100 : 20.14 R82 500 R307 500 : = 26,83% × 100 The gross profit margin deteriorated by 1,83% (26,83% – 25,00%) in 20.15, which is one of the reasons why the other profitability ratios deteriorated. Profit margin: Profit margin = Profit before tax Sales × 100 = 20.15 R7 000 R360 000 = 1,94% × 100 : 20.14 R12 500 R307 500 : = 4,07% × 100 273 The profit margin deteriorated by 2,13% (4,07% – 1,94%), which can be attributed to an increase in expenses and the decrease in the gross profit percentage. Financial leverage: Return on equity Financial leverage = Return on assets = 20.15 4,76% 8,73% = 0,55 : 20.14 10,50% 10,09% : = 1,04 The financial leverage declined to a very low level in 20.15, which is an indication of inefficient use of borrowed funds during the year. Leverage effect: 20.15 4,76% (8,73%) (3,97%) Return on equity Less: Return on assets 20.14 10,50% (10,09%) (0,41%) The members of the corporation received a negative return of 3,97% on their investment in 20.15, indicating that the borrowed money was not effectively used. The situation was better in 20.14 because a positive return of 0.41% was received. LIQUIDITY Current ratio: Current ratio = Current assets Current liabilities = 20.15 R137 000 R55 000 = 2,49 : 1 : 20.14 R123 000 R54 000 : = 2,28 : 1 The current ratio of Usuthu CC indicates a healthy liquidity position. However, it is increasing and is higher than the standard of 2:1, thus indicating a larger than necessary investment in current assets. Acid test ratio: Current assets less inventory Current liabilities = = 20.15 R(137 000 – 100 000) R55 000 1,24: 1 : 20.14 R(123 000 – 66 000) := R54 000 1,06 : 1 The acid test ratio of Usuthu CC is good although it is higher than the standard of 1:1, which indicates that the CC's current liabilities are well covered by current assets even after the exclusion of inventory. That is an indication of a good liquidity position of the entity. Trade receivables collection period: 20.15 20.14 Average trade receivables R62 500* R56 000** × 365 = × 365 : × 365 Credit sales R330 000 R270 000 = 69,13 days : = 75,70 days * Average trade receivables: R(68 000 + 57 000) = R125 000 ÷ 2 = R62 500 ** Average trade receivables: R(57 000 + 55 000) = R112 000 ÷ 2 = R56 000 274 The collection period improved from 75,70 days in year 20.0 to 69,13 days in year 20.15. Debtors currently settle their accounts 6,57 days earlier when compared with the year 20.14. Trade payables settlement period: 20.15 Average trade payables R38 500* × 365 = × 365 : Credit purchases R273 000 = 51,47 days : 20.14 R35 000** × 365 R233 000 = 54,83 days * Average trade payables: R(41 000 + 36 000) = R77 000 ÷ 2 = R38 500 ** Average trade payables: R(36 000 + 34 000) = R70 000 ÷ 2 = R35 000 Currently it takes Usuthu CC 51,47 days to settle its creditors' accounts. Compared with year 20.14, it is a slight deterioration of the ratio as the number of days Usuthu CC is required to settle its creditors' accounts 3,36 days earlier than it in year 20.14. Comparing this ratio with the trade receivables collection period, Usuthu CC is in a less favourable position, as the time it takes the CC to receive its money owed by its debtors is longer than the time the CC is required to settle its creditor's accounts. Inventory turnover rate: = Cost of sales Average inventory = 20.15 R270 000 20.14 R225 000 : R67 500* R64 000** = 4 times : = 3,49 times * Average inventory: R(69 000 + 66 000) = R135 000 ÷ 2 = R67 500 ** Average inventory: R(66 000 + 63 000) = R129 000 ÷ 2 = R64 500 Usuthu CC recorded an improvement in the inventory turnover rate in year 20.15 when compared with 20.14. Improvement in this rate can be attributed to good management of inventory, which usually leads to the saving of costs associated with holding inventory for longer periods. Inventory-holding period: Average inventory x 365 Cost of sales = 20.15 R67 500* x 365 R270 000 20.14 R64 500* x 365 R225 000 = 91,25 days 104,63 days * Refer to the calculation of inventory turnover rate The inventory-holding period indicates the number of days that inventory is on hand, that is, the period it takes the entity to sell its inventory. Usuthu CC recorded a decrease in the number of days it keeps its inventory. This is an improvement in rate, which can be attributed, amongst other things, to improved marketing strategies by the entity as inventory is sold quicker than it was in the previous year. 275 3 SOLVENCY Debt-equity ratio: Total debt Total equity × 100 = 20.15 R105 000 R147 000 × 100 : = 71,43% 20.14 R104 000 R119 000 × 100 : = 87,39% The level of debt in the entity's financial structure reported in year 20.15 is much less when compared with year 20.14. This is an improvement in the ratio as high level of debt-equity ratio generally means that the entity is aggressively financing its assets with debt than equity. Times interest earned ratio: Profit before interest Interest expense = 20.15 R22 000 R15 000 = 1,47 times : 20.14 R22 500 R10 000 : = 2,25 times The number of times interest payment is covered by the profit deteriorated in year 20.15 when compared with year 20.14. 276 EXERCISE 9.2 The following information appeared in the accounting records of Ginger Limited: GINGER LIMITED BALANCES AS AT 28 FEBRUARY 20.15 Share capital Retained earnings Long-term loan: Globe Bank Furniture and fittings (at carrying amount) Inventories Trade payables control Trade receivables control Bank Income tax payable Sales Purchases Administrative expenses Interest on long-term loan Ordinary dividend paid 20.15 R 100 000 30 000 100 000 120 000 100 000 110 000 88 000 33 000 1 000 400 000 320 000 50 000 10 000 5 000 20.14 R 100 000 10 000 100 000 140 000 80 000 99 000 66 000 25 000 2 000 360 000 290 000 45 000 10 000 2 000 Additional information 1. The opening inventory for the year ending 20.14 amounted to R75 000. Required (a) Calculate all the profitability and liquidity ratios for both years of Ginger Limited and comment on the financial position and results of the company's activities. (b) Briefly discuss the implications of a higher debt-equity ratio. (c) Calculate and comment briefly on the solvency position of Ginger Limited for the years ended 2019 and 2018. 277 SOLUTION 9.2: (a) PROFITABILITY RATIOS Gross profit percentage: Gross profit percentage = Gross profit Sales × 100 = 20.15 R100 000 R400 000 = 25,00% × 100 : 20.14 R75 000 R360 000 : = 20,83% × 100 The 20.15 gross profit percentage has improved when compared with 20.14. Any change in the gross profit percentage is associated with elements that affect the gross profit, that is, mark-up, sales mix, inventory levels, and different forms of discounts. Profit margin: Profit before tax Sales × 100 = 20.15 R40 000 R400 000 = 10,00% × 100 : 20.14 R20 000 R360 000 : = 5,56% × 100 An improvement in the profit margin is recorded in 20.15 when compared with 20.14. An improvement in the profit margin can, amongst others, be attributed to efficient management of distribution, administrative and other operating expenses. Return on assets (ROA): Profit before interest Total assets × 100 = 20.15 R50 000 R341 000 = 14,66% × 100 : 20.14 R30 000 R311 000 : = 9,65% × 100 The return on assets improved in the year 20.15. This indicates that the entity was more profitable in 20.15 when compared with 20.14. This can be traced to the entity's ability to utilise assets efficiently to generate profits. Return on equity (ROE) Profit before tax Total equity × 100 = 20.15 R40 000 R130 000 = 30,77% × 100 : 20.14 R20 000 R110 000 : = 18,18% × 100 A significant increase in the return on equity of the entity is recorded in year 20.15. Generally, increases in the return on equity ratio are attributed to decreases in expenses, increases in profit mark-ups, and decreases in equity. The increase in this ratio can also be linked to an increase in profit. 278 SOLUTION 9.2 (continued) Financial leverage: Return on equity Return on assets = 20.15 30,77% 14,66% = 2,10 20.14 18,18% : 9,65% : = 1,88 The company's financial leverage improved in 2019 when compared with 2018. Leverage effect: Return on equity Less: Return on total assets 20.15 20.14 30,77% : (14,66%) 18,18% (9,65%) 16,11% 8,53% : The leverage effect of Ginger Limited indicates that the owners (shareholders) received more on their investment than they would have if they had financed everything themselves. LIQUIDITY RATIOS Current ratio: Current assets = 20.15 R221 000 R111 000 = 1,99 : 1 Current liabilities : 20.14 R171 000 R101 000 : = 1,69 : 1 The company's current ratio increased by 17,75% over the year, which is an ideal result for the company. This means that each R1 of the current liabilities is covered by R1,99 of current assets or a margin of 99%. Acid test ratio: Current assets less inventory Current liabilities = = 20.15 R(221 000 – 100 000) R111 000 1,09: 1 : 20.14 R(171 000 – 80 000) R101 000 : = 0,9 : 1 The company's acid test ratio improved by more than 100%, which is good coverage of current liabilities. It means that each R1 of current liabilities is covered by R1,09 of "quick" assets. This also indicates that the cash flow position of the company is favourable. Trade receivables collection period: 20.15 20.14 Average trade receivables R70 000* R60 000** × 365 = × 365 : × 365 Credit sales R400 000 R360 000 = 64 days : = 61 days * R(80 000 + 60 000) ÷ 2 = R70 000 ** R60 000 (In the absence of prior year amount) 279 SOLUTION 9.2 (continued) The company's credit control weakened as debtors' amounts were outstanding for a longer period in 20.15 than in 20.14. Ginger Limited decreased its collection period by 4,92%, which was accompanied by 11,11% in sales. This means that the company extended its credit terms to boost sales. Trade payables settlement period: 20.15 20.14 Average trade payables R95 000* R90 000** × 365 = × 365 : × 365 Credit purchases R320 000 R290 000 = 108 days : = 113 days * R(100 000 + 90 000) ÷ 2 = R95 000 ** R90 000 (In the absence of prior year amount) Ginger Limited paid its creditors sooner in 20.15 than in 20.14. When compared with the trade receivables collection period, the trade payables settlement period is still favourable to the company's cash flow. The company will receive payments from its debtors sooner than it would be required to settle its creditors' accounts. Inventory turnover rate: = Cost of sales Average inventory = 20.15 R300 000 20.14 R285 000 : R90 000* R77 500** = 3,3 times : = 3,7 times * R(100 000 + 80 000) ÷ 2 = R90 000 ** R(80 000 + 75 000) ÷ 2 = R77 500 The inventory moved a bit slower in 20.15 when compared with 20.14. Lower inventory turnover ratio is considered a negative indicator of ineffective inventory management. However, a lower inventory turnover ratio will not always mean bad inventory management performance. It may in some instances indicate adequate inventory levels, which may result in an increase in sales. (b) Implications of a higher debt-equity ratio: The debt-equity ratio is the ratio of total debt (liabilities) to total equity. This ratio indicates the extent to which debt is covered by owners' equity. A higher debt-equity ratio indicates excessive financial risk. Whilst a higher debt-equity ratio may be unattractive because of the high level of risk, a very low ratio would also be unattractive because it may indicate forgone opportunity to earn higher returns from borrowed funds. (c) SOLVENCY POSITION Debt-equity ratio: Total debt Total equity 280 × 100 = 20.15 R211 000 R130 000 = 162,31% × 100 : 20.14 R201 000 R110 000 : = 182,73% × 100 Times interest earned ratio: Profit before interest Interest expense = 20.15 R50 000 R10 000 = 5 times : 20.14 R30 000 R10 000 : = 3 times The extent of debt financing is too high. This indicates that Ginger Limited uses higher levels of debt to finance its growth. This indicates that the company's assets are largely funded through debt financing. However, whilst the level of debt is astronomically high, the company can generate good returns for the owners (shareholders), as indicated by the leverage effect. The company can also generate adequate profits to settle interest payments. CALCULATIONS Gross profit Sales Cost of sales Opening inventory Purchases Closing inventory 20.15 R 400 000 (300 000) 80 000 320 000 (100 000) 20.14 R 360 000 (285 000) 75 000 290 000 (80 000) Gross profit 100 000 75 000 R 100 000 (50 000) 50 000 (10 000) 40 000 R 75 000 (45 000) 30 000 (10 000) 20 000 Profit for the year before interest and tax Gross profit Administrative expenses Profit before interest Interest expense Profit before tax Total assets Non-current assets Furniture and fittings Current assets Inventories Trade receivables Bank R 120 000 120 000 221 000 100 000 88 000 33 000 R 140 000 140 000 171 000 80 000 66 000 25 000 Total assets 341 000 311 000 R 100 000 30 000 130 000 R 100 000 10 000 110 000 R 110 000 1 000 111 000 R 99 000 2 000 101 000 Equity Share capital Retained earnings Current liabilities Trade payables Bank overdraft Current liabilities 281 SOLUTION 9.2 (continued) Total debt Long-term loan Trade payables Income tax payable 282 R 100 000 110 000 1 000 211 000 R 100 000 99 000 2 000 201 000 Self-assessment After having worked through this learning unit, are you able to do the following? Yes • Discuss the nature, scope and objectives of financial statement analysis. • Understand the need for financial statement analysis. • Define, calculate and interpret the following ratios: • − Return on equity − Return on total assets − Gross profit percentage − Profit margin − Financial leverage and leverage effect − Current ratio − Acid test ratio − Trade receivables collection period − Trade payables settlement period − Inventory turnover rate − Inventory-holding period − Debt-equity ratio − Times interest earned No Discuss the limitations of financial statement analysis. If you answered "yes" to all of the assessment criteria, you can now focus on revision of the study material for the exams. If your answer was "no" to any of the criteria, revise those sections concerned before commencing with the revision of the study material. 283
0
You can add this document to your study collection(s)
Sign in Available only to authorized usersYou can add this document to your saved list
Sign in Available only to authorized users(For complaints, use another form )