1.What is the main argument of the documentary?
The documentary makes the argument that our perspective of the impact of
international aid is wrong and that the way we as donors of aid (in developed
countries) help the poor (in developing countries) must change. The current donation
of aid represents and instils the feeling of helplessness and reliance into poor
countries populations. It also truly hinders economic growth in these countries and
keeps the developing countries from becoming developed countries. The current aid
system has a negative impact on local businesses and local entrepreneurs as it
diminishes/destroys the chances of their businesses taking off.
2.How does the documentary portray the relationship between aid organizations and
local communities? 2 examples.
It portrays a problematic relationship; wherein local communities seem to value aid
but the long-term effect can easily be bad for businesses and economic growth. A
good example is the effect of free goods on businesses in developing countries.
Example, Toms shoe company that freely gives a pair of shoes away to an
underprivileged person in Argentina when someone buys a pair elsewhere. The
supply of free shoes causes all the local shoe manufacturers to take a hit as
residents don’t want to pay for shoes because they can receive free shoes. This
forces many local companies and manufacturers to close down. A second example
would be the donation from foreigners to orphanages in poor countries and places
like Haiti. These donations and increasing number of orphanages encourages poor
families to give their children up for adoption because it’s a beter life and easier way
out of resposibilities. The children loose emotional ties with parents.It disrupts
communities and increases the number of orphans.
3.Solutions proposed by poverty inc. to improve development in 3 rd world countries?
The need to empower local entrepreneurs and businesses. Remove free foreign aid
to help economic growth. The documentary also mentions a change from aid to
trade. Allow developing countries to trade on a global level, give them a door in.
Motivate them to source goods from local businesses. Create partnerships with poor
countries entrepreneurs to help them achieve their dreams. The documentary also
mentions the need for rule of law (people’s rights to be protected) as well as property
rights (people need land ownership rights, to invest and not be afraid of losing their
land).
Paul Roos 28400739
4.How does poverty inc. challenge common perceptions about poverty in Africa?
People outside of Africa view the people of Africa as helpless and poor with
absolutely no way out of their circumstances. This is incorrect; the documentary
describes Africa as the most resource rich continent in the world but the struggle
takes place when these local businesses and farmers don’t have any support from
government or when these incorrect external perspectives force international aid on
them. People are just isolated from the global market, they aren’t stupid.
5.