DECLARATION
I, Ms. DIVYA KRUPA ANTHONY, Roll Number 121322084020, a student of
B.Com III CAP , St. Francis College for Women, Begumpet,
Hereby declare that the Project Work titled A STUDY ON CONSUMER
PERSPECTIVE ON E-VEHICLES is my own work and has been
completed by me under the Supervision of Ms. LATHA SUBRAMANIAN,
Asst. Professeur Dept. of Commerce, St. Francis College for Women,
Hyderabad.
I hereby declare that the results embodied in this work have not been submitted
to any other Institution or University for an award of Degree or diploma.
Date:
Place:
DIVYA KRUPA ANTHONY
121322084020
B. Com Computer Applications
Dept. of Commerce
St. Francis College for Women,
Begumpet, Hyderabad-16
Ⅰ
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to St. Francis College for Women for
providing me with the necessary resources and a conducive environment to pursue
this project. The support from my college has been invaluable in completing this
work.
My deepest appreciation goes to Dr. Uma Joseph, the Principal of St. Francis
College for Women, for her constant encouragement and leadership. I would like to
thank Dr Sunitha Head, Department of Commerce, for her constant support and
encouragement
I would also like to extend my sincere thanks to Ms. Latha Subramanian, my
project guide, for her expert guidance, unwavering support, and insightful
feedback. Her invaluable advice has been instrumental in shaping the direction of
my project and enhancing its quality.
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to everyone who has supported me
throughout the course of this project. This work would not have been possible
without the guidance, encouragement, and resources provided by my college,
faculty, and mentors. I am deeply thankful for the opportunity to learn and grow
during this process.
DIVYA KRUPA ANTHONY
121322084020
B.Com Computer Application
Ⅱ
Table of Contents
Chapter no.
Content
Pg.no
Introduction
1
1.1 Introduction
2
1.2 Statement of problem/Importance/Need
for the study
3
1.3 Objectives of the study
4
1.4 Research Methodology
4
1.5 Scope of the Study
4
II
Review of Literature
5-31
III
Data Analysis
32-78
IV
Findings, Conclusions & Suggestions
79
4.1 Findings
80
4.2 Conclusions
82
4.3 Suggestions
83
I
References, Bibliography and Webliography/Annexure
i-x
Ⅲ
TABLE OF CHARTS
Chart no.
Chart Title
Pg no.
3.1
Gender (Demographic Feature)
33
3.2
Residential Status
34
3.4
Age (Demographic Feature)
36
3.5
Education
37
3.6
Income Range
38
3.7
Transport Preference
38
3.8
Considered Buying an Electric Vehicle
39
3.11
Price Preference
44
3.12
Mileage preference for Daily driving
45
3.13
Charging Preference
46
3.14
Ev’s replacing Fuel vehicles
47
3.15
Used an Electric Vehicle
49
3.16
Plans to Switch to an Electric Vehicle
50
3.17
Value for Money
51
3.18
Comfortable for You
52
3.20
Reasons for Switching
54
3.21
Recommend an Electric Vehicle
56
3.22
Which Vehicle Type is More Economical
58
3.23
Charge Preference
59
3.25
Your Primary Reason for Not Purchasing an Electric
Two-Wheeler
61
3.26
Brand Preference
62
Ⅳ
3.28
Brand Reputation
65
3.29
Satisfaction with the Availability of Service Centers
66
3.30
Financing Options
68
3.31
Features of Electric Two-Wheelers
69
3.32
Spend on Monthly Charging Costs
71
3.34
Confidence in Safety
73
3.35
What Would Make You Feel More Comfortable About
Buying an Electric Two-Wheeler
75
3.36
Are Electric Two-Wheelers More Suitable for City or
Rural Areas
76
TABLE OF GRAPHS
3.3
Current City of Residence
35
3.9
Important Characteristics
41
3.10
Deal Breaker Characteristics
42
3.19
Mileage comparison
53
3.24
Awareness of Electric Vehicles
59
3.33
Home Charging
72
Ⅴ
1. INTRODUCTION
1
1.1 Introduction
An electric vehicle (EV) is a vehicle that uses an electric motor and battery to run, and can be
charged from an external source. The vehicle is run by an electric motor which is charged with
the help of an external source. India's first electric vehicle was a three-wheeler called the
VIKRAM SAFA, invented by Scooter's India Pvt Ltd in 1996. Around 400 of these vehicles
were made and sold. EV is an acronym for an Electric Vehicle. ELectric mobility was first
introduced in the 80’s, it took 4 decades for the consumers to fully trust and accept EV’s as a
regular mode of transport. Electric vehicles (EVs) have brought a whole new shift in the
automotive world , they were designed to reduce the dependency on fossil fuels and lower
carbon emissions. By default, EVs run using electricity stored in batteries rather than petrol or
diesel. There are 3 types of Electric Vehicles. Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) run entirely on
electric power and require recharging from an external power source, these are primarily used
by consumers in Hyderabad. Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs) combine an electric
motor with a gasoline engine, allowing them to be charged externally and offering the
flexibility of driving longer distances when the battery is depleted, Hybrid Electric Vehicles
(HEVs) These use a combination of an internal combustion engine and an electric motor, but
the battery is charged through regenerative braking and the engine itself, rather than by
plugging in. The EV’s were introduced with the primary goal of building a sustainable 84
environment for a better future.
The Indian government has introduced several initiatives to promote electric vehicles (EVs)
and related infrastructure. The FAME India Scheme Phase II provides financial support to
encourage both the adoption of EVs and the development of charging facilities. The Goods and
Services Tax (GST) on EVs was reduced from 12% to 5%, and the GST on EV charging
stations was also lowered from 18% to 5%. Additionally, buyers can benefit from income tax
deductions on loans taken for EV purchases. Various states offer incentives such as free
registration, special parking, and purchase discounts. The Union Budget 2023–2024 has
removed customs duties on machinery needed for manufacturing lithium-ion batteries. EVs
receive green license plates and don’t require special permits, making them more accessible.
The government has also made it easier to set up EV charging stations, resulting in over
12,000 public stations. Finally, the Electric Mobility Promotion Scheme (EMPS), launched in
2
March 2024, aims to advance green transportation and strengthen the EV manufacturing
ecosystem in India.
Electric vehicles are being adopted widely throughout the world, consumers' perspective is that
they are a one time purchase and a wonderful opportunity to save on their fuel expenses. The
market has adopted the EV’s considering the huge consumer demand. OLA electric bikes have
a prior 2-3 month booking keeping the consumer demand in mind. According to recent surveys,
every 3 out of 10 vehicles on the road are EVs. This paper presents a comprehensive review of
studies on consumer preferences for EV, aiming to better inform policy-makers and give
direction to further research. First, we compare the economic and psychological approach
towards this topic, followed by a conceptual framework of EV preferences which is then
implemented to organize our review. We also briefly review the modeling techniques applied
in the selected studies Estimates of consumer references for financial, technical, infrastructure
and policy attributes a then reviewed.
1.2 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
The aim of this study is to analyze the factors influencing consumer adoption of electric
vehicles (EVs) for daily commuting, with the goal of providing insights to help policymakers
develop supportive policies and assist automakers in understanding consumer needs. By
identifying key influences on EV adoption, the study seeks to educate consumers about the
environmental benefits and cost savings associated with EVs compared to traditional
fuel-powered vehicles. It also emphasizes the importance of conserving fossil fuels for future
generations. Additionally, the study aims to offer valuable feedback for the electric automobile
industry to guide research and development efforts, ensuring that future EVs better align with
consumer preferences. Finally, the findings will serve as a primary reference for future
research, contributing to a deeper understanding of EV adoption trends and informing ongoing
industry and policy developments.
3
1.3 OBJECTIVES
The Objectives of the study are:
➔ To Assess consumer awareness regarding electric vehicles (EVs).
➔ To Identify the key factors
influencing
consumers'
decisions
to purchase
electric-vehicles.
➔ To Examine the extent of consumer awareness about various government initiatives
related to electric-transportation.
1.4 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This study is to be conducted between 18-50 age groups, both males and females. The study is
planned to be conducted through circulation of questionnaires and a total of 150 samples are to
be collected.
Research Instrument: Questionnaire is a research instrument consisting of a series of questions
and other prompts for the purpose of gathering information from respondents.
1.4.1 Data Collection
Data collection: Both primary and secondary data were used for data collection Primary data:
The primary data is to be collected from the sample respondents through the schedule with the
help of the questionnaire which was distributed online.
Secondary data: Secondary data has been collected from research papers published on
metropolitan cities, various websites.
1.5 SCOPE OF THE STUDY
The scope of this project is limited to the twin cities of Hyderabad and Secunderabad.
4
2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE
5
Article 1 by IJCRT:
Synopsis: Consumer Perception Towards E-Vehicles in Vadodara City
Authors: Ajaysinh Parmar (MBA Student) and Prof. Tushar Pradhan (Assistant Professor),
Parul Institute of Management & Research, Parul University, Vadodara, India
Abstract:
The study explores consumer perception towards electric vehicles (E-Vehicles) in Vadodara
City, India. Given the global push towards reducing oil dependence and greenhouse gas
emissions, this research seeks to understand local consumer attitudes, preferences, and
awareness regarding E-Vehicles. The aim is to gauge how likely residents are to adopt
E-Vehicles and identify factors influencing their purchase decisions.
Objectives:
- Assess consumer awareness of E-Vehicles.
- Promote awareness about E-Vehicles.
- Identify factors driving the purchase of E-Vehicles.
- Examine government initiatives related to E-transportation in India.
Methodology:
The research uses a descriptive survey approach, combining secondary research (review of
existing literature) and primary data collected through questionnaires. The sample includes
residents of Vadodara aged 18 to 55, using random, convenience, and quota sampling methods.
6
Key Findings:
1. Demographics: The majority of respondents are male (56%), aged 20-30 (82%), and
employed (55%).
2. Consumer Preferences:
- Vehicle Type: 66% prefer electric bikes over electric bikes or scooters.
- Factors Influencing Purchase: Price, positive environmental impact, low noise level, and
new trends are key motivators.
- Company Preference: Tata (28%) and Hyundai (24%) are the most preferred brands for
E-Vehicles.
3. Awareness and Attitudes:
- 64% are aware of government subsidies for E-Vehicles.
- 57% are likely to consider purchasing a-Vehicle within the next two years.
- Many respondents view E-Vehicles as expensive but acknowledge their potential to replace
conventional bikes and contribute positively to the environment.
4. Chi-Square Test Results: The test results indicate that there is no significant preference for
E-Vehicles over traditional vehicles, as the null hypothesis (consumers do not prefer
E-Vehicles more) was not rejected.
The study finds that while there is some interest in E-Vehicles, particularly electric bikes,
overall consumer preference still leans towards traditional vehicles. Factors such as price and
environmental benefits are crucial in influencing buying decisions. Despite awareness of
government incentives, many consumers find E-Vehicles expensive and may not yet fully
prefer them over conventional vehicles. The study highlights the need for increased awareness
and incentives to boost the adoption of E-Vehicles.
Limitations:
- The research is limited to Vadodara and Parul University campus, which may not be
representative of the broader population.
- Time constraints and the online nature of the survey may have affected response accuracy.
- Future studies should include a larger, more diverse sample and consider geographical
variations.
7
Keywords: Vadodara City, E-Vehicles, Consumer Perception, Environmental Impact,
Government Initiatives.
Article 2 by Delloite:
Synopsis: "Unplugged: Electric Vehicle Realities versus Consumer Expectations"
Electric vehicles (EVs) have been part of the automotive landscape since its early days, but
recent spikes in oil prices and environmental concerns have fueled renewed interest. This study
by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (DTTL) explores consumer attitudes towards pure EVs
through a global survey of over 13,000 individuals across 17 countries.
Key Findings:
1. Consumer Interest:
- Significant interest in EVs exists globally, with China and India leading in potential first
movers at 50% and 59%, respectively. In contrast, Japan and several European countries show
lower enthusiasm, with Japan having only 4% of potential first movers.
- Consumers are generally receptive to considering EVs, though actual adoption rates are
influenced by specific vehicle attributes and regional differences.
2. Consumer Expectations vs. Reality:
Range: Consumers expect EVs to cover longer distances than current models can manage.
While many drivers typically travel less than 80 kilometers daily, they expect ranges closer to
conventional vehicles. Current EVs generally offer around 160 kilometers per charge, falling
short of consumer expectations.
Charge Time: There is a widespread expectation for EVs to charge within two hours or less.
However, most current EVs require 8 hours with standard chargers, highlighting a gap in
convenience.
8
Purchase Price: Consumers are generally unwilling to pay a significant premium for EVs.
Most expect EVs to be priced similarly to or lower than traditional vehicles, despite the high
cost of EV batteries.
Fuel Efficiency: As fuel efficiency of internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles improves,
consumer interest in EVs may decline. For example, if ICE vehicles achieve 50 mpg, over half
of respondents in some countries would be less likely to consider EVs.
3. Consumer Profiles:
- Potential first movers are often well-educated, urban dwellers, and environmentally
conscious individuals. They value EVs for their environmental benefits, technological appeal,
and trendiness but are sensitive to government incentives and charging costs.
4. Regional Differences:
- Interest and expectations vary significantly by region. For instance, North American and
European consumers exhibit different price sensitivities and range expectations compared to
those in South America or Asia.
Challenges and Considerations:
- To align with consumer expectations, automakers will need to address limitations in range,
charge time, and price. Technological advancements and infrastructure improvements are
crucial for meeting these demands.
- The impact of fluctuating fuel prices on EV adoption and the necessity of balancing cost
and technology will play significant roles in shaping the future of EV market penetration.
Overall, while there is a growing interest in EVs, significant gaps remain between consumer
expectations and current technological capabilities. Addressing these gaps will be key to
broader EV adoption.
Article 3 by Transportation Research:
9
This study provides a comprehensive examination of factors influencing consumer preferences
for electric vehicles (EVs) and the role of consumer behavior in this context. It addresses three
primary areas: sociodemographic variables, bike attributes, and environmental settings such as
governmental support schemes and infrastructure development.
Key Findings:
1. Sociodemographic Variables:
- Higher education, higher income, having children, living in urban areas, and vehicle
ownership are positively associated with EV preference.
- Men with higher salaries living in suburban areas are more likely to have EV experience.
However, their preference for EVs does not significantly differ from other groups when prices
are equalized.
2. Experience and Preference:
- Previous research supports the idea that experience with EVs encourages adoption. Yet, the
study found that lower-income groups may not have had such experiences due to price barriers
but might still share similar preferences as those with EV experience.
3. Reputation and Social Influence:
- Consumers driven by reputation tend to prefer more expensive vehicles, including EVs,
highlighting that lower-cost green products might not fulfill their desire for status signaling.
4. Government Incentives:
- Governmental incentives are crucial for EV adoption. The study validates the need for
support schemes like Spain's “MOVES III” program and emphasizes improving infrastructure
and information availability to address consumer misconceptions.
Policy Implications:
- Incentives and Support: Continued and enhanced governmental incentives are essential to
boost EV adoption, particularly to overcome price barriers.
10
- Infrastructure Development: Developing robust EV infrastructure is vital for supporting
increased EV use.
- Consumer Education: Increasing public awareness and understanding of EV performance and
benefits can help overcome misconceptions and encourage adoption.
Limitations:
- The study is correlational, not experimental, so causation cannot be firmly established.
- It focuses broadly on EVs, including hybrid and plug-in vehicles, which may not directly
translate to pure battery electric vehicles (BEVs).
- Future research should explore environmental concerns in greater depth, focus on BEVs
specifically, and consider the evolving attitudes towards bike ownership and bike-sharing
among younger generations.
Future Research Directions:
- Investigate the psychological factors influencing consumer behavior towards EVs, including
the symbolic value of green products.
- Conduct cross-country comparisons to generalize findings and address research gaps in
Southern European countries.
- Analyze the influence of automotive brands on consumer preferences, particularly in the
context of luxury versus non-luxury EVs.
This study contributes valuable insights into consumer behavior and preferences regarding EV
adoption and provides a foundation for future research and policy development aimed at
enhancing the uptake of electric vehicles.
Article 4 by KANTAR:
Study Overview:
Kantar surveyed 4,000 individuals across the US, UK, Germany, and Singapore to explore
consumer attitudes toward electric vehicles (EVs), focusing on motivations, concerns, and
11
preferences. The study also examined consumer trust in auto-pilot technology and preferences
for traditional versus specialty EV makers.
Key Findings:
Current Adoption of EVs:
- US: Lowest adoption rate with only 3% of bike owners driving EVs. 87% still drive gasoline
bikes.
- UK and Germany: 5% of primary bikes are EVs. Over half of bike owners drive gasoline
bikes, with a notable portion using diesel.
- Singapore: Highest adoption rate with 10% driving EVs. The market is diverse with a mix of
gasoline, hybrid, diesel, and EVs.
Consumer Preferences for Next Purchase:
- US & Germany: Gasoline bikes are the most popular choice for the next bike. In the US, 17%
prefer an EV, and in Germany, 22% prefer an EV.
- UK: Hybrid bikes are the most preferred, with 35% considering them for their next purchase.
EVs are considered by 22%.
- Singapore: EVs are the top choice for 39% of potential buyers, with hybrids at 32%.
Motivators for EV Purchase:
- US, UK, Germany: Key motivators include cost savings on fuel and maintenance, and
environmental impact.
- Singapore: Availability of charging stations, brand reputation, and environmental impact are
top motivators.
Concerns and Barriers:
- US & UK: High purchase cost is the primary barrier.
- Germany: Main concerns are limited driving range (range anxiety) and lack of charging
infrastructure.
- Singapore: Concerns include battery life and replacement.
12
Hybrid bikes vs. EVs:
- UK & Singapore: Significant interest in hybrid bikes due to concerns about EV charging
infrastructure and costs.
- Germany: Highest concern about the lack of charging infrastructure; high cost of EVs also a
deterrent.
Traditional vs. Specialty EV Makers
- US, UK, Germany: Preference for traditional bike makers among potential buyers.
- Singapore: Preference for specialty EV makers like Tesla.
- Financial Influence: Consumers with better financial standing in the US and UK lean towards
traditional bike makers, while those with tighter budgets show more interest in specialty EV
brands.
Study Methodology:
- Conducted online with 4,000 respondents from the US, UK, Germany, and Singapore.
- Data collection occurred between April 3 and April 10, 2023, using the Kantar Profiles
Audience Network.
The study reveals diverse attitudes towards EVs across different markets. While cost and
environmental benefits drive adoption, significant barriers include high purchase prices and
limited charging infrastructure. Preferences also vary between traditional and specialty EV
makers, influenced by consumer budget and market maturity.
Article 5 by HERO FINCORP:
Blog Synopsis: Electric Bike vs Petrol Bike - Which One is Better for You?
Date: August 10, 2023
Author: Hero FinCorp Team
Views: 9523
13
Overview:
Choosing between an electric vehicle (EV) and a petrol bike requires careful consideration.
With rising fuel prices and increased EV options in India, understanding the differences
between these types of vehicles is crucial for making an informed decision. This blog
compares electric and petrol bikes based on various parameters to help you choose the best
option for your needs.
Key Differences:
Fuel Requirement:
- Petrol bike: Operates on petrol using an internal combustion engine.
- Electric bike: Runs on electric power stored in batteries, requiring recharging.
Cost:
- Petrol bike: Lower initial purchase price but higher long-term fuel and maintenance costs.
- Electric bike: Higher purchase price but lower running costs due to cheaper electricity
compared to petrol.
Recharge/Refueling:
- Petrol bike: Requires visits to a petrol pump.
- Electric bike: Can be recharged at home or public charging stations.
carbon Emissions:
- Petrol bike: Emits high levels of CO2, contributing to pollution.
- Electric bike: Zero emissions, making it a more environmentally friendly option.
Registration:
- Petrol bike: Requires registration charges based on the vehicle’s price.
- Electric bike: Currently benefits from no registration charges.
Insurance:
14
- Petrol bike: Typically has lower insurance premiums.
- Electric bike: Insurance premiums are generally higher.
Pros and Cons:
Electric bikes:
- Pros: Energy efficiency, low emissions, high performance, lower maintenance costs.
- Cons: Longer charging times, higher purchase cost, expensive battery replacement, shorter
range, costly installation of charging points.
Petrol bikes:
- Pros: Lower repair costs, quieter operation, longer service life.
- Cons: High CO2 emissions, less fuel-efficient, requires regular maintenance, higher fuel
costs.
Decision-Making:
Choosing between an electric and petrol bike depends on factors like location and personal
preferences:
- Electric bike: Ideal for urban areas with abundant charging stations and for those concerned
with environmental impact.
- Petrol bike: Suitable for those needing robust performance and longer range on diverse
terrains.
- Hybrid bikes: Offer a balance by combining both technologies, switching engines based on
need.
Deciding between an electric and petrol bike involves evaluating their differences, pros, and
cons. An EV may be a better choice for those focused on reducing their bikebon footprint and
benefiting from lower running costs, while a petrol bike might suit those needing higher
performance and longer range. For those not ready for a new purchase, a pre-owned vehicle
with a used bike loan from Hero FinCorp is an option.
15
Frequently Asked Questions:
1. Is an electric bike better than a petrol bike?
- Depends on usage: EVs are better for daily commuting, while petrol bikes offer more
power for longer distances.
2. Which bike to buy - petrol, diesel, or electric?
- EVs are generally preferable for lower emissions, quieter operation, and lower ongoing
costs.
3. Which is faster, a petrol or an electric bike?
- Petrol bikes can achieve higher top speeds; electric bikes offer quicker acceleration.
4. Do electric bikes have gears?
- Electric bikes typically have a single gear providing full torque at various speeds.
This comparison aims to assist potential bike buyers in making an informed choice based on
their specific needs and preferences.
Article 6 by Research gate (coimbatore city)
Synopsis: Consumer Perception Towards Electric Bikes with Special Reference to Coimbatore
City
Authors:
- Mrs. P. Selvi - Assistant Professor
- Mr. Jerial Gideon.S - III B.Com B&I
- Department of Commerce with Banking and Insurance, Sri Ramakrishna College of Arts and
Science, Coimbatore
Abstract:
16
This study investigates urban commuters' perceptions of electric bikes (e-bikes) in Coimbatore
City. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research surveyed 500 urban commuters and
conducted in-depth interviews with a subset to explore e-bike usage and adoption. Findings
indicate that e-bikes are primarily used for short to medium commutes, with adoption
influenced by costs, infrastructure, and safety concerns. The study suggests strategies to
encourage e-bike use, emphasizing their potential to promote environmentally friendly urban
transportation.
Keywords:
E-Bike, Consumer Perception, Infrastructure
Introduction:
India's extensive road network and high vehicle usage contribute significantly to air pollution
and global warming. As conventional vehicles negatively impact air quality, electric vehicles
(EVs), including e-bikes, offer a greener alternative. Governments are implementing policies
to incentivize the adoption of less polluting vehicles. This study aims to enhance
understanding of public awareness and preferences regarding e-bikes in India, focusing on
Coimbatore.
Statement of the Problem:
The electric vehicle industry in India is nascent, and public awareness about e-bikes needs
improvement. This study seeks to understand consumer awareness and preferences regarding
e-bikes and to identify factors influencing their adoption.
Objectives:
1. To analyze the socio-economic background of e-bike users.
2. To assess the level of awareness among consumers regarding e-bikes.
3. To identify factors influencing e-bike sales.
Scope of the Study:
17
The study examines consumer behavior related to e-bikes in Coimbatore, focusing on
post-purchase behavior and factors driving e-bike adoption. It aims to uncover insights into the
motivations behind e-bike purchases and the forces influencing consumer decisions.
Research Methodology:
- Research Design: Descriptive research design aimed at systematically describing the
phenomenon of e-bike adoption.
- Data Collection: Utilizes both primary data (from surveys and interviews) and secondary
data.
- Sample Size: 50 respondents from Coimbatore, selected due to time constraints.
- Analysis Tools: Percentage analysis and Chi-square tests to interpret the data.
Review of Literature:
- Mohamed M, G Tamil Arasan, and G Sivakumar (2018): Electric engines can significantly
reduce pollution compared to internal combustion engines (ICEs), benefiting consumers and
the environment.
- Mr. A. Rakesh Kumar, Dr. Sanjeevikumar Padmanaban (2019): Reducing CO2 emissions
through EVs is crucial, as the transport sector is a major CO2 emitter.
Overview on E-Bikes:
E-bikes combine traditional bicycle design with an electric motor and battery. They offer
convenience, reduced environmental impact, and lower operational costs compared to
conventional vehicles. However, issues such as battery life, range, and repair facilities present
challenges.
Advantages of E-Bikes:
1. Cost-Effective: Lower operational costs compared to traditional transportation.
2. Environmentally Friendly: Reduce air pollution as they do not use fossil fuels.
3. Low Maintenance: Fewer mechanical components result in lower maintenance costs.
Disadvantages of E-Bikes:
18
1. Battery Life and Cost: Replacement batteries can be expensive, and range decreases over
time.
2. Range Limitations: Typically offers a range of 100 kilometers per charge, which may not be
sufficient for long-distance travel.
3. Repair and Maintenance: Limited repair facilities and spare parts can pose challenges.
Data Analysis & Interpretations:
The analysis, based on a sample of 50 respondents from Coimbatore, involved percentage
analysis to determine respondent categories and opinions. The study aimed to assess consumer
perceptions and the factors influencing e-bike adoption.
:
The study provides valuable insights into consumer perceptions of e-bikes in Coimbatore,
highlighting the advantages and challenges associated with their use. The findings suggest
ways to promote e-bike adoption and address existing barriers to enhance their appeal as a
sustainable transportation option.
Article 7 by The Times of India
Challenges and Future of India’s Electric Bike Market
India's electric bike market has been expanding due to rising environmental awareness and the
increasing cost of petrol. The market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 9.94%, with plans to
scale manufacturing to over 30 million units annually by 2026. However, significant
challenges hinder this growth, despite government support.
Challenges:
1. Lack of Charging Infrastructure: India has only 1,742 charging stations, and the longer
charging time compared to petrol refueling poses a deterrent. The FAME scheme aims to
improve this by incentivizing the installation of more charging stations.
19
2. High Cost of Electric Bikes: The initial cost of electric bikes is higher than petrol bikes,
though operational costs are lower. Government measures like GST reductions and subsidies
for electric vehicle batteries aim to make them more affordable. Manufacturers are also
offering financing options.
3. Limited Range: Electric bikes typically offer a range of 60-70 km per charge, which may
not meet the needs of long-distance commuters. Advances in battery technology and charging
infrastructure, supported by government incentives for R&D, are expected to address this issue.
4. Lack of Consumer Awareness: Only 31% of Indians are aware of electric bikes, making it
challenging to market and promote these vehicles effectively. Government awareness
campaigns and better marketing by manufacturers are needed to boost consumer knowledge.
Future Outlook:
With ongoing government support, including tax exemptions and significant investments in
green hydrogen and biogas, the electric bike market in India is expected to grow. The
collaboration between the government, manufacturers, and other stakeholders is crucial to
overcoming these challenges and realizing the potential of electric bikes in India’s transition to
a low-carbon economy.
Article 8 by IRJMETS (Budhana Rajasthan)
Consumer Perception of Electric Bikes in Buldhana Region
Authors: Dr. Laxmikant B. Deshmukh, Shubham Govindrao Deshmukh
Published In: International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and
Science, April 2023
20
Abstract:
This study explores consumer perception towards electric bikes (e-bikes) in the Buldhana
region. It aims to understand consumer attitudes, opinions, and preferences through surveys
and market analysis. Results indicate a generally positive view of e-bikes, appreciated for their
environmental benefits, cost savings, and health improvements. However, concerns exist
regarding high initial costs, limited charging infrastructure, and theft risks. Consumers also
seek more information on e-bike maintenance and safety.
Introduction:
Consumer perception of e-bikes varies by factors such as geography, age, income, and lifestyle.
E-bikes are seen as eco-friendly and cost-effective, particularly in urban areas for short to
medium distances and in rural areas for outdoor activities. Younger consumers find them
trendy, while older ones view them as mobility aids. Concerns include high costs and the need
for better infrastructure.
Objectives:
1. Identify factors influencing e-bike purchases.
2. Analyze key attributes of e-bikes.
3. Predict future e-bike sales in Buldhana.
4. Assess customer satisfaction with e-bikes in Buldhana.
5. Identify issues affecting e-bike purchase decisions in Buldhana.
Research Methodology:
The study uses primary data from surveys and secondary data from newspapers, magazines,
company websites, and government sources. It employs questionnaires and market surveys
targeting two-wheeler OEM dealers, students, and employees.
Data and Analysis:
Key factors influencing e-bike purchases include:
- Price: Consumers consider purchase, maintenance, and operational costs.
- Performance: Range, speed, and motor power are important.
21
- Convenience: Ease of charging and storage affects decisions.
- Environmental Impact: The carbon footprint and local air quality impact consumer views.
- Infrastructure: Availability of charging stations and bike lanes is crucial.
- Brand Reputation: Product quality and customer service play roles in perception.
Findings:
- Positive Perceptions: E-bikes are valued for environmental benefits and cost savings.
- Negative Perceptions: Concerns include high costs, safety, and lack of knowledge about
e-bikes.
- Knowledge Gaps: Consumers may lack understanding of e-bike benefits and differences
from traditional bikes.
- Market Potential: Positive perceptions indicate growth potential, but concerns must be
addressed.
Limitations:
- Time constraints.
- Potential bias in questionnaire responses.
- Recommendations for future studies include broader geographic sampling and deeper
analysis of consumer attitudes.
The study reveals a generally positive consumer perception of e-bikes, attributed to their
convenience, sustainability, and cost-effectiveness. However, challenges like high costs and
limited infrastructure persist. Addressing these issues and increasing consumer education
could enhance market growth.
Scope for Further Study:
- Gender Differences: Explore variations in e-bike perception by gender.
- Geographical Variations: Investigate e-bike perceptions in different locations.
- Design and Engineering: Assess consumer priorities regarding e-bike features, reliability, and
safety.
22
Article 9 by Journal of Positive School Psychology
Synopsis: Potential of E-Bikes in Indian Markets
Authors:
Prof. Mohammed Khaja Qutubuddin, Dr. P. Sai Rani
ICBM School of Business Excellence, Hyderabad, India
Abstract:
This study explores the potential for e-bikes in large campuses such as educational institutions
and corporate offices in Hyderabad, India. The goal is to assess awareness and willingness
among employees and students to use e-bikes, with an aim to establish partnerships and
provide e-bikes on a subscription basis. E-bikes offer an eco-friendly alternative with minimal
running costs, supported by both AC and DC charging options.
Introduction:
E-bikes, which run on electricity rather than fuel, have the potential to reduce pollution and
fuel costs. In India, increasing fuel prices and government support for electric vehicles (EVs)
highlight the relevance of e-bikes. Educational institutions and corporate offices are targeted
for their large campus sizes and potential mobility needs.
Literature Review:
- Historical Context: E-bikes originated in Japan in the 1980s but gained traction in the 2000s
due to advancements in technology.
- Current Scenario: The EV market in India is expanding with government incentives and
infrastructure improvements. E-bikes are seen as a viable solution to reduce pollution and
support the domestic EV industry.
- Challenges and Opportunities: Developing countries need to adapt EV technology to local
conditions and address infrastructure needs. The Indian government's policies, such as
subsidies under the FAME scheme, aim to enhance EV adoption.
Data Analysis:
23
- Perceived Advantages and Intent to Subscribe: Regression analysis shows a significant
positive relationship between perceived advantages of e-bikes (such as eco-friendliness and
cost-efficiency) and the intent to subscribe. The model explains 25% of the variance in
subscription behavior.
- Preference of Attributes: Speed, mileage, and price are crucial factors influencing
subscription decisions. The model accounts for 55% of the variance in subscription behavior,
emphasizing these attributes' importance.
Findings:
- Demographic Insights: Females and students show higher interest in e-bikes compared to
males and corporate employees. Students, due to their transient residence and lack of free
company transportation, are more inclined toward subscription models.
- Awareness vs. Willingness: Despite high awareness, actual willingness to use e-bikes is
lower. Key attributes influencing preference include mileage, speed, and price.
- Income and Usage: Most respondents are students with low incomes, which affects their
subscription decisions.
Recommendations:
- Infrastructure: Partner with companies to set up fast charging stations to address mileage
concerns.
- Promotional Strategies: Highlight e-bikes' benefits and address negative perceptions through
targeted campaigns.
- Corporate Offers: Introduce incentives for corporate employees to increase their interest in
e-bike subscriptions.
- Product Variants: Expand the range of e-bike models to attract a broader customer base.
- Pricing: Consider revising subscription rates to make them more attractive.
: E-bikes hold significant potential in India, driven by rising pollution concerns and fluctuating
fuel prices. While awareness is high, actual adoption is limited. Companies should focus on
improving infrastructure, expanding product options, and refining pricing strategies to enhance
market penetration.
24
Article 10 by Mckinsey and Company
Indian Consumers' Adoption of Electric Two-Wheelers
Overview:
The shift towards electric two-wheelers (e-two-wheelers) in India is gaining momentum due to
their affordability, multiple product choices, and flexible ownership models. By 2030,
e-two-wheelers are projected to represent 60-70% of new two-wheeler sales in India, driven by
consumer readiness to embrace electric technology and evolving purchasing behaviors.
Consumer Preferences and Trends:
- Product Choices and Technology: The rise in e-two-wheelers is supported by a broad range
of product options and reliable technology. Consumers are increasingly considering
sustainability, brand, and safety when purchasing e-two-wheelers.
- Omnichannel Experiences: Over 85% of consumers begin their vehicle purchase journey
online, with about 50% willing to complete the purchase online. Despite this, 80% still value
physical touchpoints, leading to the emergence of hybrid direct-to-consumer models.
- Flexible Ownership Models: There is a growing preference for flexible ownership models
such as financing, leasing, and subscription, though outright purchase remains predominant. In
the next decade, the preference for outright purchases is expected to decrease, with more
consumers exploring alternative ownership options.
Challenges and Opportunities:
- Infrastructure Concerns: Battery life and charging infrastructure remain significant concerns.
Around 35% of consumers feel their area lacks sufficient charging stations, highlighting the
need for expanded public charging networks.
- Premium Features: Consumers show a willingness to pay for premium features in
e-two-wheelers, such as higher speeds and larger battery packs. Most prefer e-two-wheelers
with a top speed of 80 km/h and are willing to pay extra for enhancements.
Market Dynamics:
25
- Consumer Segmentation: The study segments consumers into groups like "cost-constrained
mobilists," "mobility innovation pioneers," and "micromobility enthusiasts," each exhibiting
different preferences and behaviors towards e-two-wheelers.
- Future Outlook: The market for e-two-wheelers is expected to grow, with an emphasis on
addressing infrastructure issues and meeting evolving consumer demands for product features
and ownership models.
:
Indian consumers are increasingly embracing electric two-wheelers, driven by a mix of
environmental concerns, technological advancements, and shifting preferences towards
flexible ownership and premium features. Manufacturers need to address infrastructure
challenges and adapt to evolving consumer expectations to capture the growing market for
e-two-wheelers.
Authors:
Tushar Goswamy, Alexander Grausam, Bhavesh Mittal, Timo Möller, Felix Rupalla,
Prabhmaan Thapar
McKinsey & Company
Article 11 by Karuna Balikar (Goa University)
STUDY ON CONSUMER’S PERCEPTION TOWARDS ELECTRIC BIKE IN GOA
With the rapid growing industrialization India is becoming increasingly dependent upon non
renewable and conventional source of energy like the coal and fossil fuel and the increasing
utilization of such non renewable resources have led to increase in the admission of
greenhouse gasses like the Carbon dioxide, Carbon monoxide, Methane, Chlorofluorocarbon,
Nitrogen dioxide, Sulphur dioxide, etc. Thus, it is a national priority to reduce such greenhouse
gasses and regular emission of gasses and in order to develop the transport sector towards a
greener economy and diversification in fuel management is essential and vital measures are
required which focuses on road transportation with clean energy. The findings of this study
suggests that people are very conscious about the environmental aspect and are taking steps
towards the greener economy but their awareness level about the policy is very low as a result
26
awareness campaigns and programs should be initiated by the government to improve their
knowledge level about the e- bikes and e - policy. The respondents of the study ranked
environmental concern and as the top most priority for buying electric vehicles followed by
rising fuel prices. For the people who are unwilling to buy Electric bikes or are not having
accurate knowledge about the same, the government should work together to create awareness
and increase the understanding of how traditional vehicles are contributing towards creation of
carbon emission and how it has an impact on the environment. The study also found out that
factors like range anxiety, ownership cost, range of models, subsidies, reference of trusted one
have also played an important part in consumer purchase intention and their choices are
influenced by such variables. As such, the attitude of the consumer towards their product is
proved to be and important part of purchase intention. The information gained under the study
will put a light on policy maker and manufacturers in crafting energy and transport policy. This
research will also provide guidance to manufacturers of the Electric bikes and will also help
them to study the consumer purchase intention. The cost of the electric bike can be reduced by
reducing the import of batteries from other countries and exploring other alternatives using
renewable resources which are available in India. The government should work with global
investment players and oil companies to establish charging infrastructure and electric bike
related infrastructure in India which will help to create abundance of direct and indirect
employment. Installation of charging stations at adequate distances will help consumers to
reduce range anxiety and as a result increase sales of electric bikes. Also recycling units should
be installed in order to reduce battery wastage and related problems.
-
Findings
● From the study it was observe that the respondents normally do not face and range anxiety,
as the accepted that they what the electric bike either for shorter distance at low price or
bought the bike at high price for longer distance
● From the second type of questionnaire that was prepared for the buyers of the electric
vehicle it was studied that maximum amount of responding what electric drive from the price
range of 130000 to 150000 which prove that high ownership cost is not the issue or the set
back for the consumers as the expect better performance from the money that they have spent
27
● 45% of the people have moderately Agreed that the electric vehicles have high initial
ownership cost while 15% of the respondents strongly disagreed with the statement
● People had mix responses when they were asked about the limited choice of models that
were present at the showroom and they believe in pre booking of the desired model
● The buyers of the EV accepted that they buy the electric bike mainly due to the rising fuel
prices and environmental concern
-
Suggestions
The suggestion offered under this study is that the government should build more charging
infrastructure in order to help the public to charge their electric bikes. Charging infrastructure
should be offered at places like the park, offices, educational centers, malls, residential areas,
etc.
Battery swapping technology should be adopted in order to reduce range anxiety among
people.
Awareness regarding subsidies and incentives from the center and state government should
increase so that maximum people can benefit from the policies.
Batteries and motors should be manufactured in India so that battery import cost is reduced
and the total cost of electric bikes is reduced.
Used batteries should be recycled in order to reduce waste in the environment.
Article 12 by European Economic Letters (EEL)
A Study on Consumer Perception towards Electric Vehicles in India: With Special Reference
to Noida City of Gautam Buddha Nagar, Uttar Pradesh
Abstract
Research Problem: The study aims to analyze customer perceptions of Electric Vehicles (EVs)
in India, specifically focusing on seven criteria: environmental friendliness, cost, power levels,
convenience, price, and safety. These characteristics will be compared to Traditional Vehicles.
28
This study aims to examine the potential association between demographic variables, including
gender, age, educational level, and income, and the perception of Electric Vehicles in India.
Objectives of the study:
1. To study the consumer perception toward Electric Vehicles (EVs) in terms of seven
categories. (Environment friendly, cost, power levels, convenience, expensive and
safety)
2. To study the relationship between Gender and perception towards EV
To study the relationship between age and perception towards EV.
1. To study the relationship between Educational Qualification and perception towards
EV.
2. To study the relationship between Income and perceptions towards EV.
Methodology:
Data was obtained by randomly administering a structured questionnaire to 400 respondents
residing in the Noida district of Uttar Pradesh. Google Forms are employed as a means of
electronically gathering data from participants. In the current study, Slovin's method is
employed to determine the appropriate sample size for the Nodia district in Uttar Pradesh. The
present study used the convenience sampling technique. Data analysis is conducted using IBM
SPSS Version 25. The statistical methods employed include percentage analysis, bar chart,
Mann Whitney Test, and Kruskal-Wallis H test.
Findings of the study:
The study's findings illuminate the many ways in which participants view electric cars (EVs).
Even while many people recognize that electric vehicles are better for the environment, there
are still those who are worried about the price, the performance, the convenience, and the
limited range of these vehicles. Crucially, gender, age, education level, and income are some of
the demographic factors that are strongly associated with these impressions. Consequently, in
order to tackle these issues and hasten the broad acceptance of EVs, it is crucial to employ
customized strategies that include focused education, technical advancements, and legislative
29
interventions. Findings from this study highlight the need for targeted approaches to increase
electric mobility's uptake and integration across different demographics.
Electric vehicle (EV) attitudes can be resolved and EVs can be widely accepted with the help
of the present study's thorough framework. Stakeholders may overcome barriers to electric
vehicle adoption and speed up the transition to electric mobility by focusing education
campaigns, investing in infrastructure, creating incentive programs, encouraging technology
advancements, passing laws that are supportive, and engaging communities.
2.2 Introduction to the Study
Electric vehicle (EV) marketing strategies aim to promote their economic, environmental, and
technological benefits while overcoming consumer concerns related to range anxiety, charging
infrastructure, and upfront costs. Automakers and EV manufacturers use digital marketing and
social media campaigns to inform and involve potential consumers by making use of sites like
YouTube, Instagram, and LinkedIn to demonstrate real-world benefits through testimonials,
influencer collaborations, and interactive content. Green branding is essential to create a
perception of EVs as an environmentally friendly alternative, frequently supported by
corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities and green labels. Strategic partnerships with
charging infrastructure operators provide improved accessibility to charging points, alleviating
consumer concerns over driving long distances. Test drive promotions and experiential
marketing enable. consumers to personally feel the performance of EVs, dispelling myths
regarding battery durability and fuel efficiency. Personalized promotional approaches,
including AI-based suggestions and targeted advertising according to consumer interest,
further enable reaching the right audience. In addition, manufacturers highlight technological
innovations such as vehicle diagnostics through AI, software updates over the air, and
intelligent connectivity solutions to attract technology-conscious consumers. By combining
these disparate strategies, EV manufacturers intend to change people's attitudes, grow adoption
levels, and establish their market bases in a more competitive and rapidly changing automobile
sector.
30
2.3 INTRODUCTION ABOUT E VEHICLES
Electric Vehicles (EVs) are a game-changer in the worldwide transport sector, providing a
greener, more energy-efficient substitute for conventional internal combustion engine (ICE)
cars. In contrast to conventional gasoline- or diesel-fueled vehicles, EVs use electricity in
rechargeable batteries to power electric motors, which move the car. This transition from fossil
fuels is important in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and environmental pollution, making
EVs a necessary remedy to climate change and sustainable mobility. The idea of electric
vehicles is not new, but with recent technological developments in battery technology, energy
storage systems, and integration with renewable energy, they are now more feasible and
convenient for customers.
EVs are varying forms catering to specific transport needs. Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs)
are powered electrically and make use of purely battery power and charge externally through
home chargers or charging points. Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs) feature a fusion
of an electrical motor with the conventional internal combustion engine and will operate on
electric for limited mileage but employ fuel for longer transportation.
In addition, EVs are more efficient in terms of energy compared to ICE vehicles because
electric motors use a greater proportion of energy for motion. Moreover, EVs have lower
operating costs with less fuel consumption and minimal maintenance, as they contain fewer
moving parts than conventional vehicles. Governments around the globe are also promoting
the use of EVs through incentives like tax rebates, subsidies, and investment in charging points
to popularize electric mobility. In spite of their merits, EVs do have some disadvantages.
Battery technology, although progressing fast, still lags in terms of energy density and speed of
charging, impacting driving range and convenience. The charging infrastructure remains a
concern, particularly in developing countries where charging points are scarce.
31
3. DATA ANALYSIS
32
The following analysis presents insights gathered from a survey conducted to understand
consumer preferences, challenges, and expectations regarding electric two-wheelers. With 75
respondents, the data sheds light on key factors influencing the adoption of electric mobility,
including financing options, appealing features, perceived challenges, and market readiness.
This analysis aims to identify trends, uncover consumer priorities, and provide actionable
insights to stakeholders looking to enhance the appeal and feasibility of electric two-wheelers.
3.1
Chart
Interpretation:
●
60% of the respondents are female (represented in red).
●
40% of the respondents are male (represented in blue).
This indicates that the majority of the participants in the survey are female, with a significant
20% difference in representation compared to males.
3.2 Chart
33
Interpretation:
●
88% of the respondents reside in urban areas (represented in blue).
●
8% of the respondents live in sub-urban areas (represented in red).
●
4% of the respondents are from rural areas (represented in orange).
This indicates that the majority of the respondents are from urban settings, with minimal
representation from sub-urban and rural areas
3.2 Graph
34
Interpretation:
●
73.3% reside in Hyderabad, making it the dominant city in the dataset.
●
9.3% listed variations of "HYDERABAD" or "HYderabad," reflecting potential
duplicate or inconsistent data entry.
●
Smaller groups of respondents mentioned cities such as:
○
Secunderabad: 5.3%.
○
hyderabad: 4% .
○
Other cities like Bandlaguda, Goa, and Hyd were mentioned by 1 respondent
each (1.3%).
Observation:
The data indicates that the majority of respondents are concentrated in Hyderabad, but there is
inconsistency in city name capitalization and spelling, which could be standardized for cleaner
analysis.
35
3.4 Chart
Interpretation:
●
68% of the respondents fall into the 18-25 age group (blue), making it the most
represented group.
●
10.7% are aged 25-35 (orange).
●
9.3% are aged 35-45 (yellow).
●
8% belong to the 45-55 age group (green).
●
4% are aged 55 and above (purple).
Observation:
The majority of the respondents are young adults (18-25), indicating a focus on this
demographic in the survey. Other age groups are represented in much smaller proportion
3.5 Chart
36
Interpretation:
●
70.7% have an Undergraduate degree (orange), making it the most common
qualification.
●
18.7% have a Postgraduate degree (yellow).
●
9.3% have completed High School (blue).
●
1.3% have attained a Doctorate (green).
●
None are listed as having a separate "Graduate" category.
Observation:
The majority of respondents hold undergraduate degrees, while postgraduate qualifications
make up a significant secondary group. Advanced degrees (doctorates) represent only a small
fraction of the respondents.
3.6 Chart
37
Interpretation:
●
34.7% earn >10,000 (blue), making it the largest income group.
●
29.3% fall into the 10,000–50,000 income range (orange).
●
21.3% earn between 50,000–1,00,000 (yellow).
●
14.7% have an income of <1,00,000 (green).
Observation:
The data shows a significant proportion of respondents in the lower income bracket (>10,000),
with a steady distribution across the other ranges. There is noticeable diversity in income
levels among the respondents.
3.7 Chart
38
Interpretation:
●
48% use a Two-wheeler (Petrol/Diesel) (red), making it the most common mode of
transport.
●
37.3% rely on Public Transportation (orange), the second most used option.
●
10.7% use a Two-wheeler (Electric) (blue).
●
Other less common modes of transport include:
○
Metro (purple): minimal usage.
○
Four-wheeler (Electric) (green): negligible.
○
4 and 2 wheeler (Petrol) (teal): minimal usage.
Observation:
The majority of respondents use two-wheelers (petrol/diesel), followed by public
transportation. Electric vehicles and metro usage remain low, highlighting potential areas for
promoting sustainable or public transport options.
39
3.8 Chart
Interpretation:
●
58.7% answered Yes (blue), indicating they have considered buying an electric vehicle.
●
41.3% answered No (red), suggesting they have not considered it.
Observation:
The majority of respondents are open to the idea of buying an electric vehicle, but a significant
portion remains uninterested, highlighting potential for further awareness and market growth
in the electric vehicle sector.
40
3.9 Graph
This bar chart represents the factors considered by respondents when buying a vehicle, ranked
in order of importance from 1 (most important) to 5 (least important). Here is a summary:
1. Price:
○
A significant number of respondents ranked price as either the most (1) or
second most important (2) factor.
2. Mileage:
○
Mileage was predominantly ranked as the most important (1) factor, with the
highest bar in the "1" column compared to other characteristics.
3. Charging Time:
○
Charging time had a diverse distribution across ranks, but it generally appeared
less prioritized compared to price and mileage.
4. Maintenance Cost:
○
Maintenance cost showed a strong emphasis, with high rankings in the most
important categories (1 and 2).
41
5. Environmental Impact:
○
Environmental impact was ranked lower on average, with a noticeable number
of responses in the 4th and 5th importance categories.
Observation:
Mileage and price are the top priorities for most respondents when purchasing a vehicle, while
environmental impact tends to be a less critical factor for this group. Charging time is
moderately considered, highlighting potential areas for improvement in consumer awareness
or technology adoption.
3.10 Graph
This chart highlights the characteristics of electric vehicles that respondents consider deal
breakers, ranked in order of importance (1 = most important, 5 = least important). Here's the
breakdown:
Interpretation:
1. High Price:
42
○
This is the most significant deal breaker, with the highest number of responses
ranking it as the most important factor (rank 1).
2. Limited Charging Infrastructure:
○
A close second, this factor has many respondents considering it a top concern
(rank 1 or 2). It indicates that availability of charging stations is a crucial barrier
to adoption.
3. Low Range/Mileage:
○
A large number of respondents also consider range or mileage an important deal
breaker, though it ranks slightly lower than price and infrastructure.
4. Slow Charging Time:
○
While still important, this characteristic appears to be the least critical of the
four, with a more even distribution across all ranks.
The main barriers to adopting electric vehicles for this group are high prices and limited
charging infrastructure. Efforts to address these issues could significantly influence consumer
adoption rates. Range and charging time, though important, are slightly less critical deal
breakers.
43
3.11 Chart
This chart illustrates respondents' price preferences when comparing electric vehicles (EVs)
with petrol/diesel vehicles. Here’s a detailed breakdown:
Interpretation:
1. ₹50,000 - ₹1,00,000 Price Range:
○
Nearly half of the respondents (49.3%) prefer this price range, indicating
affordability is a significant factor in their decision-making.
2. ₹1,00,000 - ₹2,00,000 Price Range:
○
Approximately 30.7% of respondents are comfortable with this price range,
reflecting a moderate budget preference.
3. Under ₹50,000:
○
Only 9.3% of respondents chose this category, suggesting that very low-priced
vehicles may not meet expectations or needs.
4. Above ₹2,00,000:
44
○
Around 10.7% of respondents are open to paying over ₹2,00,000, possibly for
premium features or higher performance.
Most respondents prefer vehicles priced between ₹50,000 and ₹2,00,000, emphasizing the
importance of balancing affordability with features. Manufacturers should target this
mid-range segment to appeal to a broader audience.
3.12 Chart
This chart reflects respondents' mileage preferences for electric vehicles (EVs) on a full
charge, based on daily driving needs. Here’s the breakdown:
Interpretation:
1. 50-100 km:
○
The majority (54.7%) prefer a mileage range of 50-100 km, indicating that this
is the sweet spot for typical daily commutes.
2. 100-150 km:
○
Around 24% of respondents prefer slightly higher mileage, possibly for
extended commutes or occasional longer trips.
45
3. Less than 50 km:
○
Only 13.3% of respondents prefer a mileage below 50 km, suggesting limited
appeal for EVs with shorter ranges.
4. Above 150 km:
○
A minority (8%) prefer a mileage of over 150 km, likely for heavy daily usage
or convenience for fewer recharges.
A significant portion of users prioritize a range of 50-100 km on a full charge for their daily
driving needs. EV manufacturers should aim to design vehicles that efficiently meet this
demand while offering extended range options for niche preferences.
3.13 Chart
This chart outlines respondents' expectations for the charging time of electric vehicles (EVs).
Here's the analysis:
Interpretation:
1. 1-4 hours:
○
The majority (56%) prefer charging their EVs within 1-4 hours, highlighting the
importance of fast-charging solutions.
46
2. Less than 1 hour:
○
Around 22.7% of respondents expect their EVs to be fully charged in under 1
hour, indicating demand for ultra-fast charging options.
3. 4-8 hours:
○
Approximately 18.7% are comfortable with charging times in the 4-8 hour
range, possibly for overnight or longer charging windows.
4. Overnight:
○
Only 2.6% of respondents are open to overnight charging, suggesting that
convenience and quick turnaround times are key priorities for most users.
The majority of respondents value quick charging times (under 4 hours). This reinforces the
need for advanced battery technology and widespread fast-charging infrastructure to meet user
expectations and promote EV adoption.
3.14 Chart
This chart illustrates public perceptions on when electric vehicles (EVs) will replace 50% of
fuel vehicles. Here's the analysis:
Interpretation:
47
1. 5-10 years:
○
The largest portion (48%) believe EVs will achieve this milestone within 5-10
years, reflecting optimism about the pace of EV adoption and advancements in
technology.
2. Within 5 years:
○
33.3% anticipate this shift happening in less than 5 years, showcasing
significant confidence in the rapid transformation of the automotive sector.
3. 10-20 years:
○
9.3% believe it will take 10-20 years for EVs to replace 50% of fuel vehicles,
indicating a more cautious outlook.
4. More than 20 years:
○
A small minority (approximately 1-2 respondents) think it will take more than
20 years for such a transition.
5. Never:
○
A very small fraction predicts EVs will never replace 50% of fuel vehicles,
possibly due to skepticism about the technology or infrastructure challenges.
The majority of respondents (over 80%) foresee EVs achieving a 50% market share within the
next decade. This optimistic sentiment aligns with current global trends favoring EV adoption,
stricter emission regulations, and technological progress
48
3.15 Chart
This pie chart provides insights into respondents' prior experience with electric vehicles (EVs).
Interpretation:
1. No Experience (50.7%):
○
A slight majority of respondents have not used an EV before, highlighting that
there is still significant room for EV exposure and education among the public.
2. Experience with EVs (49.3%):
○
Nearly half of the respondents have had prior experience with EVs, indicating a
growing familiarity with the technology and its benefits.
The results indicate a balanced split, suggesting that while EVs are gaining traction, there is
still an opportunity for manufacturers and policymakers to increase awareness and
accessibility. This split also underscores the importance of addressing common barriers, such
as cost and infrastructure, to encourage wider adoption.
49
3.16 Chart
This pie chart illustrates respondents' timelines for transitioning to an electric vehicle (EV).
Interpretation:
1. No Plans to Switch (38.7%):
○
A significant proportion of respondents do not plan to switch to EVs, indicating
potential challenges in changing consumer preferences or addressing perceived
barriers.
2. Already Switched (13.3%):
○
A small group has already transitioned to EVs, reflecting early adopters of the
technology.
3. Planned Transition Timelines:
○
Within the Next 1 Year (21.3%): A notable percentage of respondents plan to
make the switch soon, signaling growing interest.
○
1–3 Years (18.7%): Many respondents are considering a medium-term
transition, suggesting ongoing deliberation about costs, benefits, and readiness.
50
○
More than 3 Years (8%): Some respondents foresee a long-term switch,
possibly waiting for advancements in technology or infrastructure.
The data shows a mix of readiness levels for EV adoption. While a significant portion remains
hesitant, the interest in short- to medium-term transitions highlights the importance of
addressing barriers such as cost, charging infrastructure, and awareness to encourage broader
adoption.
3.17 Chart
This chart displays the responses of current electric vehicle (EV) owners regarding whether
they believe their EV offers value for money.
Interpretation:
1. Positive Response (69%):
○
The majority of EV owners (almost 7 out of 10) feel that their vehicle is value
for money. This reflects satisfaction with their purchase, likely due to factors
like lower running costs, environmental benefits,
and technological
advancements.
2. Negative Response (31%):
51
○
A significant minority of owners (31%) do not believe their EV is value for
money. This could be due to factors like higher upfront costs, limitations in
range, or inadequate charging infrastructure.
While most EV owners are satisfied with the value provided by their vehicles, addressing
concerns from the dissatisfied segment will be crucial to improving adoption and long-term
satisfaction.
3.18 Chart
This pie chart shows the comparison between electric and petrol/diesel two-wheelers based on
user comfort.
Interpretation:
1. Petrol/Diesel Two-Wheelers (61.3%):
○
A majority of respondents find petrol/diesel two-wheelers more comfortable.
This preference might stem from familiarity, better infrastructure for refueling,
or superior performance for long rides.
52
2. Electric Two-Wheelers (38.7%):
○
A significant minority prefer electric two-wheelers. The preference may be
influenced by smoother rides, lower operating costs, or environmental concerns.
Although petrol/diesel two-wheelers currently lead in terms of comfort, a shift toward electric
two-wheelers can be expected with advancements in technology, better infrastructure, and
increased awareness of sustainability. Addressing perceived gaps in comfort or performance
for electric two-wheelers will be critical for broader adoption.
3.19 Graph
This bar chart represents the primary reasons why individuals consider switching to an electric
vehicle (EV), ranked in terms of importance. Respondents were allowed to choose multiple
reasons and rank them from 1 (most important) to 4 (least important).
Interpretation:
1. Environmental Concerns:
○
A significant number of participants ranked environmental concerns as the most
important reason (Rank 1).
53
○
This highlights growing awareness of climate change and the role of EVs in
reducing carbon emissions.
2. Lower Running Costs:
○
Lower running costs were frequently ranked as Rank 2, indicating financial
benefits as a strong motivator, though not the primary concern for many.
3. Government Incentives:
○
Government incentives were largely ranked as Rank 3.
○
While these incentives are helpful, they are not the primary driver for most
respondents.
4. Latest Technology:
○
Latest technology is often ranked as Rank 4, showing it is a lesser, but still
relevant factor for adoption.
Environmental concerns and financial savings are the top reasons for switching to EVs,
suggesting that policies emphasizing these benefits will resonate most with potential users.
Government incentives and advanced technology remain important secondary motivators.
3.20 Chart
54
This pie chart illustrates whether respondents would recommend an electric vehicle (EV) to
others. Here's a breakdown of the results:
Interpretation:
1. Yes (76%):
○
A large majority of respondents would recommend an EV to others. This
indicates a high level of satisfaction or belief in the benefits of EVs, such as
environmental advantages, cost savings, or performance.
2. No (24%):
○
A smaller portion of participants would not recommend EVs. This could be due
to concerns like charging infrastructure, initial costs, range limitations, or
personal experiences.
The data shows that EV owners or users generally hold positive views and are likely to
advocate for wider adoption. Addressing the concerns of the minority who are hesitant could
further boost EV acceptance.
3.21 Chart
55
This pie chart represents the survey results on which vehicle type—electric or petrol/diesel—is
perceived as more economical by 66 respondents.
Interpretation:
1. Electric Vehicle (56.1%):
○
A majority of respondents believe that electric vehicles (EVs) are more
economical. This could be due to lower running costs, reduced maintenance
expenses, and savings on fuel compared to petrol/diesel vehicles.
2. Petrol/Diesel Vehicle (43.9%):
○
A significant minority still find petrol/diesel vehicles more economical. This
perception might stem from lower upfront costs, availability of fuel
infrastructure, or doubts about EVs' long-term affordability.
While the majority recognize EVs as the more economical option, the close margin indicates
that concerns regarding the initial investment and other factors still impact perceptions. Further
education about the total cost of ownership and financial incentives for EVs could help shift
opinions.
3.22 Chart
56
This pie chart shows the frequency of charging among electric vehicle (EV) owners, based on
33 responses.
Interpretation:
1. Daily Charging (42.4%):
○
A significant proportion of EV owners charge their vehicles daily, likely
indicating frequent use or a preference for maintaining a fully charged battery.
2. Every 2-3 Days (39.4%):
○
Many respondents opt for charging their EVs every 2-3 days, which suggests
moderate usage or larger battery capacities enabling less frequent charging.
3. Weekly Charging (3%):
○
A small percentage charge weekly, possibly due to low usage or efficient
energy consumption of their vehicles.
4. Rarely Charging (15.2%):
○
These respondents charge infrequently, which could be attributed to long-range
EVs, minimal travel needs, or alternative transportation methods.
The majority of EV owners charge either daily or every 2-3 days, highlighting varied charging
behaviors that depend on usage patterns, battery capacities, and range requirements. This
emphasizes the need for accessible charging infrastructure to support diverse charging
preferences.
57
3.23 Chart
This chart provides insights into how respondents became aware of electric vehicles (EVs),
based on 75 responses.
Interpretation:
1. Social Media (32%):
○
The majority of respondents became aware of EVs through social media
platforms, highlighting the impact of digital marketing and online discussions.
2. Friends (30.7%):
○
Word of mouth from friends is a significant source of awareness, emphasizing
the role of personal recommendations and shared experiences.
3. News Articles (17.3%):
○
News Articles are also a key source of information, reflecting the influence of
media coverage on shaping opinions and awareness about EVs.
4. TV Advertisements (9.3%):
○
Traditional TV ads are less influential compared to online and interpersonal
channels, but they still play a role in promoting EVs.
58
5. Family (8%):
○
Family discussions contribute modestly to EV awareness, indicating a more
limited role compared to friends.
6. Other Sources (Dealerships and Self):
○
A small percentage of respondents mentioned dealerships and self-research as
their primary sources of information.
Digital platforms and personal connections dominate as the primary channels for EV
awareness, while traditional and formal sources like TV advertisements and dealerships have a
smaller impact. This underscores the importance of leveraging social media and fostering
conversations to boost awareness and adoption of electric vehicles.
3.24 Graph
This bar chart provides a ranked analysis of the primary reasons for not purchasing an electric
two-wheeler yet, with rankings from 1 (most important) to 5 (least important).
Interpretation:
1. High Initial Cost:
59
○
Most respondents rated the high initial cost as their primary concern (rank 1).
○
This indicates that upfront pricing is a major barrier to EV adoption.
2. Lack of Charging Infrastructure:
○
Ranked consistently as a significant factor (2nd and 3rd positions dominate),
this suggests that limited charging facilities deter potential buyers.
3. Limited Mileage:
○
A high proportion of respondents ranked limited mileage as an important factor
(often in ranks 2-3), showing concerns about the practicality of EVs for long
distances.
4. Uncertainty About the Technology:
○
Many respondents expressed moderate concerns (ranked mostly between 3-4),
implying hesitancy regarding the reliability and understanding of EV
technology.
5. Satisfaction With Petrol/Diesel Two-Wheelers:
○
Interestingly, a significant number of respondents rated this as the least
important reason (rank 5). However, for a smaller group, it was their top
concern, showing resistance from users already content with conventional
vehicles.
The primary hurdles for electric two-wheeler adoption are economic (high costs) and
infrastructure-related (charging stations), followed by performance issues like mileage.
Addressing these barriers, such as through subsidies, extended mileage, and better
infrastructure, could enhance EV adoption rates.
60
3.25 Chart
This pie chart displays the preferences for electric two-wheeler brands among 75 respondents.
Here’s a breakdown:
Interpretation:
1. Top Preferred Brand: Ola Electric (32%)
○
Ola Electric emerges as the most popular choice, commanding nearly one-third
of the preferences. This could be due to its aggressive pricing, range, and
features.
2. Second Most Preferred: Ather Energy (26.7%)
○
Ather Energy follows closely, reflecting strong consumer interest in its
high-performance models and technology-focused approach.
3. Other Notable Preferences:
○
TVS iQube (17.3%): Gaining traction as a reliable, established brand entering
the EV space.
○
Bajaj Chetak (14.7%): Popular for its classic brand reputation and quality.
4. Smaller Market Shares:
61
○
Brands like Hero Electric, Revolt Motors, Ampere Vehicles, and Okinawa have
relatively minor shares. This indicates either limited appeal or lower brand
recognition among respondents.
Ola Electric and Ather Energy are the clear leaders in the electric two-wheeler market,
reflecting consumer trust in their innovative offerings. Established brands like TVS and Bajaj
are also making their presence felt. Smaller players may need to strengthen their market
strategies to compete effectively.
3.26 Chart
This pie chart illustrates the willingness of 75 respondents to rent an electric two-wheeler for
short-term use, such as for a day or a week.
Interpretation:
1. Open to Renting (37.3%):
○
A significant portion of respondents (37.3%) are willing to consider renting an
electric two-wheeler, suggesting interest in exploring EVs without a long-term
commitment.
62
2. Undecided (46.7%):
○
Nearly half of the respondents are uncertain, indicating a potential market for
rentals if accompanied by awareness campaigns, incentives, or convenient
options.
3. Not Interested (16%):
○
A smaller group (16%) is not inclined towards renting, possibly due to a lack of
interest in EVs or preference for ownership over rentals.
With 84% either open to or unsure about renting electric two-wheelers, there is a considerable
opportunity for rental services to attract these users. Addressing the undecided segment
through promotional offers, test-drive campaigns, or educating them about the benefits of
short-term rentals could help increase adoption.
3.27 Chart
This pie chart illustrates the importance of brand reputation when selecting an electric
two-wheeler, based on responses from 75 participants.
Interpretation:
1. Very Important (48%):
63
○
Nearly half of the respondents (48%) consider brand reputation as a critical
factor in their decision-making process.
○
This indicates that well-established brands with a positive reputation have a
competitive advantage in attracting customers.
2. Somewhat Important (36%):
○
A significant portion (36%) acknowledges brand reputation as somewhat
important, suggesting it plays a role but may not be the sole deciding factor.
3. Neutral (12%):
○
A smaller group (12%) remains neutral, showing indifference towards the
brand's reputation.
4. Not Important (4%):
○
A negligible percentage (4%) do not consider brand reputation significant,
implying they may prioritize other factors like cost, features, or technology.
Brand reputation is a decisive factor for the majority (84%) of respondents, either as very
important or somewhat important. Companies in the electric two-wheeler segment should
focus on building and maintaining a positive brand image through quality products, excellent
customer service, and effective marketing to capture and retain customer trust.
64
3.28 Chart
This pie chart represents the satisfaction levels of 49 electric vehicle (EV) owners regarding
the availability of service centers for their vehicles.
Interpretation:
1. Very Satisfied (10.2%):
○
A small group of respondents (10.2%) expressed high satisfaction with the
availability of service centers, indicating that their needs are being met
effectively.
2. Satisfied (32.7%):
○
Nearly a third of respondents are satisfied, suggesting that service centers are
adequate but might have room for improvement.
3. Neutral (44.9%):
○
A significant proportion (44.9%) is neutral, indicating a lack of strong opinion
or ambivalence about the current availability.
4. Dissatisfied (8.2%):
65
○
A smaller group (8.2%) is dissatisfied, highlighting gaps in service availability
or accessibility.
5. Very Dissatisfied (4%):
○
A minor fraction (4%) is highly dissatisfied, indicating significant issues or
unmet expectations.
While a majority of respondents are either neutral or satisfied (77.6%), a notable portion
(12.2%) is dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. This suggests that while service availability might
be adequate for some, improvements in accessibility, distribution, or quality could enhance the
overall satisfaction of EV owners. Expanding service networks and ensuring consistent quality
could address these concerns effectively.
3.29 Chart
This pie chart illustrates the financing options that would most likely encourage respondents to
purchase an electric two-wheeler. Respondents were allowed to select multiple options,
reflecting diverse preferences.
66
Interpretation:
1. Zero Down Payment (33.3%):
○
The most preferred financing option, indicating a strong desire to minimize
upfront costs when purchasing an electric two-wheeler.
2. Low-Interest Loans (29.3%):
○
A significant portion of respondents favor this option, highlighting the
importance of affordable loan interest rates to make ownership more accessible.
3. Manufacturer Discounts (22.7%):
○
Discounts offered by manufacturers are also a popular choice, emphasizing the
value of cost reductions to attract buyers.
4. Extended Loan Repayment Period (10.7%):
○
A smaller group sees longer repayment periods as a motivator, suggesting that
spreading out costs over time appeals to a specific segment.
5. Government Subsidies (10.7%):
○
Subsidies provided by the government are equally important for some
respondents, reflecting the influence of policy support on purchasing decisions.
6. Not Getting One (Small Segment):
○
A very small portion of respondents expressed no interest in purchasing an
electric two-wheeler, indicating some resistance despite various incentives.
The preference for zero down payment and low-interest loans indicates that reducing the
financial burden during the initial purchase phase is key to driving adoption. Policies or
programs focusing on these aspects, alongside manufacturer discounts and government
subsidies, could significantly enhance market penetration for electric two-wheelers.
67
3.30 Chart
This chart highlights the features of electric two-wheelers that respondents find most
appealing.
Interpretation:
1. Environmentally Friendly (40%):
○
The most appealing feature, showing that sustainability and reducing
environmental
impact
are
primary motivators for choosing electric
two-wheelers.
2. Silent Operation (26.7%):
○
The quiet nature of electric two-wheelers appeals to many, reflecting a
preference for noise reduction in urban environments.
3. Low Maintenance Costs (17.3%):
○
A notable portion values the reduced long-term costs associated with
maintaining electric vehicles compared to traditional ones.
68
4. Latest Technology (14.7%):
○
Modern, cutting-edge features attract a smaller but significant segment of
respondents, highlighting the tech-savvy audience.
5. Government Subsidies (Minimal Interest):
○
This aspect appeals to a very small portion, indicating that while subsidies are
helpful, they may not be a deciding factor for many buyers.
The focus on environmental benefits and silent operation indicates that electric
two-wheelers are seen as a cleaner and quieter alternative to traditional vehicles. Emphasizing
these benefits in marketing and communication strategies can help further drive adoption. Low
maintenance costs and latest technology are additional factors that could attract a broader
audience.
3.31 Chart
This chart illustrates the willingness of respondents to spend on monthly charging costs for
their electric two-wheelers.
Interpretation:
69
1. ₹500 - ₹1,000 (52%):
○
The majority of respondents are comfortable with a moderate monthly charging
expense in this range, suggesting affordability is a key consideration.
2. >₹500 (22.7%):
○
A significant portion prefers to keep monthly costs below ₹500, reflecting a
preference for economical options.
3. ₹1,000 - ₹1,500 (24%):
○
Some respondents are open to spending higher amounts, indicating flexibility
among certain users who may prioritize convenience or quality.
4. <₹1,500 (Minimal Interest):
○
Very few respondents are willing to spend beyond ₹1,500, highlighting price
sensitivity in this market.
Price sensitivity plays a significant role in the adoption of electric two-wheelers. Most users
expect monthly charging costs to be within ₹500-₹1,000, indicating that cost-effective
charging infrastructure and energy-efficient models are essential to appeal to a broader
audience.
70
3.32 Chart
This chart shows the convenience of home charging for electric two-wheelers as perceived by
respondents.
Interpretation:
1. Somewhat Convenient (40%):
○
The largest proportion of respondents finds home charging somewhat
convenient, suggesting it is manageable but not without challenges.
2. Very Convenient (34.7%):
○
A significant number find home charging very convenient, indicating a good
level of satisfaction among this group.
3. Neutral (17.3%):
○
A smaller group remains neutral, possibly due to a lack of experience or
indifference towards home charging.
4. Inconvenient and Not Possible in My Home (Minimal):
71
○
Very few respondents find it inconvenient or impossible to charge at home,
indicating that home charging setups are feasible for most.
Home charging is largely seen as a practical solution for electric two-wheeler users. However,
increasing the ease of setup and addressing minor inconveniences could further improve
the adoption rate. Additionally, solutions for individuals without access to home charging (e.g.,
apartment dwellers) should be explored.
3.33 Chart
This chart reflects respondents' confidence levels in the safety of electric two-wheelers.
Interpretation:
1. Confident (44%):
○
The largest group of respondents feels confident about the safety of electric
two-wheelers, suggesting a general trust in their safety standards.
2. Neutral (38.7%):
○
A significant portion remains neutral, possibly indicating limited knowledge or
mixed experiences with electric two-wheelers.
3. Very Confident (13.3%):
72
○
A smaller group expresses high confidence in safety, showing strong assurance
in the technology or personal experiences.
4. Not Confident (Minimal):
○
Very few respondents report a lack of confidence, indicating safety concerns are
not widespread but may still exist in specific cases.
The majority of users feel positively or neutral about the safety of electric two-wheelers.
Efforts to address the concerns of the neutral and not confident groups—such as transparent
safety testing, enhanced safety features, and customer education—could further boost
confidence.
3.34 Graph
This bar chart depicts respondents' rankings of factors that would make them feel more
comfortable purchasing an electric two-wheeler, with "1" representing the most important
factor and "5" the least.
Interpretation:
1. Improved Battery Life:
○
Ranked as the most important factor (rank 1) by a significant majority.
73
○
Indicates that battery reliability and longevity are critical to consumer
confidence.
2. Price Reduction:
○
A substantial number of respondents prioritize lower prices, as reflected in the
high frequency of rank 1 and 2 ratings.
○
Cost appears to be a significant barrier for potential buyers.
3. Better Charging Infrastructure:
○
This factor is rated highly (ranks 1 and 2) by a notable segment.
○
Emphasizes the need for accessible and reliable charging facilities.
4. More Government Incentives:
○
While important, this factor received mixed rankings, with respondents split
between high (ranks 1-2) and lower priorities (ranks 4-5).
○
Suggests incentives are desirable but not the primary concern.
5. Better Resale Value:
○
Consistently rated as a lower priority (ranks 4 and 5) by many respondents.
○
Indicates that resale value is not a key consideration for most buyers.
The primary areas of improvement for encouraging electric two-wheeler adoption are
improving battery life, reducing costs, and enhancing charging infrastructure. Addressing
these top priorities could significantly increase buyer confidence.
74
3.35 Chart
This pie chart shows respondents' opinions on the suitability of electric two-wheelers for city
or rural areas.
Key Insights:
1. City Suitability:
○
The majority (69.3%) believe that electric two-wheelers are more suitable for
city use.
○
Likely due to shorter travel distances, better charging infrastructure, and more
accessible service centers in urban areas.
2. Rural Suitability:
○
Only 17.3% feel that electric two-wheelers are more suited to rural areas.
○
This could be attributed to challenges like limited charging infrastructure and
longer commuting distances in rural settings.
3. Suitable for Both:
○
8% of respondents believe that electric two-wheelers are equally suitable for
both city and rural areas.
○
Suggests a small group sees versatility in electric two-wheelers.
75
4. Uncertainty:
○
5.4% of respondents are unsure about the suitability, indicating a potential
knowledge gap or lack of exposure.
Electric two-wheelers are perceived predominantly as urban vehicles, suggesting that
manufacturers and policymakers need to address rural infrastructure challenges to expand their
appeal in non-urban areas.
3.36 Chart
This chart identifies respondents' views on the major challenges associated with electric
two-wheelers.
Key Insights:
1. Lack of Charging Stations (46.7%):
○
Nearly half of the respondents see the lack of charging infrastructure as the
biggest challenge.
○
Highlights the need for expansion of public and private charging networks.
2. Charging Time (17.3%):
76
○
A significant number of respondents are concerned about the time it takes to
charge electric two-wheelers.
○
Indicates the need for faster-charging technologies.
3. Battery Life (14.7%):
○
Concerns about battery longevity highlight the importance of advancements in
battery technology and warranties.
4. High Initial Cost (13.3%):
○
The upfront cost remains a barrier for some, suggesting a need for subsidies,
financing options, or cost reductions.
5. Performance in Long-distance Travel (8%):
○
A smaller percentage sees limited range or performance over long distances as a
challenge.
○
Suggests this is less of a priority compared to infrastructure and cost issues.
The primary concerns revolve around charging infrastructure and time. Addressing these areas
through technological and infrastructural advancements would likely increase adoption rates of
electric two-wheelers.
77
3.37 Chart
This chart presents respondents' perspectives on whether electric two-wheelers will become
mainstream in the next five years.
Key Findings:
Optimism (48%): Nearly half of the respondents believe that electric two-wheelers will
become mainstream within the next five years.
Uncertainty (42.7%): A significant portion is uncertain, indicating skepticism or a
wait-and-see approach. Factors like infrastructure development, government policies, and
technological advancements could influence this group's decision.
Pessimism (9.3%): A small percentage does not see electric two-wheelers becoming
mainstream soon, likely due to challenges like cost, infrastructure, or range concerns.
While there is considerable optimism about the future of electric two-wheelers, the large
percentage of uncertainty underscores the need for strategic initiatives to build trust and
address key adoption barriers.
78
4. Findings, Conclusions, and Suggestions
79
4.1 Findings
●
This research explores consumer attitudes toward electric vehicles (EVs), focusing on
barriers to adoption, purchase motivators, and market trends.
●
The data provides insights into demographics, awareness levels, preferences, and
concerns related to EVs.
Demographics and Consumer Preferences
●
The primary demographic considering EV adoption consists of young, educated urban
residents with moderate to low income.
●
60% of respondents are female, while 40% are male, indicating higher engagement
from women in EV discussions.
●
88% of respondents live in urban areas, 8% in suburban areas, and 4% in rural regions,
with 73.3% residing in Hyderabad.
●
The most interested age group is 18-25 years old (68%), with interest declining after 35
years.
●
70.7% of respondents hold an undergraduate degree, while 18.7% have a postgraduate
degree, indicating a link between higher education and EV awareness.
●
Income distribution:
○
34.7% earn less than ₹10,000
○
29.3% earn between ₹10,000–₹50,000
○
21.3% earn between ₹50,000–₹1,00,000
○
Affordability remains a significant concern for potential EV buyers.
EV Adoption and Barriers
●
58.7% of respondents have considered purchasing an EV, indicating strong market
potential.
●
41.3% remain uninterested due to persistent barriers.
●
Key factors driving EV adoption include:
○
Lower operating costs
80
○
Environmental benefits
○
Government incentives
Factors Influencing Purchase Decisions
●
Important considerations when purchasing a vehicle:
○
Mileage per charge
○
Price
○
Charging time
○
Maintenance costs
○
Environmental impact
●
Consumers prefer a mileage range of 50-100 km per charge for daily use.
●
Fast charging (1-4 hours) is a priority for potential buyers.
●
While environmental benefits are acknowledged, cost and convenience take
precedence.
●
Major deal breakers include:
○
High vehicle cost
○
Limited charging infrastructure
○
Insufficient mileage per charge
●
Consumers expect a driving range of at least 100 km per charge.
●
Preferred price range for electric two-wheelers:
○
₹50,000 - ₹1,00,000 (49.3%)
○
₹1,00,000 - ₹2,00,000 (30.7%)
○
Only 10.7% are willing to spend over ₹2,00,000, suggesting limited demand for
premium EVs.
Market Perception and Future Trends
●
50.7% of respondents have never used an EV, yet 76% would recommend them,
indicating growing acceptance.
●
61.3% still prefer petrol/diesel two-wheelers due to concerns about performance and
convenience.
81
●
Only 38.7% find electric two-wheelers more comfortable, highlighting the need for
improvements in ride quality and performance.
●
Future market predictions:
○
48% believe EVs will replace 50% of traditional fuel vehicles within 5-10
years.
○
9.3% expect this shift to take 10-20 years.
○
A small percentage remain doubtful about EVs achieving a 50% market share.
4.2 Conclusions
The findings indicate that while the adoption of EVs is on the rise, challenges related to
affordability and infrastructure continue to pose significant obstacles. Financial incentives and
improvements in battery technology could greatly enhance market penetration. Although there
are government incentives available, many consumers are not aware of these benefits, which
diminishes their impact. Younger individuals, especially those aged 18-25, show a heightened
interest in EVs, implying that focused marketing strategies aimed at students and young
professionals could help speed up adoption.
Currently, urban areas are at the forefront of EV demand, but it is crucial to expand the
network of charging stations to ensure wider accessibility. The market is very sensitive to
pricing, with most consumers looking for mid-range EVs that provide good mileage, quick
charging, and competitive prices. Furthermore, public perception of the reliability and
cost-effectiveness of EVs is still mixed. By addressing misconceptions and enhancing
awareness campaigns, it may be possible to significantly boost consumer confidence and
increase adoption rates.
82
4.3 Suggestions
●
For Manufacturers:
○
Focus on reducing the initial cost of EVs through competitive pricing, financing
options, and installment plans.
○
Prioritize battery technology advancements for longer ranges (100+ km per
charge) and faster charging (under two hours).
○
Collaborate with government and private sectors to expand fast-charging
infrastructure in urban and suburban areas.
○
Strengthen after-sales support by increasing service centers, offering extended
warranties, and improving repair facilities.
○
Highlight long-term financial benefits, such as lower maintenance and fuel
costs, along with environmental advantages in marketing efforts.
●
For Policymakers and Government:
○
Conduct public awareness campaigns on the benefits of EV ownership and
available financial incentives.
○
Increase subsidies, lower interest rates on EV loans, and provide tax breaks to
enhance affordability.
○
Prioritize infrastructure development by expanding charging stations in
residential areas, workplaces, and highways.
○
Promote rental and leasing options to allow consumers to experience EVs
before committing to a purchase.
●
For Consumers:
○
Utilize government incentives, tax benefits, and zero-interest financing options
to make EVs more affordable.
○
Consider long-term fuel and maintenance savings despite the higher initial cost
of EVs.
83
○
Explore short-term rental or subscription services to assess the practicality of
EV ownership.
○
Advocate for better charging infrastructure at home and workplaces to support
EV adoption.
○
Participate in awareness campaigns and educational programs to promote
electric mobility.
84
References, Bibliography and
Webliography/Annexure
WEBLIOGRAPHY



















https://www.dhi.nic.in/
https://afdc.energy.gov/
https://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/urban/vehicles/road/electric_en
https://www.nissan-global.com/EN/
https://www.byd.com/en/
https://about.bnef.com/
https://www.mckinsey.com/
https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2023
https://www.carbonbrief.org/
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/
https://insideevs.com/
https://www.greencarreports.com/
https://www.technologyreview.com/
https://www.frost.com/
https://www.nrel.gov/
https://www.epa.gov/greenvehicles
https://batteryuniversity.com/
https://ibma.com/
https://electrek.co/
i
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Consumer
Perception
Towards
E-Vehicles
in
Vadodara
City
a. Authors: Ajaysinh Parmar (MBA Student), Prof. Tushar Pradhan (Assistant
Professor)
b. Institution: Parul Institute of Management & Research, Parul University,
Vadodara, India
2. Unplugged: Electric Vehicle Realities versus Consumer Expectations
a. Author: Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (DTTL)
3. Consumer Preferences for Electric Vehicles and Influencing Factors
a. Source: Transportation Research
4. Consumer Attitudes Toward Electric Vehicles
a. Author: Kantar
5. Electric Bike vs Petrol Bike - Which One is Better for You?
a. Author: Hero FinCorp Team
6. Consumer Perception Towards Electric Bikes in Coimbatore City
a. Authors: Mrs. P. Selvi, Mr. Jerial Gideon S
b. Institution: Sri Ramakrishna College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore
7. Challenges and Future of India’s Electric Bike Market
a. Source: The Times of India
8. Consumer Perception of Electric Bikes in Buldhana Region
a. Authors: Dr. Laxmikant B. Deshmukh, Shubham Govindrao Deshmukh
ii
b. Published In: International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering
Technology and Science
9. Potential of E-Bikes in Indian Markets
a. Authors: Prof. Mohammed Khaja Qutubuddin, Dr. P. Sai Rani
b. Institution: ICBM School of Business Excellence, Hyderabad
10. Indian
Consumers'
Adoption
of
Electric
Two-Wheelers
Authors: Tushar Goswamy, Alexander Grausam, Bhavesh Mittal, Timo Möller, Felix
Rupalla, Prabhmaan Thapar
11. Institution: McKinsey & Company
12. Study on Consumer’s Perception Towards Electric Bikes in Goa
Author: Karuna Balikar
Institution: Goa University
13. A Study on Consumer Perception Towards Electric Vehicles in India: With Special
Reference to Noida City of Gautam Buddha Nagar, Uttar Pradesh
Source: European Economic Letters (EEL)
iii
QUESTIONNAIRE
1. Gender
What is your gender?
☐ Male
☐ Female
2. I Live In
Please specify your area of residence:
☐ Urban
☐ Suburban
☐ Rural
3. Current City of Residence
Which city do you currently reside in?
4. Age
Please select your age group:
☐ 18-25
☐ 25-35
☐ 35-45
☐ 45-55
☐ 55 and above
5. Education
What is your highest level of education?
☐ High School
☐ Undergraduate
☐ Postgraduate
☐ Doctorate
☐ Other (Please specify)
6. Income Range
iv
What is your monthly income range?
☐ Below ₹10,000
☐ ₹10,000 - ₹50,000
☐ ₹50,000 - ₹1,00,000
☐ Above ₹1,00,000
7. What Kind of Transportation Do You Use on a Daily Basis? ☐
Two-wheeler (Electric)
☐ Two-wheeler (Petrol/Diesel)
☐ Public Transportation
☐ Other (Please specify)
8. Have You Ever Considered Buying an Electric Vehicle?
☐ Yes
☐ No
9. Which of the Following Characteristics Do You Consider While Buying a Vehicle? (Rank in
order of importance, 1 = most important, 5 = least important)
☐ Price
☐ Mileage
☐ Charging Time
☐ Maintenance Cost
☐ Environmental Impact
10. Which Characteristic of an Electric Vehicle is a Deal Breaker for You? (Rank in order of
importance, 1 = most important, 5 = least important)
☐ High Price
☐ Limited Charging Infrastructure
☐ Low Range/Mileage
☐ Slow Charging Time
☐ High Maintenance Costs
11. What is Your Price Preference for Electric vs. Petrol/Diesel Vehicles? ☐
Less than ₹50,000
☐ ₹50,000 - ₹1,00,000
☐ ₹1,00,000 - ₹2,00,000
☐ Above ₹2,00,000
v
12. What Mileage on a Full Charge Would You Prefer for Your Daily Driving Needs? ☐
Less than 50 km
☐ 50-100 km
☐ 100-150 km
☐ More than 150 km
13. How Fast Do You Need Your Electric Vehicle to Be Fully Charged? ☐
Less than 1 hour
☐ 1-2 hours
☐ 2-4 hours
☐ More than 4 hours
14. From Your Perspective, When Do You Think EVs Will Replace 50% of Fuel Vehicles in
the Future?
☐ Within 5 years
☐ 5-10 years
☐ 10-20 years
☐ More than 20 years
☐ Never
15. Have You Used an Electric Vehicle Before?
☐ Yes
☐ No
16. If You Did, When Did You Plan to Switch to an Electric Vehicle?
☐ Already switched
☐ Within the next 1 year
☐ 1-3 years
☐ More than 3 years
☐ No plans to switch
17. Do You Believe Your Electric Vehicle is Value for Money? (For those who own EVs) ☐
Yes
☐ No
☐ Unsure
18. Which is More Comfortable for You: Electric or Petrol/Diesel Two-Wheeler? ☐
Electric Two-Wheeler
☐ Petrol/Diesel Two-Wheeler
vi
19. Mileage Comparison
Please provide an estimate of the mileage you get:
Electric Vehicle: (Answer here for Mileage per Charge)
Petrol/Diesel Vehicle: [Answer here for Mileage per Litre]
20. What Are Your Reasons for Switching to an Electric Vehicle? (Multiple choices allowed)
(Rank in order of importance, 1 = most important, 5 = least important) ☐ Environmental
Concerns
☐ Lower Running Costs
☐ Government Incentives
☐ Latest Technology
☐ Other (Please specify)
21. Would You Recommend an Electric Vehicle to Others?
☐ Yes
☐ No
22. Which Vehicle Type is More Economical: Electric or Petrol/Diesel? ☐
Electric Vehicle
☐ Petrol/Diesel Vehicle
23. How Often Do You Charge Your Electric Vehicle?
☐ Daily
☐ Every 2-3 Days
☐ Weekly
☐ Rarely
24. Awareness of Electric Vehicles Was Through Which Mode?
☐ Social Media
☐ News Articles
☐ TV Advertisements
☐ Friends
☐ Family
☐ Dealerships
☐ Other (Please specify)
25. What is Your Primary Reason for Not Purchasing an Electric Two-Wheeler Yet?
(Rank in order of importance, 1 = most important, 5 = least important) ☐ High Initial
Cost
vii
☐ Lack of Charging Infrastructure
☐ Limited Mileage
☐ Uncertain about the Technology
☐ I’m satisfied with my petrol/diesel two-wheeler
☐ Other (Please specify)
26. Which Brand of Electric Two-Wheelers Do You Prefer?
☐ Ather Energy
☐ Ola Electric
☐ TVS iQube
☐ Bajaj Chetak
☐ Hero Electric
☐ Revolt Motors
☐ Ampere Vehicles
☐ Okinawa
☐ Other (Please specify)
27. Would You Consider Renting an Electric Two-Wheeler for Short-term Use (e.g., for a
day or a week)?
☐ Yes
☐ No
☐ Unsure
28. How Important is Brand Reputation When Choosing an Electric Two-Wheeler? ☐
Very Important
☐ Somewhat Important
☐ Neutral
☐ Not Important
29. How Satisfied Are You with the Availability of Service Centers for Electric Vehicles? ☐
Very satisfied
☐ Satisfied
☐ Neutral
☐ Dissatisfied
☐ Very dissatisfied
30. Which Financing Options Would Make You More Likely to Purchase an Electric
Two-Wheeler? (Multiple choices allowed)
☐ Low-interest Loans
viii
☐ Zero Down Payment
☐ Extended Loan Repayment Period
☐ Manufacturer Discounts
☐ Government Subsidies
☐ None of the above
31. Which Feature of Electric Two-Wheelers Do You Find Most Appealing? ☐
Low Maintenance Costs
☐ Environmentally Friendly
☐ Silent Operation
☐ Latest Technology
☐ Government Subsidies
32. How much are you willing to Spend on Monthly Charging Costs for Your Electric
Two-Wheeler?
☐ Less than ₹500
☐ ₹500 - ₹1,000
☐ ₹1,000 - ₹1,500
☐ More than ₹1,500
33. How Convenient Do You Find Home Charging for Electric Two-Wheelers? ☐
Very convenient
☐ Somewhat convenient
☐ Neutral
☐ Inconvenient
☐ Not possible in my home
34. How Confident Are You in the Safety of Electric Two-Wheelers?
☐ Very confident
☐ Confident
☐ Neutral
☐ Not confident
35. What Would Make You Feel More Comfortable About Buying an Electric Two-Wheeler?
(Rank in order of importance, 1 = most important, 5 = least important) ☐ Improved Battery Life
☐ Better Charging Infrastructure
☐ More Government Incentives
☐ Better Resale Value
ix
☐ Price Reduction
36. Are Electric Two-Wheelers More Suitable for City or Rural Areas? ☐
More suitable for city
☐ More suitable for rural
☐ Suitable for both
☐ Not sure
37. Which of the Following Do You See as a Major Challenge for Electric Two-Wheelers? ☐
Battery Life
☐ Charging Time
☐ Lack of Charging Stations
☐ High Initial Cost
☐ Performance in Long-distance Travel
38. Do You Think Electric Two-Wheelers Will Become Mainstream in the Next 5 Years? ☐
Yes
☐ No
☐ Unsure
39. What is the Most Significant Advantage of Electric Two-Wheelers Over Petrol/Diesel
Two-Wheelers?
☐ Cost savings
☐ Environmental Benefits
☐ Advanced Technology
☐ Quieter Operation
☐ Other (Please specify)
x