CHAPTER
5
THE CMOS INVERTER
Quantification of integrity, performance, and energy metrics of an inverter
Optimization of an inverter design
5.1
Exercises and Design Problems
5.4.2
5.2
The Static CMOS Inverter — An Intuitive
Perspective
Propagation Delay: First-Order
Analysis
5.4.3
Propagation Delay from a Design
Perspective
5.3
Evaluating the Robustness of the CMOS
Inverter: The Static Behavior
Switching Threshold
5.5.1
Dynamic Power Consumption
5.3.2
Noise Margins
5.5.2
Static Consumption
Robustness Revisited
5.5.3
Putting It All Together
5.5.4
Analyzing Power Consumption Using
SPICE
Performance of CMOS Inverter: The Dynamic
Behavior
5.4.1
180
Power, Energy, and Energy-Delay
5.3.1
5.3.3
5.4
5.5
Computing the Capacitances
5.6
Perspective: Technology Scaling and its
Impact on the Inverter Metrics
Section 5.1
181
Exercises and Design Problems
1.
[M, SPICE, 3.3.2] The layout of a static CMOS inverter is given in Figure 5.1. (λ = 0.125
µm).
a. Determine the sizes of the NMOS and PMOS transistors.
Solution
The sizes are wn=1.0µm, ln=0.25µm, wp=0.5µm, and lp=0.25 µm.
b. Plot the VTC (using HSPICE) and derive its parameters (VOH, VOL, VM, VIH, and VIL).
Solution
The inverter VTC is shown below. For a static CMOS inverter with a supply voltage of
2.5 V, VOH =2.5 V and VOL=0 V. In order to calculate Vm , note from the VTC that the value is
between 0.8 V and 0.9 V. Therefore, the NMOS is saturated and the PMOS is velocity saturated. Let Vin=Vout=Vm and set the currents equal to obtain the following equation:
(kn/2)(VGS-VTN)2(1+λVDS)=kpVDSAT[(VGS-VTP)-(VDSAT/2)](1+λVDS)
Substitute the appropriate values and solve numerically to find V m=0.883 V.
Use the VTC data to solve for VIL and VIH numerically. The result is that VIH=0.97 V and
VIL=0.56 V.
3
VIL
2.5
2
Output Voltage (V)
5.1
Exercises and Design Problems
1.5
VM
1
0.5
VIH
0
−0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
Input Voltage (V)
2
2.5
c. Is the VTC affected when the output of the gates is connected to the inputs of 4 similar
gates?
Solution
No. CMOS gates are a purely capacitive load so the DC circuit characteristics are not
affected.
182
THE CMOS INVERTER
GND
Poly
Chapter 5
In
VDD = 2.5 V.
2λ
Poly
PMOS
NMOS
Metal1
Out
Metal1
Figure 5.1
2.
CMOS inverter layout.
d. Resize the inverter to achieve a switching threshold of approximately 0.75 V. Do not layout the new inverter, use HSPICE for your simulations. How are the noise margins
affected by this modification?
Solution
Changing the NMOS sizing to wn=2.0µm moves the switching threshold to 0.75 V.
This increases N MH and decreases N ML.
Figure 5.2 shows a piecewise linear approximation for the VTC. The transition region is
approximated by a straight line with a slope equal to the inverter gain at VM. The intersection
of this line with the VOH and the VOL lines defines VIH and VIL.
a. The noise margins of a CMOS inverter are highly dependent on the sizing ratio, r = kp/kn,
of the NMOS and PMOS transistors. Use HSPICE with VTn = |VTp| to determine the value
of r that results in equal noise margins? Give a qualitative explanation.
Solution
The TSMC 0.25µm models were used for simulation and the threshold voltages of
NMOS and PMOS devices are nearly equal in this process. A value near r=1 should result in
equal noise margins, since the transistors will be closely matched. HSPICE showed that the
resulting noise margins for this sizing were NMH=0.97 V and NML=1.1 V. The mismatch is
due to the fact that the PMOS threshold voltage is actually slightly lower, so the PMOS is
stronger and the upper noise margin is reduced. The actual value that results in equal noise
margins is r=0.83.
b. Section 5.3.2 of the text uses this piecewise linear approximation to derive simplified
expressions for NMH and NML in terms of the inverter gain. The derivation of the gain is
based on the assumption that both the NMOS and the PMOS devices are velocity saturated
at VM . For what range of r is this assumption valid? What is the resulting range of VM ?
Solution
Section 5.1
Exercises and Design Problems
183
Using the equations for finding the region of operation, it can be shown that the PMOS
and NMOS are both velocity saturated only while the switching threshold is between 1.06 V
and 1.10 V. Since this range may be considered inclusive, we can assume that both devices are
velocity saturated and set the currents equal with V IN=V OUT=VM to find kp/kn . The result is
that kp/kn must be between 0.34 and 0.41. This result can be checked by sizing the devices
accordingly and testing the resulting V M in HSPICE. The result gives a range of 1.04 V to
1.09 V. This makes sense, because the NMOS must be much stronger than the PMOS to
achieve a switching threshold near 1 V.
c. Derive expressions for the inverter gain at VM for the cases when the sizing ratio is just
above and just below the limits of the range where both devices are velocity saturated.
What are the operating regions of the NMOS and the PMOS for each case? Consider the
effect of channel-length modulation by using the following expression for the small-signal
resistance in the saturation region: ro,sat = 1/(λID).
Vout
VOH
VM
Vin
VOL
VIL
VIH
Figure 5.2 A different approach to derive
VIL and VIH.
Solution:
When VM is slightly larger than 1.1 V, the NMOS is velocity saturated and the PMOS
is saturated. When V‘ is slightly smaller than 1.06 V, the PMOS is velocity saturated and the
NMOS is saturated. Section 5.3.2 of the text shows this derivation for the case when both
devices are velocity saturated. These derivations can be completed by substituting the correct
current equations and using the same method. The results are as follows:
For the case when the NMOS is saturated and the PMOS is velocity saturated:
k ( V – V )( 1 + λ V
)+k V
(1 + λ (V
–V
))
dV
n in
tn
n out
p DSATP
p out
DD
out
--------------= – -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------V
k λ
dV
2
DSATP
n n
in
-----------( V in – V tn ) + k p V DSATP λ p  V i n – V D D – V tp – -----------------------
2
2
Dropping the second order terms in the numerator, substituting Vm for Vin, and simplifying
the denominator leads to the following expression for the gain:
k (V – V ) + k V
dV
out
n m
tn
p DSATP
--------------= – ----------------------------------------------------------------------ID ( Vm) (λ n – λp )
dV in
For the case when the NMOS is velocity saturated and the PMOS is saturated:
k V
(1 + λ V
) + k (V – V
– V ) (1 + λ (V
–V
))
dV
n DSATN
n out
p in
DD
tp
p out
DD
out
--------------= – --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------dV
V
k λ
2
DSATN
in
p
p
k n V DSATN λ n  V i n – V t n – ------------------------ + ------------ ( V in – V DD – V t p )
2
2
184
THE CMOS INVERTER
Chapter 5
Again, dropping the second order terms in the numerator, substituting Vm for Vin, and simplifying the denominator leads to the following expression for the gain:
k V
+ k (V – V
–V )
dV
n DSATN
p m
DD
tp
out
--------------= – -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I ( V ) (λ – λ )
dV
D m n
p
in
3.
[M, SPICE, 3.3.2] Figure 5.3 shows an NMOS inverter with a resistive load.
a. Qualitatively discuss why this circuit behaves as an inverter.
Solution
For VIN <VT, M1 is in cutoff regime, thus I=0 and Vout=2.5V. For V IN >VT, M1 is conducting and Vout=2.5V - (I*R). This in turn gives a low Vout and the input signal is inverted.
b. Find VOH and VOL calculate VIH and VIL.
Solution
Assuming negligable leakage, when Vin<VT, transistor M1 is off and VOH=2.5V. For
Vin=2.5V, assume M1 is in the linear region, and because VDS is negligable in the linear
region, channel-length modulation can be ignored. For the linear region, Vmin=VDS=Vout=VOL
=46.25m. Checking the assumption: VGT =2.07V, VDSat=0.63V, and VDS=46.25m, thus, M1
was correctly assumed to be in the linear region.
To find VM, set the resistor current equal to the NMOS current, with an input and out
put voltage of VM.
2.5 – V M
( V – 0.43 ) 2
-------------------- = k n --------------------------- ( 1 + 0.06V M )
75k
2
Thus, V M = 0.79V.
To find V IL and V IH, the slope of the VTC, at VM, is derived and the line is extrapolated
out to VOH and VOL respectively. Ignoring the effects of channel length modulation, the slope
is given by the following:
dV
R L knW
----------o = – ---------------( 2V i n – 0.86 )
2L
dV in
Plugging VM =0.79V, into the slope equation above, gives a slope of 9.32. Extrapolating the line back to VOH gives V IL=0.607V and the extrapolation of the line to VOL gives
VIH=0.87V.
c. Find NML and NMH, and plot the VTC using HSPICE.
Solution
NML = V IL = 0.607V and NMH = 2.5V - VIH = 1.63V
Exercises and Design Problems
185
* problem 3 for solutions
2.6
2.4
2.2
2
1.8
1.6
Voltages (lin)
Section 5.1
1.4
1.2
1
800m
600m
400m
200m
0
0
2n
4n
6n
Time (lin) (TIME)
8n
10n
d. Compute the average power dissipation for: (i) Vin = 0 V and (ii) Vin = 2.5 V
+2.5 V
RL = 75 kΩ
Vout
Vin
M1
W/L = 1.5/0.5
Figure 5.3
Resistive-load inverter
Solution
(i) Vin=0 means M1 is cutoff, therefore, IVDD=0 and consequently P VDD=0
(ii) Vin=2.5V, Vout=VOL=46.25mV,
2.5 – 46.25m
∆V
I VDD = ------- = ------------------------------- = 32.7uA
75k
R
P=VDD*IVDD=2.5V*32.7mA=81.75mW
e. Use HSPICE to sketch the VTCs for RL = 37k, 75k, and 150k on a single graph.
Solution
186
THE CMOS INVERTER
Chapter 5
* problem 5.3e
2.6
2.4
2.2
2
1.8
Voltages (lin)
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
R=150k
R=75k
800m
600m
R=37k
400m
200m
0
0
4.
500m
1
1.5
Voltage X (lin) (VOLTS)
2
2.5
f. Comment on the relationship between the critical VTC voltages (i.e., VOL, VOH, VIL, VIH )
and the load resistance, RL.
Solution
As RL increases, the VTC curve becomes more ideal for the following reasons: VOL
decreases, NM L increases, VIH decreases, and NMH increases. However, these come as
tradeoffs because, as RL increases, VIL decreases, which is less ideal, and VOH remains
unchanged.
g. Do high or low impedance loads seem to produce more ideal inverter characteristics?
Solution
As the impedance load increases, there is a tradeoff, the inverter VTC becomes more
ideal with a higher gain and thus better noise margins. However, the VTC curve is shifted in
favor of M1 and the threshold voltage is lowered as the VTC moves to the left.
[E, None, 3.3.3] For the inverter of Figure 5.3 and an output load of 3 pF:
a. Calculate tplh, tphl, and tp.
Solution
tpLH=0.69R LCL= 155 nsec.
For tpHL: First calculate Ron for Vout at 2.5V and 1.25V. At Vout=2.5V, IDVsat=0.439mA giving
Ron= 5695Ω and when Vout=1.25V, IDvsat=0.41m giving Ron= 3049W.
Thus, the average resistance between Vout=2.5Vand Vout=1.25V is R average=4.372kΩ.
tpLH=0.69R averageCL=9.05nsec.
tp=av{tpLH, tpHL}=82.0nsec
b. Are the rising and falling delays equal? Why or why not?
Solution
tpLH >> tpHL because RL=75kΩ is much larger than the effective linearized on-resistance of M1.
Section 5.1
Exercises and Design Problems
187
c. Compute the static and dynamic power dissipation assuming the gate is clocked as fast as
possible.
Solution
Static Power:
VIN=VOL gives Vout=VOH=2.5V, thus IVDD=0A so PVDD=0W.
VIN=VOH gives Vout=VOL =46.3mV, which is in the linear region.
Calculating the current through M1 gives IVDD=32.8mA --> PVDD =82mW
5.
Dynamic Power:
Pdyn=CL∆V*Vdd*fmax=3pF*(2.5V-46.3mV)*2.5V*12.2MHz=0.225mW.
The next figure shows two implementations of MOS inverters. The first inverter uses only
NMOS transistors.
a. Calculate VOH, VOL, VM for each case.
VDD = 2.5V
V = 2.5V
DD
M2
M4
W/L=0.375/0.25
VOUT
W/L=0.75/0.25
V OUT
VIN
VIN
M3
M1 W/L=0.75/0.25
W/L=0.375/0.25
B
A
Figure 5.4 Inverter Implementations
Solution
Circuit A.
VOH: We calculate VOH, when M1 is off. The threshold for M2 is:
V T = V T0 + γ ⋅ (
– 2φ F + V SB –
– 2φ F ) , V SB = V OUT , –2φ F = 0.6V
and M2 will be off when: VGS – V T = V D D – V OUT – V T = 0 ,
Substitute VT in the last equation and solve for VOUT.
V
DD
–V
OU T
–V
T
= 2.5 – V
OU T
– ( 0.43 + 0.4 ⋅ (
0.6 + V
O UT
–
0.6 ) ) = 0
We get VOUT=VOH=1.765V
VOL: To calculate VOL, we set V IN=VDD=2.5V.
We expect VOUT to be low, so we can make the assumption that M2 will be velocity
saturated and M1 will be in the linear region.
W

L2

V
2

DSAT-
For M2: I D2 = k' n ⋅ -------2- ⋅  ( V GS – V T ) ⋅ V DSAT – -----------------⋅ ( 1 + λV ) and
DS

2

188
THE CMOS INVERTER
W

V
2
Chapter 5

D S
for M1: I D1 = k'n ⋅ -------1- ⋅  ( V GS – V T0 ) ⋅ V DS – ----------
L1

2

Setting ID 1 = I D2 , we get an equation and we solve for V OUT.
We get: VOUT=VOL=0.263V, so our assumption holds.
VM: To calculate VM we set VM=VIN=VOUT.
Assuming that both transistors are velocity saturated, then we have the next pair of
equations:
I
I
2

V
W 
D SAT
1
– ------------------- ⋅ ( 1 + λV )
= k' ⋅ -------- ⋅  ( V – V ) ⋅ V
T0
D SAT
D1
n L  M
M
2 
1 

2

V
W 
DSAT
2
–V –V )⋅V
– ------------------- ⋅ ( 1 + λ ( V
= k' ⋅ -------- ⋅  ( V
– V ))
M
T
DSAT
D2
n L  DD
DD
M
2 
2 

Setting I D 1 = I D2 , we get for VM = 1.269V
Circuit B.
When VIN =0V, the NMOS transistor is off and the PMOS transistor in on and pulls
VOUT up to VDD, so VOH=2.5. Similarly, when V IN=2.5V, the PMOS transistor is off and the
NMOS transistor pulls V OUT all the way down to ground, so VOL=0V.
To calculate VM we set V M=VIN =VOUT.
We assume that both transistors are velocity saturated. We get the following pair of
equations.
2

W 
V
4
DSATp
I D4 = k'p ⋅ -------- ⋅  ( V M – V DD – V
) ⋅ VD SATp – ----------------------- ⋅ ( 1 + λ p V M )
L4
2
T0p


2

W 
V
3
DSATn
I D3 = k'n ⋅ -------- ⋅  ( V M – V T0n ) ⋅ V DSATn – ----------------------- ⋅ ( 1 + λ n V M )
L3
2


Setting ID 3 + I D2 = 0 , we get for VM = 1.095V.
So the assumption that both transistors were velocity saturated holds.
b. Use HSPICE to obtain the two VTCs. You must assume certain values for the source/drain
areas and perimeters since there is no layout. For our scalable CMOS process, λ = 0.125
µm, and the source/drain extensions are 5λ for the PMOS; for the NMOS the source/drain
contact regions are 5λx5λ.
Solution
Section 5.1
Exercises and Design Problems
189
The two VTCs are shown below.
* problem 5
2.6
2.4
2.4
2.2
2.2
2
2
1.8
1.8
1.6
1.6
1.4
1.4
Voltages (lin)
Voltages (lin)
* problem 5
2.6
1.2
1.2
1
1
800m
800m
600m
600m
400m
400m
200m
200m
0
0
0
200m
400m
600m
800m
1
1.2
1.4
Voltage X (lin) (VOLTS)
1.6
1.8
2
2.2
2.4
0
2.6
200m
400m
Depletion Load Inverter
600m
800m
1
1.2
1.4
Voltage X (lin) (VOLTS)
1.6
1.8
2
2.2
2.4
2.6
CMOS Inverter
c. Find VIH , VIL, NM L and NMH for each inverter and comment on the results. How can you
increase the noise margins and reduce the undefined region?
Solution
Circuit A
VIL = 0.503V => VOUT1 = 1.65V, VIH = 1.35V => VOUT2 = 0.588V
NMH = VOH - VOUT2 = 1.765 - 1.65 = 0.115V, NML = VOUT1 - VOL = 0.588- 0.23 = 0.358V
Circuit B
VIL = 0.861V => VOUT1 = 2.33V, VIH = 1.22V => VOUT2 = 0.219V
NMH = VOH - VOUT2 = 2.5V - 1.22V = 1.28V, NML = VOUT1 - VOL = 0.861V- 0V = 0.861V
6.
We can increase the noise margins by moving VM closer to the middle of the output
voltage swing.
d. Comment on the differences in the VTCs, robustness and regeneration of each inverter.
Solution
It is clear from the two VTCs, that the CMOS inverter is more robust, since the low and
high noise margins are higher than the first inverter. Also the regeneration in the second
inverter is greater since it provides rail to rail output and the gain of the inverter is much
greater.
Consider the following NMOS inverter. Assume that the bulk terminals of all NMOS devices
are connected to GND. Assume that the input IN has a 0V to 2.5V swing.
VDD= 2.5V
VDD= 2.5V
M3
x
M2
OUT
IN
M1
190
THE CMOS INVERTER
Chapter 5
a. Set up the equation(s) to compute the voltage on node x. Assume γ=0.5.
Solution
The voltage on node x is set to one threshold value VT below VDD. So:
V X = V DD – V T
V X = V DD – [ V T0 + γ ( V S B + – 2φ F –
– 2φ F ) ]
V X = 2.5 – [ 0.43 + 0.5 ( V X + 0.6 – 0.6 ) ]
V X = 2.07 + 0.39 – 0.5 V X + 0.6
V X = 2.46 – 0.5 V X + 0.6
which gives VX=1.7014V.
b. What are the modes of operation of device M2? Assume γ=0.
Solution
V X = V DD – V T
V DS2 = V DD – V OUT
V GS2 – V T = V DD – V T – V OUT – V T = V DD – V OUT – 2V T
This means that V DS2 > V GS2 – V T , so M2 is either saturated (or vel. saturated) or cut off.
c. What is the value on the output node OUT for the case when IN =0V?Assume γ=0.
Solution
When IN=0 then M1 is off and OUT will charge up to:
V out ( max ) = V X – V T
V out ( max ) = V DD – V T – V T
V out ( max ) = V DD – 2V T
d. Assuming γ=0, derive an expression for the switching threshold (VM) of the inverter.
Recall that the switching threshold is the point where VIN= VOUT. Assume that the device
sizes for M1, M2 and M3 are (W/L)1, (W/L)2, and (W/L)3 respectively. What are the limits
on the switching threshold?
For this, consider two cases:
i) (W/L)1 >> (W/L)2
ii) (W/L)2 >> (W/L)1
Solution
Assuming that both devises are velocity saturated we can equate the currents when
VIN= VOUT=VM. This gives
Section 5.1
Exercises and Design Problems
191
V DSAT
V DSAT
W
W
k' n  -----  V GS1 – V T – -------------- = k' n  -----  V GS2 – V T – --------------
 L 

 L 
2
2 
1
2
V
V
W
DSAT
DSAT
W
-----  V – V T – -------------=  -----  V – V T – V M – V T – --------------
 L  M
2   L   DD
2 
1
2
( W ⁄ L )2
Solving for VM and substituting r = ------------------- we get:
( W ⁄ L )1
V
V
DSAT
DSAT
 V – V – -------------= r  V DD – 2V T – V M – -------------T
 M

2 
2 
V DSAT
V DSAT
r  V DD – 2V T – -------------- + V T + -------------
2 
2
V M = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1+r
To find the limits for VM we check the two cases:
i) When (W/L)1 >> (W/L)2, VM = VT + V DSAT/2 = 0.43 + 0.63/2 = 0.745
ii) When (W/L)2 >> (W/L)1, V M = VDD - 2V T - VDSAT /2 = 1.325
7.
For both cases the assumptions for M1 and M2 are valid.
Consider the circuit in Figure 5.5. Device M1 is a standard NMOS device. Device M2 has all
the same properties as M1, except that its device threshold voltage is negative and has a value
of -0.4V. Assume that all the current equations and inequality equations (to determine the
mode of operation) for the depletion device M2 are the same as a regular NMOS. Assume that
the input IN has a 0V to 2.5V swing.
VDD= 2.5 V
M2 (2µm/1µm), VTn = -0.4V
OUT
IN
M1 (4µm/1µm)
Figure 5.5 A depletion load NMOS inverter
a. Device M2 has its gate terminal connected to its source terminal. If VIN = 0V, what is the
output voltage? In steady state, what is the mode of operation of device M2 for this input?
Solution
When VIN = 0V then M1 is off. M2 is on since VGS=0 > VTn2. Since there is no current
through M2, the drain to source voltage of M2 is 0 (linear mode). This means that
VOUT=2.5V.
b. Compute the output voltage for VIN = 2.5V. You may assume that VOUT is small to simplify
your calculation. In steady state, what is the mode of operation of device M2 for this
input?
Solution
We assume that M1 is in the linear mode and M2 is velocity saturated. This means:
192
THE CMOS INVERTER
2
Chapter 5
2
V ou t
V Dsat
= k n2 ( 0 – ( – 0.4 ) )V Dsat – -----------k n1 ( 2.5 – 0.4 )V ou t – --------2
2
Since Vout is small we can neglect the V2out/2 term and the previous equation becomes
k n2 0.05355
- ------------------- , which gives V out ≅ 12mV
V out = -----k n1 2.1
So our assumptions are valid.
c. Assuming Pr(IN =0)= 0.3, what is the static power dissipation of this circuit?
Solution
There is static power dissipation when both transistors are on. This happens when
VIN=1. Then the static power dissipation is given by:
P s tati c = P in = 1 V DD I D
2
 115uA 2
0.63 
- ---  0.4 ⋅ 0.63 – ------------ 
P sta tic = ( 1 – 0.3 )2.5  --------------2 1
2 
 V
P stat ic = 21.55uW
8.
[M, None, 3.3.3] An NMOS transistor is used to charge a large capacitor, as shown in Figure
5.6.
a. Determine the tpLH of this circuit, assuming an ideal step from 0 to 2.5V at the input node.
Solutions
To determine the rise time, an average current has to be calculated between the start of
the transistion with VO=0V and midpoint of the transition.
At the start of the transistion: V O=V OL=0V, M1 is velocity saturated and IDsat=1.46mA.
To find the votlage swing, VOH must be calculated using the body effect:
V gs = 2.5V – V OH = V t n + γ (
0.6 + V OH – 0.6 )
VOH=1.76V. The midpoint is thus,
V OH – V OL
------------------------= 0.88V
2
and the threshold voltage at the midpoint is: VT(Vsb=0.88V)=0.607V.
Using this threshold voltage, V GT=1.013V, VDS=1.62V, and VDSat=0.63V, thus, the
transistor M1 is still velocity saturated, giving IDSat=49.17mA.
Finding the average current between V0= 0V and V 0= 0.88V gives: Iaverage=0.756mA.
C L ∆V
5pF × 0.88V
t p = ----------------- = ------------------------------- = 5.82n sec
0.756mA
I aver age
b. Assume that a resistor RS of 5 kΩ is used to discharge the capacitance to ground. Determine tpHL.
Solution
tpLH=0.69*RLCL=0.69*5kΩ∗5pF=17.25ns
Section 5.1
Exercises and Design Problems
193
VDD = 2.5V
In
20
2 M1
Out
CL = 5 pF
Figure 5.6 Circuit diagram with annotated W/L ratios
9.
c. Determine how much energy is taken from the supply during the charging of the capacitor.
How much of this is dissipated in M1. How much is dissipated in the pull-down resistance
during discharge? How does this change when RS is reduced to 1 kΩ.
Solution
∆QVDD=CL∆V=5pF*1.76V=8.8pC
∆EVDD =∆QVDD*Vdd=8.8pC*2.5V=22pC
Half the energy is dissipated in the transistor M1, while the other half is dissipated in
the restistor Rs. The energy dissipated is independent of R s.
d. The NMOS transistor is replaced by a PMOS device, sized so that kp is equal to the kn of
the original NMOS. Will the resulting structure be faster? Explain why or why not.
Solution
If a PMOS device replaces the NMOS device, body effect will not exist and the PMOS
device will be faster.
The circuit in Figure 5.7 is known as the source follower configuration. It achieves a DC level
shift between the input and the output. The value of this shift is determined by the current I0.
Assume xd=0, γ=0.4, 2|φf|=0.6V, VT0=0.43V, kn’=115µA/V2 and λ=0.
VDD = 2.5V
VDD = 2.5V
Io
Vi
M1 1um/0.25um
Vi
M1 1um/0.25um
Vo
Vo
Vbias= 0.55V
M2
LD=1um
Io
(a)
Figure 5.7 NMOS source follower configuration
(b)
194
THE CMOS INVERTER
Chapter 5
a. Suppose we want the nominal level shift between Vi and Vo to be 0.6V in the circuit in
Figure 5.7 (a). Neglecting the backgate effect, calculate the width of M2 to provide this
level shift (Hint: first relate Vi to Vo in terms of Io).
Solution
The level shift of 0.6V tells us that V GS1=0.6V so VGT1=0.17V. This means that M1
must be in the saturation region (not velocity saturated). Thus,
W
k' ⋅ ----n L
2
---------------⋅ (V
– V ) = I , and ID=6.647 µ A.
GS
T
D
2
For M2, VGT=0.12, so M2 is also in the saturation region (not velocity saturated).
Using the same equation as above and solving for W/L gives W/L = 8.
b. Now assume that an ideal current source replaces M2 (Figure 5.7 (b)). The NMOS transistor M1 experiences a shift in VT due to the backgate effect. Find VT as a function of Vo for
Vo ranging from 0 to 2.5V with 0.5V intervals. Plot VT vs. Vo
Solution
The threshold voltage equation provides the relation that we need:
V
T
= V
T0
+γ⋅(
2φ
F
+V
SB
–
2φ ) = V + γ ⋅ (
F
T0
2φ
F
+V –
o
2φ ) .
F
See the graph at the end of this problem.
c. Plot Vo vs. Vi as Vo varies from 0 to 2.5V with 0.5 V intervals. Plot two curves: one
neglecting the body effect and one accounting for it. How does the body effect influence
the operation of the level converter?
Solution
To plot Vo versus Vi, we need to relate Vo to Vi. We can do this by solving the current
equation (M1 should remain in the same region to first order because VGT will remain roughly
constant to maintain the correct drain current) for Vi:
2I
D- .
V = V + V + --------------i
o
T
W
k' ⋅ ----n L
d. At Vo(with body effect) = 2.5V, find Vo(ideal) and thus determine the maximum error
introduced by the body effect.
Solution
The maximum error occurs at the highest VSB. At Vo = 2.5, the error is 3.49443.1=0.3944 V.
Section 5.1
Exercises and Design Problems
195
Backgate Effect: Vo versus VT
Backgate Effect: V versus V
o
0.9
i
2.5
0.85
No backgate effect
Backgate effect
0.8
2
0.75
0.7
Vo (V)
VT (V)
1.5
0.65
0.6
1
0.55
0.5
0.5
0.45
0.4
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
0
0.5
2.5
1
V (V)
o
Figure for part (b)
10.
1.5
2
Vi (V)
2.5
3
3.5
Figure for part (c)
For this problem assume:
VDD = 2.5V, W P/L = 1.25/0.25, WN/L = 0.375/0.25, L=Leff =0.25µm (i.e. xd= 0µm), CL=Cinv2
2
-1
gate, kn’ = 115µA/V , kp’= -30µA/V , Vtn0 = | Vtp0 | = 0.4V, λ = 0V , γ = 0.4, 2|φf|=0.6V, and tox
= 58A. Use the HSPICE model parameters for parasitic capacitance given below (i.e. Cgd0, Cj,
Cjsw), and assume that VSB=0V for all problems except part (e).
VDD = 2.5V
L = LP = LN = 0.25µm
VOUT
VIN
CL = Cinv-gate
(Wp/Wn = 1.25/0.375)
+
VSB
Figure 5.8 CMOS inverter with capacitive
## Parasitic Capacitance Parameters (F/m)##
NMOS: CGDO=3.11x10-10, CGSO=3.11x10-10, CJ=2.02x10-3, CJSW=2.75x10-10
PMOS: CGDO=2.68x10-10, CGSO=2.68x10-10, CJ=1.93x10-3, CJSW=2.23x10-10
a. What is the Vm for this inverter?
Solution
196
THE CMOS INVERTER
Chapter 5
Assume that Vm is around midrail (1.25V). That means that the NMOS is velocity saturated and the PMOS is saturated. To find Vm, we set the sum of the currents at Vout equal to
0 using the correct equation for each device:
V
2
DSATn
k ⋅V
⋅  V – V – ----------------------- + k ⋅ 0.5 ⋅ ( V – V
–V ) = 0.
n D SATn  M
Tn
p
M
DD
Tp

2
Plug in numbers:
172.5 ⋅ 0.6 ⋅ ( V M – 0.4 – 0.315 ) + ( –150 ) ⋅ 0.5 ⋅ ( VM – 2.5 – ( – 0.4 ) )
103.5V
M
– 74 –  – 75 ⋅  V


2
M
– 4.2V
M
2
= 0
+ 4.41  = 0 .

Solving this quadratic gives V M = 1.245 V.
b. What is the effective load capacitance CLeff of this inverter? (Include parasitic capacitance,
refer to the text for Keq and m.) Hint: You must assume certain values for the source/drain
areas and perimeters since there is no layout. For our scalable CMOS process, λ = 0.125
µm, and the source/drain extensions are 5λ for the PMOS; for the NMOS the source/drain
contact regions are 5λx5λ.
Solution
The calculation of the lumped load capacitance follows the format presented in the lecture notes. The only difference is the dimensions of the devices.
CLeff = C L + Cparasitic = Cg3 + Cg4 + Cdb1 + Cdb2 + Cgd1 + Cgd2.
Cg3 = (CGD0n + CGSOn)Wn + CoxWnL = 2(3.11e-10)(0.375e-6) + 6e-15(0.375)(0.25) = 0.796fF
Cg4 = (C GD0p + CGSOp)Wp + C oxWpL = 2(2.68e-10)(1.25e-6) + 6e-15(1.25)(0.25) = 2.545fF
Cdb1 = K eqn(ADn)C j + Keqswn(PD n)Cjsw. Need to do this calculation for both transitions and
average the results. The Keq values are already calculated in the text.
ADp=ASp=1.25um*0.625um=0.78125um2 and
ADn=ASn=0.125*0.375+0.6252=0.4375um2.
PDp=PSp=2*0.625um+1.25um=2.5um and
PDn=PSn=5*0.125um*3+(2+1+1)*0.125um=2.375um.
(0.57*0.4375*2 + 0.61*2.375*0.28) = 0.904fF for HL transition
(0.79*0.4375*2 + 0.81*2.375*0.28) = 1.23fF for LH. Average Cdb1=1.067fF.
Cdb2 = Keqp(ADp)Cj + Keqswp(PD p)Cjsw.
(0.79*0.78125*1.9 + 0.86*2.5*0.22) = 1.65fF for HL transition
(0.59*0.78125*1.9 + 0.7*2.5*0.22) = 1.26fF for LH. Average Cdb2=1.455fF.
Cgd1 = 2CGD0nWn = 2*3.11e-10*0.375e-6 = 0.233fF.
Cgd2 = 2CGD0pWp = 2*2.68e-10*1.25e-6 = 0.67fF.
CL = sum = 6.767fF. Note - since the problem states that xd=0, it is ok if you neglected the last
two parasitic capacitances. We intended for them to be included, though.
c. Calculate tPHL, tPLH assuming the result of (b) is ‘CLeff = 6.5fF’. (Assume an ideal step
input, i.e. trise=tfall=0. Do this part by computing the average current used to charge/discharge CLeff.)
Solution
We can estimate the propagation delay using the approximation ∆t = ∆Q/I, where ∆Q
= CLeffVDD and I is the average current used to charge/discharge CLeff. During the high-to-low
transition CLeff is discharged through the NMOS transistor so I = IavgN. During the low-to-high
transition CLeff is charged through the PMOS transistor so I = IavgP. In summary:
Section 5.1
Exercises and Design Problems
197
V DD ⋅ CLef f
t delay ≅ --------------------------------, where
2 ⋅ I avg
V
V
DD
DD
I ( V = 0 ) + I  V = -------------
I (V = V
) + I  V = -------------

ds o
ds  o
ds o
DD
ds  o
2
2 
I
= ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ , I
= ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------avgN
avgP
2
2
Table 1 shows corresponding values for IavgN, IavgP, tPLH, and tPHL. NOTE- This solution
for tPLH
for tPHL
Vo (V)
Operation Mode
Ids (mA)
0
PMOS vel sat.
0.300
1.25
PMOS vel sat
0.270
2.5
NMOS vel sat.
0.209
1.25
NMOS vel sat
0.195
Iavg (mA)
Prop Delay (ps)
0.285
28.5
0.202
40.0
Table 1: Average currents and propagation delays for Problem 4(c).
11.
included channel length modulation, but it is ok if your solution did not (see problem assumptions).
d. Find (Wp/Wn) such that tPHL = tPLH.
Solution
One way to do this is to solve the current average equations for W p/Wn after setting the
propagation delays equal to one another. A much easier method is to sweep the widths in
HSPICE. The HSPICE sim shows that Wp/Wn =2.6 gives equal rise and fall times.
e. Suppose we increase the width of the transistors to reduce the tPHL, tPLH. Do we get a proportional decrease in the delay times? Justify your answer.
Solution
The propagation delays DO NOT decrease in proportion to the widths because of selfloading effects. As the device size increases, its parasitic capacitances increase as well. In this
problem, increasing device size increases both average current and C Leff.
f. Suppose VSB = 1V, what is the value of Vtn, Vtp, Vm? How does this qualitatively affect
CLeff?
Solution
Vtp = Vtp0 = -0.4V.
Vtn = 0.4 + γ ⋅ ( 2φ F + 1 – 2φ F ) = 0.596 V.
Using the equation for part a) and plugging in the new value of Vtn gives: VM = 1.35V
The increased Vsb will increase the depletion region and lower the junction capacitance, lowering CLeff.
Using Hspice answer the following questions.
a. Simulate the circuit in Problem 10 and measure tP and the average power for input Vin:
pulse(0 VDD 5n 0.1n 0.1n 9n 20n), as VDD varies from 1V - 2.5V with a 0.25V interval. [tP
= (tPHL + tPLH ) / 2]. Using this data, plot ‘tP vs. VDD’, and ‘Power vs. VDD’.
Specify AS, AD, PS, PD in your spice deck, and manually add CL = 6.5fF. Set VSB = 0V
for this problem.
198
THE CMOS INVERTER
Chapter 5
Solution
*prob4g pset1
*prob4g pset1
4u
230p
3.8u
220p
3.6u
210p
3.4u
200p
3.2u
190p
3u
180p
2.8u
170p
160p
Measures (lin)
Outer Result (lin)
2.6u
150p
140p
2.4u
2.2u
2u
130p
1.8u
120p
1.6u
110p
1.4u
100p
1.2u
90p
1u
80p
800n
70p
600n
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
Outer Result (lin) (pvdd)
Delay vs VDD (part a)
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
Outer Result (lin) (pvdd)
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
Power vs VDD (part a)
b. For Vdd equal to 2.5V determine the maximum fan-out of identical inverters this gate can
drive before its delay becomes larger than 2 ns.
Solution
The maximum number of identical inverters that this gate can drive before the propagation delay exceeds 2ns is 115 inverters.
c. Simulate the same circuit for a set of ‘pulse’ inputs with rise and fall times of tin_rise,fall
=1ns, 2ns, 5ns, 10ns, 20ns. For each input, measure (1) the rise and fall times tout_rise and
tout_fall of the inverter output, (2) the total energy lost Etotal, and (3) the energy lost due to
short circuit current Eshort.
Using this data, prepare a plot of (1) (tout_rise+tout_fall)/2 vs. tin_rise,fall, (2) Etotal vs.
tin_rise,fall, (3) Eshort vs. tin_rise,fall and (4) Eshort/Etotal vs. tin_rise,fall.
Solution
Exercises and Design Problems
199
(trise+tfall)/2 vs trfin
Etotal vs trfin
5
2
1.5
Etotal (pJ)
(trise+tfall)/2 (ns)
4
3
2
0
1
0.5
1
0
5
10
trfin (ns)
15
0
20
0
Eshort vs trfin
1
1.5
0.9
1
0.5
0
5
10
trfin (ns)
15
20
Eshort/Etotal vs trfin
2
Eshort/Etotal
Eshort (pJ)
Section 5.1
0.8
0.7
0
5
10
trfin (ns)
15
20
0.6
0
5
10
trfin (ns)
15
20
d. Provide simple explanations for:
(i) Why the slope for (1) is less than 1?
(ii) Why Eshort increases with tin_rise,fall?
(iii) Why Etotal increases with tin_rise,fall?
Solution
i) The slope is less than 1 because of the regenerative property of the inverter. The high
gain around the switching point causes the output to change faster than the inputs.
ii) The amount of time for which both devices are on simultaneously increases.
iii) Total energy increases because the short circuit energy begins to dominate, and the
short circuit increases as the rise/fall time increases.
200
THE CMOS INVERTER
12.
Chapter 5
Consider the low swing driver of Figure 5.9:
VDD = 2.5 V
W
= 1.5 µm
L n 0.25 µm
W
3 µm
=
L p 0.25 µm
Vin
2.5V
Vout
CL=100fF
0V
Figure 5.9 Low Swing Driver
a. What is the voltage swing on the output node (Vout)? Assume γ=0.
Solution
The range will be from 0.4 V to 2.07 V, since the PMOS is a weak pull down device
and the NMOS is a weak pull up device.
b. Estimate (i) the energy drawn from the supply and (ii) energy dissipated for a 0V to 2.5V
transition at the input. Assume that the rise and fall times at the input are 0. Repeat the
analysis for a 2.5V to 0V transition at the input.
Solution
For a 0 V to 2.5 V transition on the input, the energy drawn from the power supply is:
E SUPPLY = ∫ i DD V DD dt = V DD ∆Q = CV DD ( ( V DD – V tn ) – V t p )
The PMOS will be in cutoff and the energy dissipated in the NMOS will be:
E DISSIPATED = E SUPPLY – ∆E CAP
V DD – V t n 2
V tp 2
E DISSIPATED = CV DD ( ( V DD – V tn ) – V t p ) – C  ----------------------- –  ----------


 2 
2
For a 2.5 V to 0 V transition on the input, the NMOS will be in cutoff and no energy will be
drawn from the power supply. The energy dissipated in the PMOS device will be equal to:
V DD – V t n 2  V tp  2
E = C  ----------------------– ---------

 2 
2
c. Compute tpLH (i.e. the time to transition from VOL to (VOH + VOL) /2). Assume the input
rise time to be 0. VOL is the output voltage with the input at 0V and VOH is the output voltage with the input at 2.5V.
Solution
When the input is high and the capacitor charges, the PMOS device is in cutoff and the
NMOS is velocity saturated for the duration of the charging. The total voltage range is 0.4 V
to 2.07 V, so the midpoint is 1.24 V. We can use the average current method to approximate
tplh. For the velocity saturated NMOS:
Section 5.1
Exercises and Design Problems
201
V DSATN
µ n C o x W
- V DSATN  V GS – V t n – ----------------- ( 1 + λV DS )
I =  ------------------


L
2 
Solving for the current at V=0.4 V and V=1.24 V and averaging yields an average current of
404 uA. Then:
( 100fF ) ( 1.24V – 0.4V )
C∆V
t plh = ------------ = --------------------------------------------------------- = 208ps
404uA
I avg
d. Compute VOH taking into account body effect. Assume γ = 0.5V 1/2 for both the NMOS and
the PMOS.
Solution
The PMOS will be deep in cutoff when Vout approaches VOH. Therefore, we consider
only the NMOS. We can express the equation for threshold voltage numerically as follows:
V t n = 0.43 + 0.5 ( ( 0.6 + 2.5 – V t n ) – 0.6 )
13.
This is an equation in one variable, so it may be solved numerically to find that V tn=0.8
V.
Consider the following low swing driver consisting of NMOS devices M1 and M2. Assume
an NWELL implementation. Assume that the inputs IN and IN have a 0V to 2.5V swing and
that VIN = 0V when VIN = 2.5V and vice-versa. Also assume that there is no skew between IN
and IN (i.e., the inverter delay to derive IN from IN is zero).
VLOW= 0.5V
IN
25µm/0.25µm
M2
Out
IN
M1
25µm/0.25µm
CL=1pF
Figure 5.10 Low Swing Driver
a. To what voltage is the bulk terminal of M2 connected?
Solution
In an NWELL process, the bulk terminal of an NMOS must be connected to ground.
b. What is the voltage swing on the output node as the inputs swing from 0V to 2.5V. Show
the low value and the high value.
Solution
Because the supply voltage is more than a threshold voltage lower than the gate drive
voltage, the output range will not be limited. Therefore the low value is 0 V and the high
value is 0.5 V.
c. Assume that the inputs IN and IN have zero rise and fall times. Assume a zero skew
between IN and IN. Determine the low to high propagation delay for charging the output
node measured from the the 50% point of the input to the 50% point of the output. Assume
that the total load capacitance is 1pF, including the transistor parasitics.
Solution
202
THE CMOS INVERTER
Chapter 5
The lower NMOS will be off during the low to high transition and the upper NMOS
will be in the linear region throughout the transition from 0.0V to 0.25V. We will assume that
the body effect is negligible, since the maximum value of VSB is 0.25V. Use the average current method to find tplh. Using the current equation for the linear region, the current when the
capacitor is at 0V, is 10.8mA. When the capacitor reaches 0.25V, the current is 4.58mA. Threfore, the average current is 7.7mA.
( 1pF ) ( 0.25V )
C∆V
tplh = ------------ = ---------------------------------- = 32.5ps
7.7mA
I avg
d. Assume that, instead of the 1pF load, the low swing driver drives a non-linear capacitor,
whose capacitance vs. voltage is plotted below. Compute the energy drawn from the low
supply for charging up the load capacitor. Ignore the parasitic capacitance of the driver circuit itself.
3
2
1
.5V 1V 1.5V 2V 2.5V 3V
Voltage, V
Solution
The capacitor charges only from 0 V to 0.5 V, so only the first segment of the graph
should be considered. The total energy drawn from the supply is:
E = V DD I ( t ) dt = Q t otal V DD
∫
The total charge required to charge the capacitor is:
0.5
·
0.5
Q = ∫ C ( V ) dV = 1pF ∫ ( 1 + 2V ) dV = 0.75pC
0
14.
0
Therefore, since the the E=QV, the total energy drawn from the supply is 0.375 pJ.
The inverter below operates with VDD=0.4V and is composed of |V t| = 0.5V devices. The
devices have identical I0 and n.
a. Calculate the switching threshold (VM) of this inverter.
Solution
( V G S – V t ) ⁄ ( nV T )
The subthreshold I-V relation is given by I D = Io e
( 1 + λV DS ) , assuming
VDS > 50mV. To calculate the switching voltage, we need to find where Vin=Vout occurs. So
equating the absolute values of the currents for the two transistors we get:
Io' e
V in ⁄ ( nV T )
( 1 + λ n V o ut ) = I o' e
( V D D – V in ) ⁄ ( n VT )
( 1 + λ p ( V DD – V out ) )
Section 5.1
Exercises and Design Problems
203
Considering Vin=Vout and doing some cancellations we get:
ln [ ( 1 + λ n V i n ) ⁄ ( 1 + λ p ( V i n – V DD ) ) ] = 1 ⁄ ( ( n ⋅ V T ) ( V DD – V i n – V i n ) )
after massaging the last equation we have:
V DD ⁄ 2 – nV T ⁄ 2 ⋅ ln [ ( 1 + λ n V i n ) ⁄ ( 1 + λ p ( V DD – V in ) ) ] = V in
Iterating this expression with V DD=0.4V, V T=26mV, λn=0.06, λp=0.1 and n=1.5 we get
Vin=0.2V. So we have a switching threshold of VDD/2=0.2V.
b. Calculate VIL and VIH of the inverter.
VDD = 0.4V
VIN
VOUT
Figure 5.11 Inverter in Weak Inversion Regime
Solution
To calculate the noise margins we need to calculate the slope of the VTC at VM=VDD /2.
Equating the currents we get:
Io' e
V in ⁄ ( nV T )
( 1 + λ n V o ut ) = I o' e
( V D D – V o u t ) ⁄ ( n VT )
( 1 + λ p ( V DD – V out ) )
and cancelling out Io‘ and differentiating both sides with respect to Vin we get:
V in ⁄ ( nV T )
∂
∂ ( V i n – V D D ) ⁄ ( nV T )
(e
( 1 + λ n V o ut ) ) =
( 1 + λ p ( V out – V DD ) )
e
∂ V in
∂ V in
e
= –e
V in ⁄ ( nV T )
( 1 + λ n V out ) ⁄ nV T + e
( V D D – V in ) ⁄ ( nV T )
V in ⁄ ( nV T )
λn
( 1 + λ p ( V DD – V out ) ) ⁄ nV T – e
∂V ou t
=
∂ V in
( V D D – V in ) ⁄ ( nV T )
λp
∂V out
∂Vin
manipulating this expression we get:
(e
= e
V i n ⁄ ( nV T )
( V DD – V i n ) ⁄ ( nV T )
λp + e
( 1 + λ n V out ) ⁄ nV T + e
plugging in Vout=Vin=VDD/2 we reach:
V i n ⁄ ( nV T )
λn )
( V DD – V in ) ⁄ ( nV T )
∂V out
=
∂ Vi n
( 1 + λ p ( V DD – V o ut ) ) ⁄ nV T
204
THE CMOS INVERTER
–e
( V DD ⁄ 2 ) ⁄ ( nV T )
( λp + λn )
Chapter 5
( V D D ⁄ 2 ) ⁄ ( nV T )
∂V ou t
= e
( 2 + ( λ p + λ n )V DD ⁄ 2 ) ⁄ ( nV T )
∂ V in
Finally:
∂V out
= – ( 2 + ( λp + λ n )V DD ⁄ 2 ) ⁄ ( nV T ) ⁄ ( λ p + λ n )
∂ V in Vin = Vout = V D D ⁄ 2
Using the values VDD=0.4V, V T=26mV, λn=0.06, λp=0.1 and n=1.5 we obtain:
g =
15.
∂V out
= – 325.6
∂ Vi n
This value is much more that we would expect from an MOS inverter (which has g~-30).
However we should keep in mind that in the subthreshold regime MOS devices behave essentially as bipolar devices and can yield such values of gain.
We know that V IL=VM+(VDD-VM)/g and VIH =VM-VM/g from the text (eq 5.7). Using
these equations and the results that we got we have: VIL=0.1994V and VIH =0.2006V.
Also NMH=NML=0.1994V
Sizing a chain of inverters.
a. In order to drive a large capacitance (CL = 20 pF) from a minimum size gate (with input
capacitance Ci = 10fF), you decide to introduce a two-staged buffer as shown in Figure
5.12. Assume that the propagation delay of a minimum size inverter is 70 ps. Also assume
that the input capacitance of a gate is proportional to its size. Determine the sizing of the
two additional buffer stages that will minimize the propagation delay.
‘1’ is the minimum size inverter.
In
OUT
?
1
?
Ci = 10fF
CL = 20pF
Added Buffer Stage
Figure 5.12 Buffer insertion for driving large loads.
Solution
Minimum delay occurs when the delay through each buffer is the same. This can be
achieved by sizing the buffer as f, f2, respectively
where f = N F = 3 2000 = 12.6 , so (γ=0)
t
p
= Nt
p0
( 1 + f ⁄ γ ) = 3 ⋅ 70ps ⋅ ( 1 + 12.6 ) = 2.8ns
b. If you could add any number of stages to achieve the minimum delay, how many stages
would you insert? What is the propagation delay in this case?
Solution
Section 5.1
Exercises and Design Problems
205
From the text, we know that the minimum delay occurs when f = e. Therefore,
ln ( 2000 )
N = ---------------------- = 7.6
ln ( f )
f=e
ln ( 2000 )
---------------------7
= 2.96
t del ay = 7 × 3.96 × 70ps = 1.9ns
c. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of the methods shown in (a) and (b).
Solution
Solution (b) is faster but it consumes much more area than (a).
d. Determine a closed form expression for the power consumption in the circuit. Consider
only gate capacitances in your analysis. What is the power consumption for a supply voltage of 2.5V and an activity factor of 1?
Solution
The power consumption is determined as follows
2 1
P = Ct ot Vdd --- α
T
3
P
2 1
= C i V d d --- α
T
∑
4
1
f –1
k
2 1
f = C i V dd --- α  ------------- = 136  --- pWatts
 T
T  f – 1
k=0
16.
[M, None, 3.3.5] Consider scaling a CMOS technology by S > 1. In order to maintain compatibility with existing system components, you decide to use constant voltage scaling.
a. In traditional constant voltage scaling, transistor widths scale inversely with S, W∝1/S.
To avoid the power increases associated with constant voltage scaling, however, you
decide to change the scaling factor for W. What should this new scaling factor be to maintain approximately constant power. Assume long-channel devices (i.e., neglect velocity
saturation).
Solution
I Dsat
1
2
- , so
We know that: P ∝ CV DD f and f ∝ ---- ∝ ------------t P CV DD
W
(W)
2
P ∝ I Dsat V ∝ k' ----- ( V – V t ) V ∝ ( s ) --------L
1
---
 s
1
To keep power constant we need to scale W ∝ ---2- . which means redesigning gates with
s
W a factor of 1/s smaller.
b. How does delay scale under this new methodology?
Solution
1   1 1
ε  ------ --------WL  2  s  1 ⁄ s
s
t
CV
---------------------------------------------------∝
∝
tp ∝
2
W
W 2
1---------⁄ sk' ----- V
k' ----- V
s
L
L
1⁄s
206
THE CMOS INVERTER
Chapter 5
so tP ∝ 1 ⁄ s 2 .
c. Assuming short-channel devices (i.e., velocity saturation), how would transistor widths
have to scale to maintain the constant power requirement?
Solution
1
P ∝ I SAT V DD ∝ V DD WC ox ( V gs – V t )υ max ∝ W ( s ) , so W ∝ --- .
s
This means that no changes need to be made.
DESIGN PROBLEM
Using the 0.25 µm CMOS introduced in Chapter 2, design a static CMOS
inverter that meets the following requirements:
1. Matched pull-up and pull-down times (i.e., tpHL = tpLH).
2. tp = 5 nsec (± 0.1 nsec).
The load capacitance connected to the output is equal to 4 pF. Notice that this
capacitance is substantially larger than the internal capacitances of the gate.
Determine the W and L of the transistors. To reduce the parasitics, use
minimal lengths (L = 0.25 µm) for all transistors. Verify and optimize the design
using SPICE after proposing a first design using manual computations. Compute also the energy consumed per transition. If you have a layout editor (such
as MAGIC) available, perform the physical design, extract the real circuit
parameters, and compare the simulated results with the ones obtained earlier.