ADDRESSING INCOMPLETE SUBMISSION OF THE ACCOMPLISHED LEARNING
ACTIVITY SHEETS USING HUE-BASED AFFIRMATIVE
REINFORCEMENT TOOL (HEART) TECHNIQUE IN
PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1 CLASSROOM
An Action Research Proposal
Presented to the
Schools Division Research Committee
LILIAN G. MONTENEGRO, MAEd
Teacher II
ROMELYN T. PONGARON, MAEd
Teacher II
Davao del Sur School of Fisheries
DIVISION OF DAVAO DEL SUR
February 2022
1
APPROVAL SHEET
This Action Research entitled “Addressing Incomplete Submission of the
Accomplished Learning Activity Sheets Using HuE-based Affirmative
Reinforcement Tool (HEART) Technique in Practical Research 1
Classroom” prepared and submitted by LILIAN G. MONTENEGRO, MAEd and
ROMELYN T. PONGARON, MAEd has been examined and is hereby,
recommended for the corresponding examination, approval and acceptance by
the District Research Committee.
DELAREY C. FLORENTINO
School Head/Principal
DISTRICT RESEARCH COMMITTEE
This Basic Research has been reviewed, evaluated and recommended for
implementation.
CRESAL VEN T. ECOY, MAEd
Master Teacher I
Member, District Research Committee
EMILY A. PALLER, PhD
Master Teacher II
Member, District Research Committee
ELWIN R. INTERVENCION, MAEd
Master Teacher II___________
Member, District Research Committee
ELISETA A. SENARILLOS, MAEd
______Master Teacher III________
Member, District Research Committee
EPIFANIO M. ARAÑEZ
Chair, District Principal In-charge
* (please include 1 or 2 representative/s from Secondary Schools under the District)
SCHOOLS DIVISION RESEARCH COMMITTEE (SDRC)
Recommending Approval:
Approved:
RAQUEL J. CARBOS, Ed.D.
SEPS, Planning and Research
JANETTE G. VELOSO
OIC, Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
Title Page
Context and Rationale
4
Proposed Innovation, Intervention, Strategy
5
Research Questions
8
Research Methodology
9
Sampling
10
Data Collection
11
Plan for Data Analysis
14
Ethical Consideration
15
Action Research Timeline
16
Cost Estimates
17
Plan for Dissemination and Utilization
18
References
19
Annexes
I.
Research Proposal Application Form and
Endorsement of Immediate Supervisor
20
II.
Declaration Of Anti-Plagiarism
23
III.
Declaration Of Absence of Conflict of Interest
24
IV.
Interview Guide Questionnaire
25
V.
Informed Consent Form
26
3
I.
CONTEXT AND RATIONALE
The K to 12 frameworks has been the underpinning of any learning
institutions in the Philippines today. This established system envisioned to
holistically develop learners become globally competent where skills and
necessary competencies are met. In this perceived scenario, the challenges of
teachers to exert effort in teaching, be updated with current teaching models and
consider the individual differences of learners became an enormous challenge of
every educator of the country especially at this time of remote teaching. One
certain task that teachers to continually function is to help all types of learners
especially learners who have not met the academic requirements of the
discipline.
In the study of Mercado (2015), there is this group of learners who need to be
considered by teachers is the Alternative Learning System (ALS) students. The
data revealed that the students had maximal problems in the content and
instruction. They also encountered more problems in the length of the program or
course. This clearly speaks of an urgent solution to the cited problem and hook
interest of these ALS learners to keep them learning even within this time of
pandemic.
Furthermore, the group of students in Davao del Sur School of Fisheries led
by Canete (2019) conducted a study on ALS learners’ challenges and revealed
that the Alternative Learning System (ALS) learners experienced class
participation problems and one participant of this study confessed and said, “we
lack foundation of the subjects because we only have met once in a week before
4
and it is hard for us to submit the accomplished learning activity sheets on time”.
In addition, based on the record of the class adviser, frequently, there are only
30-35 out of 96 enrolled ALS learners of School Year 2021-2022, Second
Semester who can submit the accomplished learning activity sheets on time.
This clearly cites that there are ALS learners who are not submitting their
accomplished learning activity sheets. This also calls an action to be exemplified
and this motivated the proponents to conduct an intervention that would
immediately address the pressing problems especially, the incomplete
submission of accomplished learning activity sheets in Practical Research 1
subject.
The findings of this study can be used to motivate learners to do their
responsibility for learning’s sake and can be used as guide to devise other
teaching interventions that would help increase learners’ participation in learning.
II. PROPOSED INNOVATION, INTERVENTION AND STRATEGY
To address the cited problem, this devised technique called “HuE-based
Affirmative Reinforcement Tool (HEART)” aims to motivate Grade 11- ALS
learners to completely perform the tasks in Practical Research 1 as indicated in
their Learning Activity Sheets (LAS) and submit the accomplished LAS along with
academic honesty, completeness and punctuality. This technique is anchored on
Incentive Theory of Motivation developed by B. F. Skinner that states people are
motivated by a drive for incentives and reinforcement and argues that people are
more motivated to perform activities if they receive a reward afterward, rather
than simply because they enjoy the activities themselves (Lumen, 2018).
5
This HEART Technique will be given to 96 Senior High School -Alternative
Learning System (ALS) Grade 11 learners of Davao del Sur School of Fisheries,
Bagumbayan, Malalag, Davao del Sur. These 96 ALS learners will be the target
participants and they will be performing the designed intervention of this action
research. This intervention will run for three months of School Year 2021-2022 in
Practical Research I classroom. ALS learners will be invited and their voluntary
participation will be accounted.
Further, this HEART Technique basically will use heart shapes with
different colors to be used in recognizing learners’ efforts in completing their
learning activity sheets with honesty, completeness and punctuality. Thus, this
technique will unfold following these salient phases:
ORIENTATION PHASE. The proponents will be conducting an orientation to all
Grade 11 ALS learners about the purpose, procedures, duration and time of
implementation of this devised technique.
IMPLEMENTATION PHASE. This implementation phase will run for three
months. During this phase, the proponents will virtually monitor the learners’
activity when it comes to accomplishing their learning activity sheets in Practical
Research 1. They will be reminded all the time in their respective chat rooms as
to completion and date of submission of the LAS. In this phase as well, the
distribution and retrieval of the learning activity sheets and the self-learning
modules will also be monitored.
The school practices two weeks row
submission of accomplished learning materials in-school basis. In this time of
implementation, when learners submitted the LAS on time, the LAS will be
6
checked and evaluated following these criteria in the checklist; accomplished
LAS is only answered by the learner himself/herself by scrutinizing the
penmanship comparing it with the submitted written data in a form, activities in
the LAS are completely answered and the accomplished LAS is submitted on
time.
RECOGNITION PHASE. After the evaluation and checking of LAS submitted by
the learners, the proponents will now recognize learners who have met the
criteria in the checklist as mentioned above. The proponents will give:
Printed YELLOW HEART to learners who have answered the LAS
through his/her own self alone, all activities in the LAS are accomplished, LAS
submitted on time. When learners received this yellow heart means they earned
5 points to be added on their points in Performance Task.
Printed GREEN HEART to learners who have met 2 indicators in
the checklist. When learners received this green heart means they earned 3
points to be added on their points in Performance Task.
Printed BLACK HEART to learners who have met 1 indicator in the
checklist. When learners received this black heart means they earned 1 point to
be added on their points in Performance Task.
This recognition phase will be observed every scheduled distribution of
modules and other learning materials to learners.
CONCLUDING PHASE. This phase of the intervention will be the awarding
ceremony. Summing up all aspects of active participation by learners through
7
awarding some learning materials that can be used in continuing their studies
and certificates of recognition for their active participation. Learners who will be
noted excelling in this intervention will be recognized during this phase as
honorable; yellow honorable means they frequently excelled in the submission,
green honorable means they sometimes excelled in the submission and black
honorable if learners have exemplified at least 1 indicator in this technique.
III. ACTION RESEARCH QUESTIONS
This study aims to determine the efficacy of the formulated HuE-based
Affirmative Reinforcement Tool (HEART) Technique when applied to Grade 11SHS-ALS Learners of Davao del Sur School of Fisheries for School Year 20212022. Specifically, this study aims to answer the following qualitative and
quantitative questions:
1. What is the level of assessment of Grade 11- SHS ALS learners on the
conducted HEART technique in terms of?
1.1.
Learners’ Orientation,
1.2.
Intervention Implementation, and;
1.3.
Awarding?
2. How does HEART technique address the incomplete submission of the
accomplished Learning Activity Sheets in Practical Research 1?
8
IV. ACTION RESEARCH METHODS
This section contains sets of procedures to be carefully adhered by the
researchers in order to systematically perform the necessary actions in
addressing incomplete submission of learning activity sheets in Practical
Research 1. This action research will use descriptive quantitative and qualitative
design. Descriptive quantitative design concerns about describing the nature,
characteristics and components of the population or phenomenon (Faltado,
Bombita, Boholano & Pogoy, 2016). Whereas, qualitative research design
reveals the participants range’ of views and perspectives with reference to
specific topics or issues (Henson & Soriano, 2016). In this action research, the
assessment of Grade 11- SHS ALS learners on the activities conducted that
comprise HEART technique will be measured and the views of the participants
as to HEART technique address the incomplete submission will be recorded and
analyzed.
Also, this section includes the comprehensive discussion of the target
participants, a way to gather them and the instruments to use, a way to analyze
the data and the ethical consideration to be ensured.
Participants and/or Other Sources of Data and Information
The participants of the study will be ninety-six (96) enrolled Senior High
School ALS in Grade 11 who have Masonry and Food and Beverages Services
specialization. These 96 ALS learners will be identified based from the learners’
record in School Form 1 of the adviser and they will be involved in answering
9
the adapted research instrument in collecting the quantitative data of the study.
Also, these 96 ALS learners are to be directly identified as participants of the
study anchoring on sampling called non-probability or nonrandom technique
selection of participants.
This technique as classified is called purposive
sampling technique particularly, Total Population Sampling (TPS). This TPS is a
technique where the entire population that meet the criteria are included in the
research being conducted (Etikan, Musa & Alkassim, 2016).
Whereas, Grade 11 ALS learners who will be awarded as yellow, green and
black honorable will be included in the in-depth interview as a way to collect the
qualitative data of the study. In this case, still purposive sampling particularly
following the Homogeneous Sampling technique of selecting participants will be
adhered. This sampling follows the idea on focusing the precise similarity and
how it relates to the topic being researched (Etikan, Musa & Alkassim, 2016). In
this manner, the similarity of learners who will be interviewed is that participants
are awarded as honorable in the HEART technique. The participants’ identities
will be safeguarded and respected.
Data Gathering Methods
In gathering the data, the following steps will be observed in order to secure
accurate information and obtain the necessary approval and permit to actualize
this study.
Seeking permission to conduct the study. First, the researchers will send a
letter of request to the School Principal to ensure that the conduct of the
10
intervention activities are fully permitted and also, the minimum health protocols
are considered in materializing the intervention.
Seeking approval and endorsement of the District Research Committee. In
this stage, the researchers will seek the approval and endorsement of the District
Research Committee Coordinator to qualify for Division Research Committee
scrutiny.
Seeking approval of the proposed action research study from the Division
Research Committee. This phase explains about the researchers’ desire in
making the endeavor be known by the Division Research Committee and be
approved by the Division Superintendent as qualifier for Basic Education
Research Fund (BERF) for examination and funding.
Seeking approval of the proposed action research study from the Regional
Research Committee. This phase speaks about the researchers’ aspiration in
realizing the endeavor be known by the Regional Research Committee and be
approved by the Regional Director for Basic Education Research Fund (BERF)
Grant.
Conduct the Proposed Intervention- the HEART Technique. In this stage,
the activities under the HEART will be deliberately executed in accordance with
the ethics of research and based also in the known minimum health protocols.
Administration and retrieval of the questionnaires and conduct in-depth
interview. In this stage, the researchers will give the pre-informed consent to
11
seek the approval of the participants before the distribution of the survey
questionnaire and the in-depth interview will take place after.
Recording, tallying and tabulating of the gathered data. The responses will
be recorded, tallied and tabulated in preparation for the statistical treatment of
the quantitative data and thematic coding analysis will be used in analyzing the
qualitative data.
Furthermore, the study will use the survey questionnaire adapted from the
identified and reliable authors in gathering quantitative data as acknowledged in
the questionnaire itself. The questionnaire has two (2) parts. The first part askes
the participants about their profile which is deemed as significant in knowing the
respondents of this study.
The second part contains of items about the
assessment of ALS learners in the activities conducted under HERT Technique.
On the other hand, to gather the qualitative data, a formulated in-depth interview
guide questionnaire will be used. The researchers will submit both the qualitative
and quantitative instruments to three (3) experts for content validation. After the
validation, the researchers will follow the suggestions for refinement purposes of
the instrument.
The scales in the next page will be used in interpreting the quantitative
data to determine the efficacy of the conducted HEART Technique as a
formulated technique to be used in addressing the incomplete submission of the
accomplished Learning Activity Sheets in Practical Research 1.
12
Mean
Interval
4.20-5.00
3.40-4.19
2.60-3.39
Descriptive
Rating
Excellent
Descriptive Interpretation
The Learners ‘Orientation, Implementation and
Awarding that comprise HEART Technique is
100% effective in addressing the incomplete
submission of Accomplished Learning Activity
Sheets in Practical Research 1.
Very Good
The Learners ‘Orientation, Implementation and
Awarding that comprise HEART Technique is
67-99% effective in addressing the incomplete
submission of Accomplished Learning Activity
Sheets in Practical Research 1.
Good
The Learners ‘Orientation, Implementation and
Awarding that comprise HEART Technique is
34-66% effective in addressing the incomplete
submission of Accomplished Learning Activity
Sheets in Practical Research 1.
1.80-2.59
Fair
1.00-1.79
Poor
The Learners ‘Orientation, Implementation and
Awarding that comprise HEART Technique is 133% effective in addressing the incomplete
submission of Accomplished Learning Activity
Sheets in Practical Research 1.
The Learners ‘Orientation, Implementation and
Awarding that comprise HEART Technique is
0% effective in addressing the incomplete
submission of Accomplished Learning Activity
Sheets in Practical Research 1.
Data Analysis Plan
In analyzing the quantitative data, the researchers will use statistical tools
in accordance with what the question is measuring. In question 1 of the action
research, the researchers will employ the descriptive statistics particularly the
mean in knowing the level of learners’ assessment of the activities conducted
13
that comprise HEART Technique. SPSS is the tool that will be used in generating
the data and finding the accurate results and it will be presented using table for
data presentation. Likert scale is the scale [Excellence (5), Very Good (4), Good
(3), Fair (2), and Poor (1) will be used by the researchers in analyzing the
answers of the respondents on items indicated in the action research
questionnaire.
On the other hand, the generated qualitative data that will answer question
2 of this action research will be organized and analyzed using Descriptive
Analysis of Colaizzi (1978) which identifies the significant statements, formulate
meaning, theme cluster and emergent theme. This will be done to supplement
the quantitative data and strengthened the general aspect of the study.
Ethical Consideration
An ethical consideration is one of the most important components in doing
qualitative and quantitative research. Interactions between the researcher and
the participants are subject to ethical issues such as privacy, honesty, openness
and misrepresentations (Warusznski, 2002). In addition, Richards and Schwartz
(2002) stated the following areas to be seriously considered: anonymity,
confidentiality and informed consent and participants’ validation and checking.
Anonymity. To keep the participants identity, the researchers will use
pseudonyms which are P1, P2, P3…. and so forth as participant 1, participant 2,
participant 3 and so on. It is one way to protect the participant’s identity where
their real names are being hidden. Anonymity would be highly observed so that
14
the identity of the participants is protected (Corti et. al 2000). This will be applied
in both qualitative and quantitative presentations of data.
Confidentiality. In this matter, the researchers will secure that any
information, including the names, places and other details and other personal
information of the participants be kept confidential. Confidentiality is considered
to be in line with anonymity and should be sustained to the highest extent and it
has a goal of protecting the participant’s identity (Crow & Wiles, 2008).
Informed Consent. In this concern, the researchers will give
informed
consent form to the participants before conducting an in-depth interview that
comprise procedures and other related actions which will unfold in data
collection. The researchers will ask permission and confirmation if whether they
are willing to be interviewed as one of our participants. Also, the researchers will
make sure to explain the content of the consent form clearly and free from
coercion. This will help solidify the content of the study.
15
V. ACTION RESEARCH WORK PLAN AND TIMELINES
Theme/
Areas
Objective
Physical
Target
Activities
Time
Frame
Persons
Involved
Writing of
Proposal
Manuscript
February
2022
Researchers
Resources
Needed
February
2022
(Division)
Approval of
Research
DepEd
Proposal in
March
Authorities,
the school,
2022
Researchers
division and
(Regional)
regional levels
Data
Collection
Activities
Governance
To increase
parental
Initial
involvement Reports on
on the
Findings and
distribution
Analysis
and
retrieval of Interpretation
the selfn of the Data
learning
Collected
modules.
Final
Research
Report
Acceptance
Report from
the
Committee
Action Plan
Conduct of
Research and
Data
Collection
MarchJune
2022
Interpretation
of the Data
Gathered
June
2022
Writing of the
Final
Manuscript
June
2022
Securing of
the
Certificate of
Acceptance
from the
Regional
Research
Committee
July 2022
Liquidation of Dissemination
of the
Funds
Results to the
Used
Field
July 2022
School
Head,
Parents and
Researchers
Book paper,
computer ink,
food and
snacks,
transportation
allowance,
Researchers reproduction
cost, binding
expenses,
communication
n expenses
(internet)
Researchers
DepEd
Authorities,
Researchers
DepEd
Authorities,
Researchers
16
VI. COST ESTIMATES
Budgetary Requirements
Activities
Physical Target
Approved
Research
Proposal
1. Pre
Research
Stage
Work Plan
Certificate of
Acceptance
Copy of MOA
Data Collection
Activities
2. Actual
Research
Stage
Initial Reports on
Findings
and Analysis
Interpretation of
the Data
Collected
Final Research
Report
3. Post
Research
Stage
Acceptance
Report from the
Committee
Liquidation of
Funds Used
Copy of MOA
Expenditure
Items
Estimated
Cost
book paper,
computer ink,
food and
snacks,
transportation
allowance,
reproduction
cost,
communication
expenses
(internet)
PhP
9,000.00
book paper,
computer ink,
food and
snacks,
transportation
allowance;
reproduction
cost,
communication
expenses
(internet)
book paper,
computer ink,
food and
snacks,
transportation
allowance,
communication
expenses
(internet),
binding
expenses
book paper,
computer ink,
Disseminated
the results in the food and snacks,
scholarly journal
transportation
4. Research
and presented in
allowance,
Disseminati on
communication
conferences and
research
expenses
congress
(internet), binding
expenses
Funding
Source
DepEd
Basic
Education
Research
Fund
(BERF)
FIRST
TRANCHE
(80%)
PhP 15,000.00
PhP
6,000.00
DepEd
Basic
Education
Research
Fund
(BERF)
SECOND
TRANCHE
(20%)
Key
Persons
Involved
DepEd
Authorities,
Researchers
School
Head,
Parents,
Researchers
DepEd
Authorities,
Researchers
DepEd
Authorities,
Researchers,
Research
Organizations
17
VII. PLAN FOR DISSEMINATION AND UTILIZATION
The results of this action research will be disseminated and communicated
to the Davao del Sur School of Fisheries community through its teachers
convening in the regular Learning Action Cell (LAC) and hard copies of the
results will also be printed and will be stored in School Library or in the proposed
online school journal. Also, the results will be presented to parents during
parents’ meeting.
Finally,
the
results
will
be
used
as
basis
in
crafting
policy
recommendations to School Head for a possible framework to be adopted in
order to increase learners class performance.
18
VIII. REFERENCES
Canete, J. (2019). The Alternative Learning System (ALS) Passers: English Class
Recitation Challenges. Davao del Sur School of Fisheries
Corti, L., Day, A., & Backhouse, G. (2000, December). Confidentiality and informed consent:
Issues for consideration in the preservation of and provision of access to qualitative data
archives. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research (Vol.
1, No. 3). Freie Universität Berlin.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling
and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics,
5(1), 1-4.
Faltado, R. E., Bombita, M. B., Boholano, Helen B. & Pogoy, A. M. (2016). Practical
Research 2 Quantitative Research.Lorimar Publishing Inc., Quezon City,
Philippines.
Henson, R. M. & Soriano, R. F. (2016). Practical Research 1 Qualitative
in Tanauan City.
Lumen, N. C. (2018). In vitro to in vivo extrapolation for high throughput prioritization
and decision making. Toxicology in vitro, 47, 213-227.
Mercado, J. (2015). The Problems of the Alternative Learning System (ALS)
Research World of Reality Dissections. Mutya Publishing House Inc.,Malabon
City, Philippines.
19
Annex 1. RESEARCH PROPOSAL APPLICATION FORM AND
ENDORSEMENT OF IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR
A. RESEARCH INFORMATION
RESEARCH TITLE:
ADDRESSING INCOMPLETE SUBMISSION OF THE ACCOMPLISHED LEARNING
ACTIVITY SHEETS USING HUE-BASED AFFIRMATIVE REINFORCEMENT TOOL
(HEART) TECHNIQUE IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1 CLASSROOM
SHORT DESCRIPTION OF THE RESEARCH
.
This action research delivers the idea of teaching and learning. This addresses the
problem on incomplete submission of accomplished learning activity sheets and
aims to motivate ALS learners by employing an intervention named, HEART
technique.
RESEARCH CATEGORY
only one)
o National
o Region
o Schools Division
o District
o School
(Check RESEARCH AGENDA CATEGORY (Check
only one main research theme)
o Teaching and Learning
o Child Protection
Human Resource
Development
o Governanc
e
(Check only one)
o Action Research
o Basic Research
(Check up to one cross-cutting theme, if
applicable)
o DRRM
o Gender and
Development
O
Inclusive
Education
O
Others
(please
specify):
______________
FUND SOURCE (e.g. BERF, SEF,
Others)*
AMOUNT
BERF
30,000.00
*Indicate also if proponent will use personal fund
20
B. PROPONENT INFORMATION
LEAD PROPONENT/INDIVIDUAL PROPONENT
LAST NAME:
FIRST NAME:
MIDDLE NAME:
LILIAN
GACANG
MONTENEGRO
BIRTHDATE
(mm/dd/yyyy):
May 27, 1975
SEX:
POSITION/DESIGNATION:
FEMALE
TEACHER -II
REGION/DIVISION/SCHOOL (whichever is applicable)
XI/DAVAO DEL SUR/DAVAO DEL SUR SCHOOL OF FISHERIES
CONTACT NUMBER
1: 09095091261
CONTACT NUMBER 2:
EMAIL ADDRESS:
09477576567
lilian.montenegro@deped.
gov.ph
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
(DEGREE TITLE) Enumerate from
Bachelor’s degree up to Master’s
Degree
Master of Arts in Teaching
Filipino
TITLE OF THESIS/RELATED RESEARCH
PROJECT
Maunawang Pagbasa at Performans ng mga Magaaral sa mga Araling Pangnilalaman
Bachelor of Secondary
Education-Library
Science/Filipino
SIGNATURE OF PROPONENT:
21
IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR’S CONFORME
I hereby endorse to the District Research Committee the attached research
proposal. I certify further that the proponent/s have the capacity to implement a
research study without compromising his/her office functions.
_______
DELAREY C. FLORENTINO_____
Name and Signature of Immediate Supervisor
Position/Designation:
Date:
School Principal III_
February 24, 2022
22
Annex 2. DECLARATION OF ANTI-PLAGIARISM
1.
I, LILIAN G. MONTENEGRO understand that plagiarism is the act of
taking and using another’s ideas and works and passing them off as one’s own.
This includes explicitly copying the whole work of another person and/or using
some parts of their work without proper acknowledgement and referencing.
2.
I hereby attest to the originality of this research proposal and has cited
properly all the references used. I further commit that all deliverables and the
final research study emanating from this proposal shall be of original content. I
shall use appropriate citations in referencing other works from various sources.
3.
I understand that violation from this declaration and commitment shall be
subject to consequences and shall be dealt with accordingly by the Department
of Education and the Basic Education Research Fund grant mechanism.
PROPONENT:
LILIAN G. MONTENEGRO
SIGNATURE: ______________________
DATE:
February 24, 2022____
23
Annex 3. DECLARATION OF ABSENCE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST
1.
I, LILIAN G. MONTENEGRO understand that conflict of interest refers to
situations in which financial or other personal considerations may compromise
my judgment in evaluating, conducting, or reporting research.
2.
I hereby declare that I do not have any personal conflict of interest that
may arise from my application and submission of my research proposal. I
understand that my research proposal may be returned to me if found out that
there is conflict of interest during the initial screening as per provision in the
Research Management Guidelines.
3.
Further, in case of any form of conflict of interest (possible or actual) which
may inadvertently emerge during the conduct of my research, I will duly report it
to the research committee for immediate action.
4.
I understand that may be held accountable by the Department of
Education and the Basic Education Research Fund for any conflict of interest
which I have intentionally concealed.
PROPONENT:
LILIAN G. MONTENEGRO
SIGNATURE:
DATE:
February 24, 2022____
24
Annex 4. INTERVIEW GUIDE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR QUALITATIVE DATA
Title
of the Study: ADDRESSING INCOMPLETE SUBMISSION OF THE
ACCOMPLISHED
LEARNING
ACTIVITY
SHEETS
USING
HUE-BASED
AFFIRMATIVE REINFORCEMENT TOOL (HEART) TECHNIQUE IN PRACTICAL
RESEARCH 1 CLASSROOM
Research Questions
1.How does HEART
technique address the
incomplete submission of
the accomplished
learning activity sheets in
Practical Research 1?
Main Questions
1.How does HEART
technique address your
incomplete submission of
the accomplished
learning activity sheets in
Practical Research 1?
Probing Questions
1.1. What can you
share
about
HEART
Technique?
1.2. How
this
HEART
Technique
remind you of
your
responsibility to
submit
an
accomplished
learning activity
sheet?
1.3. What do you
like about this
HEART
Technique?
1.4. What do you
suggest
to
improve doing
this
HEART
technique
in
class?
25
Annex 5. RESEARCH SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR QUANTITATIVE
DATA
Direction: Please fill in the needed information by putting a check (√) mark on the
corresponding space for the answer. Rest assured that your responses will be treated
with utmost care and confidentiality.
PART I:
Name (optional) _______________________________________________
Specialization: __________________________________
Part II: Put a check mark inside the column that indicates your answers. Describe
how you feel about the following conducted activities.
Excellent
Very
Good
Good
Fair
Poor
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
Good
Fair
Poor
(3)
(2)
(1)
ORIENTATION
1.
Learners Orientation
(registration & confirmation)
2.
Information dissemination regarding the
conduct of the intervention
3. Opportunity to ask questions regarding the
topic.
4. Opportunity to address specific academic
concerns I have about my performance in class
and the orientation topic.
5.
Teacher receptiveness
6. Teacher explanation on purpose, procedures,
time and duration of the intervention
7. Orientation discussion on the relevance to
enhance my education
Adapted from Parent Orientation Evaluation -Parent-Teacher Conference Feedback
Murduck Conferences (2014)
Excellent
INTERVENTION IMPLEMENTATION
(5)
1.
Very
Good
(4)
HEART mechanisms and procedures
26
2.
HEART purpose and objectives
3.
HEART implementation monitoring
4.
HEART lessons infusion
5.
HEART emphasis on WATCH (WE
ADVOCATE TIME CONCIOUSNESS
AND HONESTY)
adapted from Questionnaires Used in Process Evaluation of School Intervention
https://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2017/docs/16_0381AppendixA.docx)
Excellent
(5)
Very
Good
(4)
Good
(3)
Fair
Poor
(2)
(1)
AWARDING
1.
Awarding Program
2.
Awards given
3.
Awarding Mechanics and Procedures
4.
Awarding Purpose and Objectives
5.
Awarding significance
Adapted from ACADEMY OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL VOLUME 18, Issue 3, 2019 1
1939-6104-18-3-382, Rewards and Recognition Questionnaire (2015) And 50 Pulse Survey Questions
for Your Next Employee Engagement Survey (Management and Leadership (2020)
27
Annex 6. INFORMED CONSENT FORM
Title of the Study: “ADDRESSING INCOMPLETE SUBMISSION OF THE
ACCOMPLISHED LEARNING ACTIVITY SHEETS USING HUE-BASED AFFIRMATIVE
REINFORCEMENT TOOL (HEART) TECHNIQUE IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1
CLASSROOM”
Researchers: LILIAN G. MONTENEGRO, MAED
ROMELYN T. PONGARON, MAED
Davao del Sur School of Fisheries
To the Informant:
You are requested to be one of the key participants who will help materialize
this study on addressing incomplete submission of accomplished learning activity
sheets in Practical Research 1. You are chosen as participant of this study
because we firmly believed that you can give valid and accurate information
about the concern of our endeavor.
Purpose of the study:
The main purpose of this study is to address the incomplete submission of
the accomplished learning activity sheets in Practical Research 1 subject.
Research Questions
1.
What is the level of assessment of Grade 11- SHS ALS learners on the
conducted HEART technique in terms of?
1.1. Learners’ Orientation,
1.2. Intervention Implementation, and;
1.3. Awarding?
2.How does HEART technique address the incomplete submission of the
accomplished Learning Activity Sheets in Practical Research
Procedures:
If you decide to be part of this study, you will also agree on the following
procedures:
We will tape record our interview activity and when you have ample time to
say what you would to share about the topic, you are free to say it. The purpose
of the tape recording is to secure accurate information that is useful for this
study. We will share a list of the questions with you prior to the interview.
28
Additional questions may arise during the interview. The recorded information
and answers will be kept privately and be treated with utmost confidentiality. To
protect your privacy, you will be referred to as an acronym (P1 or P2 or
P3…which means Participant 1, 2, or 3).
In addition, we will also take photos from our encounter and your identity
will be protected by using a reference of (P1, P2 or P3) which helps us indicate
Photo 1, or 2, or 3).
Statement of Consent:
I have read and understand the explanation provided to me. I have had all
my questions answered to my satisfaction, and I voluntarily agree to participate in
this study.
I have been given a copy of this consent form.
________________________________
My Signature
____________________
Date
________________________________
My Printed Name
_____________________
Signature of the Researcher
For further information, please contact:
MRS. ROMELYN T. PONGARON
Mobile No.: 09108323333
29