SHS Web of Conferences 208, 04003 (2024)
DSM 2024
https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420804003
Research on the Impact of Oligopoly on the
Electronics Industry and Optimization Strategies
— Taking Apple, Xiaomi, and Samsung as
Examples
Bingxian Jiang1*
1Hangzhou Dipont School of Arts and Science, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 311121, China
Abstract. This study delves into the profound impact of oligopoly within
the electronics industry, with a specific focus on the market dominance
exerted by Apple, Xiaomi, and Samsung. These industry giants wield
significant influence, shaping market trends, consumer behavior, and the
competitive landscape. Understanding the dynamics of oligopoly in this
sector is crucial, as the concentration of power among these companies can
lead to several critical issues. The research systematically analyzes their
market control, innovation strategies, and the implications for consumer
choice. It identifies key challenges, including the potential stifling of
innovation, reduced competition, and increased dependency within the
supply chain. To address these concerns, the study proposes a series of
strategic optimizations. These include diversifying product offerings to
reduce market control, increasing investment in research and development
to foster innovation, enhancing product customization to meet diverse
consumer needs, and improving supply chain flexibility to mitigate
dependencies. These recommendations are designed to counteract the
negative effects of oligopoly, promoting a more competitive and innovative
industry environment. The findings of this research are of significant
importance, offering valuable insights for both industry practitioners and
policymakers. By addressing the challenges posed by oligopolistic markets,
the study contributes to the development of more effective strategies for
managing competition and innovation in the electronics industry, ultimately
benefiting consumers and the market as a whole.
1 Introduction
1.1 Background research
Electronics is a worldwide manufacturing industry that constitutes a fundamental part of
modern technological advancement and development. It ranges from mobile phones, tablets,
laptops, and other consumer electronics that society can barely do without. There is intense
commercial rivalry and intricate value networks because of this industry where nitrous oxide
* Corresponding author: jiang.bingxian@rkcshz.cn
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
SHS Web of Conferences 208, 04003 (2024)
DSM 2024
https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420804003
is used as a refrigerant, and technological progression is almost incredibly fast with extensive
usage across the globe. The electronics market structure is highly concentrated, bearing the
traits of an oligopolistic market since a few big players command a massive market share.
1.2 Industry data: market share and revenue information of Apple, Xiaomi and
Samsung
Three companies of high importance in the electronics market are Apple, Xiaomi, and
Samsung. Out of Apple’s $365.7 billion annual revenues in 2023, the iPhone Segment
contributed something near to $205.5 billion [1]. Among the kiwi birds, Xiaomi is relatively
younger, but it boasts around 12% of the market share, achieving $6.42 billion of revenue
through smartphones alone in Q1 2024 [2]. These statistics show the large amount of
dominance these companies have in the industry and also in regard to their supply chain [3].
Currently, Apple stands tall in controlling almost 27.5 % of the global smartphone market
share, with better models and brand loyalty [4]. Samsung Electronics has approximately 20%
of the overall market share of electronic products and has revenues in the current year, which
is 2022, equal to $245 7 billion [5].
1.3 The critical role of oligopoly in shaping market structure analysis
There are various reasons why this type of research focusing on the oligopoly in the
electronics industry is crucial. First, it indicates the degree of concentration and how the
application of this power impacts the prices, the introduction of new products, and consumers’
decisions. In an oligopolistic market, more firms are linked to each other, which means that
a decision made by one company can have an influential effect on the others. The knowledge
of these dynamics can help to estimate the market behavior and opportunities for collusion
or other actions that might be damaging to consumers.
1.4 The societal and commercial benefits unveiled by this research
As a result, this research has business and societal consequences. This can help commercial
personnel and industry regulators in policy formulation to avoid monopoly practices and
foster competition. The effects of oligopoly, therefore, become important for business
students because they provide clues on the behavior of industries and decision-making
processes of organizations, ranging from individual prices to general strategies such as
acquisitions. Ideologically, this research can reveal the availability and cost of electronics to
consumers so that innovations extend to the majority of the public. In addition, using
optimization methods can propose ideas on ways to increase market effectiveness, develop
the quality of the products, and promote sustainability in the business world.
1.5 Literature review
Aziz opined that through the market structure, the electronics industry experiences low
competition with high market power dominated by a few organizations [1]. By achieving this
concentration, a product such as iPhone, Samsung, Google phone, Blackberry, etc. can price
their products in the higher subscription, control supply chain, etc, and develop new products
at their own appreciation. Competition can be lacking, and since small firms do not have to
compete intensely, they might be hindered, and the choices for the consumers will be limited.
This, however, has the disadvantage of placing the market under the control of a few
2
SHS Web of Conferences 208, 04003 (2024)
DSM 2024
https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420804003
dominant players who are also inclined to invest a huge number of resources towards
technological developments, hence the frequent launch of superior technologies to the market.
Sun and Fah, the market structure of the electronics industry, which is an oligopolistic
market, impacts Xiaomi in the following ways because the market consists of several large
firms that control the price and have less competition [2]. Xiaomi has been able to operate
within this environment by emphasizing relatively cheaper gadgets that are highly functional,
setting it apart from other firms. Speaking about the target market, Xiaomi has managed to
occupy a large share of it due to the company’s decision-making to provide products at rather
affordable prices; the integration of the mobile Internet also positively affects Xiaomi’s
position among the competitors.
Son and Kim, according to the nature of the electronics industry, the supply chain and
pricing powers are highly centralized in the dominant firms such as Samsung [3]. The source
of market power allows Samsung to innovate fast and keep high profit margins, but the
smaller players must face these issues. It should also be noted that Samsung has a welldeveloped SCM strategy based on vertical integration. This way, Samsung is able to control
all the phases, from the assembly of parts to the merchandising of the final product.
Typically, there are still some gaps in the literature regarding oligopolies. Although there
are numerous writings and studies on oligopolies, some aspects remain relatively
uninvestigated. One such gap is the lack of understanding of how specific characteristics of
the oligopolistic markets influence technological innovation and relevant product
development strategies of firms, primarily in the electronics industry. It is also noteworthy
that there are no encompassing meta-analyses that discuss the impacts of oligopolistic
strategies on choice and variety in the long run.
1.6 Research framework
The research logic of this article seeks to cover the above-stated research gap by examining
the optimization strategies of the firms in the electronics oligopolistic market by conducting
extensive research on Apple, Xiaomi, and Samsung. The framework of this research is
structured as follows:
First of all, the article will be preceded by the literature review, where key literature
sources describing the market competition, the strategies for setting prices, and other essential
activities in the oligopolistic market will be outlined. This will create a baseline of recognized
knowledge on the state of the art and expose the areas that lack implemented optimization
strategies.
Second, the best practices regarding operational efficiency, innovative activity, and
partnership between Apple, Xiaomi, and Samsung will be investigated. Through these case
studies, the article will reveal exactly how these companies keep up their oligopolistic place
in this systematic market setting. Secondly, the research will use the comparison and contrast
technique to show how these three firms approach the optimization issue dissimilarly but
with some similarities. This will enable this comparison to reveal the strategies that each
company uses to manage its strengths and weaknesses in order to survive in the oligopolistic
market structure. Last, the direction for the synthesis of findings will include the discussion
of implications for industry practice as well as the direction for future research. At the same
time, the conclusion will also provide recommendations to other organizations operating in
oligopolistic markets and recommend potential areas of optimization with reference to the
best practices identified by Apple, Xiaomi, and Samsung. In this structured manner, the
research should contribute to the said gap by presenting a comprehensive and specific
examination of the optimization approaches appropriate in the oligopolistic electronics
industry and thus offer guidance to other scholars and practitioners.
3
SHS Web of Conferences 208, 04003 (2024)
DSM 2024
https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420804003
2 Case description
2.1 Apple: brief history, market position, and key products
Apple was initially started in 1976 by Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak, and Ronald Wayne, and it
was involved in the manufacturing of personal computers [5]. Apple is a company that is
famous for its products and innovations, as well as the advanced technologies it applies.
Successive product launches such as the iPod in 2001, by which Apple entered the market as
a frontrunner, and iPhone in 2007 [5]. These are the iPhones, iPads, Mac computers, and the
Apple Watch, among other services such as the App Store, Apple Music, and iCloud. Today,
Apple’s market share is around 27. 5% of the global total in the smartphone market, and its
market revenue is still high from other Apple products, especially the iPhone segment,
approximately $205,5 billion in 2023 [5].
2.2 Xiaomi: brief history, market position, and key products
This newcomer, Xiaomi, was founded in 2010 by Lei Jun and seven co-founders to enter the
electronics business [6]. Being cost-effective but quality oriented, Xiaomi’s business model
is mainly comprised of online selling and social media interaction. It can be said that Xiaomi
has experienced rapid growth in recent years thanks to the orientation of applying innovative
ideas to its products as well as its selling strategies [6]. Some of its principal products include
mobile phones, especially Smartphones, smart televisions, and computers, particularly
notebooks, and home automation products and systems. However, the Smartphone division
of Xiaomi i. e., Mi, obtained $6.42 billion in Q1 2024, proving the position of Xiaomi in the
market [6]. Currently, the distribution share of Xiaomi is approximately 12%, which puts it
among the leaders in the global smartphone market [2].
2.3 Samsung: brief history, market position, and key products
Praised to be the flagship of the South Korean industry, Samsung Electronics originated in
trading and was established in 1938 by Lee Byung-chul [6]. Samsung is a leading firm in
various industries, such as consumer electronics, semiconductors, and telecommunications
equipment. It is a globally reliable company that deals with a broad array of products,
including mobile phones, televisions, home electronic appliances, and semiconductor
memory chips. Smartphones are commonly sold in the market; however, Samsung’s Galaxy
can be considered in a segment of its own as it directly challenges Apple iPhone [6].
According to Samsung’s financial statement for the year 2022, Samsung secured $245.7
billion in revenue, current setbacks notwithstanding, mostly due to its semiconductor division
[6].
2.4 Comparative analysis
Analyzing the similarities and differences between the three companies’ basic facts Key
similarities: Although all of them act as market leaders in the electronics industry, their
approaches and market shares are different.
2.4.1 Innovation and product differentiation
Apple is incredibly centered on development and luxury products. It barely allows itself low
margins, thus relying on the client base and creating a tightly-knit circle of hardware and
4
SHS Web of Conferences 208, 04003 (2024)
DSM 2024
https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420804003
services. Thus, Xiaomi uses cost leadership and high product performance, cutting prices in
comparison with rivals [6]. Samsung is especially noteworthy because of its diversification
with one of the world’s most successful electronics companies, which is complemented by a
strong background in such components as semiconductors, which suggests a strong revenue
stream across segments.
2.4.2 Market strategies
This can be summed up as Apple’s strategy to focus on a few segments – premium highmargin, where the integration with the existing ecosystem is of paramount importance. The
social strategy of Xiaomi is based on the approximate prices and interaction with users
through the Internet for sales and advertising [7]. Instead of choosing the first option,
Samsung follows a blend of the two strategies in the sense that it provides luxury products
while reaching out to the mid-and lower-end markets.
3 Analysis on the problem
3.1 Impact identified of case
3.1.1 Market control: oligopoly impacts market control and pricing strategies
The market structure of the electronic industry, specifically in smart mobile manufacturing,
where Apple, Xiaomi, and Samsung play the more prominent role greatly affects the control
of the market and price. These firms have significant market control, which enables them to
control the prices, output, and the entire market forces [8]. These companies achieve large
market shares; hence, they are capable of charging relatively higher or relatively lower prices
than those set in a competitive market. For instance, Apple’s strategic use of high prices for
its products it has an embedded consumer base where they centralize their loyalty, hence high
profit margins.
3.1.2 Innovation: effects in terms of innovation and progress in technology
In general, the presence of oligopolies could be considered as a positive factor that stimulates
innovation as well as a factor that hinders innovation. On the one hand, the great earnings of
companies like Apple, Samsung, and Xiaomi prove to create adequate funds to invest in the
creation of new devices and technologies [9]. This has brought about advancements in
technology and new products in the market, such as the iPhone, Samsung’s Galaxy, and
Xiaomi’s affordable specs smartphones. Correspondingly, innovation goes through various
processes to enhance economic growth, as indicated in Figure 1. This creates competition
where firms have to come up with new features and technologies to outcompete the other
firms.
5
SHS Web of Conferences 208, 04003 (2024)
DSM 2024
https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420804003
Idea generation
Increased Economic
growth
Admissions
New Goods and
Services
Application
Fig. 1. Innovation process [5]
3.1.3 Consumer choice: effect on consumer decisions and product differentiation
Due to the oligopolistic nature of the electronics industry, consumer attraction and product
differentiation is rather limited. On the one hand, the rivalry between Apple, Samsung, and
Xiaomi results in a large number of excellent devices that meet customers’ needs; on the
other, the monopoly of these companies may restrict consumers’ choices [10]. The behavior
is that each company forms its own complex, and the consumers can be trapped in the given
brand. For instance, the iPhone, iTunes, iPod, iPad, and the coming iMac are all parts of
Apple products through which consumers are locked into the Apple brand. Still, Samsung
and Apple products get consumed in large quantities based on the means of marketing
techniques like advertising, as shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3.
50.00%
45.00%
40.00%
35.00%
30.00%
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
SamSung
Twitter
TikTok
Apple
Facebook
Instagram
Youtube
I've never seen
Fig. 2. Results on the places on the Internet where consumers come across more Apple and Samsung
ads [10]
6
SHS Web of Conferences 208, 04003 (2024)
DSM 2024
https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420804003
45.00%
40.00%
35.00%
30.00%
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
SamSung
Apple
Others
Influencers
Word of Mouth
Technology sellers Advertisements
Brand Website
Fig. 3. Applying the criteria of consumer ratings [10]
3.2 Problem Identified and Analysis
3.2.1 Antitrust issues: legal challenges and antitrust investigations faced by these
companies
The market power held by Apple, Samsung, and Xiaomi has attracted significant antitrust
scrutiny. These companies have faced numerous legal challenges and investigations
regarding their business practices [11]. For instance, Apple has been involved in multiple
antitrust cases, particularly concerning its App Store policies, which have been criticized for
being monopolistic. Samsung has also faced antitrust investigations related to its pricing
strategies and market dominance in the semiconductor industry. Xiaomi, while less
frequently targeted, has faced regulatory scrutiny in several markets for its aggressive pricing
strategies and market practices.
3.2.2 Market saturation: challenges related to market saturation and competition
Market saturation is a significant challenge in the electronics industry, particularly for leading
firms like Apple, Samsung, and Xiaomi. As these companies have already captured
substantial market shares, finding new growth opportunities becomes increasingly difficult
[12]. The global smartphone market, for instance, has reached a level of saturation where
most potential customers already own a device, and the rate of new adopters is slowing. This
saturation leads to intensified competition among the existing players as they strive to attract
customers from each other.
3.2.3 Supply chain dependencies
Supply chain dependencies pose another critical challenge for Apple, Samsung, and Xiaomi.
The global electronics supply chain is highly complex and involves numerous suppliers and
manufacturers. These dependencies can lead to vulnerabilities, as disruptions in any part of
the supply chain can significantly impact production and sales, as indicated in Figure 4. For
example, the COVID-19 pandemic exposed the fragility of global supply chains, causing
delays and shortages in electronic components [13]. Apple, known for its tight supply chain
management, faced delays in product launches due to component shortages. Samsung and
7
SHS Web of Conferences 208, 04003 (2024)
DSM 2024
https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420804003
Xiaomi, too, experienced supply chain disruptions that affected their production schedules
and market availability.
8%
29%
24%
26%
Production Sustainability programming
Production quality &health programming
Transport sustainability
Transport Quality & health
Facilities-Sustainability
Facilities-Quality & health
Fig. 4. Supply Chain Dependencies [13]
4 4. Suggestions
4.1 Strategy for market control
Diversification: Encouraging Diversification of Product Lines to Reduce Dependency on
Core Products: Thus, such businesses as Apple, Xiaomi, and Samsung need to reduce the
impact of threats associated with market control and the dependence on the key products by
diversification [14]. This means the identification and development of new products or
markets apart from the basic product lines. For instance, Apple could expand on technology
segments such as AR / VR or move into markets having nothing to do with computers, such
as healthcare technology. It could still diversify further into smart home products or
renewable energy-related items, for example. Samsung now has a well-balanced portfolio of
businesses where it can extend and expand or target other industries such as biotechnology
or advanced materials.
4.2 Strategy for innovation
R&D Investment: The Role of Research & Development in Aiming for Innovation: The
nature of competition in an industry characterized by different firms selling more or less
similar products is such that there can be forces at work that compel firms to step up the
research and development process. It creates capital for research and development, through
which firms are able to create newer technologies, refine currently existing ones, and look
into new emerging markets [15]. It is suggested that Apple, Xiaomi, and Samsung assign
much of their sales to research and development, particularly in the areas of artificial
intelligence or machine learning, as well as future networks. Depending on internal research,
it is possible to cooperate with small innovative companies and startups, thus increasing the
pace of innovation. Collaborations with startups allow them to receive innovations and
approaches that may be incompatible with the company’s processes.
8
SHS Web of Conferences 208, 04003 (2024)
DSM 2024
https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420804003
4.3 Strategy for consumer choice
Customization: Providing More Endpoints to Address Many Different Customers’ Needs: To
improve consumers’ decision-making, organizations need personalization to guarantee client
satisfaction and brand loyalty since the products offered can be customized according to the
customers’ needs and preferences. Apple can offer more options for modifying the
accessory’s characteristics and software options, such as setting individual device settings or
individual software experiences [16]. Thus, Xiaomi may launch smart home solutions that
change according to customer preferences of a particular house. Samsung might offer a wider
range of devices, which offer the possibility to upgrade/change some of their elements in
response to clients’ requirements.
5 Conclusion
Given the fact that an oligopolistic market is captively dominated by Apple, Xiaomi, and
Samsung, strategic management and strategic direction are highly imperative for the control
of the market, revolution of innovation, improving the choice front of consumers, and
handling legal and working quandaries. Thus, the key development strategies identified in
relation to the specifics of the market are diversification, compliance with regulations, and
the ability to step up investment in R&D. Transparency, regulators’ interaction, and new,
emerging markets are other major factors that may help solve the antitrust problems and
market oversaturation.
5.1 Summary of key findings
5.1.1 Impact analysis
There are several major outcomes of the study of the oligopolistic influence on the electronics
industry, concentrating on Apple, Xiaomi, and Samsung. Market control being in the hands
of these firms affects the price levels, and hence, this paper sees very little price flexibility
and little or no competition. These few firms play both the role of enabler and inhibitor of
innovation through their massive R&D expenditures needed to independently drive
innovation while at the same time protecting their superior positions in the various markets
from disruptive innovation.
Problems Identified: These are some of the challenges. Antitrust/competition litigation:
Here, the companies are barred from engaging in activities that may be deemed monopolistic
in nature by the law.
5.1.2 Optimization strategies
Some of the potential solutions with regard to these threats are to diversify the product
offering in a bid to look for avenues other than the core products that form the share of their
sales, strengthen compliance with the antitrust laws, and invest more in research and
development in order to come up with more innovative products. The issues of market
saturation and similarities with competitors need cooperation with smaller firms, penetration
into new regions, and Shah’s insistence on a socially responsible strategy.
9
SHS Web of Conferences 208, 04003 (2024)
DSM 2024
https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420804003
5.2 Research significance
5.2.1 Industry impact
Overall, this research endeavors to give a novel understanding of the way that oligopoly
influences the electronics industry. Analyzing the consequences of market control and
competition, actors will be able to adapt to the existing trends and improve the situation. The
results confirm that the tendencies require strategic diversification and innovation, as well as
compliance with the regulations, thus fostering a more competitive environment.
5.2.2 Company impact
Concerning Apple, Xiaomi, and Samsung, such insights point to the significance of
comprehending the functioning prospects and employing efficient management approaches
for sustaining a market position and responding to difficulties. Applying the abovementioned
optimization strategies, these firms will be able to mobilize their positions in the market,
encourage innovation, and ensure increased consumer satisfaction, which, in turn, will allow
them to become successful in the long term.
5.3 Limitations and future studies
5.3.1 Limitations
The research mainly uses secondary data, which may slightly restrict the examination depth
and data credibility. Secondary data may be incomplete, include old data, or are influenced
by the researcher’s bias, and this influences the reliability of the results. Further, the study is
limited in that the investigation is strictly confined to the three dominant companies in the
industry.
5.3.2 Future studies
Future studies ought to incorporate the use of primary data sources such as questionnaires,
interviews, and case studies in an effort to establish the actual effects of oligopoly on the
electronics industry. Increasing the range of companies and regions, it will be possible to get
a broader picture of changes in the industry. Similarly, the best practice research done in
conjunction with other oligopolistic markets may also provide additional and useful angles
through which to approach the same issues and strategies.
References
1.
2.
3.
Aziz A. Oligopoly Market and Monopolistic Competition in the Digital Era: Shariah
Economic Perspective. Quality - Access to Success, 24 (193) (2023).
Sun L, Fah C T. Xiaomi-Transforming the Competitive Smartphone Market to Become
a Major Player. Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3): 96–110 (2020).
Son I, Kim S. Supply Chain Management Strategy and Capital Structure of Global
Information and Communications Technology Companies. Sustainability [Internet],
14(3):1844 (2022).
10
SHS Web of Conferences 208, 04003 (2024)
DSM 2024
https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420804003
4.
Apple. Apple reports second quarter results [Internet]. Apple Newsroom (Kenya). 2024
[cited
2024
Jul
30].
Available
from:
https://www.apple.com/ke/newsroom/2024/05/apple-reports-second-quarter-results/
5. Sher D. Samsung: Empowering Athletes with Mobile Innovations [Internet].
Investing.com.
2024.
Available
from:
https://www.investing.com/academy/statistics/samsung-facts/
6. Giantari IGAK, Jatra M. The Role of Differentiation Strategy and Innovation in
Mediating Market Orientation and the Business Performance. Journal of Business
Management and Economic Research [Internet], 6(3):39–60 (2019).
7. Sintani L, Ridwan R, Kadeni K, Savitri S, Ahsan M. Understanding marketing strategy
and value creation in the era of business competition. International journal of business,
economics & management [Internet], 6(1):69–77 (2023).
8. Gerpott TJ, Berends J. Competitive Pricing on Online markets: a Literature Review.
Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management [Internet], 21(21) (2021).
9. Mohamed MMA, Liu P, Nie G. Causality between Technological Innovation and
Economic Growth: Evidence from the Economies of Developing Countries.
Sustainability [Internet], 14(6):3586 (2022).
10. Almeida M, Sousa E, Rodrigues C, Candeias MB, Au-Yong-Oliveira M. Samsung vs.
Apple: How Different Communication Strategies Affect Consumers in Portugal.
Administrative Sciences [Internet], 11(1):19 (2021).
11. Cohan P. Apple Antitrust Suit Comes Amid Questions Over Its Innovation Strategy
[Internet].
Forbes.
2024.
Available
from:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/petercohan/2024/03/24/apple-antitrust-suit-comes-amidquestions-over-its-innovation-strategy/
12. Liu Q, Qu X, Wang D, Abbas J, Mubeen R. Product Market Competition and Firm
Performance: Business Survival Through Innovation and Entrepreneurial Orientation
Amid COVID-19 Financial Crisis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12 (2022).
13. Fang M, Yu Y, Park K, Liu F, Shufeng (Simon) Xiao, Shi Y. Supply chain relationship
dependencies and circular economy performance: The contingency role of digitalization
capability. Journal of purchasing and supply management, 100902–2 (2024).
14. Hadrian P, Milichovský F, Mráček P. The Concept of Strategic Control in Marketing
Management in Connection to Measuring Marketing Performance. Sustainability
[Internet], 13(7):3887 (2021).
15. Biniam Getnet Agazu, Chalchissa Amentie Kero. Innovation strategy and firm
competitiveness: a systematic literature review. Journal of innovation and
entrepreneurship, 13(1) (2024).
16. Hosseinnia Shavaki F, Ebrahimi Ghahnavieh A. Applications of deep learning into
supply chain management: a systematic literature review and a framework for future
research. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56 (2022).
11