Integrating Te Whare o Oro and Situational Analysis within the He Pikorua Framework Te Whare o Oro, Situational Analysis, and He Pikorua each offer unique but complementary approaches to understanding and addressing neurodevelopmental needs, trauma, and educational support. By integrating these frameworks, a comprehensive, strengths-based, and culturally affirming model can be developed to guide professionals working with tamariki, whānau, and educators. 1. Aligning Theoretical Foundations Te Whare o Oro is a mātauranga Māori framework that uses the metaphor of the whare tūpuna to conceptualize brain development and neurodiversity. It incorporates the Neurosequential Model of Therapeutics and Polyvagal Theory, mapping brain structures onto traditional Māori concepts. Situational Analysis is an ecological and appreciative inquiry framework that helps professionals collaboratively analyze complex situations, co-construct meaning, and implement evidence-based interventions. He Pikorua is an inclusive and flexible inquiry framework guiding educational and developmental psychology practice. It emphasizes strengths-based, ecological, and culturally responsive practices. All three frameworks emphasize: Holistic, ecological approaches to understanding development. Strengths-based inquiry that builds upon existing supports. Collaborative and culturally responsive engagement with whānau, educators, and communities. Ongoing reflection and adaptation to ensure meaningful change. 2. Integrating Situational Analysis and Te Whare o Oro within He Pikorua The structured approach of Situational Analysis can be used alongside Te Whare o Oro’s Māori-informed neurodevelopmental model, underpinned by the continuous improvement cycle of He Pikorua. He Pikorua Phase Situational Analysis Alignment Te Whare o Oro Alignment Kohikohi (Gather information) Data collection from multiple perspectives, identifying strengths and barriers in learning/wellbeing. Assessment of pou (brain regions), neural pathways (heke), and structural supports in whānau and learning environments. Āta whakaaro (Sense-making) Thematic analysis of data, developing shared understanding of challenges and opportunities. Identifying pou (core neurodevelopmental structures) requiring strengthening, using Māori metaphors to frame discussions. Tātai (Plan collaboratively) Developing principles for action, co-constructing plans based on ecological and appreciative inquiry. Using the whare tūpuna model to map intervention strategies that strengthen resilience and balance across Te Whare Tapa Whā. Whakamahi (Take action with integrity) Implementing new strategies and tracking changes collaboratively. Applying kanorau ā-roro (neurodiversity) approaches rooted in Māori healing, sensory regulation, and learning strategies. Whai whakaaro (Reflect together) Evaluating effectiveness, adapting approaches as needed. Assessing whether pou have been strengthened and if tamariki are thriving across taha wairua, tinana, whānau, and hinengaro. 3. Practical Applications: Supporting Tamariki and Whānau A. Neurodevelopmental Assessments Te Whare o Oro provides a culturally grounded developmental lens. Situational Analysis structures the assessment and planning process. He Pikorua ensures continuous reflection and adaptation. Example: For a child with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD), Te Whare o Oro’s framework can be used to map cognitive and emotional strengths and challenges using Māori metaphors, while Situational Analysis ensures collaborative problem-solving with educators, health professionals, and whānau. He Pikorua guides iterative learning and support adjustments. B. Trauma-Informed Approaches in Schools Te Whare o Oro: Identifies brainstem-dominant (fight/flight/freeze) responses using the pou tuarongo concept. Situational Analysis: Structures multi-disciplinary response planning. He Pikorua: Embeds collaborative support plans within school routines. Example: A tamaiti experiencing dysregulation can be supported through pūrākau (storytelling) and waiata (rhythmic regulation) to engage the limbic system (pou tokomanawa), while Situational Analysis helps refine classroom adaptations. C. Strengthening Whānau Engagement Te Whare o Oro: Frames interventions through whakapapa and whānau-centered care. Situational Analysis: Ensures whānau voice is central. He Pikorua: Maintains open dialogue and continuous learning. Example: A whānau struggling with engagement in their child’s Individualized Education Plan (IEP) can use Te Whare o Oro to map cultural narratives of strength, with Situational Analysis guiding inclusive decision-making and He Pikorua ensuring ongoing, manaenhancing collaboration. 4. A Unified, Holistic Approach By working together, Te Whare o Oro and Situational Analysis can provide a culturally responsive, structured approach to supporting tamariki and whānau, while He Pikorua ensures continuous improvement and adaptive learning. This integrated model: Honors mātauranga Māori while incorporating contemporary psychological frameworks. Strengthens evidence-based, strengths-focused inquiry through collaborative action. Ensures practical, flexible, and sustainable support for tamariki, whānau, and educators.