EVALUATION OF A COMMUNITY PROJECT
I.
PROJECT SUMMARY
PROJECT TITLE
PROJECT GOAL/S
PROJECT OBJECTIVE/S
PROJECT LOCATION
LEAD INSTITUTION
CCCM St. Lorenzo Ruiz Study Hub
● To provide a comfortable space where students can study
and learn effectively.
● By the start of the project, provide chairs and tables for
students to use in studying. Also provide wall fans for
cooling.
● Become a space where students come and study.
● Provide a quiet and comfortable space for students to study.
● Create an environment that supports focus and productivity.
● Encourage collaboration and group learning among students.
● Help students achieve their academic and personal goals.
● Provide chairs, tables, and wall fans for students to use.
Andres Bonifacio Street, Tibanga Highway, Iligan City, Lanao del
Norte
● Roman Catholic Bishop of Iligan
● Catholic Center Campus Ministry
PROJECT
LEAD/MANAGER
Marilou B. Eliseo (Coordinator)
PROJECT CONTACT #
OR EMAIL
09930249362
campusministry92@gmail.com
DATE STARTED
DATE FINISHED
PROJECT BUDGET &
SOURCE
ACTUAL EXPENSES
BENEFICIARIES
EVALUATION PLAN
(include evaluator and frequency;
was it evaluated?)
●
●
●
●
July 5, 2023 ( Groundbreaking)
March 11, 2024 (Operation)
February 2024 ( End of Construction)
Ongoing (Operation)
● 3.2 million pesos ( Budget)
● ¾ Fr. Michel de Gigord, MEP (founder)
● ¼ Solicitation from Benefactors
3.6 million pesos
Name of Group: All Students
No. of Beneficiaries: more than 20
● Not yet Evaluated
● Plan to have Evaluation Annually
II.
PROJECT OVERVIEW
● CCCM Study Hub construction on its 35% progress
● CCCM Study Hub construction on its 85% progress
● CCCM Study Hub construction on its 100% progress
III.
EVALUATION DATA
WHAT
WHEN
RESULTS
OUTPUT OR
TARGET
FREQUE
OUTCOME
NCY
MEASURE
DESCRIPTION
PROJECT GOAL 1: To provide a comfortable space where students can study and learn effectively.
By the start of the
Number of
Provide a By the
40 chairs
project, provide
chairs, table, specific
start of 14 tables
chairs and tables for and wall fans amount
the
10 wall fans
students to use in
installed.
of chairs project
studying. Also
and
only.
provide wall fans for
tables.
cooling.
Become a space
Monthly
A specific Monthl March- 75 students
where students
counts of
amount
y
April- 168 students
come and study.
students
of
May- 226 students
using the
students
June- 28 students
space
using the
July- 12 students
study
August- 18 students
hub.
September- 15 students
October- 21 students
November- 38 students
December- 7 students
Provide a quiet and
Student
Students Qualitat 100% of respondents agree that the hub is
comfortable space
feedback
concur
ive
a quiet and comfortable space to study at.
for students to
through
that the
study.
surveys
study hub
is so.
Create an
Student
Students Qualitat 100% of respondents agree that they have
environment that
feedback
concur
ive
more focus at the study hub and are more
supports focus and
through
that the
productive.
productivity.
surveys
study hub
is so.
Encourage
Student
Students Qualitat 71% of the respondents do their studying
collaboration and
feedback
would
ive
at the hub with someone while the
group learning
through
study in
remaining 29% does it alone.
among students.
surveys
groups.
STRATEGIC
OBJECTIVES
Help students
achieve their
academic and
personal goals.
Student
feedback
through
surveys
Students Qualitat 57% of the respondents disagree while the
would get ive
other 43% agree that they got good marks.
desirable
marks on
the
subject
they
were
studying.
IV.
DISCUSSION
In order to properly evaluate the effectiveness of the project, we used a questionnaire to find
out more about the views and experiences of users, specifically the students that use the study
hub. The questionnaire is composed of five questions and majority of it is answerable by yes or
no while the last question can be answered by choosing between not desirable, desirable, and
very desirable. The questions are as follows:
- Is the CCCM study hub quiet and comfortable for studying?
- Of all the times that you used the hub, did you experience quietness and comfort?
- Are you more productive and more focused when you are there?
- Do you study together with someone or are you alone?
- When you study at CCM study hub, do you get good grades in your exam?
The chosen respondents are all fourth year environmental engineering students which had a
history of using the study hub for studying which is a total of 7 students. The names are as
follows:
- Javinel Servano
- Lesley Laparan
- Christian Tener
- John Joseph Banticil
- Jerlie Acuram
- Andrian Padilla
- Dearl Bado
Below are the discussion for each of the objectives:
● By the start of the project, provide chairs and tables for students to use in studying.
Also provide wall fans for cooling.
One of the main goals at the beginning of the project is to guarantee that the necessary
facilities are available to provide a favorable learning environment for students. This
includes setting up the study space with chairs, tables, and wall fans. These features are
meant to improve student comfort and offer the facilities required for both solo and
group study sessions. At the start of the project(March) until now (December), the hub
has 40 chairs, 14 tables, 10 wall fans readily available for students who are studying at
the hub.
● Become a space where students come and study.
The study hub is solely for students to use in their studying. One of the objectives
of the project is to provide a space where students prefer to use in their studies, thus
this is measured by the students' attendance at the hub.
There are noticeable fluctuations in the statistics on student visits to the study
hub from March to December, which could be related to academic cycles and other
outside variables. Early in the year, attendance peaked at 226 students in May after
rising sharply from 75 in March to 168 in April in the first few months. According to this
pattern, the study hub is most frequently used during busy academic times, most likely
to prepare for tests or meet project deadlines.
However, June showed a significant decrease in attendance, which is caused by
the end of the academic semester or the beginning of school breaks, as there were only
28 kids present. With persistently low attendance in July (12 students), August (18
students), and September (15 students), this decline persisted throughout the middle of
the year. The low level of involvement during these months is the result of students
being on vacation, less awareness of the hub, or academic off-seasons. There was a
minor recovery in October (21 students) and November (38 students), which might
mean that students are coming back to get ready for final examinations or coursework.
In conclusion, the study hub gets the greatest usage from March to May, when
classes start, and it has trouble keeping up with attendance in the middle of the year.
● Provide a quiet and comfortable space for students to study.
One of the objectives of the project was to provide a quiet and comfortable
space for students to study. To measure the success of this objective, student feedback
was collected through surveys to assess their perceptions of the study hub’s
environment. The target was for students to concur that the hub meets the desired
criteria of being quiet and comfortable.
All participants (100%) agreed that the study center offers a quiet and
comfortable environment for learning. This result shows that the project's objective was
successfully met. The overwhelmingly positive comments imply that the area
successfully meets the demands of students looking for a setting that promotes
concentration and productivity. This success was influenced by elements like the general
design, cozy furnishings, and peaceful ambiance.
In summary, the findings show that the study hub is doing its job of providing a
helpful atmosphere for students. To make sure the hub keeps up with student
expectations, it will be crucial to uphold these standards going forward and keep an eye
on feedback.
● Create an environment that supports focus and productivity.
Creating an environment that supports focus and productivity for students is one
of the objectives of this study. This was measured qualitatively through student feedback
collected via surveys. The target was for students to concur that the study hub fosters
focus and productivity.
The findings tell us that all respondents (100%) agreed that using the study hub
helps them focus better and feel more productive. This unanimous response
demonstrates how well the hub's surroundings serve its intended function. The calm
environment, well-planned design, and cozy amenities probably contributed significantly
to the students' ability to focus and complete their assignments quickly.
To sum up, the study hub has been successful in establishing a setting that
encourages concentration and output. It will be necessary to continuously monitor
student comments and make sure the environment continues to meet their needs in
order to sustain this favorable result.
● Encourage collaboration and group learning among students.
Promoting student cooperation and group learning within the study hub was one
of the project's objectives. Surveys were used to gather student input on whether they
used the area for solo or group study in order to assess this.
According to the survey, 29% of participants preferred to study alone, while 71%
of respondents said they studied with others at the hub. This indicates that for the vast
majority of its users, the study hub facilitates collaborative learning. Large tables and
cozy seating configurations are examples of shared spaces that encourage student
interaction and group projects.
Even though the results demonstrate that collaboration may be successfully
fostered, it's crucial to acknowledge the demands of students who would rather study
alone. Going forward, a well-rounded strategy that takes into account both group and
solitary learning preferences will guarantee the hub's continued effectiveness and
inclusivity for all users.
● Help students achieve their academic and personal goals.
The project aimed to help students achieve their academic and personal goals by
providing a dedicated study space. To assess its effectiveness, student feedback was
gathered through surveys, specifically asking whether students felt that studying at the
hub helped them achieve desirable marks in their subjects.
The findings showed that while 57% of respondents disagreed, 43% of
respondents agreed that the study hub helped them get good grades. This implies that
although some students may benefit from the area, not all students will certainly
succeed academically. These results are impacted by a number of things, including
individual study habits, the difficulty of the subject, or outside assistance.
Although the study hub might offer a productive environment, the results show
that more assistance is required to help students meet their academic objectives.
Improvements like workshops, tutoring, or focused study materials could boost the
hub's influence on academic achievement.
During the construction of the Study Hub, several challenges arose that required careful
management. One significant problem was budget constraints, as the initial budget proved
insufficient due to the rising cost of materials and some unplanned items not being included in
the original list. This led to additional expenses, which were addressed by allocating extra funds
and prioritizing essential components to ensure the project's completion. Delays in material
deliveries also posed issues, but these were managed by sourcing alternatives and adjusting the
construction timeline.
In the operational phase, issues emerged regarding food being brought into the study
areas, which led to concerns about cleanliness and potential distractions. To address this, clear
rules were established, designating specific areas for eating and reinforcing cleanliness
guidelines. However, some students did not follow these rules, prompting the need for regular
reminders and the involvement of staff to ensure compliance. Despite these challenges,
proactive measures helped maintain the hub’s purpose as a productive and welcoming space for
all students.
While there were no changes made to the original construction plan, adjustments were
made to the operational use of the Study Hub over time. Initially intended solely as a study
space, the hub evolved to accommodate additional needs as students began using it for
activities like seminars and group discussions. This shift was driven by the demand for a flexible
venue that supports both individual and collaborative academic activities. Furthermore, the hub
now allows overnight use, recognizing the need for students to work on projects or study for
exams during late hours. These changes were made to better serve the students' needs, making
the Study Hub a more versatile and inclusive space.
V.
CONCLUSION
The Study Hub project is a success, as evidenced by the consistent usage recorded in the
logbooks, with many students benefiting from the space daily. The hub has become a vital
resource, providing a conducive environment for studying, hosting seminars, and fostering
collaboration. Despite the challenges encountered during construction and operation, such as
budget adjustments, material shortages, and rule enforcement, these were effectively
managed, allowing the hub to fulfill its purpose.
The tangible impact includes a fully functional facility that meets the diverse academic
needs of students, while the intangible benefits include improved focus, productivity, and a
sense of community among users. By adapting to students' evolving needs, such as allowing
overnight access and supporting group activities, the Study Hub has proven its value as a
versatile and essential space for learning and growth.
VI.
RECOMMENDATION
To enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the Study Hub, it is recommended to
assign a dedicated staff member or manager to oversee its daily operations. While the existing
CCTV system provides surveillance, having someone present ensures that rules are followed and
immediate assistance is available to address any concerns. This presence would also help
maintain cleanliness, monitor food policies, and create a supportive environment for users.
For future projects, this model of integrating a dedicated manager is commendable and
could be implemented in other study hubs to ensure smooth operations and better user
experiences. Additionally, regular feedback from students can help identify areas for
improvement, allowing the hub to adapt to evolving needs and maintain its relevance. This
project demonstrates the potential of such initiatives in supporting academic success and is
highly recommended for replication in other communities.
Submitted by:
John Joseph P. Banticil
Jayvimar B. Sumagang
This report is correct.
Confirmed by:
Marilou B. Eliseo
In-charge