Ghosts : A Blessing or a Curse
Abstract:
This academic article explores the use of spectral figures and haunting motifs as literary devices
in Toni Morrison's "Beloved" and Arundhati Roy's "The God of Small Things." It explores how
these spectral elements work as powerful metaphors for dealing with historical trauma within
societies ravaged by slavery and colonialism. The present study argues that both authors use
spectral figures to uncover repressed narratives, confront lingering social traumas, and
emphasize the urgency for historical accountability. With rigorous textual analysis and
comparative study, this research shows how Morrison and Roy employ haunting methodologies
to create atmospheres within which the impacts of oppression on collective consciousness may
be examined and potentially healed.
Introduction
Literature has been one avenue through which the complexity of human experiences—
particularly in relation to how historical trauma continues to leave lasting marks on people and
their communities—is explored. Along this regard, it is seen that deploying tropes like the
appearance of ghosts or haunting provides yet another avenue writers have developed in the
literature to describe and give insight into their unending anguish among all the oppressed. This
paper discusses two such works of literature: Toni Morrison's "Beloved" and Arundhati Roy's
"The God of Small Things." Though hailing from quite different cultural backgrounds, the
novels come together in their issues of oppression and its aftermath, in both cases drawing on
elements of group trauma experienced by subjugated peoples. Morrison thematizes the haunting
presence of slavery in the United States, while Roy's account in her fiction explores colonialism
and caste discrimination in India. Through a comparative analysis of these texts, the study
examines the role of ghostly narratives as a method for approaching historical injustices and their
lasting legacies. Through much of "Beloved" and "The God of Small Things," Morrison and Roy
underline, through their works, the use of haunting and ghosts to address directly the history and
trauma rooted in the oppressed, mainly in parts of the world that are deprived of full history and
accountability for terrible things done, such as slavery and colonial devastation. In these specterfilled realms, history and collective awareness survive as haunted entities that need the action of
both characters and readers to finally meet those painful realities that have been repressed or
overlooked. This study will conduct an in-depth analysis of these texts to examine the separate
roles that their narratives perform: they work as metaphors for unresolved trauma, as amplifiers
for negotiating repressed histories, and as catalysts in the need for historical acknowledgment
and reconciliation. In this way, I strive to prove how literature stands for an essential means
through which collective trauma may be negotiated and a more profound understanding of the
effects of history upon present conditions may be reached.
Ghosts as Metaphors for Historical Trauma
It is essential to prove a theoretical framework for understanding the use of ghosts as metaphors
for historical trauma in literature, its effects on the people and the significance of it in cultures.
This section will explore the concept of hauntology and its relevance to postcolonial and African
American literature.
Hauntology and Literary Ghosts
Hauntology calls itself an approach for understanding spatial dimensions through spectral
imprints—tangible traces that bring unrecorded stories. A good example is "The underground
tunnel, which takes the place of a "time capsule" where:
Decades-old graffiti tags
These are "ghosts" that tell forgotten stories and subcultural legacies. The writer characterizes
these areas as "haunted by a secret past"—a past that stays "unwritten in the annals of history yet
inscribed into its very materiality" ("Excavating ghosts: Urban exploration as graffiti
archaeology"). Here, this perspective meets squarely with Derrida's founding concept of
hauntology—the idea that the present is always troubled by unfinished histories and repressed
stories. In relation to the above illustration of the portrayal of ghosts as individuals by the author,
literature forms an aspect of history that is well hidden and forgotten. The literacy approach
provides insight into existence and presents a moral narrative without a hero or villain.
Beloved: Confronting the Specters of Slavery
Toni Morrison's "Beloved" is a critical work in African American literature that comes in the
form of a ghost narrative. This section will explore the way Morrison makes use of Beloved as
both a ghostly figure and then as a concrete incarnation to explore the memory of slavery and the
impact it has on personal and collective memory.
In her analysis of Beloved, Inez Martinez draws attention to the significant role that unnatural
occurrences play in the novel's events, particularly, of course, the ghostly apparition haunting
124 Bluestone Road. The novel's opening lines at once introduce this phantom presence: "124
was spiteful. Full of a baby's venom" (Morrison, 3). This ghostly event is replete with complex
symbolism. It symbolizes, first, the psychic suffering stemming from the murder of an infant by
Sethe herself, which vividly proves the deep emotional and psychological consequences of
slavery. Secondly, the appearance of the ghost symbolizes vast collective grief—linked to
slavery in African Americans' experience—writing down that the impact of slavery radiates from
individual suffering and moves out into generations, carrying trauma through history.
As the story develops, so does the physical incarnation of Beloved transform the concept of
trauma. Beloved grows from a ghostly character into the embodiment of collective historical
trauma. Her return forces the characters, especially Sethe, to confront the buried memories and
unbearable pain within their pasts. Morrison puts this idea into words when she writes, "Beloved
is the manifestation of the past that must be remembered to be forgotten" (Morrison, 274). The
focus of the narrative on the necessity to deal with distressing pasts to move forward underscores
the strong requirement of human involvement and curiosity while simultaneously heightening
the inherent difficulties involved. The conclusion of the novel, where the community comes
together to expel Beloved, further illustrates this idea in that recovery from historical trauma
requires a collective act of the community.
Morrison reflects on the communal aspect of healing when she writes, "They forgot her like a
bad dream. Remembering seemed unwise" (Morrison, 323). This conclusion presents the battle
between the tendency to forget painful experiences and the realization that true healing requires
both identification and remembrance, which takes both community and individual introspection.
Arundhati Roy's The God of Small Things is cast in a non-linear narrative and makes use of
symbolism to bring forth the continuing effects of India's colonial past and the violence of caste
discrimination.
Form of Haunting
One of the strategies through which Roy achieves an intense feeling of haunting is her use of a
non-linear narrative framework: The story jumps between events in the past and recent events,
which allows for a maze-like reading experience-a reflection of how traumatic memories persist
in the present. All this confusion points toward the long-lasting trauma effects, all bound to
plague the character's life. As Lucy Hopkins writes, "The God of Small Things insists that its
readers labor to negotiate the understanding that individual memories are constituent parts of
broader histories, which, in turn, are inalienable from the traumatic moments of a single life,
whilst the mediation of colonial and caste repression, along with the media and power of the
wealthy, works to bury the truth.". The integration of historical elements with contemporary
circumstances functions as a metaphor showing how the remains of the past always function in
these character's lives to cloud reality and build a veneer of history. The disturbed temporal
continuity plays various roles in Roy's articulation of trauma. Fir
First, it gestures toward something of the cyclical nature of oppression-that just as historical
events rupture the present, so the social and historical structures set up through colonialism
continue to enforce violence and inequality. Second, the dislocation here speaks to the
fragmented nature of how trauma is sensed and remembered. According to Hopkins, the story
highlights how it is impossible to escape your past, as the characters cannot move forward
without dealing with ghosts that have haunted them for years. Velutha
Velutha turns out to be such an essential element in this novel that his absence after his death
brings to the fore the cruelness of caste oppression. Although Velutha is not a ghost, his presence
is haunting because his memory even beyond his death has a continuous effect on the lives of
other characters. "Velutha had no past. No future. He had only the present" (Roy, 339) strongly
makes the dehumanizing effect of caste oppression, eliminating both the history and the future of
human beings who are given insignificant by this system of oppression. The death of Velutha
thus tends to show how caste violence is a way of erasing history. His tragic end due to the love
relationship with Ammu and trespass of the caste borders depicts the grey aspects of the caste
system.
His presence in the novel forces characters like Ammu and Estha to confront the violence and
injustices of the social order within which they exist.
Hopkins writes, "Velutha haunts the narrative even after his death," signifying how the structures
of colonialism, though no longer materially present in life today, still have such strong effects. It
is a sign of the moral legacy concerning their meaning and a gruesome reminder of the cruelties
and sufferings associated with them. Compare and Contrast: Morrison and Roy
While there are differences in the method of Morrison and Roy concerning spectral narratives,
they both make use of these to evoke historical trauma and still-present traumas of marginalized
communities. This section discusses their works considering those ideas but brings out both the
similarities and differences of haunting as a literary device.
Morrison's Beloved uncovers the forgotten stories of slavery and the long-term effects of these
on African American peoples' sense of identity. The presence of Beloved intertwines with a
reflection of the voices of the subjugated enslaved women, mothers, and communities. Such a
revelation of painful histories enables the ability to face and acknowledge traumatic experiences
of enslavement. Roy's scholarship also deals with submerged historical narratives, especially
relating to the impact of colonialism and caste discrimination in postcolonial India. Roy brings
forth the silent bequests of domination through a study of how such social systems impinge on
the lives of the twins, Ammu and Velutha. The haunted quality of the novel is conveyed through
the investigation of how injustices from the past continue to echo in contemporary life and
pattern human destinies.
In Beloved, memory is at the heart of healing. Characters must confront and work through their
traumatic pasts, but most importantly, Sethe must confront her history to be free from Beloved's
grasp. Morrison drives home the point that remembering is painful but necessary for healing both
the individual and the community. The novel emphasizes the impossibility of erasing the past but
rather the need to acknowledge it to break free from its control.
On the other hand, Roy uses memory as a source of pain and resistance. In The God of Small
Things, memories keep on resurfacing, relating the present to the colonial past and caste system.
Though painful, these are also some of the ways in which memory serves as a testament to the
stubborn resilience of the oppressed. They were means of reclaiming legacy and sight in a
society which, otherwise, erases or suppresses the history of the marginalized.
VI. Conclusion
The analysis of "Beloved" by Toni Morrison and "The God of Small Things" by Arundhati Roy
shows the power of narratives in confronting historical trauma and its continuing effects on the
histories of oppressed communities. Both authors create, through their unique approaches to
haunting, literary spaces wherein the marginalized histories can be investigated, and the
aftereffects of slavery, colonialism, and discrimination can be searched for.
In "Beloved", Morrison uses a literal ghost, a metaphor for the collective trauma of slavery-a
way to confront the painful truth that was suppressed or ignored, even by characters and readers
themselves. She stresses the healing of historical trauma that needs to take place within a
community. While Roy does not use literal ghosts, she uses a frame of haunting, and her nonlinear narrative creates a sense of haunting, focusing on the persistence of past traumas in the
present. "The God of Small Things" brings to light how colonial legacies and caste
discrimination continue to shape individual lives and collective consciousness in India.
These works of literature also oblige readers to consider how unresolved traumas keep on
hauntingly resonating within collective consciousness, something that calls for an extended and
inclusive reinterpretation of history. Creating a context where ghosts, literal or metaphorical,
may be heard, Morrison and Roy elevate a broader conversation about historical responsibility
and an ongoing attempt to come to grips with painful histories.
In conclusion, the spectral elements in "Beloved" and "The God of Small Things" are powerful
literary devices while at the same time being indispensable to the re-encounter with past
atrocities and their lingering effects. These stories show that it is inevitable to confront,
understand, and deal with the ghosts of history because they continue to affect current society.
Through their evocative stories, Morrison and Roy invite readers to engage with risky histories
and reflect on their own role in the ongoing process of historical recognition and recovery.
References
• “View of Toni Morrison’s Beloved”: Jungianjournal.ca, 2024,
jungianjournal.ca/index.php/jjss/article/view/69/62. Accessed 11 Dec. 2024.
• Hopkins, Lucy. “‘What Will Sophie Mol Think?’: Thinking Critically about the
Figure of the White Child in Arundhati Roy’s the God of Small Things.” Global
Studies of Childhood, vol. 1, no. 4, Jan. 2011, pp. 280–90,
https://doi.org/10.2304/gsch.2011.1.4.280.
• Santos, Miguel Dos. “A Look and Analysis of the Themes of Beloved and the
God of Small Things….” Academia.edu, 5 Jan. 2017,
www.academia.edu/30763104/A_Look_and_Analysis_of_the_themes_of_Bel
oved_and_the_God_of_small_things_. Accessed 11 Dec. 2024.
• Gladio, V, and Shilpa Vince. Copyright@ REST Publisher Contemporaneity of
Language and Literature in the Robotized Millennium Vol: 2(3), 2020 REST
Publisher; ISBN: 978-81-936097-3-6 Website: Https://Restpublisher.com/BookSeries/Cllrm/ Post-Colonial Aspects in Arundhati Roy’s the God of Small Things.
• Kindynis, Theo. “Excavating Ghosts: Urban Exploration as Graffiti
Archaeology.” Crime, Media, Culture: An International Journal, vol. 15, no. 1,
17 Sept. 2017, pp. 25–45, https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659017730435.
•
•