Assignment Instruction This assignment consists of two sections, each worth 5 marks, for a total of 10 marks. Use this document to provide answers to the following questions. Please ensure that you save the output/results after completing each task. Once saved, upload the corresponding SPSS files and outputs to the Learning Management System (LMS). Section A o A study was conducted in the UAE to evaluate the health score among 456 participants and determine if there is a significant difference in the mean health score between the study groups based on gender and marital status o Using the attached SPSS File "2. Quality of life Score among teachers" A. Select the appropriate analysis method and justify it. (1 marks) B. Find the mean, SD, 95% CI and Sign value for Education and Income (as given in Table 1) (2 marks) C. Calculate and interpret the significance of the mean quality of life score between Education and Income, respectively (2 marks) Answer 1: A. Type of test used: T - Test Justification :it is a T Test because it has 2 independent variable and 1 dependent variable used B. Table 1: The mean, standard deviation, and 95% CI results on quality of life scores among education and income groups are explained in the table below. Variable Mean SD 1. 33.85 1. 5.26 2. 35.31 2. 5.26 <5000 dollars 1. 34.62 5.5 2. Income 2. 34.20 4.8 95% CI Sig (2-tailed) Variable 1. Educated 2. Noneducated 0.003 Quality of life score 1. Income 0.424 >5000 dollars n = 456; The mean difference is significant at the .05 level C. Result interpretation: (Explain) For the education level , the sig 0.879 which is large than 0.05 that means that our interpretation is right so we can move to next sig The second section of the table P=value is 0.003 p=value is less than 0.05 , that’s mean our result is statistically significant For the income , the sig 0.079 which is large than 0.05 that means that our interpretation is right so we can move to next sig The second section of the table P=value is 0.424 p=value is more than 0.05 , that’s mean our result is statistically insignificant Section B Abstract: A study was conducted among three faculties: science, education, and arts. The purpose of the study was to examine whether there is a statistically significant difference in achievement scores and job satisfaction between these faculties. Kindly use the data attached in the SPSS file labeled "3. Achievement among participants based on different Program" Question 1: A. Identify the appropriate analysis method to compare the significant difference in mean achievement scores among the three faculties and justify. B. Create a research question OR null hypothesis. (1 mark) (1 mark) C. Perform ALL STEPS of analysis and interpret the results.? (3 marks) Answers 1: A. Appropriate analysis method: one way A NOVA TEST Because it is used to compare the mean of more than two groups or levels of an independent variables B. Research Question or Hypothesis (Decide): Is there a statistically significant difference in the extent of achievement among participants based different programs? C. test steps: 1. Population normality: (Explain) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Select the Analyze menu Click on Descriptive and Frequency Select approval Select statistic (mean, median, mode) Select chart histogram and show normal curve on histogram Click continue, then ok Statistics Achievemen Name of t Faculty N Valid 456 456 Missing 0 0 Mean 31.8772 2.0373 Median 32.0000 2.0000 a Mode 31.00 2.00 a. Multiple modes exist. The smallest value is shown Homogeneity of variance: (Explain) 2. Tests of Homogeneity of Variances Achieveme nt Based on Mean Based on Median Based on Median and with adjusted df Based on trimmed mean Levene Statistic .689 .628 .628 .667 df1 2 2 2 df2 453 453 451.718 Sig. .503 .534 .534 2 453 .514 To get the homogeneity of variance we first go to analyze and go to compare mean and variation and then to one way a nova and move achievement to dependent and faculty to factor and also select options and select descriptive and homogeneity of variance o levene statistic test shows non significant result (p>.05) it indicate all groups are approximately equal. Table1: Test of Homogeneity of Variances Achievement Tests of Homogeneity of Variances Levene Statistic .689 .628 .628 Achievement Based on Mean Based on Median Based on Median and with adjusted df Based on trimmed mean .667 df1 2 2 2 df2 453 453 451.718 Sig. .503 .534 .534 2 453 .514 o levene statistic test shows non significant result (p>.05) it indicate all groups are approximately equal. 3. Analysis of Variance Results: (Explain) ANOVA Achievement Between Groups Within Groups Total Sum of Squares 165.757 11189.366 11355.123 df 2 453 455 Mean Square 82.878 F 3.355 Sig. .036 24.701 p< .05 indicate rejection of null hypothesis 4. Post Hoc Analysis (Tukey HSD) (Explain) Faculty of science and education faculty had significance value less than 0.05 and showed significance while on the other hand all the other faculty had value significance more than 0.05 Multiple Comparisons Dependent Variable: Achievement Tukey HSD (I) Name of Faculty 1=Faculty of Science Mean Difference (IJ) 1.43946* (J) Name of Std. Faculty Error 2=Education .59191 Faculty 3=Faculty of Art .53923 .67685 2=Education 1=Faculty of -1.43946* .59191 Faculty Science 3=Faculty of Art -.90023 .56077 3=Faculty of Art 1=Faculty of -.53923 .67685 Science 2=Education .90023 .56077 Faculty *. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level. Sig. .041 95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper Bound Bound .0476 2.8313 .705 .041 -1.0523 -2.8313 2.1308 -.0476 .244 .705 -2.2188 -2.1308 .4184 1.0523 .244 -.4184 2.2188