Uploaded by umaruchandeso

Deviance & Counterculture Lecture Notes

advertisement
Deviance and Counterculture
Subculture
Counterculture
Deviance
Social control
Subjective (chủ
quan)
Statistically
Harmful
behavior
A sub-group that does not challenge mainstream society *Frankfurt school*
A sub-group that challenge mainstream society
Ways of thinking and acting that are subject to social control
 Counterculture is often seen as deviant
They ways in which members of social groups express their disapproval of people
and behaviors
 This helps sociologists avoid certain problems as they look at the issue of
deviance
 Criminals, child-molesters, drug addicts, alcoholics, mental ill people =>
labeling of these as deviant is subjective*
Labelling attributes a moral stance to the observed behaviors
A deviant behavior is a behavior which is uncommon
Murders, rapist, thieves.
- Many non-harmful members of society are labelled deviant by society and
many even suffer harming themselves from the more numerous, mentally ill,
homosexual, transgender, mentally delayed
3 theories of deviance
Strain theory
“Social structure and anomie” – Robert Merton – 1938
Strain theory: deviance emerges when there is a lack of fit between cultural
goals, and the means to achieve these goals
- Anomie: normless, lack of ideas, lack of purpose
- Robert Merton focusses on marginalized economic class as the main source
of strain – noting that deviant behavior is most common amongst that group
- Also there are more types of strain than just not getting what you want in life
- => escape from a negative condition (abuse)
- Loss of something of social value (a child forced to move)
Deviance could emerge when:
1. A social structure encourages people to seek objectives that are not actually
available to them
2. People seek escape from a negative condition
3. People have lost something of social value
5 ways of adjusting to situations:
1. Conformity (tuân theo): most common. Accept as legitimate both the
culturally approved goals and means of achieving these goals
 E.g: Strive for material success by working hard, trying to get a good
education.
2. Innovation: accept the culturally legitimate form of success but reject the
conventional way of achieving success
 E.g: Bank robber, drug dealer
3. Ritualism: some go through the motions, accepting the means to achieve
goals, but are not motivated by the goals themselves
-
Cultural
Support
theory
 E.g: mechanically doing your job but not motivated to do more because you
know it is futile to try
4. Retreatism: adjusting to strain by dropping out of the system. Losing
confidence in it and your ability to function in it
 Alcoholism, drug addictions, unemployed lethargy. Retreat into alternative
lifestyle (counterculture)
5. Rebellion: Perform acts intended to replace the current cultural goals and
means with new ones
 E.g: political activist or domestics terrorist
People learn mainstream norms through communication
 E.g: we are in university because we’ve learned to value this sort of practice as
part of our life cycle
People learn deviant behavior from others as well
 E.g: norms that justify stealing at work
Our society is culturally complex – we are taught not to steal, but sometimes we
justify deviant action – convincing ourselves that the rules do not apply to the
situation
Has been more successful than strain theory in explaining “white collar crime”
But, when researching, it is difficult to get people to admit to having deviant values
Also, focusing just on values can obscure other reasons (strain) for deviance
Control theory Assumptions: humans are greedy, hurtful and deceitful
 Lying and cheating are the easiest ways to get what you want
 Sexual excess and drug abuse are more enjoyable than studying and working
hard
They will engage in deviant behavior whenever they can get away with it
How cult
seduce
Network of “conventional others”
 The tighter and more numerous networks you have, the more social
control is exerted, the less likely deviant behaviors will be
 Notice: there is no way to separate “control” from “cultural learning” and “social
inclusion”
 So, your acceptance of or the other of these theories depends on your
assumptions about human behaviors
1. Boundaries: cult, unlike most modern phenomena, have a closed boundary.
You’re either in or out. This creates passionate solidarity.
The Firewall
- Cult build a protective barrier
- Only those committed and close to the core are fully in the know
- Outsiders are kept largely in the dark
-
The firewall is also an information firewall
Only those inside knows the truth. Outsiders should not be listened to
Big Brother
- Cult define “what we’re not”
- A common tactic is to define a big enemy in the outside world
- Attacks from the outside only reinforce the paranoia
External vs Internal communications
- Members have privileged information
- Communication is intimate, extensive, frequent
- Outsiders are often fed a completely different story
2. Initiation
Selecting recruits
- Cults focus not on “who we can get” but “who is ready”
- People going through dramatic life change make excellent recruits, new
students, recent divorces
- 85% people who join a cult do so through a friend of acquaintance
Batting the hook
- No-one wakes up one day and says “I know, I’ll join a cult”
- Cults use bait which is invite you in for an innocent, worthwhile purpose with
high prosperity for repeat visits – like a course
- During this course, you are initiated to a world view that says “learning the
ways of this cult is the real purpose of my life”
Love bombing
- A key human need which cults meet is belonging
- Here everyone suddenly loves and accepts you!
- Only those cult members who have shown an aptitude for attracting and
reassuring potential recruits are included in these introductory sessions; and a
relationship is build across a series of convivial social meetings
Matriculation
- This is a critical process and is carefully managed
- You can’t just walk in and “join” – you have to be invited, and experience an
initiation
- This is the “brainwashing” stage; intense; isolating; aimed at breaking you
down, getting you to internalized and identify with certain problems, then
building you back up as a believer
3. Customs
Pyramid:
-
Cult know that treating everyone the same means making no-one feel special
or motivated
They act as an emotion pyramid scheme; self-sustaining and administering
through many levels
Communication is mainly vertical
Duties
- Cults keep people busy (too busy to stop and think)
- Duties: do the leg work, recruit, improve at whatever needs fixing, sell crafts,…
- Idleness is a sin! The most common complaints of an ex-cult members is not
the spiritual content, so much as that all their spare time is devoted to work,
like mending the Kingdom hall roof and trudging from doorstep to doorstep
4. Ideology
The leaders/the apostles
- Cults tend to be personality cults
- The leaders’ story is the story of the cult, their word is law.
- Access to the leader is an exclusive reward to the higher ups
- These acts as apostles, evangelists and gatekeepers
The word
- Cult have their own vocabulary, way of speaking
- This has a powerful effect, words are concepts are thoughts
- Cults also foreclose awkward debate with “wise saying”
Belief system
- Cults are masters of disciplined, simple formatting
- Part of their appeal is a simple black-and-white view of reality, far from mess of
real relationships and life conflicts
- A constant repetition of the same format displaces all else with this simple core;
chanting, recruiting, committing, …
The rules
- Arbitrary restrictions and rules, oddities and experiences reinforce a way of life
“through the looking glass”
- And ritual experience underline the otherness of this world
- Cutting ties with your mundane old existence is key to making this alternate
reality the reality
Families, love and relationships
Structure
Structure/Agency
Family
↓↑
Terms
Pattern of
authority
Nuclear family
Politics Economy Culture
•Monogamy: married to one person
•Serial Monogamy: have sex with 1 person at a time, following by another
•Polygamy: more than one partner
–Polygyny: more than one wife (fairly common)
–Polyandry: more than one husband (Toda of India)
Group marriage: Rare (Kurnandaburi of Australia)
Patriarchy: rule of the father (Chế độ phụ hệ)
- Reinforce through institutions such as law, school, government and culture
- Appx 5000 years old
Matriarchy: rule of the mother
- Almost as early societies, 2000 BC until 2500 BC – Mosou (China), Iroquois,
exists in all continents but Europe
- Origin: Western Europe
- Marriage by choice and based on romantic love
- Man and women with strict gender role
- Children are socialized and cared for by only this man and women (not
neighbors, extended family, government)
- The house is private domain of the family
- Other members of the community or even extended family are just visitors
and are not involved in childcare, cleaning, family business
Is it natural?
- Structural functionalists use biological determinist arguments to say YES
- Conflict theorists and social constructivists say NO
Gender division of labour
Man
Work man can do
Male children
Woman
Female children
Hunting/
Gathering
families
Industrialization/
Capitalism
(Europe &
Britain)
-
Labour
Labour power
Future labour
Nurturer of man’s labour power
Nurturer of future labour power
Future nurturer
Norm in human history (99% of history)
5-30 people
Line between family and community is blurred
Private/public not clear
Social/economical/political networks based on kinship
This type of family has existed in non-hunter gathered societies as well
Change to industrial capitalism from agricultural feudalism was called “The
Great Transformation” – Karl Polanyi
Changed family structure
1500 – 1920s: colonialism
-
Triangular Trade
(1800s – Britain)
Romance and
Love
(5th – 12th C)
Enlightenment/
Capitalism/
Romanticism
(16th – 19th C)
Colonialism made capitalism and industrialization possible in Europe
(especially Britain)
- Primitive accumulation
- The new forms of family that emerged in colonials powers were transported
to their colonies
- Merchants: trade materials and amassed wealth during the colonial period
- By 1800s, especially Britain, massive wealth had been amassed
- Combined with “enclosure” and urbanization
- Combined with technological innovations inspired by colonial conflict
(especially steams)
 Industrial revolution
- Idea of “romantic love”: end of the middle ages (5th – 15thC)
- from “courtly love (12thC)
Courtly love (tình yêu kiểu hiệp sĩ trung cổ)
- Chivalrously expressing love and admiration; amongst nobility; not between
married spouses
- The lover accepts the independence of his mistress, tries to prove
worthiness, by acting bravely and honorable and by doing whatever deeds
she might desire; subjecting himself to a series of tests (ordeals) to prove to
her his love and commitment
Enlightenment (16th – Early 19thC)
- Ideas of personal liberty, democracy, freedom from “custom”, rationality
Capitalism (begin late 18thC)
- Needed the nuclear family and individualism
Romanticism
- Artistic movement that focusses on individual emotion as the source of
artistic beauty and creativity
Canada divorce
rates
-
1st marriage: 50%
2nd marriage: 72%
3rd marriage: 85%
Arranged marriage divorce rate: 5-7%
Bruckner – 2013: Argues that marriage used to be sacred and love,
unnecessary. Now love is sacred and marriage unnecessary. Love has
triumphed, but may be causing unstable lives
Decline of
nuclear family
-
Modern capitalist system has declined
Required stable nuclear family
-
Post-modern capitalism system has increased
Required flexible individuals working multiple jobs
Require very individualistic consumer
Religion
Region
declining
(Stephen
Hawking 2011)
Modernity’s
Institutions
(17th century –
Europe)
Colonialism
(European –
Catholics)
Secularization thesis: rationalism will replace religion as science overcomes faith
Problem: Both “rational” scientism and religion are ontologies (bản thể học)
- It is impossible to disprove the existence of God, or prove that science is
really “rational” and “Objective”
- Stephen Hawking – 2011: Modern physics has proven both that all scientific
observation is obscured by the observer’s bias, and that the universe, matter,
time may all be created by something that looks like “collective
consciousness”
- 72% of Canadians believe in God, but only 45% attended religious
service
- Why has belief remained and attendance declined?
17th Century in Europe: e.g: all institutions were religious
- Family, government, the school, hospital, church
- Modernity has its own institutions that fulfil these roles
-
European colonialism was justified and perpetuated through religious
*Atrocities were justified because non-Christian were not through of as being
“fully human”
European colonialism
- Was the result of European political expansionism and the needs of a new
capitalist system for more inputs and control over more markets
- Religion worked conveniently as a way to argue that colonizers were justified
- Colonized people where “heathens” and were therefore less-than-human and
in need of saving
Terror
- Protestant vs Catholics - Irish conflict in much of the 20th century had a
religious tinge
- The 2001 attacks in the World Trade Centre were undertaken by Muslim
extremists
Politics and Social movement
Politics
-
Power
-
Authority
State
The Process by which individuals and groups act to promote their
interests, often in conflict with others (text, p. 348)
It is also an arena in which people discuss, debate and transform each
other’s interests and values
The ability of a person or a group to achieve their objectives, even
when opposed
Power reflects the extend to which available resources both constrain and
enable people’s actions
Power also reflect the extent to which a person or group can impact the
values and beliefs of others
- Max the ability to exert power without the use of, or threat of physical force
- Weber – claimed there were 3 types of authority
1. Traditional authority:
- People obey because that’s the way things have always been done
- Chiefs or elders in tribal societies, spiritual guides, priests, a father in
patriarchal society
- More powerful when it is grounded in a belief that it comes from a reverse
spiritual source
2. Charismatic authority:
- Based on the belief that an individual has exceptional qualities
- Thought to be able to solve the problems beyond the capacity of ordinary
people
- May build strong followings
- Mao Zedong, Adolf Hitler, Oprah Winfrey
3. Rational-legal-authority:
- Based on formally established rules, procedures and expertise in which a
person’s acknowledge right to command is limited to his or her official
position
- Characteristics of bureaucratic institutions – those higher up the chain have
more authority
- CEO, economist, electrician, medical doctors, movie critics
4. Assertive authority (not claimed by Weber)
- Individuals who make claims or suggest actions assertively in groups are
often believed or followed because of the authority with which they suggest
something
- Most strong predictions by experts about politics, the economy, event sports
are wrong
- The predictions of such people are only slightly better than random guess
- Weber – 1922: A human community that claims the monopoly of the
legitimate use of physical force within a given territory
- Residents consider this use of force acceptable when the leader calls on it
and when it is in accordance with established rules (aka laws)
-
Nation
Nation-state
-
Social
movement
-
But legitimacy cannot always be assumed, therefore, many use another
definition
The state is that set of procedures, and organizations concerned with
creating, administering and enforcing rules or decisions for conduct
within a given territory
E.g: Elections, lawmaking, judges
Associated especially with the development of industrialized media
A cultural community
Benedict Anderson – 1989: An “imagined community”
Some groups are marginalized in the cultural construction of the “Nation”
Is the modern notion in which the idea of “nation” (cultural community) is
used to justify a “state” and the “state” in turn protects the “nation”
Palestinians, Quebecois: some nations, however, do not have states
Large, informal grouping of individuals or organizations which work to carryout resist, or undo a social, economic, political or cultural change
They are part of civil society
2 types:
“Old” social movements
- Based on economic depravation
- E.g: Cuban revolution (1953-1959): labour movement
- Goal: to take or substantially alter governing or corporate power
“New” social movements
- Based on identities, culture and non-economic factors
- Example: gay rights, women’s rights, …
- Goal: to challenge and change forms of governmentality – mostly through
acquiring social, cultural, and financial capital
-
Political positioning
Conservative
(Conservative
party)
Neoliberal
(Conservative
party)
Liberal (NDP)
Governmentality: the ways in which those with more power manage and
control the behaviors of others through the installation of beliefs, habits and
laws which govern behavior
Democracy is fine as it is (no issue of elite control)
Government should be small and tax little
Markets should be allowed to make resource allocation decisions for society
-
Just another name for the conservative position
-
Critical of elite control of the state
Skeptical of the ability of unregulated markets to create social good
Advocate more social programs and redistributive social programs
Socialist
(MarxistLeninist party)
New socialist
(No party in
Canada)
-
Large state that controls most of the economy
Should be democratic, but often seems to be dictatorial
May only exist in North Korea and Cuba
Radical decentralization of political power from central government to
community groups
These groups work in convert with less political powerful regional and federal
government
Regulate or utilize markets as required by the situation. Markets are used
more than “old” socialism
Begin to form in Brazil, Venezuela, Cuba
Often related to “participatory democracy” and “community development”
Population, Urbanization and Environment
Population growth
Environmental
footprint
Problems with
urbanization
Growth rate:
- 8000 BC to 1 CE: 0.036%/year
- 1 to 175: 0.056%/year
- 175 to 1800: 0.44%
- By 1960s and 1970s: 2%
- Current: 1.2%
Why the growth?
- Advances in healthcare, agricultural, industrial revolution in England and
then European colonies (white majorities)
- In the 20th century, birth rate dropped in developed countries as life
expectancy increased
- Populations in wealthy countries impact the environment more per capita
than those in poor countries
Waste
- Ontario residents, institutions and industries produce 12.4 million tons of
garbage a year, the equivalent weight of more than 80,000 fully loaded
Boeing 707 jetliners
- Only 3 million tons are diverted from landfill sites into recycled goods, w
about 6 million tons ending up in Canadian dumps (40%)
- 4 million tons of waste is trucked annually from Ontario to Michigan, where
the state government stated they will not accept
- Ontario’s landfill will reach capacity in 20 years
- Majority garbage are in packaging
Smog and Pollution
- Ground-level ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulphur dioxide, carbon monoxide,
sulphates and particular matter, mostly generated by car
- TPH estimates that 1,700 Torontonians die prematurely each year due to air
pollution
- Another 6000 people are admitted to hospitals
- At least $150 mil in healthcare costs
Gridlocks
- Related to sprawl (urban expansion)
- Travel time will double by 2031, freeway speed drop by 21%
- 82-min average commute, doubled by 2031
Slums
- Over 1B people live in slums
- Urbanization in 3rd world is much faster than it was in Europe
- Therefore cities are unplanned, underserviced, and informal
- Urban slums are places of poverty but also places of innovations
Urbanization
Push factors:
Farmers pushed off land due to:
- Privatization (unequal land distribution)
- Industrialization of agriculture (less workers)
- Population growth
- Environmental problems in countryside
Pull factors:
- Hope of jobs
- Modern ideology
- Industrialization of agriculture (larger food surplus)
Urbanization
rates
- 1800: 3% of world population lived in cities
- 1900: 14%
1. Curb III World Development
- Problems: ethics, military repressions
 Poverty causes desperation and leads to environmental impact (Amazon
deforestation)
 This is not a viable option
2. Curb Population Growth
Problem:
- Consumption is a bigger issue than population growth
- Best solutions: promoting development, urbanization, self-reliance
- Wealth-flow theory
Solutions:
- Solve poverty, educate, provide financial aids, child-quota laws
3. Reduce consumption, resource extraction, pollution
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005 found that technology cannot solve
the problem
- Instead:
Strong political commitments
Better environmental awareness
Environmental friendly technologies
Higher price for exploiting natural resources
Reduction of consumerism
Globalization and Social Change
Globalization
dimensions (4)
-
Political
Economic
Cultural
Environmental
Communication and travel has become advanced and cheap enough to have
“shrunken the world”
But Globalization is unequal. Certain groups of people benefit more than the other
group of globalizations
Historical
processes
Political
globalization
First stage
- Colonialism (1500 – 1945)
- Trade routes established all over the world as a result after late colonialism
- Some benefitted more than others from this trade because it was colonial
trade
- A sort of free trade existed amidst severe military repression
- 1914 led to War
1. Shrinking of the power of nations to govern their own territories
(neoliberal policies in “economic globalization”)
2. Attempts in cooperation through international agencies based on UN
(World Bank, WTO, UNCTAD, UNESCO)
3. Information technology increases trans-national communication in
decentralized way
- Global consumer, global citizen
- International civil society
Cultural
globalization
Economic
globalization
4. Increased power of the market – translational corporations – setting policy
agendas
- Global financial speculators
- Large corporations
- IMF/WTO/WB
- Global social movements
- Enforced again by WTO/WB/IMF
- Or bilateral/multilateral free trade agreements
- Limited government control to protect national cultures from
international media and business
- Neoliberal policies
- Enforced by WB/IMF/WTO (structural adjustments)
- Global financial capital (aka “golden straightjacket”)- Thomas Freidman
- Deregulation of market/Free trade/Privatization
Inward looking
national
development
Massive changes
Positive aspects
Environmental
globalization
Corporatocracy
1. Building internal and cohesive national identity (flags, transport, sports, ..)
2. Inward-looking economic policy (welfare state)
- Making products for internal consumption
- Limited trade (quotas, tariffs)
- National provision of essential services (healthcare, education)
- Early 1970s: oil shocks
- Led to stagflation
- Increased government debt (stimulus attempts)
-
Late 1970s and 1980s: government debt crisis
- Welfare state could no longer be afforded
-
1980s: Fall of Soviet Union
- Rise of Neoliberal ideology
Increase global understanding (culture, religion, people)
Global migration
Cosmopolitanism: Toronto has great food
Social understanding/movements/social media
May reduce global poverty
Global South: cheap labour, low taxes, weak environmental regulation
Global warming is a global issue
Oil dependency: Ontario imports from Middle East, Alberta export to the
world
-
-
The rule of corporations
51 of 100 wealthiest economies in the world are corporations
Media and Communications
Communication
Discourse
-
First need of human, human are the products of communication
Communication systems (ways) determine the content
Communication is capitalist – shaped by economic markets
Largely produced by “cultural industries”
We are largely controlled by large corporations – mindless, unthinking,
automated consumers
- Communicate in signs (semiotics)
- Culture: product/content of communication
- Human: product of communication
A group of idea/understandings communicated through languages. Complex
Sign = signifier + signified
E.g: America (people think of freedom, rich, multicultural)
Meme: an entire discourse/part of one (aka. Word, phrase, idea)
Subjectivity
Communication
systems
E.g: fake news, hipster
A blank human space populated by discourses and/or meme
- Richard Dawkins 1976 - You are a subjectivity, “machine for memes”,
propagate memes and discourses
- It’s the meme/discourses that are in control
- Social and technical systems through which we communicate and
organize our communication
- Shape communication
- Shape subjectivities
- Nicholas Garnam – “cultural industries” ….produce and disseminate
symbols in the form of cultural goods and services… as commodities
Encoding/decoding Stuart Hall
model
Encoding
- Dominant
- Negotiated
- Oppositional
Global and Media
Industries
-
7% of global GDP
Largest exports of USA
Trade in cultural goods doubled over the last 10 years
Increasing 10% per year
“New Economy” – “Creative Economy” – all products are to a certain extent
cultural (product packaging, ads, marketing,..)
Why the economy
cultural?
-
1950s overproduction crisis
Digital technology
Extension of intellectual property law
Humans are cultural creatures – not “selves”
Liberal
(neoclassical)
economics
Market efficiency
-
Standard way of analyzing all industries (cultural and media)
Extension ideology of liberalism
Free market distribution = most efficient use of resources and highest
outputs
- The most efficient producers with the highest quality products will be
successful and the inferior will fail in any given market
Only under these conditions:
1. Perfect competition
2. Perfect information
3. Decreasing marginal returns (no economies of scale)
4. Consumer sovereignty (chủ quyền)
All are violated in cultural goods
Imperfect
information
Increase Marginal
Returns
Market failure
results
Market always fail when the product has cultural content
- Music, TV shows, films are heterogeneous (hỗn tạp)
- Consumers cannot know if the music is the “best” unless they’ve heard all
music in the world
- 27,000 – 35,000 CDs are released yearly in US
- 450 movies in US and 2500 (worldwide) yearly
Economies of scale
- Fixed cost > variable costs
No Consumer sovereignty
- Consumers tastes shaped by ads, other consumers
 Can be manipulated by the marketers
 Human identities/ideas/values/tastes formed through communication
-
Canadian Media
empires (4)
Culture industry
Cultural industry
creates
-
Many cultural products do not come to consumers
They are controlled/chosen by people w money and power
Unfair for cultural producers
Unfair for consumers
CanWest Global
Rogers
CTV globe media
Quebecor Media
Frankfurt school
Cultural industries produce both cultural products and the culture
Only 1 privileged – capitalist consumer culture
Instrumental rationality – work efficiently to achieve ends
Value rationality – decisions are based on what’s “right”
Commodity fetishism – consumer goods give “supernatural powers” – sùng bái
hàng hóa
- Standardization
-
Data
Propaganda Model
-
Pseudo-individualization – minor cosmetic changes makes us feel like we
are expressing taste and desire
Distraction – from inequalities and injustices
Cooption – cultural resistance disappear
$7B spent on cosmetics in US
2,500,000 lives could be saved from that money
400,000,000 people in Africa could have permanent drinking water
Herman & Chomsky
Applies in news/media
5 filters affect what’s being presented:
- Ownership
- Funding/Advertising
- Sourcing
- Flak (discredit)
- Anti – “other”
Download