3/20/23, 10:40 AM Nostalgia for ’50s Gets Close Scrutiny | American Enterprise Institute - AEI Article Nostalgia for ’50s Gets Close Scrutiny By Robert McCain Washington Times June 09, 1999 Conservatives who celebrate “the halcyon 1950s” are in danger of succumbing to nostalgia by idealizing an era that was “the product of very unusual, even un-American, circumstances,” author David Frum warned Monday. “What I want to do is to caution against nostalgia, the most useless of emotions,” Mr. Frum told an American Enterprise Institute (AEI) audience. Instead, he suggests they “abandon the idea that it can somehow be remade in the image of the society that waged World War II.” Many Americans correctly remember the 1950s as “a time of consensus and stability and respect for authority,” Mr. Frum said. Marriage rates were high, divorce rates were low, and a man with only a high-school diploma could support a wife and family. But these “impermanent” and “unnatural” conditions were the products of “a society formed by war,” Mr. Frum told those attending his presentation in AEI’s Bradley Lecture Series, titled “Where Did the Sixties Come From?” He pointed out that from the Spanish-American War in 1898 until U.S. withdrawal from Vietnam – a 75-year period that included World War I, World War II and the Korean War – “the United States was almost constantly at war or in imminent danger of war, and even when it was at peace, its leaders and elites believed that it should be governed in ways that mobilized its strength in readiness for war.” https://www.aei.org/articles/nostalgia-for-50s-gets-close-scrutiny/ 1/4 3/20/23, 10:40 AM Nostalgia for ’50s Gets Close Scrutiny | American Enterprise Institute - AEI Mr. Frum, a Canadian who is a contributing editor to the Weekly Standard and a senior fellow of the Manhattan Institute, said America at mid-century was experiencing a “blue-collar utopia created by bombing Japan and Germany flat and granting broad union powers.” In addition to destroying the industrial base of America’s economic competitors, U.S. victory in World War II also inspired “faith in the political leaders who bring victory,” Mr. Frum said. “Americans trusted their leaders. How could you not trust General Dwight D. Eisenhower?” The “sense of common endeavor” shared by GIs who had served in World War II was the fruit of a wartime “we’re-all-in-this-together spirit,” Mr. Frum said. That spirit produced political consensus in the postwar era: “However much Republicans and Democrats disagreed about the relatively petty issues of domestic politics, they were united on what then really mattered – the great issues of war and peace,” he said. While critical of “the liberal devil myth of the 1950s” as “a sexist, racist, homophobic nightmare,” Mr. Frum suggested that the “almost unbelievable consensus and homogeneity” of the United States in the ’50s was in part the product of government policies that most conservatives reject. “In the 1950s, the top rate of federal income tax was 95 percent,” Mr. Frum reminded the AEI audience, citing the military draft, strict economic regulation, unrestricted wiretapping, “urban renewal” and “closed shop” labor union agreements as other unwelcome aspects of the ’50s. Conservatives have sometimes cherished a myth “in which the 1950s are represented as a cross between the Athens of Pericles and Mayberry, USA,” Mr. Frum said. But “never before in American history had the political authorities enjoyed as much discretionary power as they did then.” Such centralized authority “is not the American way,” Mr. Frum said, arguing that the “wartime discipline” that persisted after World War II “triggered a revolution” in the 1960s. Many conservative critics, including former federal Judge Robert H. Bork, have focused on the unrest of the 1960s as a wrong turn in American history. But Mr. Frum, who recently completed a book about the 1970s that will be published this fall, said it is “more correct” to locate “this national convulsion” in the 1970s. Mr. Frum’s skepticism toward “nostalgia” for the 1950s provoked less controversy from the AEI audience than a remark near the end of his lecture: “I have become convinced . . . that at https://www.aei.org/articles/nostalgia-for-50s-gets-close-scrutiny/ 2/4 3/20/23, 10:40 AM Nostalgia for ’50s Gets Close Scrutiny | American Enterprise Institute - AEI least one bit of conservative wisdom is wrong: human nature is not fixed and immutable. It changes all the time. And it will continue to change.” In a question-and-answer session after the speech, Mr. Frum cited changes in sexual attitudes – particularly, men’s unwillingness to fight in defense of women’s honor – as an example of the mutability of human nature that he suggested will lead America “onward . . . toward something new: new vices, new virtues, new sins and new progress.” Robert McCain Tags: Donate Subscribe About Contact Policy Areas About AEI American Enterprise Institute Economics Organization and Purpose 1789 Massachusetts Avenue, Foreign and Defense Policy NW Washington, DC 20036 Leadership Health Care Main telephone: Annual Report Education 202.862.5800 Politics and Public Opinion Main fax: 202.862.7177 Opportunity & Social Mobility https://www.aei.org/articles/nostalgia-for-50s-gets-close-scrutiny/ 3/4 3/20/23, 10:40 AM Nostalgia for ’50s Gets Close Scrutiny | American Enterprise Institute - AEI Workforce Development Society and Culture Technology and Innovation Legal and Constitutional Studies Scholars Find a scholar by policy area: Agricultural Policy Studies Economics Education Foreign and Defense Policy Health Care Housing Legal and Constitutional Politics and Public Opinion Poverty Studies Science, Energy, and Environment Society and Culture Technology and Innovation © 2023 American Enterprise Institute | Privacy Policy https://www.aei.org/articles/nostalgia-for-50s-gets-close-scrutiny/ 4/4