Introduction
●
Briefly introduce the Treaty of Versailles.
●
Mention the quote: "The Treaty of Versailles was too harsh on Germany."
●
State your thesis: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the quote?
Body Paragraph 1: Arguments Supporting the Quote
●
Harsh Territorial Losses: Explain how Germany lost significant territories, impacting its economy
and national pride.
○
●
Severe Military Restrictions: Discuss the limitations imposed on the German military.
○
●
Examples: Alsace-Lorraine to France, Saar Basin under League of Nations, Polish Corridor.
Examples: Army reduced to 100,000 men, no tanks or air force, limited navy.
Heavy Reparations: Highlight the financial burden of reparations on Germany.
○
Example: Reparations amounting to 132 billion gold marks.
Body Paragraph 2: Arguments Against the Quote
●
Germany's Role in WWI: Argue that Germany's actions in the war warranted severe consequences.
○
●
Examples: Unrestricted submarine warfare, invasion of neutral Belgium.
Long-term Stability: Argue that the treaty aimed to ensure long-term peace and stability in Europe
by weakening Germany's ability to wage war again.
Body Paragraph 3: Middle Ground
●
Inefficiency of the Treaty: Discuss how some aspects of the treaty were impractical and led to future
problems.
○
●
Example: Economic hardship leading to hyperinflation and political instability in Germany.
Different Perspectives: Consider the perspectives of other Allied powers and their motivations for
the treaty terms.
○
Example: France's desire for security versus the U.S.'s push for a more moderate approach
(Wilson's Fourteen Points).
Conclusion
●
Summarize the key points discussed.
●
Restate your thesis in light of the arguments presented.
●
Provide a final reflection on the overall fairness and impact of the Treaty of Versailles.
The Treaty of Versailles, signed on June 28, 1919, brought an official end to World War I. The treaty's terms
have been a subject of intense debate, with some arguing that it was excessively harsh on Germany. I agree
with the quote, "The Treaty of Versailles was too harsh on Germany" to some extent.
On one hand, the treaty imposed severe territorial, military, and financial penalties on Germany. The loss of
territories, such as Alsace-Lorraine to France and the Saar Basin to the League of Nations, significantly
impacted Germany's economy and national pride. Moreover, the creation of the Polish Corridor divided
Germany, further fueling resentment. The military restrictions were also stringent, limiting the German army to
100,000 men and prohibiting tanks, aircraft, and submarines. These restrictions aimed to prevent Germany
from becoming a military threat again but also left the country feeling vulnerable and humiliated. The financial
reparations imposed on Germany were another point of contention. The enormous sum of 132 billion gold
marks placed a heavy burden on the German economy, leading to hyperinflation and severe economic
hardship for the German people.
Conversely, some argue that the Treaty of Versailles was justified given Germany's role in World War I.
Germany's aggressive actions, including unrestricted submarine warfare and the invasion of neutral Belgium,
contributed significantly to the war's devastation. From this perspective, the harsh terms of the treaty were
seen as a necessary measure to ensure that Germany would not be able to initiate another conflict.
Furthermore, the treaty aimed to establish long-term stability in Europe. By weakening Germany, the Allies
hoped to create a balance of power that would prevent future wars. While the immediate effects of the treaty
were harsh, some believe that these measures were necessary to secure lasting peace.
It is also essential to consider the inefficiencies and impracticalities of the treaty. The economic hardships
caused by the reparations contributed to hyperinflation and political instability in Germany, which ultimately
led to the rise of extremist movements, including the Nazi Party. This outcome suggests that while the treaty
aimed to ensure peace, its execution may have inadvertently sown the seeds for future conflict. The
perspectives of the Allied powers also played a crucial role in shaping the treaty's terms. France, having
suffered greatly during the war, sought to ensure its security by imposing strict penalties on Germany. In
contrast, the United States, under President Woodrow Wilson, advocated for a more moderate approach
based on his Fourteen Points. The differing motivations of the Allies led to a compromise that reflected a mix
of punitive and conciliatory elements.
In conclusion, the Treaty of Versailles was undeniably harsh on Germany, imposing significant territorial,
military, and financial penalties. However, given Germany's role in the war and the broader context of
post-war Europe, these measures were not entirely unjustified. Even though the treaty aimed at ensuring
long-term stability, its execution had unintended consequences that contributed to future conflicts. Therefore,
while I agree that the Treaty of Versailles was harsh on Germany, it was not excessively so given the
circumstances of the time.