Tourist itinerary
Review and recommendations of the committee
Introduction
The aim of this report is to reveal the problems that were discovered during the previous programme
for a group of foreign students. Last month we had a group of foreign students visiting a number of
sites. The range of locations and the time allotted to visit the sites both received mixed reviews. This
report is based on feedback on these features.
A variety of locations
Even though the majority of students were fascinated to visit as many places of interest as it was
possible in three days, some felt they were really exhausted and found the programme overladen with
destinations. On the other hand, the transportation raised no complaints and did not require any effort.
Nevertheless, the idea of visiting more than two places a day was seen by several as being tiring and
tough.
Time concerns
Although the most part of the group found this tour time-consuming, there was also some criticism
about the time limits for each of the sites. There were some complaints about the time that was allowed
to spend in an each place. Regardless of the ability to visit a wide range of places, some reviews faultfind
the visits were too short.
Suggested improvements
For the students who are due to arrive this year we would propose that we choose a slightly small
number of sites. Instead of selecting the locations ourselves, this year we suggest that we should make a
research beforehand to deduce two or three the most popular sites among the students in contrast to
the last year’s five locations. Moreover, reducing the number of sites will allow to increase the amount
of time that the students will be able to spend there.