HAD 508 Case Study Presentation Rubric Case Selection The case not only relates to the weekly learning objectives, it also promotes achievement the course's student learning outcomes; The presenters may even identify a new objective or learning outcome for consideration. Analysis and Application All of the below will apply: The group has made clear connections to course/weekly topics and has correctly applied relevant concepts; The application is itself carefully and clearly laid out , making it easy for observers to make the same connections or applications; All of the pertinent case elements are clearly identified and discussed. Critical Engagement Research Presentation Discussion questions The presentation goes beyond solid analysis and application and does one or more of the following: All of the below will apply: All of the below will apply: The presentation draws upon at least one peer-reviewed study; The screencast is well-organized and appropriately paced; All of the below will apply: Relevance: The relevance of the questions to the weekly objectives (and possibly even student learning outcomes) are clear or clearly explained if not immediately apparent Introduces and discusses relevant concerns, questions, and/or topics not yet addressed in research or class discussions; Identifies knowledge gaps and proposes steps for filling them; Identifies and critiques problematic assumptions. The presenters clearly explain how a given reference supports the presentation or how it has complicated or enriched the analysis or triggered a critique; Attributions are clear and documentation conforms to the prescribed formats. The text is edited and fits well with the narration; The slides are clear, polished, and easily read Scope and Challenge: The questions are crafted to provide a manageable scope for responding within a reasonable time requirement: if the question is especially challenging or requires outside research, timesaving resources and guidance are provided Critical Engagement: The questions promote critical thinking (see the Critical Engagement column) 5 PTS The above element or characteristic is present but needs improvement 1-4 PTS The element or characteristic is absent or noticeably deficient 7 PTS All of the above elements or characteristics are present but one or two need improvement 7 PTS The above element or characteristic is present but needs improvement 5 PTS All of the above elements or characteristics are present but one or two need improvement 5 PTS All of the above elements or characteristics are present but one or two need improvement 6 PTS All of the above elements or characteristics are present but one or two need improvement 4-6 PTS One of the above elements or characteristics is absent or noticeably deficient 1-3 PTS Two or more of the above elements or characteristics is absent or noticeably deficient 4-6 PTS 3-4 PTS One of the above elements or characteristics is absent or noticeably deficient 1-2 PTS Two or more of the above elements or characteristics is absent or noticeably deficient 3-4 PTS One of the above elements or characteristics is absent or noticeably deficient 1-2 PTS Two or more of the above elements or characteristics is absent or noticeably deficient 4-5 PTS One of the above elements or characteristics is absent or noticeably deficient 1-3 PTS The element or characteristic is absent or noticeably deficient 1-3 PTS Two or more of the above elements or characteristics is absent or noticeably deficient
